因日本中部电力公司在核电站重启审查中提供的材料存在数据造假行为，日本原子能规制委员会7日指责该公司恣意操纵数据，并决定 继续停止相关审查工作。 日本中部电力公司5日承认，为使其运营的滨冈核电站3号和4号机组通过审查重启，该公司涉嫌存在操纵相关数据、故意低估可能发生 的地震最大破坏力的行为。因收到数据造假的"外部通报"，日本原子能规制委员会已于2025年12月暂停相关审查工作。 来源：央视新闻客户端 End 欢迎分享给你的朋友！ 出品 | 中国能源报（c ne ne rgy） 责编丨李慧颖 日本监管机构指责电力公司核电站审查数据造假。 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 因日本中部电力公司在核电站重启审查中提供的材料存在数据造假行为，日本原子能规制委员会7日痛 斥该公司恣意操纵数据，并决定继续停止相关审查工作。 日本中部电力公司5日承认，为使其运营的滨冈核电站3号和4号机组通过审查重启，该公司涉嫌存在操 纵相关数据、故意低估可能发生的地震最大破坏力的行为。据日本共同社报道，该事件的曝光是由于日 本原子能规制委员会收到了"外部通报"，日本原子能规制委员会已于2025年12月开始暂停了相关审查工 作。 据日本媒体7日报道，日本原子能规制委员会在当天的例会上将中部电力公司的行为定义为恣意操纵数 据的不正当行为，决定不等中部电力公司设立的第三方委员会的调查结果而独立采取措施。 日本原子能规制委员会委员长山中伸介表示，这是与安全直接相关的审查数据的捏造事件，是很明显的 不正当行为，是极其严重和重大的事件。他说此次事件是对安全监管的"暴行"，使迄今为止的审查可靠 性受到质疑，因此审查有必要推倒重来。 来源：新华社 ...

日本中部电力公司1月5日召开记者会承认，为使其运营的滨冈核电站3号和4号机组通过 审查重启，该公司涉嫌存在操纵相关数据、故意低估可能发生的地震最大破坏力的行为。 去年2月，日本原子能规制委员会在接到外部举报后，启动了对中部电力公司相关行为的 调查。因为重要项目的判断依据存疑，规制委员会自去年12月起暂停了重启审查。 来源：央视新闻客户端 End 欢迎分享给你的朋友！ 出品 | 中国能源报（c n e n e rg y） 编辑丨 闫志强 ▲ 日本滨冈核电站（资料图） 有关日本中部电力公司疑似在滨冈核电站3号和4号机组（静冈县）重启审查中，蓄意低 估作为抗震设计大致标准的"基准地震动"问题，1月7日，日本原子能规制委员会就继续 暂停重启审查达成一致。 日本原子能规制委员会委员长山中伸介指出，相关行为是直接关乎安全的审查数据造假事 件，显然是违规行为。负责地震与海啸审查的委员山冈耕春指出，滨冈核电站位于南海海 槽震源区的正上方，最受关注，中部电力公司的行为"属于伪造和篡改"。 因数据造假，日本继续暂停对滨冈核电站重启审查。 ...

1 王毅会见柬埔寨副首相兼外交大臣布拉索昆 2025年12月 12月28日，中共中央政治局委员、外交部长王毅在云南玉溪会见柬埔寨副首相兼外交大臣布拉索昆。王毅表示，中柬铁杆友谊经受国际风云变幻考验，坚如 磐石、历久弥坚。中方高度关注柬泰边境紧张局势，一直致力于劝和促谈。在各方共同努力下，柬泰两国军方达成停火协议，朝着恢复和平迈出重要一步， 中方对此表示祝贺。停火完全符合柬泰人民共同愿望，符合地区各国普遍期待，相信会得到各方欢迎支持。（央视新闻） N 王毅会见泰国外长西哈萨 据财政部网站，12月27日至28日，全国财政工作会议在北京召开。会议指出，2026年继续实施更加积极的财政政策。一是扩大财政支出盘子，确保必要支出 力度。二是优化政府债券工具组合，更好发挥债券效益。三是提高转移支付资金效能，增强地方自主可用财力。四是持续优化支出结构，强化重点领域保 障。五是加强财政金融协同，放大政策效能。 3 辽宁辽阳白塔区三里厨娘饭店重大火灾事故调查报告发布 40名公职人员被问责 辽宁省应急管理厅网站于12月28日向社会公布了辽阳白塔区三里厨娘饭店重大火灾事故调查报告。调查认定，这是一起因饭店主体责任不落实，违法改造扩 ...

