Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of maintaining a strong focus on style construction as a fundamental aspect of the Communist Party's success over the past century [1][2][4] - The article highlights that the cultivation of good style is crucial for the Party's image, creativity, cohesion, and overall effectiveness [2][3] - It discusses the historical context of style construction, noting that it has been a significant aspect of the Party's development since its inception, with various leaders contributing to its evolution [3][4] Group 2 - The article stresses the need for continuous efforts in style construction, indicating that it is an ongoing process rather than a one-time achievement [5][6] - It points out the persistent issues within the Party, such as ideological purity and the prevalence of formalism and bureaucratism, which require ongoing attention and resolution [5][6] - The importance of adhering to the Central Eight Regulations is highlighted as a key measure for improving style and addressing long-standing issues [8][9] Group 3 - The article calls for a comprehensive strengthening of institutional frameworks to support style construction, emphasizing that many style issues are rooted in systemic problems [10] - It advocates for the establishment of a robust regulatory system to ensure the sustainability of improvements in style and to prevent the resurgence of negative behaviors [10] - The need for continuous education and reinforcement of Party members' ideological foundations is underscored as essential for maintaining high standards of conduct [9][10]

Group 1 - The core idea emphasizes that the style of work reflects the party's character, and improving work style is fundamentally about strengthening party character [1] - The historical context of party discipline and style is traced from the land revolution to the current era, highlighting the importance of maintaining the political essence of communism [1] - The article stresses that issues in work style stem from a lack of strong party character and ideal beliefs, indicating that foundational work is essential to prevent negative influences [1] Group 2 - Party character education is described as essential for personal development among party members, requiring continuous self-reflection and alignment with party standards [2] - The article highlights the importance of distinguishing between public and private interests, stating that many work style issues arise from improper handling of these relationships [2] - Examples of exemplary party members are provided to illustrate the principle of public over private, emphasizing the need for integrity and selflessness in public service [2] Group 3 - Small matters and details are portrayed as reflections of party character and principles, with a warning that minor lapses can lead to significant errors [3] - The article advocates for maintaining vigilance in personal conduct and interactions, stressing the importance of integrity in everyday actions [3] - It calls for a close integration of party character cultivation with work style improvement, using party principles as a measure for evaluating actions and decisions [3]

纪律和自由是什么关系？ 四川眉山市东坡区太和镇永丰村党委书记、村委会主任李雪平讲过一段故事：如今村级"小微权力"实行 清单式管理，村里要买春耕机械，要由村报账员、村务监督员审核，经乡镇终审后才能支出。全流程从 严后，干事反而简单了，村"两委"召集村民代表商议，买什么机械、选什么品牌、花多少钱，大伙儿一 起把账算得明明白白，事办得漂漂亮亮。 "心里亮堂了，关系融洽了，干事也更顺了"，李雪平的感言，生动印证了一个道理：党的纪律和干事创 业是内在统一的，遵规守纪，就会拥有干事创业的充分自由和广阔空间。 同时要看到，面对监督执纪从严的氛围，也有少数干部存在抵触心理，把纪律和自由简单地对立起来， 工作中瞻前顾后，抱怨"手脚被捆住"，甚至以"规矩多"为由"躺平""甩锅"，遇到矛盾绕着走、碰到难题 往上交。这表面上是认识错误，根子上还是党性修养不强。 我们党成立之初，就把严明的纪律写在自己的旗帜上。对党员、干部而言，遵规守纪是基本的底线，也 是必备的党性修养。从严，是要刹歪风、去痼疾，绝不是要把人管死。对于干净干事的党员、干部来 说，党纪既是"紧箍咒"，更是防护栏。安全防护区之内，天高地阔，大有可为，也应当大有作为。 比如 ...