日本参议院12月16日通过补充预算案，使得2025财年日本防卫开支达到了约11万亿日元，创下新高。而 就在大幅增加的防卫开支引发各界强烈抗议之时，日防卫省在冲绳"圈地"、加强西南岛屿军事部署等动 作亦引发当地民众的担忧和反对。同样忧心不已的还有日本旅游从业者，面对中国赴日航班数量大幅削 减、订单大量取消，有业者直言：旅行社正面临"存亡危机"。 日参议院通过补充预算案防卫开支创新高 日本国会参议院16日表决通过2025财年补充预算案。由于众议院此前已通过该补充预算案，参议院的批 准意味着该补充预算案在日本国会获得通过。加上补充预算，2025财年日本防卫开支达到了约11万亿日 元（约合5000亿元人民币），创下新高，引发日本各界的质疑和强烈反对。 近年来，日本一再突破"和平宪法"约束，大幅增加防卫预算，推动杀伤性武器出口，图谋修改"无核三 原则"。日本多地近日举行市民集会，强烈抗议日本政府罔顾民生福祉，不断推进军备扩张路线。一名 集会参加者就表示，"我们交税不是为了扩军"。 日本防卫省计划在熊本市部署升级型12式岸舰导弹。根据计划，该导弹在首支地面部队部署后，将于 2027年扩展部署至静冈县陆上自卫队富士驻地。舆 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Japanese government's military expansion plans and controversial remarks by Prime Minister Sanna Takashi regarding Taiwan have sparked significant domestic criticism and protests from various civic groups [1][3][4]. Group 1: Civic Response - Civic groups in Nagasaki have sent protest statements to Prime Minister Sanna Takashi and other cabinet officials, demanding the retraction of his remarks related to Taiwan [1][3]. - In Kumamoto, multiple civic groups held gatherings opposing the government's plan to deploy long-range missiles, indicating widespread public dissent against military expansion [4][6]. Group 2: Military Expansion Plans - The Japanese Defense Ministry plans to deploy upgraded Type 12 surface-to-ship missiles in Kumamoto, with the first ground troops expected to be stationed by the end of March 2026 [6][10]. - The upgraded Type 12 missiles will have an extended range of approximately 1,000 kilometers, raising concerns about regional security and Japan's adherence to its pacifist constitution [6][10]. Group 3: Public Sentiment - Civic group representatives express fears that missile deployment could lead to civilian casualties in the event of conflict, emphasizing the need to oppose actions perceived as harmful [8]. - There is a prevailing public sentiment that Japan's military buildup contradicts its constitutional commitment to self-defense and could destabilize regional security dynamics [10].

Group 1 - Japan is increasing its defense spending significantly, with a projected total of approximately 11 trillion yen (about 498.2 billion RMB) for the fiscal year 2025, marking a 13-year consecutive increase in defense budget [1] - The new security policy emphasizes the need to fundamentally strengthen defense capabilities and includes the controversial "capability to attack enemy bases," which undermines Japan's principle of "defensive defense" [2] - The Japanese government is investing in various military preparations, including the development of "universal plasma" and the conversion of civilian ports for dual-use purposes [1] Group 2 - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs has expressed strong opposition to Japan's militaristic tendencies, highlighting concerns over Japan's historical revisionism and its increasing military capabilities [3] - The Chinese government has reiterated its stance against Japan's actions that challenge post-war international order and has called for Japan to reflect on its past and fulfill its obligations as a defeated nation [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes that Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's remarks regarding Taiwan have fundamentally harmed the political foundation of China-Japan relations, provoking strong public outrage in China [1] - The Chinese government has issued a stern warning to Japan, urging it to retract its erroneous statements and to cease creating incidents related to China, indicating that failure to do so will result in severe countermeasures from China [1] - The spokesperson highlighted that Japan's historical use of the concept of "survival crisis" as a pretext for military aggression is a dangerous precedent that must not be repeated, referencing past events such as the Mukden Incident and the Pacific War [3] Group 2 - The article mentions that China has suspended imports of Japanese seafood due to Japan's failure to provide promised technical materials ensuring product safety, which is a prerequisite for such exports [3] - The spokesperson noted that the current political climate, exacerbated by Kishida's controversial statements, has led to a lack of market for Japanese seafood in China, regardless of its quality [3]

Core Points - The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mao Ning, emphasized that Japan's use of "existential crisis" and "self-defense" as justifications for external aggression is a common tactic of militarism [1][2] - Mao Ning highlighted that Japan's historical actions, such as the invasion of Northeast China in 1931 and the declaration of the "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere," were framed as matters of national survival, leading to significant military conflicts [2] Summary by Sections - **Japan's Militaristic Tactics** - Japan has historically invoked "existential crisis" to justify military aggression, as seen in events like the Mukden Incident in 1931 and the Pacific War [2] - The international community must remain vigilant against any resurgence of militarism from Japan [2] - **Legal and Historical Context** - The concept of "collective self-defense" was established under the UN Charter to maintain international security and prevent the resurgence of fascism [1] - Post-World War II, Japan was restricted from exercising this right, as outlined in the Potsdam Declaration and its own constitution, which commits to renouncing war and military threats [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government criticizes Japan's potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, linking it to historical patterns of Japanese militarism and aggression under the guise of "self-defense" and "survival crisis" [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - Japan has historically used the concept of "survival crisis" to justify military aggression, such as the invasion of Northeast China in 1931 and the broader conflicts during World War II [2]. - The notion of "self-defense" has been manipulated by Japan to initiate conflicts, as seen in the lead-up to the Pacific War [2]. Group 2: Legal Framework - The Chinese government emphasizes that Japan's post-World War II constitution prohibits the use of military force for resolving international disputes and mandates a principle of self-defense [1]. - The United Nations Charter's provision for "collective self-defense" was established to maintain international security and prevent the resurgence of fascism, which Japan is seen as violating by considering military actions in the Taiwan Strait [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Ministry of Defense expresses strong dissatisfaction and opposition to Japan's 2025 Defense White Paper, accusing Japan of fabricating narratives to justify military expansion and portraying a "China threat" [1] Group 1: Japan's Military Actions - Japan is significantly increasing its defense budget and loosening restrictions on arms exports, which raises concerns about militarization and regional stability [1] - The Japanese government is forming military alliances and engaging in confrontational tactics, which are seen as a revival of militarism that could threaten peace in the Asia-Pacific region [1] Group 2: Historical Context and Implications - The year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War, emphasizing the historical significance of Taiwan's return to China in 1945 as part of post-war international order [1] - The Chinese government urges Japan to learn from historical lessons and adhere to commitments made in the four political documents between China and Japan, particularly regarding Taiwan [1]