Workflow
业绩补偿
icon
Search documents
净利接连承压,东方智造实控人李斌欲“退场”
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-12-15 11:27
入主东方智造(002175)逾两年时间,李斌欲让出公司控制权。12月15日午间,东方智造披露公告称, 公司控股股东科翔高新技术发展有限公司(以下简称"科翔高新")正在筹划涉及其所持有公司股份转让 事宜,该事项可能导致公司控制权发生变更,公司股票自12月15日起停牌,预计停牌时间不超过2个交 易日。实控人拟"退场"背后,东方智造近年来净利连续下滑,今年前三季度公司扣非后归属净利润更是 同比转亏。此外,筹划控制权变更的同时,东方智造控股股东科翔高新所持股份超九成目前处于质押状 态。 公告显示,东方智造于12月14日收到控股股东科翔高新的通知,科翔高新正在筹划涉及其所持有公司股 份转让事宜,其拟将持有占公司总股本约14.33%的股份转让给广西现代物流集团有限公司(以下简 称"广西现代物流集团")或其指定主体,前述股份转让事项可能导致公司控制权发生变更,本次权益变 动事项尚需履行协议转让相关程序,及国有资产监督管理等有关部门的审批。 据了解,广西现代物流集团成立于2021年2月,前身是广西物资集团,聚焦物流、环保、机电三大主 业。 从股权关系来看,2021年12月,东方智造控股股东由无控股股东变更为科翔高新。时隔两年 ...
停牌了!002175,又筹划易主
中国基金报· 2025-12-15 04:41
【导读】东方智造筹划易主 中国基金报记者 夏天 东方智造 以 " 智能制造 " 与 " 产业园区综合管理服务 " 为双主业,其中智能制造业务涵盖 精密数显量具量仪、智能物流分拣设备、真空镀膜设备三大板块。 2024 年,公司荣获工信 部认定的 " 全国制造业单项冠军 " 。就在停牌前一个月,公司还以 2748.87 万元收购赛孚 机械 70% 股权,以强化智能制造主业布局。 当前, 东方智造 的控股股东为 科 翔高 新技术发展有限公司(以下简称科翔高新),实控人 为李斌。截至 2025 年三季度末,科翔高新持有东方智造 2.45 亿股,持股占比为 19.21% 。 | 十大股东明细 | | | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 时间范围 | | | | | | | 14时间排序 | [ = = Halexcel | | 2025年三季报 | | | | | | | | 查看图形 | | 股东名称 | 股东性质 | 期末参考市值 (亿元) | 持股数量(股) | 持股比例 (%) | 较上期持股变 动数(股 ...
打了近7年官司,终审胜诉!000536,获赔高达30.3亿元,但拿到钱不容易
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-12-13 13:45
Core Viewpoint - The long-standing lawsuit involving Huaying Technology has concluded with a final ruling in favor of the company, mandating a compensation payment of 3.029 billion yuan, which significantly exceeds the company's previous year's revenue of 1.739 billion yuan [1][5]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit dates back to 2014, involving disputes between Huaying Technology and its former controlling shareholders, leading to a final ruling by the Supreme People's Court that upheld the lower court's decision [2][3]. - The original agreement stipulated that if the company's net asset return rate fell below 10%, the defendants were obligated to compensate Huaying Technology in cash [2][3]. - The defendants, including Huaying Bermuda and its parent company, faced severe debt issues, which hindered their ability to fulfill the compensation obligations [3][5]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The 3.029 billion yuan compensation is crucial for Huaying Technology, given that its revenue last year was only 1.739 billion yuan, raising concerns about the actual collection of this amount [5][6]. - The company has fully provisioned for bad debts amounting to 1.456 billion yuan due to the financial instability of the defendants [5]. - The financial impact of the ruling will depend on the execution of the judgment and the recoverability of the assets involved [5]. Group 3: Stakeholder Analysis - The former controlling shareholder, Huaying Technology, has lost its controlling power and is currently undergoing bankruptcy proceedings, complicating the recovery of the compensation [4][5]. - In contrast, Datong Company, another defendant, has shown financial strength with reported revenues exceeding 8 billion yuan and a market capitalization over 20 billion yuan, indicating potential for fulfilling obligations [6].
