同日，在辽宁全省警示教育会上，与会人员集中观看的警示教育片聚焦风腐交织这一现阶段党风廉政建 设和反腐败斗争要着力解决的突出问题，深刻剖析该省查处的违反中央八项规定精神和由风及腐典型案 例，让党员干部从中得到警醒、受到教育。 形式主义、官僚主义是党和国家事业发展的大敌，多地警示教育会明确提出，力戒形式主义、官僚主 义。甘肃省委主要负责同志强调，坚持问题导向，持续整治形式主义为基层减负，深入推进群众身边不 正之风和腐败问题集中整治，以"同查"严惩风腐交织问题，以"同治"铲除风腐共性根源。辽宁全省警示 教育会明确要求党员干部以真抓实干的工作作风勇于担当作为，深入落实《整治形式主义为基层减负若 干规定》，切实把基层负担减下来、效能提上去。 "前车之覆，后车之鉴。"各地把警示教育作为一体推进不敢腐、不能腐、不想腐的重要一环，推动吸取 教训，以案促改促治。 中央纪委国家监委网站 曹俊明 徐菱骏 近期，全国多地召开警示教育会，运用由风及腐案例教育引导党员干部深刻反思、警钟长鸣，切实从中 受警醒、明底线、知敬畏，推动深入贯彻中央八项规定精神学习教育走深走实。 集体观看警示教育片、通报查处的违反中央八项规定精神问题典型案例，是 ...

Group 1 - The central government has publicly reported on 10 typical violations of the Central Eight Regulations, highlighting issues such as blindly introducing "characteristic town" projects that do not align with local development, leading to project failures [1] - There is a strong emphasis on the need to combat formalism and bureaucratism, as these practices lead to wasted resources and increased burdens on grassroots levels [1][2] - Xi Jinping has stressed the importance of practical work and the need to focus on real results rather than superficial achievements, advocating for a pragmatic approach to governance [2][4] Group 2 - The article illustrates examples of exemplary local leaders who prioritize practical work and community engagement, demonstrating the effectiveness of a hands-on approach in achieving tangible results [3] - It is noted that successful governance requires a commitment to real outcomes, with a call for officials to place public interests above personal gains and to avoid the pitfalls of formalism [4] - The philosophical perspective presented emphasizes that true success in any endeavor relies on substantial effort rather than mere formalities, reinforcing the idea that practical results are paramount in governance [4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of addressing superficial rectification in ecological and environmental protection inspections, highlighting the persistence of issues due to formalism and ineffective measures [1][2] - There is a need for a problem-oriented approach to ensure effective resolution of environmental issues, moving beyond mere surface-level actions [1] - Strengthening the use of inspection results in the management of officials is crucial, linking these results to performance evaluations and promotions to encourage genuine efforts rather than superficial compliance [1] Group 2 - The newly issued "Regulations on Ecological and Environmental Protection Inspections" includes a dedicated chapter on rectification, promoting systematic and clear management of rectification tasks [2] - Establishing a dynamic tracking mechanism using digital platforms for real-time monitoring of rectification progress is essential to avoid "last-minute fixes" and "material-based rectification" [2] - Emphasizing the role of technology in supervision, such as satellite remote sensing and big data analysis, can help identify gaps and weak points in rectification efforts [2] Group 3 - Encouraging public participation in the rectification process is vital, with a focus on transparency and accountability through timely disclosure of rectification plans and results [3] - Setting up reporting platforms for citizens to provide effective leads and rewarding them can enhance community involvement in supervision [3] - Supporting NGOs, media, and volunteers in the oversight process fosters a collaborative governance model among the government, enterprises, and the public [3]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of implementing the Central Eight Regulations to strengthen the party's governance and maintain public trust, while acknowledging the persistent issues of formalism and bureaucratism among party members and officials [1] - A case study involving a party member, Fan, highlights the failure to enforce environmental regulations despite multiple complaints from the public regarding pollution from a local sand washing factory, illustrating a lack of accountability and effective action [2][3] - There are differing opinions on how to classify Fan's actions, with one view suggesting a violation of work discipline and another advocating for a classification of formalism and bureaucratism due to neglecting public interests [3][4] Group 2 - The distinction between violations of public discipline and work discipline is crucial, as public discipline directly relates to the party's connection with the people and the protection of their interests [4][5] - The criteria for determining violations of public discipline include the nature of the work, subjective awareness of the issues, objective performance, and the impact on public sentiment and interests [5][6] - Fan's behavior is characterized as formalism and bureaucratism, as he failed to take substantive action in response to public complaints, reflecting a distorted sense of responsibility and a lack of genuine engagement with community concerns [6][7]

(责编：岳弘彬、牛镛) 今年的《政府工作报告》提出，政府要寓管理于服务之中，用服务的暖心增强企业的信心。就调研情况 来看，企业对行政检查并不排斥，反而表示"非常希望执法部门能够指导帮助补齐短板、排除隐患"。这 就要求党员干部把以人民为中心的发展思想落细落实，转变工作作风，想方设法为企业提供问题清单与 解决方案，让企业真切感受到"监管有温度、服务零距离"。 企业和群众判断一个地区营商环境好坏，最直接的就是看这个地区党员干部的作风如何，是不是把党中 央关于涉企决策部署落到实处，是不是真正为企业排忧解难。优化营商环境，不是嘴上说说就行，而要 在企业遇到困难和问题时积极作为、靠前服务。当前，全党正在开展深入贯彻中央八项规定精神学习教 育，广大党员干部要以此为契机，走好新时代党的群众路线，以作风建设新成效为优化营商环境注入新 气象。 （摘编自《中国纪检监察报》） 《 人民日报 》（ 2025年05月21日 05 版） 笔者在基层调研了解到，一些地方职能部门在开展涉企行政检查时，只列出问题清单，对整改措施等不 予指导，让企业自己想办法整改。当地纪委监委及时对相关单位主要负责人进行提醒谈话，责令举一反 三整改，改进工作作风 ...

