Steel Dynamics Raises Bid to Increase Its American Production Capacity - Barron'sSkip to Main ContentThis copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by our Subscriber Agreement and by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visit www.djreprints.com.# Steel Dynamics Raises Bid for BlueScope. How It Plans to Ramp Up U.S. Production.By [Al Root]ShareResize---ReprintsIn thi ...

Group 1 - Several participants indicated support for a two-sided description of future interest rate decisions, suggesting the possibility of upward adjustments due to inflation concerns [1] - Officials expect inflation to decrease this year, but the pace and timing remain uncertain, with factors such as tariffs and housing prices influencing this outlook [2] - Some companies are automating operations to offset price increases, but progress towards the 2% inflation objective may be slower and more uneven than expected [3][10] Group 2 - Labor market conditions show signs of stabilization, with diminished downside risks, although concerns remain about labor supply [5][18] - Consumer spending is resilient, driven largely by higher-income consumers, while lower-income spending remains soft [6] - There are concerns about high asset valuations and low credit spreads, with vulnerabilities noted in the private credit sector and hedge funds [6][7] Group 3 - The focus of the January meeting shifted from jobs to inflation, with several participants noting the potential for inflation to stabilize at a higher than desired level [9][11] - The discussion included the impact of tariffs on prices, with concerns that tariff-related price increases may not fade as quickly as anticipated [10] - The economic burden of tariffs is primarily borne by U.S. companies and consumers, with various studies indicating that 90% or more of the costs are passed on to them [14][15]

Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve Bank of New York published a paper indicating that 90% of the costs from Trump's tariffs are borne by U.S. consumers and companies, contradicting the White House's stance that foreign exporters are responsible for these costs [1][3]. Group 1: Economic Analysis - The paper's findings suggest that foreign exporters are not absorbing tariff costs but are instead passing them on to American buyers [2][3]. - The National Economic Council director criticized the paper for its narrow focus on prices, arguing that it overlooked wage growth and benefits from onshoring [3]. Group 2: Public and Political Reaction - The comments from the National Economic Council director sparked a strong online reaction, with some commentators labeling the Trump economic team as divided and lacking credibility [4]. - The Tax Foundation estimated that tariffs would cost the average U.S. household $1,000 by 2025, aligning with the consensus that import taxes are primarily borne by domestic consumers [4]. Group 3: Market Predictions - Prediction markets indicate a 26% chance that the Supreme Court will rule in favor of Trump's tariffs, which could lead to refunds exceeding $130 billion and impact American trade policy [5]. - A separate market estimates an 18% chance that importers will receive refunds, suggesting limited expectations for consumer reimbursement even if the court rules against the tariffs [6]. Group 4: Retail Sector Insights - Traders are closely monitoring Walmart's upcoming earnings report for any commentary on tariffs, as the retailer has reached a record customer penetration of 72% of U.S. households, indicating a shift towards budget-conscious shopping [6].

Core Viewpoint - The criticism from White House economist Kevin Hassett regarding a study by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which claims that American consumers are bearing the costs of President Trump's tariffs, highlights ongoing tensions surrounding trade policy and its economic implications [1]. Group 1 - Kevin Hassett stated that the authors of the New York Fed paper "should presumably be disciplined" for their findings [1]. - Hassett described the analysis as "an embarrassment," indicating strong disapproval of the study's conclusions [1]. - The criticism comes as the Trump administration awaits a potential Supreme Court ruling on the president's tariffs [1].

