影石创新(688775.SH)发布《关于美国国际贸易委员会对公司开展337调查的最终裁决结果公告》称，公 司于2026年2月26日(美国时间)获悉ITC最终裁决结果，针对案涉6件专利，ITC确认3件GoPro主张的发明 专利(第10,015,413号、第10,958,840号、第10,529,052号)所涉及的指控产品不构成侵权且专利权利要求 无效/部分无效、1件GoPro主张的发明专利(第10,574,894号)所涉及的指控产品不构成侵权、1件GoPro主 张的发明专利(第11,336,832号)权利要求无效。公司仅部分出口美国产品落入1件GoPro主张的外观专利 (第D789,435号)保护范围，但公司提出的新外观设计方案已由ITC再次认定未对该件专利构成任何权利 侵犯。该落入GoPro主张的外观专利保护范围的上一代产品已经不再出口美国，当前产品均已由新外观 设计方案取代。 本次终裁结果与初裁结果相比，在初裁结果认定第10,529,052号发明专利所涉及的部分指控产品构成侵 权但专利权利要求无效的情况下，终裁结果认定该发明专利所涉及的全部指控产品既不构成侵权且该专 利权利要求无效。另初裁结果认定第10,9 ...

2月27日下午，影石创新发布公告，宣布美国国际贸易委员会（ITC）发起的337调查中最终裁决结果， GoPro六项专利指控全部化解。 影石创新提示，GoPro有权在ITC最终裁决生效之日起60天内向美国联邦巡回法院提出上诉；同时，其 有权向加州中区法院申请重新启动相关诉讼程序。 来源 深圳商报综合 编辑 石展溥校审谭录岗 本次终裁结果与初裁结果相比，在初裁结果认定第10529052号发明专利所涉及的部分指控产品构成侵权 但专利权利要求无效的情况下，终裁结果认定该发明专利所涉及的全部指控产品既不构成侵权且该专利 权利要求无效。另初裁结果认定第10958840号发明专利所涉及的指控产品不构成侵权，终裁结果进一步 补充了该项专利所涉及的指控产品的不侵权情况。初裁结果的其他认定结论均予以维持。 至此，公司涉及的337调查已终结，本次337调查未对公司生产、经营造成实质性影响。公司将持续不受 限制地在美国进口和销售现有产品。 影石创新表示，在此次337调查过程中，公司的专项工作组制定了充分的抗辩应对措施以及风险应对策 略。除在应诉过程中进行积极抗辩外，公司准备了新的外观设计方案，并获得ITC确认新设计方案不构 成侵权。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The legal battle between GoPro and Chinese competitor Insta360 culminated in a victory for Insta360, allowing it to continue selling its products in the U.S. market without restrictions, while GoPro's market position has significantly weakened [2][15][20]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The ITC ruled that five out of six patents claimed by GoPro were either not infringed or invalid, with only one design patent partially applicable to an older product that is no longer sold in the U.S. [2][13] - The legal dispute lasted nearly two years, with Insta360 spending over $10 million to defend against GoPro's claims, showcasing its financial and legal capabilities [11][14]. - The outcome of the case not only confirmed Insta360's technological independence but also eliminated compliance barriers for its expansion in the North American market [15][14]. Group 2: Market Performance - Insta360 reported a record revenue of 9.858 billion yuan in the last fiscal year, marking a 76.85% year-on-year increase, despite the ongoing legal challenges [3][17]. - The company's market share in the global consumer panoramic camera market reached 67.2% in 2023, while GoPro's share dropped to 9.2% [5]. - Following the legal victory, Insta360's sales network expanded to over 60 countries, with significant growth in North America, where revenue from major retail channels increased from 6.5% to 19% [15][19]. Group 3: Product Development and Innovation - Insta360 has consistently updated its product line, launching five iterations of its panoramic camera from ONE X2 to X5, while GoPro has struggled with product delays [5][12]. - The company has invested heavily in research and development, with a total expenditure of 1.649 billion yuan in the last year alone, focusing on core areas such as chip customization [19]. - Insta360's commitment to innovation is evident in its upcoming product launches, including a handheld gimbal camera and a panoramic drone, reinforcing its position as a technology-driven company [19][20].

