傅聪指出，联合国是最具普遍性、代表性和权威性的政府间国际组织。国际形势越是复杂，越要维护联 合国权威和地位。各方不能对联合国"合则用、不合则弃"，更不能抛开联合国另起炉灶。安理会承担着 维护国际和平与安全的首要职责，其地位和作用不可替代。 傅聪还说，中国是国际法治的坚定维护者。中方将同各国一道，积极推动构建人类命运共同体，为加强 国际法治、促进世界和平与发展作出新的贡献。 傅聪说，《联合国宪章》是处理国际关系的根本遵循，也是国际秩序稳定的重要基石。各国之间要平等 相待，尊重彼此主权和领土完整，坚持以和平方式解决争端，反对在国际关系中使用或威胁使用武力， 恪守不干涉别国内政这一"黄金法则"。 他强调，国际法平等统一适用于所有国家，没有也不应该有例外。我们从不认为哪个国家可以充当国际 警察，也不认同哪个国家可以自诩为国际法官。世界不能倒退回弱肉强食的丛林法则。大国应发挥带头 作用，不能搞双重标准和选择性适用，不能将本国意志强加于人。世界多极化和国际关系民主化是不可 逆转的时代潮流。世界命运应由各国共同掌握，国际规则应由各国共同制定，发展成果应由各国共同享 有。 新华社联合国1月27日电 中国常驻联合国代表傅聪26 ...

新华社联合国1月26日电 联合国安理会26日举行国际法治公开辩论会。联合国秘书长古特雷斯在会上强 调国际法治的重要性，敦促联合国会员国维护国际法治。 ...

来源：人民日报 【#中国代表驳斥美方涉南海错误言论#】#中国代表提醒美无权对他国指手画脚# 当地时间1月26日，联 合国安理会举行"重申国际法治：重振和平、正义与多边主义"公开辩论会。面对美国代表关于南海问题 的错误言论，中国常驻联合国代表傅聪大使当场做出严正回应。傅聪大使强调指出，中国在南海诸岛及 其附近海域拥有无可争辩的主权，对相关海域拥有主权权利和管辖权。中国在南海的领土主权和海洋权 益具有充分的历史和法理依据。傅聪大使还提醒美国代表，美国不是《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，更 无权以《公约》法官自居、对他国指手画脚。美方罔顾南海问题的历史经纬和客观事实，到处搬弄是 非、挑拨离间，甚至在南海地区部署包括陆基中程导弹在内的进攻性武器，以"航行自由"为名频繁派先 进舰机到南海搞军事侦察和演习，擅闯中国领海领空及岛礁临近海空域。究竟是谁在南海搞"胁迫"、 搞"霸凌"，是谁在扰乱地区稳定、威胁航行自由与安全，又是谁在破坏国际法治？真相不言自明。 （CCTV国际时讯） ...

中国常驻联合国代表傅聪26日在安理会国际法治公开辩论会上作补充发言，回击美国代表在发言中污蔑 中国在南海所谓"扩张性非法声索"的错误言论。 傅聪说，中方坚决反对美国代表关于南海问题的错误言论，不得不做出严正回应。中国在南海诸岛及其 附近海域拥有无可争辩的主权，对相关海域拥有主权权利和管辖权。中国在南海的领土主权和海洋权益 具有充分的历史和法理依据。 中国常驻联合国代表傅聪26日在安理会国际法治公开辩论会上作补充发言，回击美国代表在发言中污蔑 中国在南海所谓"扩张性非法声索"的错误言论。 傅聪说，中方坚决反对美国代表关于南海问题的错误言论，不得不做出严正回应。中国在南海诸岛及其 附近海域拥有无可争辩的主权，对相关海域拥有主权权利和管辖权。中国在南海的领土主权和海洋权益 具有充分的历史和法理依据。 傅聪表示，美国不是《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，更无权以《公约》法官自居、对他国指手画脚。美 方罔顾南海问题的历史经纬和客观事实，到处搬弄是非、挑拨离间，甚至在南海地区部署包括陆基中程 导弹在内的进攻性武器，以"航行自由"为名频繁派先进舰机到南海搞军事侦察和演习，擅闯中国领海领 空及岛礁邻近海空域。究竟是谁在南海搞胁迫、 ...

