Core Viewpoint - The arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro by the U.S. military has not shaken the foundations of his regime, as key supporters remain in power and the situation is still uncertain [2][4][5]. Group 1: Political Situation - Despite Maduro's arrest, the core pillars supporting his government, including the Defense Minister and Interior Minister, are still in control [2][4]. - The Interior Minister, Diosdado Cabello, is viewed as a key executor of Maduro's policies and has publicly displayed a strong stance against opposition [2][3]. - The short-term critical issues include who controls key infrastructure and the actual security situation, which will provide important clues about the direction of the crisis [4]. Group 2: International Reactions - The international community has mixed reactions to Trump's actions; while some Latin American governments do not recognize Maduro's 2024 election results, Mexico condemned the military action as a violation of international law [6]. - Allies of Trump, such as Argentine President Javier Milei, praised the arrest, while countries like China, Russia, and Iran condemned it [6]. - The EU has maintained a cautious stance, emphasizing the need to respect international law and calling for a peaceful transition [6].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the U.S. military operation in Venezuela, focusing on the potential appointment of Marco Rubio as the "governor" of Venezuela and the historical context of such a title in U.S. foreign policy [4][7][19]. Group 1: U.S. Military Action and Political Implications - The U.S. military operation successfully captured Venezuelan President Maduro, leading to discussions about U.S. "management" of Venezuela, with Rubio as a potential key figure [4][9]. - Rubio's long-standing commitment to regime change in Venezuela is highlighted, emphasizing his personal motivations tied to his Cuban heritage and political career [7][9]. - The U.S. faces a dilemma in balancing its desire for control over Venezuela while avoiding the negative connotations of colonialism and adhering to international law [11][18]. Group 2: Historical Context of "Governor" in U.S. Policy - The term "governor" has historical roots in U.S. colonial practices, where territories were managed by appointed governors, contrasting with the current situation in Venezuela, which is a recognized sovereign nation [13][16]. - Historical examples, such as Puerto Rico and American Samoa, illustrate the evolution from direct governance to self-rule, which is not applicable to Venezuela's situation [14][16]. - The article outlines significant differences between U.S. territories and Venezuela, including legal foundations, governance evolution, international reactions, and potential outcomes of intervention [16][18]. Group 3: Challenges to Rubio's Potential Appointment - The article identifies three major obstacles to Rubio's appointment as "governor": international law opposition, domestic skepticism within the U.S. government, and the complex internal situation in Venezuela [22][23]. - International condemnation of U.S. actions could lead to significant diplomatic isolation for the U.S. if it attempts to impose a "governor" on Venezuela [22]. - The internal resistance from Venezuelan military and militia groups complicates any potential governance structure that Rubio might attempt to establish [23]. Group 4: Economic Motivations Behind U.S. Intervention - The core motivation for U.S. intervention in Venezuela revolves around its vast oil reserves, with the U.S. aiming to control Venezuelan oil assets amidst the country's economic decline [26][29]. - Rubio's role in managing Venezuela's oil resources positions him as a key player in influencing the political landscape, allowing the U.S. to exert control without direct governance [29]. - The article suggests that this approach represents a new form of "informal empire," where economic influence replaces traditional administrative control [29][31].

（原标题：马杜罗称不认罪，中方表态） 来源：北京日报 1月6日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。 彭博社记者提问，对于美国的指控，委内瑞拉总统马杜罗表示不认罪。他说，"我在加拉加斯的家中被 绑架""我是无辜的，我无罪""我仍然是委内瑞拉总统"。中方对此有何评论？ 毛宁表示，美方无视委内瑞拉总统马杜罗的国家元首身份，公然在国内法院起诉并进行所谓审判，严重 侵犯委内瑞拉的国家主权，严重破坏国际关系的稳定。任何国家都不能将本国的规则凌驾于国际法之 上。中方呼吁美方立即释放马杜罗总统和夫人，并确保他们的人身安全。 马杜罗对美国指控表示不认罪，中方表态 ...

Core Viewpoint - The United Nations Human Rights Office spokesperson criticized the United States for its interference in Venezuela, stating it violates Venezuela's sovereignty and international law, thereby undermining global security [1] Group 1: U.S. Actions in Venezuela - The U.S. military actions in Venezuela have raised significant concerns from the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, highlighting the violation of a fundamental principle of international law regarding the use of force against a nation's territorial integrity [1] - The spokesperson emphasized that the U.S. actions send a dangerous signal that power can act without restraint, which weakens mechanisms designed to prevent further conflicts and potential global wars, such as the United Nations [1] Group 2: Call for International Response - There is a call for the international community to remain vigilant regarding the situation, with a unified stance to defend the UN Charter and international law [1] - The spokesperson urged all nations to collectively oppose actions that violate international law, reinforcing the need for global cooperation to maintain peace and security [1]

【环球网报道】据全日本新闻网报道，关于美国对委内瑞拉的军事行动，日本内阁官房长官木原稔在1月6日记者会上受到连番追问。面对记者尖 锐提问，木原稔躲闪回避，声称"我国不是直接当事人"，不对美国行动做出评价。 木原稔回答说，"总体而言，包括联合国宪章在内的国际法应得到尊重。但针对本次事件，我国不是直接当事人，且不能够充分了解真实情况，所 以对于'从法理角度如何评价'等，（日本政府）不做置评。" 美军3日凌晨对委内瑞拉发动军事打击，强行抓走总统马杜罗及其夫人。日本首相高市早苗就此事件发表声明，却对如何评价美国行动闭口不谈， 声明内文甚至未提及美国。日本政府的态度被批"双标"，受到日本舆论强烈抨击。 在美军行动后的首次内阁官房长官记者会上，木原稔受到记者关于此次行动的连番追问。有记者问到，"联合国安理会5日就委内瑞拉局势举行紧 急会议。多国谴责美国违反国际法。日本政府如何看待作为安理会常任理事国的美国被指违反国际法？"对于该提问，木原稔依旧避重就轻，声 称"不对他国发言逐一做出评论"，随后转移话题，谈及"保护当地日本侨民"、"为稳定当地局势做外交努力"等等。 还有记者问到，"在本次事件中，美国动用军队将马杜罗抓到美国 ...

