Core Viewpoint - Both Dongxu Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. and Shenzhen Guangdao Digital Technology Co., Ltd. have received administrative penalties from regulatory authorities for financial fraud, highlighting the increasing scrutiny and zero-tolerance policy towards financial misconduct in the market [1][4][16]. Group 1: Dongxu Optoelectronics - Dongxu Optoelectronics has been found guilty of false disclosures and fraudulent issuance of shares, with a total of 9.595 billion yuan in non-operating funds misappropriated by its controlling shareholder [5][9]. - The company raised 7.565 billion yuan through a non-public stock issuance, which was based on falsified financial reports from 2015 and 2016, leading to a penalty of 3.9 billion yuan from the Hebei Securities Regulatory Bureau [10][11]. - Dongxu Optoelectronics was officially delisted on October 11, 2024, after its stock price fell below 1 yuan for twenty consecutive trading days [14]. Group 2: Guangdao Digital - Guangdao Digital has been accused of fabricating sales and procurement activities from 2018 to the first half of 2024, resulting in inflated revenues and costs, with a maximum inflation rate of 99.39% in reported figures [6][7]. - The company reported inflated revenues of 1.43 billion yuan in 2018, increasing to 3.04 billion yuan in 2023, leading to a total penalty of 10 million yuan from the Shenzhen Securities Regulatory Bureau [11][12]. - Guangdao Digital is at risk of becoming the first delisted company on the Beijing Stock Exchange due to significant violations, having already received a warning and a special treatment designation [15]. Group 3: Regulatory Environment - The regulatory bodies have demonstrated a strong commitment to enforcing laws against financial fraud, reflecting a broader trend towards stricter oversight and legal compliance in the securities market [16].

【导读】华夏基金下调*ST紫天估值，调整幅度超过70% 中国基金报记者 若晖 被监管出具《责令改正决定书》并实施风险警示，停牌近3个月时间，股价距2023年最高点已下跌超80%的*ST紫天，近期再遭基金公司"补刀"。 6月16日，华夏基金发布公告称，即日起，对华夏中证2000ETF持有的停牌股票"*ST紫天"按照2.50元进行估值。相比停牌前的价格，估值下调幅度超 70%。 业内人士表示，早在6月13日收盘，中证2000指数就已将*ST紫天从成份股中调出，未来该股一旦复牌，将遭遇指数基金集体卖出。而目前基金公司调整 停盘股估值，意味着基金公司认为当前停牌价格无法反映最新的基本面情况。未来不排除更多的基金公司跟进调整估值。 华夏基金下调*ST紫天估值 调整幅度超过70% 停牌接近3个月，面临退市风险的*ST紫天遭遇基金公司猛砍估值。 6月16日，华夏基金公告，停牌股票"*ST紫天"（证券代码：300280）于6月13日沪深交易所收市后由中证2000指数成份股中调出，为客观反映基金公允价 值，根据《中国证监会关于证券投资基金估值业务的指导意见》的要求，经与基金托管行协商一致，自6月16日起，华夏基金对华夏中证20 ...

Core Viewpoint - *ST Guangdao is facing severe regulatory penalties due to significant financial fraud, which may lead to its forced delisting from the Beijing Stock Exchange due to violations of major misconduct regulations [1][8]. Financial Fraud Scale and Methods - The company engaged in systematic fraud from 2018 to mid-2024, inflating revenue by a total of 14.65 billion yuan, with inflated revenue ratios exceeding 85% across all periods [2][5]. - The inflated operating costs amounted to 7.54 billion yuan, with similar high ratios of over 83% [2][5]. - The fraud involved falsifying a complete set of documents, including purchase and sales contracts, invoices, and delivery notes [2][3]. Regulatory Penalties - The company faces a maximum fine of 10 million yuan, while the actual controller, Jin Wenming, is fined 15 million yuan and banned for life from the securities market [6][7]. - The penalties cover all levels of responsibility, from decision-makers to execution layers, emphasizing the end of the "decorative" role of independent directors [7]. Delisting Mechanism - The company is at risk of dual delisting due to financial misconduct and a significant violation of listing rules, marking it as the first major misconduct delisting case on the Beijing Stock Exchange [8][9]. Investor Protection - A compensation fund of 220 million yuan has been established to cover losses incurred by eligible investors due to false statements, reflecting a proactive approach by the underwriting institution [10]. - This mechanism aims to address the challenges of lengthy litigation and evidence collection for investors [10]. Broader Implications - The case establishes a comprehensive accountability system, integrating administrative penalties, criminal accountability, civil compensation, and forced delisting, signaling a shift towards a "zero tolerance" policy in regulatory enforcement [11]. - The case serves as a benchmark for the health of the capital market, indicating that the costs of financial fraud will outweigh the benefits, thereby promoting compliance and internal control [13][14].

