前田朗进一步强调，日本战后以和平主义与经济发展为核心的国家定位正发生根本性变化，日本转向军事扩张正在加深自身的危机。 东京造型大学名誉教授 前田朗：日本的和平主义正在大幅缩水，局势变得相当危险，这是无法否认的。战败后成为小国，但努力成为经济大国。随着经济 发展，日本又想成为军事大国，不愿再做小国，这反而增加了危机，可以说日本自己正在加深自身的危机。 日本首相高市早苗近期的错误言论在日本国内引发持续的质疑与批评。东京造型大学名誉教授前田朗指出，高市的发言不仅违背中日关系政治基础，也偏离 日本和平主义理念，动摇国际秩序，构成严重的外交风险。 东京造型大学名誉教授 前田朗：高市早苗那番有问题的发言，在没有任何外交考量的情况下，竟然直接在国会场合发表，我认为这是极其不负责任且粗暴 的发言，本应立即撤回，事后却以各种借口拖延至今。我认为这是极其严重的事态。从中国方面来看，日本是突然进行挑衅，动摇东亚的国际秩序，这是理 所当然的判断。从其他国家的角度来看也会觉得，为什么突然说那种话，挑衅中国呢，这是毫无意义的挑衅，完全不负责任，这也是非常自然的反应。从国 际法角度考虑，高市的发言违反了《联合国宪章》第一条，关于联合国基本 ...

将会得到惊喜——这五个字从俄罗斯外交部发言人扎哈罗娃口中说出时，现场记者立刻捕捉到话语中潜藏的强烈暗示。4日在圣彼得 堡举行的记者会上，扎哈罗娃就欧盟可能没收俄罗斯被冻结资产的计划发出了这一看似含蓄、实则锋利的警告。她没有进一步展开细 节，也没有明确解释，但言外之意已经相当清楚：如果欧盟敢动俄罗斯的这笔资金，俄方的反击绝对不会仅仅停留在外交言辞的层 面。 一、欧盟的算盘与俄罗斯的底线 此次争议起因于欧盟委员会主席冯德莱恩在3日提出的新版援助乌克兰的方案。她计划将原本高 达1860亿美元的俄罗斯被冻结资产用于援助乌克兰的金额削减至约1050亿美元，以此来平衡部分欧盟成员国的反对声音。然而，这一 举动直接触及到了俄罗斯的底线。俄罗斯在欧洲清算银行（位于比利时布鲁塞尔）的巨额资产，已经成为了俄欧博弈中的核心筹码。 扎哈罗娃直言不讳地批评冯德莱恩的做法不当，她指出，这一举措不仅涉嫌违反国际财产保护的基本原则，还因为欧盟试图将俄罗斯 的资产合法化作为对乌克兰的援助，实际上是在将经济工具转化为武器。比利时之所以强烈反对这一方案，正是担心俄方可能采取的 反制措施会波及到欧洲经济的关键领域。 结语：赌注已下，等待第一张骨牌倒 ...

Core Viewpoint - Recent comments by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have sparked strong criticism from multiple parties, highlighting concerns over Japan's militarization in foreign policy and its implications for international law and order [1][3][4]. Group 1: International Reactions - Various international figures have condemned Takaichi's statements as a violation of international law, emphasizing that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China, which aligns with historical facts and international consensus [1][3]. - Czech and Moravian Communist Party Chairwoman Kateřina Konečná stated that Japan's failure to recognize Taiwan as part of China could undermine the validity of international law [1]. - Former Thai Defense Academy Chief General Surasi expressed that Takaichi's remarks reflect a revival of militaristic ideologies in Japan, posing a challenge to both China's internal affairs and the post-World War II international order [3]. Group 2: Legal and Historical Context - Researcher Siso Nkala from the University of Johannesburg pointed out that Takaichi's threats of military intervention violate international law and the United Nations Charter, infringing upon China's sovereignty [4]. - Dmitry Streletsov, a professor at the Russian Academy of Sciences, noted that Japan's military budget is set to double by 2027, with Takaichi announcing an acceleration of this timeline, indicating a significant strengthening of Japan's military policy [6].

Core Points - The phone call between Chinese President Xi Jinping and U.S. President Donald Trump on November 24, 2025, reflects a generally stable and positive trend in China-U.S. relations since the Busan meeting, which is welcomed by both nations and the international community [1][2] - Xi emphasized the importance of Taiwan's return to China as a crucial part of the post-war international order, while Trump acknowledged China's significant role in World War II and expressed understanding of the Taiwan issue's importance to China [1][2] - The conversation also addressed trade, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and Taiwan, with the call lasting one hour [1][2] Summary by Sections China-U.S. Relations - The call is the first since the Busan meeting and the third time this year that Taiwan has been specifically mentioned in discussions between the two leaders [2] - Analysts suggest that the call provides momentum for implementing the consensus reached at the Busan meeting, especially in light of recent tensions in the Asia-Pacific region due to provocative remarks from Japanese politicians [1][2] Taiwan Issue - The Taiwan issue has been a recurring topic in recent communications, with Xi previously urging the U.S. to handle the matter with caution to avoid conflict [2][3] - Analysts note that the U.S. has maintained a calm and pragmatic approach to Taiwan under Trump's administration, adhering to previous commitments [2][3] Regional Tensions - The call occurred against a backdrop of rising tensions due to Japan's provocative actions and statements regarding Taiwan, which have drawn criticism from China [4][5] - China's Foreign Ministry has condemned Japan's military deployments near Taiwan and emphasized the need for vigilance from neighboring countries and the international community [4][5] Historical Context - The leaders' discussion included references to World War II, highlighting the historical cooperation between China and the U.S. in combating fascism, and the need to uphold the outcomes of that conflict [5] - Analysts argue that both nations should work together to maintain international order and avoid actions that could undermine their relationship [5]