西班牙外交大臣阿尔瓦雷斯5日指责美国对委内瑞拉的军事行动"违反国际法"，认为美国此举"为未来树 立了一个非常危险的先例"。他强调，和平与民主应始终建立在尊重他国主权的基础之上。 南非国际关系与合作部长拉莫拉5日表示，美国此举违反《联合国宪章》，严重侵犯委内瑞拉主权与领 土完整，破坏了国际关系基本准则。国际社会绝不能重蹈"强权即公理"的覆辙。 印度尼西亚外交部4日晚发表声明，指出此类行为有可能在国际关系中树立危险先例，并破坏地区稳 定、和平以及主权和外交原则。声明表示，国际社会必须尊重委内瑞拉人民行使自身主权、决定自身发 展道路和未来的权利与意愿。 欧盟对外行动署4日发表声明，强调国际法和《联合国宪章》原则是国际安全架构的重要支柱，无论在 何种情况下各方都必须遵守。欧盟尊重委内瑞拉主权。 新华社北京1月6日电 综合新华社驻外记者报道：美军3日凌晨对委内瑞拉发动大规模军事打击，强行 控制委总统马杜罗夫妇并将他们带到美国。国际社会近日纷纷谴责美国此举严重侵犯委内瑞拉的主权与 领土完整。 西非国家经济共同体4日发表声明，重申对委内瑞拉人民的声援，敦促各国尊重委内瑞拉的独立和领土 完整，并表示支持委内瑞拉人民通过包容性 ...

外交部发言人毛宁1月6日在例行记者会上答问时表示，美方无视委内瑞拉总统马杜罗国家元首身份，公 然在国内法院"起诉"并进行所谓"审判"，严重侵犯委内瑞拉国家主权，严重破坏国际关系稳定。 "任何国家都不能将本国的规则凌驾于国际法之上。中方呼吁美方立即释放马杜罗总统和夫人，并确保 他们的人身安全。"毛宁说。 （文章来源：中国新闻网） ...

一键追踪美国"闪击"委内瑞拉时间线： 据新华社报道，外交部发言人毛宁1月6日在例行记者会上答问时表示，美方无视委内瑞拉总统马杜罗国家元首身份，公然在国内法 院"起诉"并进行所谓"审判"，严重侵犯委内瑞拉国家主权，严重破坏国际关系稳定。 "任何国家都不能将本国的规则凌驾于国际法之上。中方呼吁美方立即释放马杜罗总统和夫人，并确保他们的人身安全。"毛宁说。 来源丨新华社 编辑 | 曾静娇 见习编辑林芊蔚 SFC 21君荐读 马杜罗首次出庭：我是被绑架的，我无罪 特朗普：美国将深度介入委内瑞拉 委内瑞拉下令搜捕美国侵略支持者 ...

外交部发言人毛宁1月6日在例行记者会上答问时表示，美方无视委内瑞拉总统马杜罗国家元首身份， 公然在国内法院"起诉"并进行所谓"审判"，严重侵犯委内瑞拉国家主权，严重破坏国际关系稳定。 来源｜新华社 编辑 ｜心一 "任何国家都不能将本国的规则凌驾于国际法之上。中方呼吁美方立即释放马杜罗总统和夫人，并确保 他们的人身安全。"毛宁说。 ...

1月6日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。彭博社记者提问，对于美国的指控，委内瑞拉总统马杜罗 表示不认罪，他说，"我在加拉加斯的家中被绑架""我是无辜的，我无罪""我仍然是委内瑞拉总统"。中 方对此有何评论？ 毛宁表示，美方无视委内瑞拉总统马杜罗的国家元首身份，公然在国内法院起诉并进行所谓审判，严重 侵犯委内瑞拉的国家主权，严重破坏国际关系的稳定。任何国家都不能将本国的规则凌驾于国际法之 上。中方呼吁美方立即释放马杜罗总统和夫人，并确保他们的人身安全。 智通财经记者 杨文钦 朱郑勇 1月6日，外交部发言人毛宁主持例行记者会。彭博社记者提问，对于美国的指控，委内瑞拉总统马杜罗 表示不认罪，他说，"我在加拉加斯的家中被绑架""我是无辜的，我无罪""我仍然是委内瑞拉总统"。中 方对此有何评论？ 毛宁表示，美方无视委内瑞拉总统马杜罗的国家元首身份，公然在国内法院起诉并进行所谓审判，严重 侵犯委内瑞拉的国家主权，严重破坏国际关系的稳定。任何国家都不能将本国的规则凌驾于国际法之 上。中方呼吁美方立即释放马杜罗总统和夫人，并确保他们的人身安全。 智通财经记者 杨文钦 朱郑勇 ...