Core Viewpoint - *ST Guangdao has been implicated in systematic financial fraud over the past seven years, leading to potential forced delisting from the Beijing Stock Exchange due to serious violations of listing rules [2][7]. Group 1: Financial Fraud Details - From 2018 to mid-2024, *ST Guangdao inflated its revenue by 1.465 billion yuan through the creation of false sales and purchase contracts, invoices, and other documents, with the inflated amounts exceeding 85% of reported figures for each period [3]. - The company also inflated its operating costs by 754 million yuan, with the inflated amounts ranging from 83.30% to 99.13% of reported costs [3]. - The fraudulent activities resulted in false disclosures in annual reports from 2018 to 2023 and the 2024 semi-annual report [3]. Group 2: Penalties and Consequences - The Shenzhen Securities Regulatory Bureau has proposed severe penalties, including a 10 million yuan fine for the company and a 15 million yuan fine for the actual controller, Jin Wenming, who may also face a lifetime ban from the securities market [4][5]. - Other executives, including the financial head Zhao Lu, are also facing fines ranging from 500,000 to 2.5 million yuan, with potential lifetime bans for their involvement in the fraud [5]. - Jin Wenming's 6.52 million shares (9.73% of total shares) have been judicially frozen due to financial disputes, although this does not currently affect control or normal operations [5]. Group 3: Market Impact and Future Risks - Due to the fraudulent activities, *ST Guangdao is at risk of being forced to delist, with its stock set to be suspended for one trading day and then subject to delisting risk warnings upon resumption [7][8]. - If formal penalties confirm the delisting standards, the company's stock will be terminated from listing, marking a significant case of accountability under the new registration system [8]. - The company’s sponsor, Wukuang Securities, is working on a compensation plan for investors affected by the fraudulent disclosures, indicating a proactive approach to mitigate investor losses [6].

Core Viewpoint - *ST Guangdao has been found to have engaged in long-term financial fraud, significantly inflating its revenue through falsified documents and contracts, leading to potential severe penalties and a risk of delisting from the Beijing Stock Exchange [1][3][4]. Group 1: Financial Fraud Details - From 2018 to the first half of 2024, *ST Guangdao inflated its revenue by amounts ranging from 716.46 million to 2.49 billion, with the inflated figures constituting up to 99.39% of reported amounts in certain years [4][5]. - The fraudulent activities have been ongoing for six and a half years, indicating a persistent and significant violation of financial regulations [4][6]. Group 2: Key Personnel Involved - The chairman and general manager, Jin Wenming, has been implicated for knowingly allowing and facilitating the fraudulent activities since June 2016 [4][7]. - Zhao Lu, the financial officer, organized the falsification of documents and obstructed audits, while Song Kai, the deputy general manager, assisted in signing false contracts [5][6]. - Independent director An Xiumei, despite claiming ignorance of the fraud, failed to provide evidence of due diligence during her tenure [6][9]. Group 3: Regulatory Actions and Penalties - The Shenzhen Securities Regulatory Bureau has proposed a fine of 10 million yuan for *ST Guangdao, with additional fines for key personnel, including 15 million yuan for Jin Wenming [3][7]. - The regulatory body is considering lifetime bans from the securities market for Jin Wenming and Zhao Lu due to their direct involvement in the fraud [7][11]. Group 4: Impact on Stakeholders - Minmetals Securities has initiated a compensation fund of approximately 220 million yuan to address investor losses resulting from the fraudulent activities of *ST Guangdao [11][12]. - The firm is taking steps to ensure compliance and protect investor interests, reflecting a broader regulatory push against financial misconduct in the industry [11][12].

