Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of a stable and effective institutional system for the construction of the Party's good conduct, which has been continuously improved since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China [1] - The implementation of the Central Eight Regulations and the focus on combating the "Four Winds" (formalism, bureaucratism, hedonism, and extravagance) are key components of the Party's internal regulations [1][2] - The Party has established a series of regulations and documents to address the new manifestations of formalism and bureaucratism, which are characterized by concealment and technicality [2][3] Group 2 - The evaluation of leadership effectiveness includes loyalty to responsibilities, courage to take action, and the ability to maintain the interests of the masses [3][4] - The Party emphasizes the need to reduce burdens on grassroots levels, which is crucial for enhancing governance efficiency [4][5] - The Party's commitment to frugality and opposition to extravagance is reinforced through strict adherence to regulations regarding gifts and hospitality [5][6] Group 3 - The Party has implemented strict regulations to combat corruption related to improper dining and entertainment practices, which are seen as breeding grounds for corruption [6][7] - The focus on controlling the construction of government buildings reflects a commitment to using limited resources effectively for public welfare rather than ostentation [7][8] - The Party aims to transform institutional constraints into internal recognition and behavioral consciousness among all members [7]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of addressing public grievances and the responsibility of the government to respond to the needs of the people, as highlighted by the complaint from Mr. Yuan regarding unpaid project funds [1][2] - The incident reflects a typical manifestation of formalism and bureaucratic attitudes within government, showcasing a lack of service awareness and a negligent work style among certain officials, which erodes public trust and damages the relationship between the government and the people [1][2] - Following the exposure of the incident, local authorities took swift action by suspending involved personnel, initiating self-examination of government conduct, and facilitating a payment agreement to settle the owed funds by the end of the year, demonstrating a commitment to rectify the situation [1][2] Group 2 - Continuous improvement in work style is essential, with a focus on enhancing team building within government departments to ensure officials are genuinely accountable to the public and actively serve their needs [2] - There is a call for proactive measures rather than relying solely on media exposure to address issues, advocating for optimized workflows and clear feedback mechanisms for public grievances [2] - The establishment of a "proactive handling" mechanism is suggested, utilizing data analysis to identify public concerns and potential risks, thereby transforming reactive responses into proactive solutions [2]

Group 1 - The article highlights the issue of empty rhetoric and formalism among some officials, emphasizing the need for genuine communication with the public [1][2] - It points out that some officials prioritize their status over serving the public, leading to a disconnect between their statements and the actual needs of the people [1] - The article mentions a specific case where a local party secretary held 208 meetings in a year, yet the feedback from grassroots officials indicated that these meetings were filled with empty talk and lacked actionable content [1] Group 2 - The article discusses the attitude problem among some officials who prefer to act as mere transmitters of information rather than taking responsibility for real issues [2] - It identifies the root cause of empty rhetoric as a manifestation of formalism and bureaucratism, suggesting that effective communication should stem from practical engagement with the community [2] - The article advocates for a shift from empty words to practical solutions, emphasizing that understanding the public's needs will lead to more credible and supportive communication [2]

习近平总书记曾指出一些党员干部在调查研究中存在的问题："有的下基层调研走马观花，下去就是为 了出出镜、露露脸，坐在车上转，隔着玻璃看，只看'门面'和'窗口'，不看'后院'和'角落'，群众说是'调 查研究隔层纸，政策执行隔座山'。"无论是调研还是考核，都应该深入群众，看群众的难题解决了没 有，群众的生活改善了没有；都应该深入一线，把关注的重点放在实绩实效上，看相关地方和部门做了 哪些工作。人到心不到，"蜻蜓点水"式查阅资料，不求甚解听取汇报后打道回府，无法掌握基层真实情 况与群众内心诉求。 前段时间，河南省纪委监委公开通报6起违反中央八项规定精神典型问题。其中，宁陵县委原常委、宣 传部长，县政府原副县长王东霞在任某镇党委书记期间，为应付人居环境治理工作检查，花费财政资金 249.62万元打造"经典观摩路线"，对沿线21个行政村共计40多万平方米墙体喷漆刷白。 这一"刷白墙"事件，并非首例。此前，安徽省阜南县郜台乡在脱贫攻坚期间"刷白墙"被曝光，新疆和静 县委原书记刘克文在农村道路两侧"刷白墙"被点名通报。"刷白墙"为何禁而不止？ "刷白墙"是典型的面子工程，其目的是应付考核、调研，往往华而不实、劳民伤财，会损害 ...

Group 1 - The revised regulations on frugality and opposition to waste by party and government agencies emphasize the prohibition of superficial learning exchanges and inspections without substantial content, reflecting a strong commitment from the central government to combat formalism and address the chaos in research and investigation [1] - The article highlights that effective research should focus on solving real problems rather than merely fulfilling quotas or showcasing large-scale inspections, which can lead to wasted resources and diminished public trust [1][2] - It is essential to adopt a practical approach to research, engaging directly with various stakeholders to gather comprehensive insights, thereby avoiding superficial assessments [2] Group 2 - The fundamental purpose of research is to solve problems, and there is a need to establish a closed-loop mechanism for discovering, analyzing, solving, and providing feedback on issues, transforming research outcomes into actionable policies [2] - The implementation of the central eight regulations is currently being promoted across the party, with a focus on improving research practices as the first directive, emphasizing the importance of genuine engagement in the field [2]