华映科技终审胜诉,被告被判赔偿30亿元业绩补偿款
Zhong Guo Ji Jin Bao· 2025-12-13 09:49
Core Viewpoint - Huaying Technology has won a final judgment in a long-standing lawsuit against its former controlling shareholder, resulting in a compensation payment of 3.029 billion yuan, which is expected to have a positive impact on the company's operations and development [1][2][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Background - The lawsuit between Huaying Technology and its former controlling shareholder, Huaying Bermuda, dates back to 2019 when the Fujian High Court accepted the case [2]. - The initial ruling by the Fujian High Court ordered Huaying Bermuda to pay 3.029 billion yuan in performance compensation to Huaying Technology, with Da Tong Company and China Display also held jointly liable [2][4]. - The final judgment was issued by the Supreme People's Court, which upheld the original ruling and dismissed the appeal from Huaying Bermuda and Da Tong Company [3]. Group 2: Financial Implications - Huaying Technology reported a revenue of 1.739 billion yuan for 2024, with a cumulative net loss of nearly 4.2 billion yuan over the past four years [1]. - The compensation of 3.029 billion yuan, if successfully executed, could significantly improve Huaying Technology's financial situation [1]. - Da Tong Company, despite Huaying Technology's bankruptcy, continues to operate normally, reporting over 8 billion yuan in revenue for the first three quarters of 2025 [5]. Group 3: Company Background - Huaying Technology, originally known as Mindong Electric (Group) Co., Ltd., was listed in 1993 and underwent a major asset restructuring in 2010, acquiring stakes in several companies under China Display [4]. - The company primarily engages in the research, design, production, and sales of display panels and modules, positioning itself as a significant manufacturer in the flat panel display industry [5]. - The company has faced ongoing challenges due to cyclical downturns in the panel industry, leading to poor financial performance [5].
华映科技终审胜诉 被告被判赔偿30亿元业绩补偿款
Zhong Guo Ji Jin Bao· 2025-12-13 09:49
Core Viewpoint - Huaqing Technology has won a final victory in a long-standing lawsuit against its former controlling shareholder and actual controller, resulting in a court ruling that requires the defendants to pay a performance compensation of 3.029 billion yuan [2][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Background - The lawsuit between Huaqing Technology and its former controlling shareholder, Huaqing Bermuda, dates back to January 4, 2019, when the Fujian High Court accepted the case [4]. - The Fujian High Court ruled that Huaqing Bermuda must pay 3.029 billion yuan in performance compensation within ten days of the ruling [4]. - Huaqing Bermuda and other defendants appealed the first-instance judgment, but the Supreme Court upheld the original ruling [5]. Group 2: Financial Impact - Huaqing Technology reported a revenue of 1.739 billion yuan for 2024, with a cumulative net loss of nearly 4.2 billion yuan over the past four years [2]. - The 3.029 billion yuan compensation, if successfully executed, is expected to have a significant positive impact on Huaqing Technology's business development [2]. Group 3: Company History and Operations - Huaqing Technology, originally known as Mindong Electric (Group) Co., Ltd., was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 1993 and underwent a major asset restructuring in 2010 [7]. - The company primarily engages in the research, design, production, and sales of display panels and modules, making it a significant player in the global flat panel display manufacturing industry [9]. - Due to the cyclical downturn in the panel industry, Huaqing Technology has faced ongoing poor performance, with a revenue of 1.039 billion yuan in the first three quarters of 2025, a year-on-year decline of 21.03% [9].
东方时尚驾驶学校股份有限公司关于累计诉讼、仲裁情况的公告
登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码:603377 证券简称:ST东时(维权) 公告编号:临2025-199 ● 是否会对上市公司损益产生负面影响:本案件处于审理阶段,由于北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁院 审理结果存在不确定性,最终以北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁院裁决结果为准。公司将根据本次案件 的情况,按照有关规定及时履行信息披露义务,敬请投资者注意投资风险 一、本次仲裁的基本情况 近日,公司收到北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁院送达的(2025)京仲案字第09433号仲裁案受理通知 书。公司因与被申请人存在合同纠纷,向北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁院提起仲裁申请。现该案件已 获北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁院受理,公司现将有关情况公告如下: (一)本次仲裁的各方当事人 申请人:东方时尚驾驶学校股份有限公司 被申请人:莘县天华宇宏企业管理咨询合伙企业(有限合伙)、莘县振鸿企业管理咨询中心、北京长天 鑫桥投资有限公司、荆州丽华置业发展有限公司、荆州市宇吉生物科技有限公司、陆天振、申劲、伍 彬、罗莉华 转债代码:113575 转债简称:东时转债 东方时尚驾驶学校股份有限公司 关于累计诉讼、仲裁情况的 ...
大晟时代文化投资股份有限公司关于祺曜互娱业绩补偿事项的公告
登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码:600892 证券简称:*ST大晟 公告编号:临2025-051 关于祺曜互娱业绩补偿事项的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏,并对其内容 的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 大晟时代文化投资股份有限公司(以下简称"公司")于2025年11月26日召开第十二届董事会第十一次会 议,审议通过了《关于祺曜互娱业绩补偿事项的议案》,上述议案尚需提交公司2025年第三次临时股东 会审议。具体内容如下: 一、祺曜互娱业绩承诺概述 公司控股子公司深圳淘乐网络科技有限公司(以下简称"淘乐网络")分别于2017年、2019年收购海南祺 曜互动娱乐有限公司(以下简称"祺曜互娱",2023年11月已全部对外转让,现不属于公司合并报表范围 内子公司)80%、20%股权时,与相关方签署了《盈利预测补偿协议》,祺曜互娱原股东分宜新视界投 资合伙企业(有限合伙)(赵斌控制企业,以下简称"分宜新视界")和赵斌承诺:祺曜互娱2017年、 2018年、2019年的年度净利润(根据扣除非经常性损益前后孰低原则确认)分别不低于2,10 ...
