Core Viewpoint - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated a Section 337 investigation into certain electronic eyewear products and their components, following a complaint from Ingeniospec, LLC regarding patent infringement [1] Group 1: Investigation Details - The ITC's investigation is identified by the code 337-TA-1455 and was voted on July 8 [1] - The complaint was filed by Ingeniospec, LLC based in San Jose, California, on June 17, 2025 [1] - The investigation concerns alleged violations of U.S. patent numbers 10,310,296 and 12,078,870 related to the import and sale of these products in the U.S. [1] Group 2: Legal Actions Requested - Ingeniospec, LLC has requested the ITC to issue a limited exclusion order and a cease-and-desist order against the infringing products [1]

Group 1 - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced a partial final ruling on June 20, 2024, regarding certain sensors with pixels and their downstream products, terminating the investigation based on a settlement [1] - The ITC initiated the 337 investigation on May 31, 2024, following a complaint from SiOnyx, LLC, alleging patent infringement related to specific registered patents [1] - The patents in question include U.S. Patent Nos. 9,064,764, 9,905,599, 10,224,359, 11,069,737, and 11,721,714, with SiOnyx requesting limited exclusion and cease-and-desist orders [1] Group 2 - Samsung Electronics, along with its subsidiaries in the U.S., is named as a defendant in the investigation [2]

Core Points - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has initiated a Section 337 investigation into certain Wi-Fi routers, devices, mesh Wi-Fi network devices, and their components due to alleged patent infringements [1] - The investigation was prompted by a complaint filed by Estelgia, LLC, claiming violations of multiple U.S. registered patents [1] - The defendants in this case include companies such as ASUStek Computer Inc., D-Link Corporation, and Linksys Holdings, among others [2] Investigation Details - The investigation was officially launched on June 17, following a complaint submitted on May 16, 2025 [1] - The ITC is required to determine the end date of the investigation within 45 days of the case being filed [2] - Any relief orders issued by the ITC in Section 337 cases take effect on the day of issuance and become final 60 days thereafter, unless vetoed by the U.S. Trade Representative for policy reasons [2]

Group 1 - IngenioSpec, LLC has filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, alleging that certain electronic eyewear products and their components violate U.S. regulations [1] - The complaint specifically targets the export, import, and sale of certain electronic eyewear products and related charging apparatuses [1] Group 2 - Multiple companies have been named as defendants in the complaint, including Brilliant Labs Limited, SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd., Even Realities Ltd., and several others from China and Singapore [2] - The list of defendants includes companies involved in technology and electronics, indicating a broad scope of potential impact on the industry [2]

Group 1 - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issued a final ruling on May 28, 2025, terminating the investigation against specific crafting machines and their components, including companies from China [1] - The ITC decided not to review the initial ruling made on April 30, 2025, which involved several Chinese companies, including Hunan Sijiu Technology and Guangdong Rongtu Technology [1] - The investigation was initiated based on a complaint from Cricut, Inc. regarding patent infringements related to multiple U.S. registered patents [3] Group 2 - The ITC extended the investigation period to May 13, 2026, for additional defendants, including HK Sijiu International Share Co. and a U.S. registered design [2] - The ITC also terminated investigations based on withdrawals and consent orders for other companies, including SainStore Technology and Hunan Sijiu Electronic Technology [2][4] - The companies listed as defendants include Hunan Sijiu Technology, Guangdong Rongtu Technology, and several others from China [4]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced a review of a previous ruling regarding liquid coolers used in computer electronic components, focusing on patent validity and infringement issues [1] Summary by Relevant Sections Legal Proceedings - The ITC decided to review the initial ruling made by the administrative law judge on March 21, 2025, concerning the invalidity of U.S. patents 10,509,494 and 11,061,414 [1] - The review will assess whether the complainant meets the technical and economic criteria for domestic industry status in the U.S. [1] Recommendations and Public Input - The ITC suggested remedies including a general exclusion order and a cease-and-desist order [1] - Interested government agencies and individuals are invited to submit written comments regarding the review and suggested remedies by June 2, 2025 [1]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has voted to initiate a Section 337 investigation into specific balloon dilation devices, systems, and their components, following a complaint from Entellus Medical, Inc. and Stryker Corporation regarding violations of U.S. trade laws [1] Group 1 - The investigation is identified by the code 337-TA-1449 and involves claims against German companies Fiagon GmbH, Fiagon AG Medical Technologies, and their U.S. affiliates [1] - The ITC is required to determine the conclusion of the investigation within 45 days of the filing [1] - Any relief orders issued by the ITC in Section 337 cases become effective on the date of issuance and have a final effect 60 days after the issuance, unless vetoed by the U.S. Trade Representative for policy reasons [1]

美国国际贸易委员会将于立案后45天内确定调查结束期。除美国贸易代表基于政策原因否决的情况外， 美国国际贸易委员会在337案件中发布的救济令自发布之日生效并于发布之日后的第60日起具有终局效 力。 美国NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, Calif.、美国Qualcomm Incorporated, San Diego, Calif.、中国广东 OnePlus Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China、英国Nothing Technology Limited, London, United Kingdom为列名被告。 据中国贸易救济信息网消息，2025年5月20日，美国国际贸易委员会（ITC）投票决定对特定集成电 路、包含该集成电路的电子设备及其组件（Certain Integrated Circuits, Electronic Devices Containing the Same, and Components Thereof）启动337调查（调查编码：337-TA-1450）。 2025年4月18日，美国Onesta I ...

Core Viewpoint - Epson companies have filed a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission, alleging that certain ink cartridges and components imported and sold in the U.S. violate Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 [1]. Group 1: Companies Involved - The complaint was filed by Epson Portland Inc., Epson America, Inc., and Seiko Epson Corporation [1]. - A list of defendants includes multiple companies from China and Hong Kong, such as Dongguan Ocbestjet Digital Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen Hongxinyuan ECommerce Co., Ltd., and Zhuhai Zhenyang Electronics Co., Ltd. [2]. Group 2: Legal Context - The complaint is based on Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, which addresses unfair practices in import trade [1]. - The focus is on specific ink cartridges and their components that are allegedly infringing on U.S. trade laws [1].

2025年5月13日，美国国际贸易委员会(ITC)投票决定对特定具有视频功能的笔记本电脑、台式计算机、 手持式计算机、平板电脑、电视、投影仪及其组件和模块启动337调查(调查编码：337-TA-1448)。美国 Acer America Corporation of San Jose,CA、中国台湾地区Acer Inc.of Taiwan、中国台湾地区ASUSTeK Computer Inc.of Taiwan、美国ASUS Computer International of Fremont,CA、中国山东Hisense Co.,Ltd.of China海信集团有限公司、美国Hisense USA Corporation of Suwanee,GA、美国Hisense Electronics Manufacturing Company of America Corporation of Suwanee,GA为列名被告。(中国贸易救济信息网) ...