不仅如此，搞弄虚作假，本质上属于形式主义、官僚主义，有关公职人员还应受到政务、党纪处分。根 据政务处分法，工作中有形式主义、官僚主义行为，或有弄虚作假、误导、欺骗行为，造成不良后果或 者影响的，予以警告、记过或者记大过；情节较重的，予以降级或者撤职；情节严重的，予以开除。根 据党纪处分条例，搞形式主义、官僚主义，造成严重损害或者严重不良影响的，也给予相应处分。 据央视财经报道，在湖南湘潭市雨湖区长城乡的黑家湾社区，一块永久基本农田却被建筑垃圾覆盖，无 法耕种。2024年11月，当地媒体曝光后，乡政府曾表示立即落实整改措施。然而所谓的整改，只是进行 了简单覆土，建筑垃圾清运工作并未开展。存在问题的地方，还不仅是区区一个黑家湾社区。据报道， 江西萍乡市也存在类似情况，原本要整改的"渣山"，时隔一年后，反而在"生长"。 整改不动的垃圾山，践踏了法纪的权威，也折射出形式主义、官僚主义的扭曲影子。央视报道后，5月 19日，萍乡市生态环境保护委员会公开通报称，市委、市政府高度重视，成立联合调查组对报道反映的 问题调查处理。期待其他被曝光的地方，也能引起应有的震动，有关部门迅速展开调查。受到破坏的基 本农田，固然要恢复生态 ...

对一些地方领导来说，搞不切实际的集中开工、集中签约已经形成彰显政绩的习惯性方式，这种习惯必 须改变。 4月27日，中央层面整治形式主义为基层减负专项工作机制办公室会同中央纪委办公厅，对3起整治形式 主义为基层减负典型问题进行通报。其中包括北方某省的一些地方在项目集中开工、集中签约中盲目攀 比，数据不实问题。 5月8日，人民日报评论版又以文章摘编的形式对此现象进行了批评。 根据通报，近年来，该省一些地方在重大项目集中开工中，多个项目反复开工。某市高新区2025年春季 集中开工的35个项目中有6个为重复项目，个别县区单个项目反复开工3次。还有的县级市项目集中签约 名不符实，实际落地率严重偏低。部分基层干部群众和企业对项目集中开工、集中签约中的形式主义问 题反应比较强烈。 集中开工、集中签约是一种比较常见的现象，官方的出发点为了鼓舞士气、提高项目引进工作的精气 神。但很多集中开工、集中签约更多是出于彰显政绩的需要，是一种形式主义的表演。 这些项目真的需要集中开工吗？实际上每个项目进展各有不同，有的已经开工了；有的在论证阶段；还 有的八字一撇还在划，为了凑数目，也被"集中"了。这中间有多少真正开工的项目，其实存疑。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The publication of a flawed medical paper by two gynecologists from Fujian Provincial People's Hospital, which incorrectly reported a 64% male patient ratio in a study on endometriosis, highlights significant issues in academic integrity and the peer review process in the medical field [1] Group 1: Issues in Academic Integrity - The paper's blatant data fabrication contradicts medical knowledge, yet it was published in a journal without any scrutiny from editors or hospital personnel, indicating a failure in the peer review process [1] - The incident reflects a deeper problem of formalism in academic evaluation, where meeting basic formatting requirements may take precedence over the validity of the research [1] Group 2: Motivations Behind Academic Misconduct - The underlying motivation for such academic dishonesty is linked to unreasonable promotion mechanisms within the medical profession, where publishing papers is often prioritized over practical clinical experience [1] - A gray market has emerged around the publication of papers, driven by the need for professionals to meet publication quotas for career advancement [2] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - The National Health Commission has advocated for a reevaluation of assessment standards to eliminate the overemphasis on publications, encouraging healthcare workers to focus on frontline patient care [2] - Reforming the promotion system to align with industry practices could lead to a reduction in the publication of nonsensical papers, ultimately enhancing the quality of medical services and restoring public trust [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of balancing visible achievements with substantive results in governance, highlighting that true success lies in delivering tangible benefits to the community rather than superficial projects [1][2][3] - The article discusses the shift in the political landscape since the implementation of strict party governance, which has led to a reduction in formalism and an increase in grassroots engagement among party members [2][3] - It points out the negative consequences of "face projects," where resources are wasted on ostentatious displays rather than meaningful improvements, citing specific examples of excessive spending on non-essential projects [2][3] Group 2 - The article advocates for a pragmatic work style among party members, encouraging them to engage directly with the community to understand and address their needs effectively [3] - It stresses that the essence of party conduct is rooted in serving the people's interests, urging members to maintain a focus on practical outcomes rather than personal prestige [3] - The narrative concludes with a call for continuous self-reflection and adherence to the party's innovative theories to ensure that the focus remains on benefiting the populace, thereby earning genuine respect and reputation [3]