收购换来持续亏损,康惠股份仲裁追讨2.66亿元业绩补偿款
Bei Ke Cai Jing· 2025-11-15 05:08
Core Viewpoint - The company, Kanghui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., has initiated arbitration against Lai Xinsheng for a remaining performance compensation of 266 million yuan, stemming from a previous acquisition that has led to significant financial losses and uncertainties regarding future profits [1][2][3] Group 1: Acquisition and Performance Compensation - In September 2020, Kanghui acquired 51% of Shandong Youbang Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. for 32.64 million yuan, with performance guarantees from Lai Xinsheng for net profits of 5 million, 10 million, and 20 million yuan for the years 2021 to 2023 [2] - Following an audit, Shandong Youbang reported a cumulative loss of 72.6377 million yuan from 2021 to 2023, leading to a compensation claim of 269 million yuan from Lai Xinsheng [2][3] - As of now, Lai Xinsheng still owes Kanghui 266 million yuan in performance compensation, despite partial payments made through a third party [3] Group 2: Financial Performance and Losses - Kanghui has reported continuous losses over the years, with revenues of 492 million yuan, 673 million yuan, and 562 million yuan from 2022 to 2024, and corresponding losses of 63.06 million yuan, 26.16 million yuan, and 89.63 million yuan [8] - In the first three quarters of 2025, Kanghui's revenue declined by 12% to 356 million yuan, with a net loss of 133 million yuan, attributed to the write-off of receivables from its subsidiary, Shaanxi Youbang [8] Group 3: Operational Challenges - Shaanxi Youbang, a subsidiary of Kanghui, has faced operational difficulties, including a complete shutdown of production due to market competition and ongoing losses, leading to plans for bankruptcy restructuring to improve its financial situation [5][6] - The company has also made significant provisions for bad debts related to Shaanxi Youbang, totaling 121 million yuan, indicating a challenging financial outlook [6] Group 4: Corporate Changes - In September 2023, Kanghui underwent a change in control, with the major shareholder shifting from Shaanxi Kanghui Holdings to Jiaxing Yuehe Zhichuang Technology Partnership, which has implications for its strategic direction [7] - Following the change in control, the company rebranded from "Kanghui Pharmaceutical" to "Kanghui Co., Ltd." to better reflect its long-term development strategy [7]
奥瑞德:部分业绩补偿股份回购注销完成,左褚二人补偿存不确定性
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-11-13 09:18
Core Viewpoint - The company announced that due to its wholly-owned subsidiary's failure to meet performance commitments from a significant asset restructuring in 2015, performance compensation obligations must be fulfilled by the responsible parties [1] Group 1: Performance Compensation - Eight performance compensation obligors, including Suzhou Songhe, are required to compensate with a total of 12,065,449 shares, which have been transferred to the company's repurchase account and will be canceled on November 14 [1] - After the completion of this repurchase and cancellation, the company's total share capital will be reduced to 2,751,447,394 shares [1] Group 2: Uncertainty in Compensation - Performance compensation obligors Zuo Hongbo and Chu Shuxia are required to compensate a total of 390,706,608 shares, but their shares have been entirely judicially frozen, leading to significant uncertainty regarding the company's ability to recover these compensation shares and cash [1]
欢瑞世纪联合股份有限公司关于重大诉讼事项的公告
Core Viewpoint - The company, Huanrui Century, is involved in a significant lawsuit concerning contract disputes, with potential implications for its stock and financial performance [2][3][9]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit has been accepted by the Beijing Financial Court, with the case number (2025) Jing 74 Min Chu 2055, and is currently in the pre-trial stage [3][10]. - Huanrui Century is the plaintiff, while the defendants include individuals and a company associated with a previous asset purchase transaction [4][5]. - The total amount involved in the lawsuit includes a request for the transfer of 113,259,178 shares, which represents 11.55% of the company's total share capital, along with a cash compensation of approximately RMB 17.67 million [2][4]. Group 2: Legal Claims - The company seeks to compel the defendants to transfer specific shares issued during a 2016 asset purchase, with a nominal transfer price of 1 RMB per share, and to provide cash compensation for any shortfall in the number of shares transferred [5][6]. - The defendants are also requested to cover the legal fees incurred by the company in this lawsuit [7]. Group 3: Financial Impact - The lawsuit is a strategic move by the company to protect its and its shareholders' rights, although the final outcome remains uncertain and may affect future financial performance [9]. - The company has reported that its total litigation and arbitration amounts over the past twelve months are approximately RMB 28.69 million, which is 3.26% of its latest audited net assets [8].