Group 1 - The article highlights the ongoing efforts by the Jilin Provincial Discipline Inspection Commission to combat formalism and bureaucratism within local government, emphasizing the need for accountability among officials [1][2][3][4] - Four specific cases of misconduct are detailed, showcasing various forms of mismanagement and corruption among local officials, including extravagant spending on unnecessary projects and neglect of public concerns [1][2][3] - The cases involve significant financial implications, such as the doubling of project costs and the burden of debt from poorly conceived initiatives, which have led to severe fiscal strain on local governments [2][3] Group 2 - The first case involves Li Deming, who oversaw a costly public restroom project that exceeded budget by over 100%, disregarding local economic conditions [1] - The second case features Zeng Haiyang, who initiated a financially unsustainable deer industry project, resulting in long-term losses and a heavy fiscal burden [2] - The third case discusses Yu Fengxiang's mismanagement in the disposal of infected timber, leading to extensive ecological damage and legal repercussions [3] - The final case addresses the inaction of the Nong'an County government in responding to public grievances, resulting in significant public discontent and disciplinary actions against 25 officials [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article reports on the national situation regarding violations of the Central Eight Regulations, highlighting the number of cases and disciplinary actions taken in April this year [2]. Summary by Relevant Sections - In April, a total of 18,845 cases of violations of the Central Eight Regulations were investigated, resulting in 24,559 individuals being criticized or dealt with, including 100 officials at the provincial and ministerial level and 1,113 at the county and department level [2]. - Among the violations, 9,658 cases were related to formalism and bureaucratism, with 12,845 individuals receiving criticism or disciplinary actions. The most significant issues involved a lack of responsibility and action in economic and environmental protection, with 8,329 cases reported [2]. - Additionally, 9,187 cases of hedonism and extravagance were addressed, affecting 11,714 individuals. Specific violations included 5,097 cases of accepting valuable gifts and cash, 1,149 cases of improper allowances or benefits, and 1,853 cases of inappropriate dining [2].

Group 1 - The meeting emphasized the importance of the Central Eight Regulations and the achievements made since the 18th National Congress, attributing success to the leadership of Xi Jinping and the guidance of Xi Jinping's Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era [1][2] - It was highlighted that addressing the "Four Winds" issues is crucial for deepening the education on the Central Eight Regulations, advocating for a comprehensive approach to reduce bureaucratic burdens at the grassroots level [1][2] - The meeting called for leaders at all levels to take responsibility in promoting the learning and implementation of the Central Eight Regulations, ensuring that the political responsibilities are met with higher standards and practical measures [2] Group 2 - The meeting underscored the need for political guidance through Xi Jinping's Thought, aiming to unify various political parties and groups within the People's Political Consultative Conference (PPCC) to ensure political steadfastness [2] - It was stressed that the focus should be on practical and beneficial discussions that align with the provincial decision-making, contributing to the modernization efforts in Shaanxi [2]

同日，在辽宁全省警示教育会上，与会人员集中观看的警示教育片聚焦风腐交织这一现阶段党风廉政建 设和反腐败斗争要着力解决的突出问题，深刻剖析该省查处的违反中央八项规定精神和由风及腐典型案 例，让党员干部从中得到警醒、受到教育。 形式主义、官僚主义是党和国家事业发展的大敌，多地警示教育会明确提出，力戒形式主义、官僚主 义。甘肃省委主要负责同志强调，坚持问题导向，持续整治形式主义为基层减负，深入推进群众身边不 正之风和腐败问题集中整治，以"同查"严惩风腐交织问题，以"同治"铲除风腐共性根源。辽宁全省警示 教育会明确要求党员干部以真抓实干的工作作风勇于担当作为，深入落实《整治形式主义为基层减负若 干规定》，切实把基层负担减下来、效能提上去。 "前车之覆，后车之鉴。"各地把警示教育作为一体推进不敢腐、不能腐、不想腐的重要一环，推动吸取 教训，以案促改促治。 中央纪委国家监委网站 曹俊明 徐菱骏 近期，全国多地召开警示教育会，运用由风及腐案例教育引导党员干部深刻反思、警钟长鸣，切实从中 受警醒、明底线、知敬畏，推动深入贯彻中央八项规定精神学习教育走深走实。 集体观看警示教育片、通报查处的违反中央八项规定精神问题典型案例，是 ...

Group 1 - The central government has publicly reported on 10 typical violations of the Central Eight Regulations, highlighting issues such as blindly introducing "characteristic town" projects that do not align with local development, leading to project failures [1] - There is a strong emphasis on the need to combat formalism and bureaucratism, as these practices lead to wasted resources and increased burdens on grassroots levels [1][2] - Xi Jinping has stressed the importance of practical work and the need to focus on real results rather than superficial achievements, advocating for a pragmatic approach to governance [2][4] Group 2 - The article illustrates examples of exemplary local leaders who prioritize practical work and community engagement, demonstrating the effectiveness of a hands-on approach in achieving tangible results [3] - It is noted that successful governance requires a commitment to real outcomes, with a call for officials to place public interests above personal gains and to avoid the pitfalls of formalism [4] - The philosophical perspective presented emphasizes that true success in any endeavor relies on substantial effort rather than mere formalities, reinforcing the idea that practical results are paramount in governance [4]