Group 1 - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) voted to initiate a Section 337 investigation into certain mobile cellular communications devices on August 4, 2025 [1] - The investigation was prompted by a complaint from South Korea's Pantech Corporation, alleging that the products exported to, imported into, and sold in the U.S. violated U.S. patent laws [1] - The patents in question include U.S. registered patent numbers 9,548,839, 11,659,503, 11,051,344, and 12,267,876, with Pantech requesting a limited exclusion order and a cease-and-desist order [1] Group 2 - The ITC is required to determine the end date of the investigation within 45 days of the case being filed [3] - Unless vetoed by the U.S. Trade Representative for policy reasons, the relief orders issued by the ITC in Section 337 cases take effect on the date of issuance and have final effect 60 days thereafter [3] Group 3 - Multiple companies are named as respondents in the investigation, including OnePlus Technology, Lenovo Group, Motorola Mobility, and various TCL entities [2]

Group 1 - A group of companies including Wonderland Switzerland AG, Iron Mountains, LLC, Nuna International B.V., Nuna Baby Essentials, Inc., Joie International Co., Ltd., Joie Children's Products, Inc., and Graco Children's Products Inc. filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, alleging that certain child car seats exported to and sold in the U.S. violate U.S. Section 337 [1] - The complaint specifically targets the import and sale of certain child car seats in the U.S. market [1] Group 2 - Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc., Dorel Industries Inc., Guangdong Roadmate Group Co., Ltd., Roadmate Trading (Hong Kong) Limited, and Zhongshan Roadmate Juvenile Products Co. are named as defendants in the complaint [2]

Core Points - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling on July 24, confirming infringement related to certain liquid coolers for electronic components in computers and imposed limited exclusion orders against named defendants [1] - The ITC decided to review the initial ruling made by the administrative law judge on March 21, 2025, regarding the invalidation of U.S. registered patents and suggested remedies including a general exclusion order and a cease-and-desist order [2] - The ITC initiated a 337 investigation on March 15, 2024, based on a complaint filed by Cooler Master Co., Ltd. and others, alleging infringement of U.S. patents [3] Company and Industry Summary - The named defendants in the case include SilverStone Technology, Inc. from the U.S., Cooler Master Co., Ltd. from Taiwan, and several other companies involved in the manufacturing and sale of liquid cooling products [4] - The investigation pertains to specific patents, including U.S. registered patents 10,509,446, 11,061,450, and D856,941, which are claimed to be infringed by the products in question [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The company is currently involved in a Section 337 investigation initiated by GoPro, Inc. regarding alleged patent infringements related to its products and accessories in the U.S. market [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Details - GoPro filed the investigation on March 29, 2024, claiming that the company's products infringe on six U.S. intellectual property rights, including stabilization algorithms and design patents [1][2]. - The ITC's preliminary ruling indicated that only a portion of the company's exported products fell under one of GoPro's design patents, and the new design proposed by the company was confirmed not to infringe on that patent [2]. Group 2: Company's Response - The company has established a special task force and engaged a legal team specializing in Section 337 investigations to actively respond to the claims [2]. - The company has prepared new design solutions and has applied to the USPTO for an IPR procedure to invalidate GoPro's asserted patents, with some patents currently under review [2]. Group 3: Impact on the Company - The ongoing Section 337 investigation is an administrative review process and does not involve patent damage compensation, meaning it will not have a substantial impact on the company's current production and operations [3]. - A parallel lawsuit related to the same intellectual property claims was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, which has been suspended pending the outcome of the ITC investigation [3].

Group 1 - The U.S. plans to initiate a Section 337 investigation into specific electronic glasses and their components, including related charging devices [1] - The China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products organized a warning meeting regarding this investigation [1] - Representatives from relevant enterprises in Guangdong and Zhejiang provinces attended the meeting, indicating the potential impact on local businesses [1] Group 2 - Key officials from the Ministry of Commerce's Trade Relief Investigation Bureau participated in the meeting to provide guidance [1] - Attendees included representatives from various local commerce departments and intellectual property protection centers, highlighting the collaborative effort to address the issue [1] - The meeting aimed to prepare and respond to the potential implications of the U.S. investigation on the industry [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated a Section 337 investigation into certain electronic eyewear products and their components, following a complaint from Ingeniospec, LLC regarding patent infringement [1] Group 1: Investigation Details - The ITC's investigation is identified by the code 337-TA-1455 and was voted on July 8 [1] - The complaint was filed by Ingeniospec, LLC based in San Jose, California, on June 17, 2025 [1] - The investigation concerns alleged violations of U.S. patent numbers 10,310,296 and 12,078,870 related to the import and sale of these products in the U.S. [1] Group 2: Legal Actions Requested - Ingeniospec, LLC has requested the ITC to issue a limited exclusion order and a cease-and-desist order against the infringing products [1]

Group 1 - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced a partial final ruling on June 20, 2024, regarding certain sensors with pixels and their downstream products, terminating the investigation based on a settlement [1] - The ITC initiated the 337 investigation on May 31, 2024, following a complaint from SiOnyx, LLC, alleging patent infringement related to specific registered patents [1] - The patents in question include U.S. Patent Nos. 9,064,764, 9,905,599, 10,224,359, 11,069,737, and 11,721,714, with SiOnyx requesting limited exclusion and cease-and-desist orders [1] Group 2 - Samsung Electronics, along with its subsidiaries in the U.S., is named as a defendant in the investigation [2]

Core Points - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated a Section 337 investigation into certain Wi-Fi routers, devices, mesh Wi-Fi network devices, and their components due to alleged patent infringements [1] - The investigation was prompted by a complaint filed by Estelgia, LLC, claiming violations of multiple U.S. registered patents [1] - The defendants in this case include companies such as ASUStek Computer Inc., D-Link Corporation, and Linksys Holdings, among others [2] Investigation Details - The investigation was officially launched on June 17, following a complaint submitted on May 16, 2025 [1] - The ITC is required to determine the end date of the investigation within 45 days of the case being filed [2] - Any relief orders issued by the ITC in Section 337 cases take effect on the day of issuance and become final 60 days thereafter, unless vetoed by the U.S. Trade Representative for policy reasons [2]

据中国贸易救济信息网消息，2025年6月13日，美国国际贸易委员会（ITC）投票决定对特定为吸收式 制冷系统使用的锅炉保护产品及其组件和下游产品（Certain Boiler Protection for Absorption Refrigeration Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same）启动337调查（调查编码：337-TA- 1453）。 2025年5月14日，美国ARPC LLC and Paul Unmack of Butte, Montana向美国ITC提出337立案调查申请， 主张对美出口、在美进口和在美销售的该产品违反了美国337条款（侵权美国注册专利号8056360），请 求美国ITC发布普遍排除令或有限排除令、禁止令。 中国河南Kuofanghenanmaoyiyouxiangongsi, Zheng Zhou, China阔方河南贸易有限公司、中国安徽 Wuhujiaoxiangdianzishangwuyouxiangongsi, Wu Hu, China芜湖蕉香电子商务有限公司、中国广东Wang ...

Group 1 - IngenioSpec, LLC has filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, alleging that certain electronic eyewear products and their components violate U.S. regulations [1] - The complaint specifically targets the export, import, and sale of certain electronic eyewear products and related charging apparatuses [1] Group 2 - Multiple companies have been named as defendants in the complaint, including Brilliant Labs Limited, SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd., Even Realities Ltd., and several others from China and Singapore [2] - The list of defendants includes companies involved in technology and electronics, indicating a broad scope of potential impact on the industry [2]