Core Viewpoint - *ST Guangdao has been found to have engaged in long-term financial fraud by fabricating sales and procurement documents, leading to significant inflation of revenue and costs, which may result in severe penalties and potential delisting from the Beijing Stock Exchange [1][3][4]. Group 1: Financial Misconduct - From 2018 to the first half of 2024, *ST Guangdao inflated its revenue by amounts ranging from 716.46 million to 2.49 billion, with the inflated figures constituting up to 99.39% of reported amounts in certain years [4][5]. - The fraudulent activities have persisted for six and a half years, indicating a systemic issue within the company's financial reporting practices [4][6]. Group 2: Key Personnel Involvement - Key executives, including Chairman Jin Wenming, CFO Zhao Lu, and Vice President Song Kai, have been implicated in orchestrating the financial fraud, with Jin approving the use of external funds to mask discrepancies [4][5][6]. - Independent director An Xiumei, while claiming ignorance of the fraudulent activities, failed to provide evidence of due diligence during her tenure [6][10]. Group 3: Regulatory Actions and Penalties - The Shenzhen Securities Regulatory Bureau has proposed a fine of 10 million yuan for *ST Guangdao and additional fines for key executives, including 15 million yuan for Jin Wenming [3][7]. - The regulatory body is considering lifetime bans from the securities market for Jin and Zhao due to their direct involvement in the misconduct [7][12]. Group 4: Impact on Stakeholders - The actions of *ST Guangdao have prompted its underwriting institution, Wukuang Securities, to initiate a compensation fund to address investor losses resulting from the company's fraudulent disclosures [12][13]. - The regulatory scrutiny on independent directors has intensified, with recent cases highlighting the potential for significant penalties for failure to fulfill their responsibilities [8][10].

北京商报讯（记者马换换王蔓蕾）6月13日晚间，*ST广道（839680）披露公告称，公司当日收到深圳 证监局下发的《行政处罚事先告知书》（以下简称《告知书》）。公司股票将于6月16日起停牌1天，将 于6月17日起复牌，自复牌之日继续实施退市风险警示。 （文章来源：北京商报） 深圳证监局表示，金文明2016年6月至今担任*ST广道董事长、总经理，全面负责公司经营管理，明知 并放任公司通过伪造合同单据等方式实施财务造假，审批同意公司借用外部资金使银行存款期末余额账 实相符；赵璐2016年6月至今担任*ST广道董事、副总经理、财务负责人，2022年6月至今担任*ST广道 董事会秘书，组织公司员工实施伪造合同单据等财务造假行为及拦截询证函等应对审计行为；宋凯2016 年6月至今担任*ST广道的副总经理，根据赵璐的安排，在多份虚假销售合同和发货通知单上签字，指 导财务人员制作虚假销售合同列表。在上述情况下，三人签字保证公司2018年至2023年年度报告、2024 年半年度报告及《募集说明书》真实、准确、完整，系直接负责的主管人员。 深圳证监局拟决定对*ST广道责令改正，给予警告，并处以1000万元罚款；对金文明给予警告 ...