券中社 × 券商中国 券 中 社 扫码下载券中社APP 扫码关注券商中国公众号 quanshangcn qzs.stcn.com 舞中 券中社APP 券 商 中 国 是 证 券 市 场 权 威 媒 体 《 证 券 时 报 》 旗 下 新 媒 体 , 券 商 中 国 对 该 平 台 所 刊 载 的 原 创 内 容 享 有 著 作 权 , 来源：央视财经 责编：刘珺宇 校对：赵燕 百万用户都在看 利好突袭！上交所，重大发布！ 大跌超80%！A股公司，紧急报警！ 重大资产重组！A股公司，深夜公告！ 凌晨！全线大涨！美联储，突发警告！ 2026年A股休市安排来了 违法和不良信息举报电话：0755-83514034 邮箱：bwb@stcn.com 日本防卫省26日作出停止川崎重工业公司参与招标的处分，为期两个半月。川崎重工业公司当天发布对 该公司篡改船舶用发动机测试数据的补充报告。报告承认，该公司为日本海上自卫队制造的潜水艇发动机 也存在篡改燃油效率数据的情况。川崎重工业公司表示，将采取措施防止发生类似不当行为。2024年8 月，川崎重工业公司承认该公司存在篡改船舶用发动机测试数据的不当行为，涉及的船舶用发动机总数达 ...

一、当美联储也开始"做假账" 结果呢？左边股票三个月后翻倍，右边继续阴跌。这让我想起医学院老师的话："症状会骗人，但血常规不会。" 看到美联储承认就业数据被系统性高估时，我差点把咖啡喷在屏幕上。这帮西装革履的家伙终于承认了！每月6万个岗位的水分，相当于把整个华尔街的清 洁工都算成"新增就业"了。更讽刺的是，这个数字还是高盛预测值的两倍——连华尔街最精明的投行都被蒙在鼓里。 这让我想起2015年A股那场闹剧。当时官方数据说经济稳中向好，结果股灾来了个"膝斩"。现在回头看，那些漂亮的经济指标，跟美颜过度的自拍有什么区 别？区别就在于，自拍骗的是点赞，经济数据骗的可是真金白银。 二、数据幻象下的生存法则 在复旦读金融时，教授说过一句话让我记到现在："市场永远在说谎，但数据从不说谎。"当时觉得这是句漂亮的废话，直到我用量化系统跑完第一个回测 ——那些K线图背后藏着的交易行为模式，就像指纹一样独一无二。 看看最近这波"牛市暴跌"，简直是把散户当猴耍。一边是媒体高喊"千金难买牛回头"，另一边是机构悄悄减仓。这场景熟悉得令人发指——2015年1月那波 调整前，同样的剧本已经演过三遍。 但有意思的是，当我把这些年的交易数据摊 ...