Core Viewpoint - The president's tariffs have opened up new economic opportunities for India, suggesting a shift in trade dynamics that could benefit the Indian economy [1] Group 1 - The tariffs imposed by the president are seen as a catalyst for India to enhance its manufacturing capabilities and attract foreign investment [1] - Indian companies are positioned to capitalize on the trade shifts resulting from these tariffs, potentially increasing their market share in various sectors [1] - The commentary highlights the potential for India to become a key player in global supply chains as companies seek alternatives to existing manufacturing hubs [1]

Core Viewpoint - The recent New York Federal Reserve paper suggests that U.S. companies and consumers bear most of the tariff burden, which has been criticized by White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett as flawed and partisan [1][2]. Group 1: Criticism of the New York Fed Paper - Hassett described the paper as "an embarrassment" and the "worst paper" in the history of the Federal Reserve, arguing that its conclusions are based on inadequate analysis [2]. - He emphasized that the researchers failed to consider the broader economic impacts of tariffs, such as the positive effects on wages and benefits from increased domestic production [1][2]. Group 2: Findings of the New York Fed Paper - The paper indicated that approximately 90% of the additional costs from tariffs were passed on to consumers and companies, although the impact diminished over time [3]. - Hassett countered this by asserting that tariffs had minimal effect on prices and contributed to an improved standard of living [3]. Group 3: Economic Indicators - Hassett noted that inflation has decreased over time, with the consumer price index rising only 2.4% year-over-year in January, and core CPI showing its lowest annual gain since March 2021 at 2.5% [4]. - He highlighted that real wages increased by an average of $1,400 last year, suggesting that consumers benefited from the tariffs [4].

Group 1 - The Federal Reserve cut its key interest rate by 25 basis points, placing the overnight borrowing rate in the 3.5%-3.75% range [1] - Experts believe that mortgage rates are influenced by various factors beyond interest rate decisions, including tariffs, inflation, and stagnant wages [2] - The Mortgage Bankers Association reported a 3.8% decline in total mortgage application volume for the week ending December 12 compared to the previous week [4] Group 2 - Financial experts predict that mortgage rates will not change significantly in 2026, with minimal rate cuts expected [5] - The recent Fed meeting saw a non-unanimous vote, indicating a lack of alignment among board members regarding interest rate decisions [5] - As of December 19, the average interest rate for a 30-year fixed-rate conventional loan was 6.208%, reflecting a slight decrease of 0.04% from the previous week [5]

Open your pocketbooks. You're about to pay up for President Trump's tariffs this year. That's the overriding message from a recent report published by the Tax Foundation, a nonpartisan organization focused on tax policy. The impact of tariffs will cost the average U.S. household $1,300 in 2026, based on the Tax Foundation's analysis. Will AI create the world's first trillionaire? Our team just released a report on the one little-known company, called an "Indispensable Monopoly" providing the critical tec ...

Core Points - The first $36 billion in Japanese-funded infrastructure and industrial projects has been approved, marking the launch of a $550 billion investment pact [1][2] - This initiative aims to revitalize the American industrial base and is seen as a mutual benefit for both Japan and the United States [2][3] - The investment committee, chaired by Lutnick, will recommend projects while Japan will provide feasibility input, with a profit-sharing structure favoring the U.S. [5] Strategic Insights - The announcement reflects a multi-year commitment from Japan to enhance economic security for both nations [2][3] - President Trump attributes the capital inflow to his administration's trade policy, particularly the use of tariffs [4] - The agreement allows the U.S. to retain 90% of generated cash flows after initial costs are recovered, indicating a favorable financial structure for the U.S. [5]

Core Viewpoint - The S&P 500's high valuation poses a risk of significant stock price declines, particularly if tariffs negatively impact economic growth [1][2] Group 1: Tariffs and Economic Impact - President Trump's tariffs have increased the average tax on U.S. imports to approximately 13%, the highest level in 90 years [4] - Studies indicate that U.S. companies and consumers are primarily bearing the costs of tariffs, with estimates suggesting they paid 94% to 96% of the tariff burden [6] - The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) predicts that tariffs will lead to lower real GDP, negatively affecting corporate earnings and stock valuations [8] Group 2: Stock Market Valuation - The S&P 500's forward price-to-earnings (PE) ratio was reported at 22.2, significantly above the 10-year average of 18.8, indicating an elevated valuation [9] - Historical comparisons show that similar high valuations occurred during the dot-com bubble and the Covid-19 pandemic, both of which resulted in substantial market declines [9] - If forward earnings estimates are overestimated due to tariffs, a sharp decline or crash in the stock market could occur [10]