新浪科技讯 2月27日下午消息，影石创新发布公告，美国337调查终裁落定：美国国际贸易委员会 （ITC）维持初裁，判定GoPro六项指控均不成立。 影石在公告中表示："本次337调查未对公司生产、经营造成实质性影响。公司将持续不受限制地在美国 进口和销售现有产品。" 影石在公告中表示："本次337调查未对公司生产、经营造成实质性影响。公司将持续不受限制地在美国 进口和销售现有产品。" 资料显示，337调查源于《美国1930年关税法》第337条款，是ITC审查进口产品是否侵犯知识产权的贸 易救济程序。一旦认定侵权，ITC可发布排除令，禁止侵权产品进入美国市场。因其审理节奏快、制裁 力度大，337调查长期被视为中国企业出海的主要法律壁垒之一。 根据ITC终裁，GoPro指控的六项专利争议中，五项被裁定为不构成侵权或相关专利权无效；针对剩余 一项外观专利，影石提出的新设计方案也获ITC确认不构成侵权。 影石创始人刘靖康曾表示"感受到了强烈的恶意"。他透露，公司为此支付的应诉成本超过1000万美 金，"很多公司不一定打得起这样的官司"。但他同时强调，"我们从来没想过要干死谁"，影石市场表现 优于GoPro，是产品定义 ...

2月26日，美国国际贸易委员会投票决定对特定一次性及其他封闭式电子尼古丁传送系统装置及其组件 启动337调查。 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling on February 11, 2025, to review and overturn previous decisions regarding Zhejiang Juhua Co., Ltd. due to lack of direct infringement [1] - The ITC decided not to review the initial ruling on January 5, 2026, which terminated the investigation related to U.S. Patent No. 8,337,725 based on the applicant's withdrawal [1] - On December 9, 2025, the ITC corrected the names of companies involved in the case, changing Solvay Specialty Polymers, USA LLC to Syensqo Specialty Polymers, USA LLC, and Solvay Specialty Polymers Italy S.P.A. to Syensqo Specialty Polymers Italy S.P.A. [2] Group 2 - The ITC's final ruling on April 22, 2025, terminated the investigation against Inner Mongolia 3F Wanhao Fluorochemical Industry Co. Ltd. based on a settlement [3] - The ITC initiated an investigation into Certain Polyvinylidene Fluoride Resins on February 14, 2025, under investigation code 337-TA-1439 [3] - A complaint was filed on January 13, 2025, by Synesqo SA and Solvay Specialty Polymers against the import and sale of products violating U.S. Patent No. 8,337,725, requesting exclusion orders [4] Group 3 - The named defendants in the investigations include Zhejiang Sinochem Lantian Co., Ltd., Inner Mongolia 3F Wanhao Fluorochemical Industry Co. Ltd., Zhejiang Juhua Co., Ltd., Zhejiang Fluorine Chemical New Material Co. Ltd., and Hubei Fluorine New Materials Co., Ltd. [5]

康希通信一系列前沿产品的展示与发布。 来源：法治日报 近日，一场耗时近两年、耗资超9000万元的跨国知识产权博弈获得阶段性胜利。国产Wi-Fi射频前端芯 片领域的领军企业格兰康希通信科技（上海）股份有限公司（以下简称"康希通信"）在美国国际贸易委 员会（ITC）的"337调查"中被裁定五项涉案专利全部"零侵权"。这意味着美国射频巨头公司试图通过专 利诉讼排挤中国竞争对手的计划受挫，也为中国半导体行业在国际知识产权博弈中树立了"以技维权、 以法护航"的标杆。 行业人士认为，此次"337调查"初裁胜诉，对中国科技企业应对跨境知识产权纠纷具有重要示范意义。 中国企业出海过程中，如何避免陷入漫长的诉讼维权，应怎样提前构建风险防御机制，是当下出海企业 面临的新课题。 初裁是最核心的环节 2024年7月，全球射频芯片前端行业龙头Skyworks依据《美国1930年关税法》第337节，向ITC提出调查 申请，指控康希通信及下游客户制造、对美出口和销售的特定射频前端模块产品侵犯其5项专利权，请 求ITC发布普遍排除令、有限排除令及禁止令，试图阻断康希通信产品进入美国市场。2024年8月，ITC 正式立案。 "这是一场硬仗，也 ...

