中國電動車 出口數據 藏著一個 驚天的騙局！ 你以為的 「出口暢旺」 很多都是假的！ 行業裡有個 不能說的秘密 叫零公里 二手車！ 操作手法 簡直是天才！ 第一步 新車剛下線 車廠自己買 自己上牌 偽裝成國內銷售 先騙到國家 一大筆補貼！ 第二步 這輛一公里都沒 開過的二手車 轉頭就出口海外 再賺一筆！ 一買一賣 一份業績 被算成兩份！ 數據膨脹 庫存也清掉了！ 有多誇張？ 業內人士估計 2024年出口的 所謂二手車裡 高達 90% 都是這種新車！ 所以北京這次 出手管制出口 根本不是 針對特斯拉 而是要親手 擠破這個巨大的 數據泡沫！ 一場內部大清洗 已經開始了！. ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing concerns regarding the effectiveness and integrity of influencer marketing in live-streaming sales, particularly focusing on the disparity between promised and actual sales outcomes, leading to dissatisfaction among merchants [1][2][3]. Group 1: Case Studies - A businessman in Heilongjiang paid 50,000 yuan as a "slot fee" to a popular influencer with millions of followers, expecting significant sales, but only one order was completed [1][2]. - Another case involved a merchant in Henan who was promised a minimum sale of 20,000 pairs of shoes but ended up selling only 58 pairs, which is less than 0.3% of the promised amount [2][3]. Group 2: Market Trends - Complaints related to live-streaming sales have surged, with the 12315 platform receiving 402,000 complaints in 2024, marking a 19.3% increase year-on-year, and complaints on short video platforms rising by 48.8% [2]. Group 3: Industry Practices - Many influencers and agencies exploit information asymmetry, leading to misleading data presentations that can deceive small merchants into signing unfavorable contracts [3][4]. - The article emphasizes that some influencers may inflate their follower counts and engagement metrics through artificial means, such as purchasing fake followers or using bots [3][5]. Group 4: Regulatory Environment - China's e-commerce law prohibits false advertising and misleading commercial practices, while the "Network Live Marketing Management Measures" specifically bans data manipulation in live-streaming [4][5]. - There is a call for improved regulatory measures to address industry malpractices, enhance data authenticity, and ensure that live-streaming platforms uphold integrity in their operations [5]. Group 5: Recommendations for Merchants - Merchants are advised to critically assess potential partners beyond just follower counts, focusing on past performance and customer feedback, and to clearly outline key contractual terms to mitigate risks [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing concerns regarding the effectiveness and reliability of influencer marketing in live-streaming sales, particularly focusing on the disparity between promised and actual sales outcomes, leading to dissatisfaction among small merchants [2][3][6]. Group 1: Issues Faced by Merchants - Merchants like Mr. Tao and Mr. Xue have experienced significant discrepancies between the sales promised by influencers and the actual sales achieved, with Mr. Tao only selling 1 unit despite a 50,000 yuan "placement fee" and Mr. Xue selling only 58 pairs of shoes against a promised 20,000 pairs [2][3]. - Influencers often evade accountability by claiming that contracts do not guarantee sales, which has led to frustration among merchants seeking refunds [6][9]. Group 2: Data Reliability Concerns - The article points out that many merchants are misled by seemingly impressive data presented by influencers, such as high follower counts and live viewer numbers, which may not reflect genuine engagement or sales [7][9]. - There are allegations that some influencers engage in practices like purchasing fake followers and manipulating live-stream data, which undermines the integrity of the marketing process [10][12]. Group 3: Regulatory and Industry Response - The increase in complaints related to live-streaming sales, with 402,000 reports in 2024, indicates a growing need for regulatory oversight in this sector [6]. - The article calls for improved regulations and enforcement against deceptive practices in influencer marketing, emphasizing the need for platforms to ensure data accuracy and transparency [10][12]. Group 4: Recommendations for Merchants - Merchants are advised to critically evaluate potential influencer partnerships, focusing on past performance and genuine user feedback rather than just follower counts [12]. - It is recommended that merchants clearly outline their rights and obligations in contracts to mitigate risks associated with verbal agreements [12].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing discontent among small merchants regarding the effectiveness and reliability of influencer marketing, particularly in live streaming sales, where promised sales figures often do not materialize, leading to financial losses for businesses [1][4][6]. Group 1: Case Studies of Merchants - A merchant in Heilongjiang paid 50,000 yuan as a "slot fee" to an influencer with millions of followers, expecting to sell 6,000 to 8,000 units of beer, but only one sale was made [1][4]. - Another merchant from Henan invested 50,000 yuan and prepared over one million yuan worth of inventory based on promises of selling 20,000 pairs of shoes, but only 58 pairs were sold, which is 0.3% of the promised amount [2][6]. Group 2: Complaints and Regulatory Response - Merchants are facing difficulties in obtaining refunds, as influencers' representatives claim that contracts do not guarantee sales volumes, leading to frustration among affected merchants [6][9]. - In 2024, the 12315 platform received 402,000 complaints related to live streaming sales, marking a 19.3% increase from the previous year, with complaints on short video platforms rising by 48.8% [6][10]. Group 3: Issues with Data Integrity - Many merchants are misled by seemingly impressive data presented by influencers, such as high online viewer counts and sales figures, which may not reflect actual performance due to potential data manipulation [7][9]. - The article emphasizes that some influencers may use purchased followers and artificial engagement tactics, leading to a significant disparity between reported and actual sales [7][10]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - The article calls for stricter regulations and oversight in the live streaming e-commerce sector to combat issues like false advertising and data manipulation, urging platforms to ensure data integrity [10][12]. - Merchants are advised to critically evaluate potential influencer partnerships, focusing on past performance and user reviews rather than just follower counts, and to clearly outline contractual terms to protect their interests [12].