据新华社消息，中国常驻联合国代表傅聪26日在安理会国际法治公开辩论会上作补充发言，回击美国代 表在发言中污蔑中国在南海所谓"扩张性非法声索"的错误言论。 白银，突发大跳水！特朗普出手，狂飙！ （原标题：中方：坚决反对，不得不做出严正回应） 来源：新华社 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's firm stance on its sovereignty in the South China Sea, countering U.S. accusations of "expansionist illegal claims" and asserting that the U.S. has no right to judge other nations regarding international maritime law [3][4]. Group 1: China's Sovereignty Claims - China asserts undeniable sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and adjacent waters, backed by historical and legal evidence [3]. - The Chinese representative criticizes the U.S. for not being a party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and for making unfounded claims about China's actions in the region [3]. Group 2: U.S. Military Presence and Actions - The article highlights U.S. military activities in the South China Sea, including the deployment of advanced naval and aerial assets under the guise of "freedom of navigation," which China views as provocative and destabilizing [3][4]. - A recent incident involving the crash of U.S. military aircraft during exercises in the South China Sea is noted, with China offering humanitarian assistance while emphasizing that such military maneuvers contribute to regional security issues [5]. Group 3: Diplomatic Efforts and Regional Stability - China, in collaboration with ASEAN countries, aims to maintain stability in the South China Sea and is committed to implementing the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea [4]. - The article describes the South China Sea arbitration case as a politically motivated farce orchestrated by the U.S., which China does not recognize as valid or binding [4].

Group 1 - The Chinese representative at the UN Security Council urged Japan to confront its historical actions and take responsibility through concrete actions [1][2] - The representative highlighted that the victory in World War II upheld the baseline of human civilization and led to the establishment of the current international legal system [1] - Concerns were raised regarding Japan's Prime Minister's recent statements linking Taiwan to Japan's "survival crisis," which were seen as a potential signal for military intervention [1] Group 2 - The representative emphasized the need for international unity and cooperation to strengthen the rule of international law, especially in light of rising unilateralism and power politics [2] - There is a call to uphold the principles and purposes of the UN Charter and to maintain the authority of international law [2] - The Chinese side expressed its commitment to work with other countries to promote a community with a shared future for mankind and contribute to strengthening international law and promoting world peace and development [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese representative at the United Nations, Fu Cong, strongly refuted the U.S. claims regarding China's "expansionist illegal claims" in the South China Sea, asserting China's indisputable sovereignty over the islands and adjacent waters in the region [1] Group 1: China's Position on Sovereignty - China possesses undeniable sovereignty and jurisdiction over the South China Sea islands and their surrounding waters, supported by historical and legal evidence [1] - The U.S. is not a party to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and therefore lacks the authority to act as a judge regarding other nations [1] Group 2: U.S. Actions and Accusations - The U.S. has been accused of ignoring the historical context and objective facts of the South China Sea issue, engaging in provocations and military activities under the guise of "freedom of navigation" [1] - The deployment of offensive weapons, including land-based intermediate-range missiles, by the U.S. in the South China Sea has been highlighted as a source of regional instability and a threat to navigation freedom and security [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the increasing challenges in outer space governance, highlighting the need for a more equitable and sustainable governance system, particularly in light of the rising militarization and competition for space resources. China's global governance initiative is presented as a constructive solution to these issues [1]. Group 1: Challenges in Outer Space Governance - The outer space governance system faces multiple deficits, including a representation deficit where global South countries lack adequate representation in decision-making processes [2]. - There is an authority deficit threatening the multilateral governance framework led by the United Nations, exacerbated by unilateral actions from countries like the U.S. that undermine established international laws [2]. - An effectiveness deficit is evident as current governance mechanisms are slow to respond to emerging challenges such as space debris and military ambitions, leading to regulatory gaps [2]. Group 2: China's Global Governance Initiative - China's initiative emphasizes five core principles to enhance outer space governance: equality of sovereignty, rule of law, multilateralism, human-centered values, and practical effectiveness [3]. - The principle of equality of sovereignty aims to democratize international relations in outer space, ensuring that the voices of global South countries are included [3]. - The initiative advocates for adherence to existing international legal frameworks, including the Outer Space Treaty, to maintain order in outer space governance [3]. Group 3: Constructing a Fairer Governance System - The article argues for reforming the existing governance system rather than completely overhauling it, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the core principles of the United Nations framework [4][5]. - It calls for inclusive participation from all countries in governance processes, particularly in critical areas like frequency allocation and space debris management [5]. - The need for international cooperation and capacity building for developing countries is highlighted to enhance their participation in outer space governance [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article criticizes the unilateral military action taken by the United States to forcibly control Venezuelan President Maduro and his wife, labeling it as a violation of international law and the principles of the United Nations Charter [3]. Group 1 - The U.S. military action against Venezuela is described as an act of arrogance and barbarism, undermining the post-war international order [3]. - The article emphasizes that such unilateral actions, without authorization from the United Nations Security Council, pose a threat to global peace and stability [3]. - It argues that the principles of international law and sovereignty should not be disregarded, and that history will condemn such hegemonic behavior [3].