Industry Secret - The electric vehicle industry has an unspoken secret known as "zero-kilometer used cars" [1] - A significant portion, estimated at up to 90%, of used car exports in 2024 are suspected to be new cars [1] Deceptive Practices - Car manufacturers are allegedly buying their own newly produced vehicles and registering them as domestic sales to obtain government subsidies [1] - These vehicles, essentially new, are then exported as used cars to generate additional revenue [1] - This practice inflates sales figures and reduces inventory, creating a false impression of strong export performance [1] Regulatory Response - Beijing's recent export controls are aimed at curbing this practice and eliminating the data bubble, rather than specifically targeting Tesla [1] - An internal investigation and cleanup within the industry is reportedly underway [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing concerns regarding the effectiveness and integrity of influencer marketing in live-streaming sales, particularly focusing on the disparity between promised and actual sales outcomes, leading to dissatisfaction among merchants [1][2][3]. Group 1: Case Studies - A businessman in Heilongjiang paid 50,000 yuan as a "slot fee" to a popular influencer with millions of followers, expecting significant sales, but only one order was completed [1][2]. - Another case involved a merchant in Henan who was promised a minimum sale of 20,000 pairs of shoes but ended up selling only 58 pairs, which is less than 0.3% of the promised amount [2][3]. Group 2: Market Trends - Complaints related to live-streaming sales have surged, with the 12315 platform receiving 402,000 complaints in 2024, marking a 19.3% increase year-on-year, and complaints on short video platforms rising by 48.8% [2]. Group 3: Industry Practices - Many influencers and agencies exploit information asymmetry, leading to misleading data presentations that can deceive small merchants into signing unfavorable contracts [3][4]. - The article emphasizes that some influencers may inflate their follower counts and engagement metrics through artificial means, such as purchasing fake followers or using bots [3][5]. Group 4: Regulatory Environment - China's e-commerce law prohibits false advertising and misleading commercial practices, while the "Network Live Marketing Management Measures" specifically bans data manipulation in live-streaming [4][5]. - There is a call for improved regulatory measures to address industry malpractices, enhance data authenticity, and ensure that live-streaming platforms uphold integrity in their operations [5]. Group 5: Recommendations for Merchants - Merchants are advised to critically assess potential partners beyond just follower counts, focusing on past performance and customer feedback, and to clearly outline key contractual terms to mitigate risks [5].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing concerns regarding the effectiveness and reliability of influencer marketing in live-streaming sales, particularly focusing on the disparity between promised and actual sales outcomes, leading to dissatisfaction among small merchants [2][3][6]. Group 1: Issues Faced by Merchants - Merchants like Mr. Tao and Mr. Xue have experienced significant discrepancies between the sales promised by influencers and the actual sales achieved, with Mr. Tao only selling 1 unit despite a 50,000 yuan "placement fee" and Mr. Xue selling only 58 pairs of shoes against a promised 20,000 pairs [2][3]. - Influencers often evade accountability by claiming that contracts do not guarantee sales, which has led to frustration among merchants seeking refunds [6][9]. Group 2: Data Reliability Concerns - The article points out that many merchants are misled by seemingly impressive data presented by influencers, such as high follower counts and live viewer numbers, which may not reflect genuine engagement or sales [7][9]. - There are allegations that some influencers engage in practices like purchasing fake followers and manipulating live-stream data, which undermines the integrity of the marketing process [10][12]. Group 3: Regulatory and Industry Response - The increase in complaints related to live-streaming sales, with 402,000 reports in 2024, indicates a growing need for regulatory oversight in this sector [6]. - The article calls for improved regulations and enforcement against deceptive practices in influencer marketing, emphasizing the need for platforms to ensure data accuracy and transparency [10][12]. Group 4: Recommendations for Merchants - Merchants are advised to critically evaluate potential influencer partnerships, focusing on past performance and genuine user feedback rather than just follower counts [12]. - It is recommended that merchants clearly outline their rights and obligations in contracts to mitigate risks associated with verbal agreements [12].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the growing discontent among small merchants regarding the effectiveness and reliability of influencer marketing, particularly in live streaming sales, where promised sales figures often do not materialize, leading to financial losses for businesses [1][4][6]. Group 1: Case Studies of Merchants - A merchant in Heilongjiang paid 50,000 yuan as a "slot fee" to an influencer with millions of followers, expecting to sell 6,000 to 8,000 units of beer, but only one sale was made [1][4]. - Another merchant from Henan invested 50,000 yuan and prepared over one million yuan worth of inventory based on promises of selling 20,000 pairs of shoes, but only 58 pairs were sold, which is 0.3% of the promised amount [2][6]. Group 2: Complaints and Regulatory Response - Merchants are facing difficulties in obtaining refunds, as influencers' representatives claim that contracts do not guarantee sales volumes, leading to frustration among affected merchants [6][9]. - In 2024, the 12315 platform received 402,000 complaints related to live streaming sales, marking a 19.3% increase from the previous year, with complaints on short video platforms rising by 48.8% [6][10]. Group 3: Issues with Data Integrity - Many merchants are misled by seemingly impressive data presented by influencers, such as high online viewer counts and sales figures, which may not reflect actual performance due to potential data manipulation [7][9]. - The article emphasizes that some influencers may use purchased followers and artificial engagement tactics, leading to a significant disparity between reported and actual sales [7][10]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - The article calls for stricter regulations and oversight in the live streaming e-commerce sector to combat issues like false advertising and data manipulation, urging platforms to ensure data integrity [10][12]. - Merchants are advised to critically evaluate potential influencer partnerships, focusing on past performance and user reviews rather than just follower counts, and to clearly outline contractual terms to protect their interests [12].