Group 1 - The recent firing of the head of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics raises concerns about the politicization of data collection, particularly regarding the July CPI data [1] - There have been significant revisions to non-farm payroll data, with over 800,000 jobs being revised downward last year, indicating a pattern of over-reporting by approximately 60,000 jobs each month [1] - The non-farm payroll figures for June were revised from 147,000 to 14,000, and for May from 144,000 to 19,000, resulting in a total downward revision of 258,000 jobs over two months [1]

Group 1 - The core point of the news is the significant downward revision of U.S. non-farm employment data, which has shaken global markets and raised concerns about the reliability of economic statistics [1][3][5] - The U.S. Labor Department reported that July added only 73,000 jobs, the lowest in nine months, contradicting previous claims of a strong job market [3][5] - The revisions for May and June were drastic, with May's jobs adjusted from 144,000 to 19,000 and June's from 147,000 to 14,000, indicating a potential manipulation of data [3][5][9] Group 2 - The sudden drop in employment data has led to a reevaluation of the Federal Reserve's stance on interest rates, with calls for immediate rate cuts emerging [5][11] - The situation presents a unique opportunity for China to adjust its monetary policy in response to the changing global economic landscape [7][11] - Emerging markets are likely to reassess their monetary policies independently of the Federal Reserve, potentially breaking the dependency on the "dollar hegemony" [13][15]

Group 1 - The U.S. labor market data has been significantly revised downwards, with a total of 258,000 jobs disappearing from the non-farm payrolls over two months, indicating a potential systemic issue with the accuracy of employment statistics [2][4] - The U.S. government has a history of releasing favorable employment data to boost market confidence, only to later revise these figures downward, which has raised concerns about the integrity of the data [4][6] - The recent employment data revisions have led to negative implications for President Trump's administration, as he faces pressure to address the weak job numbers and has called for the dismissal of key economic officials [4][6] Group 2 - The job growth reported in June, which showed an increase of 147,000 jobs, was misleading as the majority of new positions were in government, education, and healthcare, while retail and manufacturing sectors showed little to no growth [6][7] - The current economic situation in the U.S. presents a dilemma for monetary policy, where both raising and lowering interest rates could lead to significant risks for the economy [6] - In the context of U.S.-China trade negotiations, the U.S. appears anxious and is employing various strategies, while China maintains a stable and patient approach, suggesting a potential delay tactic from the Chinese side [7]

Group 1 - The core point of the news is the significant market reaction to Trump's new tariff policy, which was initially touted as a way to reshape global trade but resulted in a market crash and negative economic indicators [1][3]. - Trump's administration announced tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on 12 economies, including China and the EU, with a specific 40% penalty on goods routed through third countries [1]. - Following the announcement, major U.S. stock indices experienced sharp declines, with the Dow Jones dropping 1.23%, Nasdaq falling 2.24%, and S&P 500 decreasing by 1.6%, indicating a widespread market sell-off [3]. Group 2 - The U.S. labor market data released showed a disappointing increase of only 73,000 jobs in July, significantly below the expected 100,000, and previous months' data were revised downwards, indicating a troubling trend [4]. - Trump's response to the market downturn included attacking Federal Reserve Chairman Powell and suggesting a lack of independence for the Fed, which raised concerns about the administration's approach to economic policy [4]. - The dismissal of the Labor Statistics Bureau director amid claims of manipulated data has sparked controversy, with critics arguing that this undermines the credibility of economic statistics and reflects a desperate attempt to shift blame for poor economic performance [7].