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen Guangdao Digital Technology Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Guangdao Digital" or "*ST Guangdao") is facing severe penalties from the Shenzhen Securities Regulatory Bureau for financial fraud, including the fabrication of sales and procurement contracts to inflate revenue and costs [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Financial Misconduct - Guangdao Digital allegedly inflated its revenue by a total of 1.43 billion, 1.92 billion, 2.23 billion, 2.49 billion, 3.04 billion, 2.83 billion, and 716.46 million from 2018 to the first half of 2024, representing 87.34%, 95.39%, 98.96%, 85.87%, 99.39%, 98.14%, and 88.11% of the reported amounts for those periods [1]. - The company also inflated its operating costs by 646.5 million, 854.2 million, 1.17 billion, 1.33 billion, 1.63 billion, 1.52 billion, and 38.63 million during the same period, accounting for 84.53%, 91.17%, 98.41%, 83.30%, 99.13%, 92.26%, and 83.81% of the reported amounts [1]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The Shenzhen Regulatory Bureau plans to impose a maximum penalty on Guangdao Digital, including a fine of 10 million and warnings for key individuals involved, with fines totaling 15 million for the controlling shareholder Jin Wenming [3][4]. - Jin Wenming and Zhao Lu are also facing lifetime bans from the securities market due to their roles in the financial misconduct, which severely disrupted market order [4]. Group 3: Potential Consequences - Guangdao Digital may face mandatory delisting due to serious violations as per the Beijing Stock Exchange's listing rules, with a trading suspension for one day following the announcement [5][6]. - The company has already been flagged for financial delisting risks due to an audit report that expressed an inability to provide an opinion on its 2024 annual financial statements [5]. Group 4: Investor Protection Measures - The North Exchange and related institutions are preparing to offer advance compensation to eligible investors who suffered losses due to the company's fraudulent activities [7]. - Advance compensation is a voluntary civil settlement process for investors affected by significant legal violations, with previous cases already established in the market [7].

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that Zhejiang Furun Digital Technology Co., Ltd. (*ST Furun) has been penalized for serious financial misconduct, leading to the termination of its stock listing on April 30, 2025 [1][2][3] - The company engaged in fraudulent activities through its subsidiary, resulting in inflated revenue and costs amounting to 717 million yuan and 716 million yuan respectively from 2020 to mid-2022 [1] - The Shanghai Stock Exchange issued a notice on April 10, 2025, indicating that *ST Furun's stock had been trading below 1 yuan for 20 consecutive trading days, triggering delisting conditions [3] Group 2 - The Zhejiang Securities Regulatory Bureau imposed a fine of 5.5 million yuan on *ST Furun, with additional penalties for key executives, including 2.5 million yuan for the chairman and vice-chairman [2] - The penalties highlight the serious consequences of financial misconduct and serve as a warning to other listed companies about the repercussions of illegal activities [3] - Investors who suffered losses due to the company's actions may be eligible for compensation, with specific conditions outlined for claims based on trading dates [3]

文/梧桐小新 6月10日，最高人民检察院披露了一起注册会计师提供虚假证明文件的典型案例。 顺藤摸瓜发现虚假审计报告 在办理宋某等6人涉嫌违规披露重要信息案时，检察机关发现涉案会计师事务所对W文旅公司明显系造 假的2018年年报开展了审计。 "但我们查询中国证监会行政处罚数据后发现，案涉注册会计师朱某、刘 某并未受到行政处罚。" 该院办案检察官告诉记者，这些异常情况引起了办案组的注意。 随后， 办案组进一步加大对涉案人员之间微信聊天记录等电子数据的审查力度，发现了W文旅公司高 管与朱某、刘某建立了年报审计沟通群。 通过对聊天记录中的文字及相关文档进行细致审查比对，办 案组发现 会计师朱某、刘某与W文旅公司有关高管人员在发布2018年年报前曾召开审计协调会，会后 两名注册会计师督促W文旅公司提供"新买家、新合同"，同时还要求W文旅公司终止原合同、要回询证 函等。 检方查明，2018年11月，W文旅公司的子公司与某传媒公司签订了影视剧播映合同，由于未取得播放许可 证，项目收益不能确认为W文旅公司2018年收入。 为满足公司后续发行公司债券的条件，该公司董事长宋 某等人指使公司人员另找公司签订新合同代替旧合同，虚假确 ...