Group 1 - The core focus of the G20 meeting was the independence of central banks, which was strongly emphasized in the joint communiqué, highlighting its importance for maintaining price stability [1][2][3] - The communiqué acknowledged the global economic uncertainties stemming from ongoing geopolitical tensions and trade conflicts, stressing the need for enhanced multilateral cooperation [1][4] - The G20 members collectively supported the idea of addressing the debt vulnerabilities of middle and low-income countries in a predictable and coordinated manner [5] Group 2 - The communiqué did not directly mention "tariffs," but the impact of trade tensions was evident throughout the document, reflecting the significant changes in global trade rules due to U.S. tariff policies [4] - The International Monetary Fund (IMF) revised its global growth forecast for 2025 down from 3.3% to 2.8% due to these trade tensions, indicating a cautious outlook on economic stability [4] - The G20 reaffirmed the importance of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in advancing trade issues while acknowledging the need for meaningful reforms [4][5]

要想理解特朗普为何只会"骂而不解雇"，必须先看清他所面对的几重困境。 特朗普对鲍威尔的反感由来已久，几乎成为公开的秘密。他不止一次骂鲍威尔是"笨蛋""白痴"，甚至在会议中嘲讽说"跟他讲话简直像跟一把椅子对话"。 尤其最近美联储总部斥资25亿美元进行大规模翻修的项目，被特朗普抓住不放，他直言这"或许足以成为开除鲍威尔的理由"。如果换作他公司里的高管， 恐怕早已被迫离职。 特朗普嘴上严厉指责美联储主席鲍威尔"做得很糟糕""没尽责"，却始终没有真正动手罢免他。这种看似矛盾的行为，表面上是特朗普对鲍威尔个人的不 满，实则背后牵扯着复杂的权力博弈、政治算计和经济现实之间的微妙平衡。 但美联储主席并非普通员工。美国法律对美联储的独立性设有严格保护机制，主席任期为四年，总统无权随意开除，除非有"合法且充分的理由"，比如违 法或渎职。 虽然美联储翻新大楼的开销巨大，但美联储方面给出的解释合情合理：清除石棉、处理污染土壤、提升安全标准，这些额外成本并非挥霍浪费。更重要的 是，美联储用的是自有资金，而非政府财政拨款。特朗普若想强行给翻修费扣上"正当理由"的帽子，法律上根本站不住脚。 就连共和党内部也有人提醒特朗普别轻易出手。众议 ...

Group 1 - The G20 finance ministers and central bank governors meeting emphasized the importance of maintaining central bank independence and strengthening multilateral cooperation [1][2] - The joint communiqué highlighted the challenges facing the global economy, including geopolitical conflicts, trade tensions, supply chain disruptions, high debt levels, and extreme weather [1] - The meeting agreed on implementing growth-oriented macroeconomic policies, enhancing fiscal resilience, and encouraging investment and productivity reforms to consolidate long-term growth potential [1] Group 2 - Progress was made on debt restructuring, multilateral development bank (MDB) financing expansion, cross-border payment efficiency, global minimum corporate tax, infrastructure financing, and sustainable finance [2] - Member countries confirmed the voluntary allocation of over $100 billion in Special Drawing Rights (SDR) or equivalent resources to assist countries in need [2] - The communiqué reiterated cooperation in areas such as climate, health, and the digital economy, promoting research and practice between public and private sectors in carbon market data models and cross-border infrastructure [2]

Group 1 - The G20 finance ministers and central bank governors reached a rare consensus emphasizing the importance of central bank independence for maintaining price stability, collectively supporting Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell amid ongoing trade tensions and political pressures from President Trump [1][3] - The G20 communiqué acknowledged the global economy faces uncertainties due to "ongoing war conflicts, geopolitical and trade tensions," highlighting the importance of strengthening multilateral cooperation [1][4] - The communiqué did not directly mention "tariffs," but the impact of trade tensions was a recurring theme, with the U.S. imposing significant tariffs on various imports, reshaping global trade rules [4] Group 2 - The independence of central banks was a focal point of the G20 meeting, with South African central bank governor Kganyago stating that this issue was strongly reflected in the discussions [2] - The communiqué reiterated the importance of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in advancing trade issues while acknowledging that the WTO faces challenges requiring meaningful and comprehensive reforms [5] - Despite differences, the G20 reached consensus on several issues, including addressing the debt vulnerabilities of low- and middle-income countries and the impact of extreme weather events on economic growth and financial stability [6]

日本财务省官员：二十国集团（G20）对央行独立性的支持态度是有意义的。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The independence of central banks, particularly the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Federal Reserve, is under scrutiny, with potential global implications for monetary policy and economic stability [1] Group 1 - ECB Governing Council member Nagel emphasizes that the independence of central banks should not be taken lightly [1] - Challenges to the independence of the Federal Reserve could have far-reaching effects on global financial markets and economic conditions [1]

德国央行行长内格尔：不应该与央行独立性开玩笑。 ...

Core Viewpoint - All Federal Reserve officials emphasize the importance of central bank independence [1] Group 1 - The statement reflects a unified stance among Federal Reserve officials regarding the significance of maintaining the autonomy of the central bank [1]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around President Trump's potential decision to dismiss Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, which has sparked significant market reactions and discussions among Republican lawmakers [1][3]. - Following Trump's comments, there was a notable market response: U.S. Treasury yields fell, gold prices surged, Bitcoin rose by $1,400, and both the U.S. dollar and stock market declined [3][5]. - Trump's remarks included a suggestion that he had considered a draft letter for Powell's dismissal, indicating serious contemplation rather than mere speculation [3][5]. Group 2 - Trump later downplayed the likelihood of Powell's dismissal, stating there were no current plans, but left the door open for future actions depending on Powell's performance [5][7]. - The legal ambiguity surrounding the President's authority to dismiss the Fed Chairman remains a critical point, as federal law states that a dismissal can only occur for "just cause," which is not clearly defined [7][8]. - Analysts warn that removing Powell could lead to market panic, undermine the independence of the Federal Reserve, and potentially trigger legal battles, with historical context showing that Powell was prepared for such a scenario six years ago [7][8].

美联储威廉姆斯：央行独立性能够带来更佳的经济表现。 ...