来源：法眼看市 放贷好处费怎么收？近日，法眼获悉上海二中院的判决书。 上诉人（原审被告人）庄某，男，1990年出生，本科文化，原某某公司宝山支行（以下简称农商银行宝 山支行）市场二部客户经理。因本案于2023年5月5日被刑事拘留，同年6月8日被逮捕。 上海市宝山区人民法院判决一审认定：2019年7月至2022年11月，被告人庄某在担任农商银行宝山支行 营业部对公客户经理、市场二部客户经理期间，利用负责对该行中小微企业担保贷款业务进行审核的职 务便利，在明知贷款中介石某（已判决）介绍的贷款申请人相关贷款材料存在虚假财务数据的情况下， 未履行严格审查义务，违规审核通过上述贷款申请人的贷款申请，并在贷款发放后多次从石某处收取好 处费。 经查，被告人庄某共计违规向23家公司发放中小微企业担保贷款共计人民币1亿余元，并从石某处收取 相关好处费共计30余万元。 2023年5月5日，被告人庄某被公安机关抓获到案，到案后如实供述上述犯罪事实。 另查明，23家涉案公司在申请贷款期间提交的材料经审计均含有虚假财务数据；截至公安机关立案时， 共有8家涉案公司贷款逾期未偿还，涉及金额共计2100万元。 案件审理期间，被告人庄某退出全 ...

Core Points - The case involves a trust loan of 15.5 billion yuan provided by Zhongrong International Trust Co., Ltd. to Shanxi Transportation Investment Group, facilitated by Minsheng Bank's Taiyuan branch, with allegations of bribery and money laundering [2][4][5] - The court has gone through multiple rounds of trials, with the latest ruling resulting in prison sentences for the involved parties, including Liu Yang receiving 11 years for bribery [2][13][14] Group 1: Case Background - In 2013, Shanxi Provincial Transportation Department initiated a financing project through Shanxi Transportation Investment Group, using Minsheng Bank for loans [4] - Liu Yang, the general manager of Minsheng Bank's Taiyuan branch investment banking department, facilitated the introduction of trust loans totaling 23.47 billion yuan [4] - Zhongrong Trust was involved in setting up 12 trust products to provide 15.5 billion yuan in loans to Shanxi Transportation Investment Group [4] Group 2: Allegations and Charges - Liu Yang allegedly received 85.5 million yuan as a "consulting service fee," which prosecutors claim was a bribe [2][5] - The prosecution accused Liu Yang of non-state staff bribery, while Gai Qijun was charged with money laundering, and Zhou Bailin with bribery [8][9] - Liu Yang argued that the funds were legitimate service fees, not bribes, and claimed the bank's role was as an intermediary [3][8] Group 3: Judicial Proceedings - The case has undergone six rounds of trials, with the latest ruling affirming the sentences for Liu Yang (11 years), Gai Qijun (5 years and 6 months), and Zhou Bailin (3 years and 7 months) [2][13][14] - The court's decisions have been challenged multiple times, with Liu Yang planning to apply for a retrial based on his defense that the funds were not illegal [3][15] - The latest ruling increased Liu Yang's sentence by 2 years compared to the initial judgment [13]