Core Viewpoint - The preliminary ruling by the U.S. International Trade Commission indicates that the company's wholly-owned subsidiary did not infringe on Skyworks' patents, allowing the company to continue expanding its business in the U.S. market and promoting new technology products globally, which is expected to enhance profitability and increase overseas revenue [1][5]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Impact - The company faced a significant disruption to its main business due to the 337 investigation, which lasted over a year [3]. - The lawsuit and investigation created uncertainty for the company's international expansion plans, particularly affecting its Wi-Fi radio frequency front-end modules [3]. - In 2024, the company anticipated a significant increase in global shipments of its Wi-Fi7 FEM products, but reported a 21.99% decline in overseas sales revenue and a 148.23% increase in management expenses due to litigation costs [3]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Despite a 39.32% year-on-year increase in revenue in the first three quarters of 2025, the company reported a net loss of 30.53 million yuan due to litigation costs [4]. - By the end of 2025, the company had incurred over 90 million yuan in litigation and related expenses, but the preliminary ruling is expected to significantly reduce these costs, improving cash flow and profitability [4]. Group 3: Future Strategy and Product Development - The preliminary ruling is seen as a new starting point for the company's global strategy, with plans to increase R&D investment and expand into new markets [5]. - The company is conducting preliminary research on Wi-Fi8 RF front-end chips and has plans to launch samples supporting Wi-Fi8 protocols in 2026, aiming to collaborate with leading chip companies to seize industry opportunities [6].

Core Viewpoint - The company, 康希通信科技 (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., and its subsidiary GRAND CHIP LABS, INC. have not violated Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as per the preliminary ruling by the ITC administrative judge, thus not infringing on Skyworks' patents [2][4][5]. Group 1: Case Background - The case is currently at the stage of the ITC's preliminary ruling regarding a Section 337 investigation initiated by Skyworks Solutions, Inc. and its affiliates, claiming patent infringement related to specific RF front-end modules (FEMS) [2][3]. - Skyworks filed a lawsuit in May 2024 against 康希通信科技 (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and GRAND CHIP LABS, INC. for patent infringement, which led to the initiation of the ITC investigation in July 2024 [2][3]. Group 2: Preliminary Ruling Results - On January 24, 2026, the ITC administrative judge issued a preliminary ruling stating that 康希通信科技 (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and GRAND CHIP LABS, INC. did not infringe on two of Skyworks' patents (US 9,917,563 and US 8,717,101) [4]. - Three other patents (US 9,450,579, US 9,148,194, and US 7,409,200) were withdrawn by Skyworks during the evidence disclosure phase, leading to their termination in the investigation [4][5]. Group 3: Company Response and Impact - The company emphasizes its commitment to intellectual property management and protection, maintaining a complete intellectual property system and conducting thorough IP checks before technology implementation [6][7]. - The favorable preliminary ruling is seen as a significant legal support for the company's product exports to the U.S. market, although both parties retain the right to request a review within the statutory period [7].

广州老鸟智能科技有限公司、东莞市比高德智能科技有限公司、深圳乐行天下科技有限公司、深圳市金 丛智能科技有限公司、广州极动态智能设备有限公司为列名被告。 人民财讯1月22日电，据中国贸易救济信息网消息，2026年1月21日，美国Inventist, Inc.、美国Alien Technology Group, Inc. d/b/a Alien Rides根据《美国1930年关税法》第337节规定向美国际贸易委员会提 出申请，主张对美出口、在美进口及销售的特定陀螺稳定电动独轮车及其组件和下游产品违反了美国 337条款。 ...