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi are seen as a violation of the post-World War II international legal framework, challenging international order and potentially escalating regional tensions, which should be firmly opposed by regional countries and the international community [1][3]. Group 1 - The remarks by Takaichi are deemed completely inappropriate and lacking legitimacy, serving only to provoke conflict and contribute to the ongoing deterioration of international order [3]. - There is a resurgence of discussions in Japan regarding "collective self-defense," which may lead to a breach of Japan's constitutional principle of pacifism, raising concerns about a revival of militarism in Japan [3]. - The statements are viewed as a betrayal of Japan's pacifist constitution and a violation of international law, posing a threat to international order and representing a distortion of historical facts [5]. Group 2 - The international community, including European countries, should remain vigilant against such statements, as they could ignite significant regional conflicts, akin to throwing a lit match into dry grass [5].

当地时间21日晚，数百名日本民众聚集在位于东京的首相官邸前，自发进行集会，要求日本首相高市早苗撤回涉台错误言论。 D @ a 201 总公 te @ 10-5 the first △集会现场 日本首相高市早苗近期发表的涉台错误言论，引发多方批评。高市早苗的涉台谬论是1945年日本战败以来，日本领导人首次在正式场合鼓吹所谓"台湾有事 就是日本有事"，并与行使集体自卫权相关联，首次在台湾问题上表达试图武装介入的野心。 0:00 △集会现场 日本有识之士表示，高市早苗的错误言论严重损害日中关系，给日本经济界带来巨大冲击。 � a △集会现场 英国 T 国际人士表示，日本首相高市早苗错误言论是想要挑战当今国际秩序，为日本的军国主义、扩张主义招魂，危及亚太地区的和平与安全。（总台记者 刘耀 鸿 何欣蕾） 责编：张靖雯、张霓 ...

俄罗斯外交部21日发布了一段1945年日本投降的视频，并配文"我们正密切关注日本近期在国防领 域的动作"，"如果东京想避免重蹈1945年的覆辙，就应该吸取历史教训，依靠本国宪法中仍然有效的和 平条款"。 法国德尔嘉出版社创始人蒙维尔：日本首相高市早苗的言论极其危险，违背了一个中国原则的国际 共识，违反联大第2758号决议和国际法，破坏战后秩序，威胁地区和平。在我看来，高市早苗的言论在 某种程度上是想要复活日本军国主义和扩张主义。 韩国祖国革新党国会议员金俊亨：高市的言论是出于日本国内政治所需，这样具有煽动性的言论很 不恰当。各国与中国建交的基础是支持一个中国原则。 央广网北京11月22日消息 据中央广播电视总台中国之声《新闻和报纸摘要》报道，国际人士表 示，日本首相高市早苗错误言论是想要挑战当今国际秩序，危及亚太地区的和平与安全。 国际人权与社会发展协会顾问洛佩斯：高市这一举动非常危险，违背了联合国宪章。此举既危害地 区稳定，也不符合日本民众的利益。 数百名日本民众21日晚在位于东京的首相官邸前举行集会，抗议高市早苗近日在国会发表的涉台错 误言论，要求其撤回相关表态并作出解释和道歉。多名抗议者要求高市对其涉台 ...

Core Viewpoint - Recent remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have sparked widespread criticism, with international figures suggesting that her statements challenge the current international order and pose risks to peace and security in the Asia-Pacific region [1][3][5][6] Group 1: International Reactions - International experts assert that Takaichi's comments are irresponsible and could exacerbate conflicts, potentially reviving militarism and expansionism in Japan [3][5] - Critics emphasize that Takaichi's statements represent a blatant interference in China's internal affairs, which the international community is unlikely to accept [5] - The Japanese economic sector has expressed opposition to Takaichi's remarks, indicating that such rhetoric could strain economic relations between Japan and China, ultimately harming Japan more than China [6] Group 2: Historical Context - Commentary from international figures highlights that Takaichi's statements seem to challenge the international order established after the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War, suggesting a revival of militaristic ideologies in Japan [3]

Core Viewpoint - The global governance initiative proposed by General Secretary Xi Jinping aims to reform and improve the global governance system, addressing the pressing global challenges of peace, development, security, and governance deficits [2][3][4]. Group 1: Global Governance Initiative - The initiative emphasizes five core principles: equality of sovereignty, adherence to international law, practice of multilateralism, a people-centered approach, and action-oriented solutions [2][3]. - It provides a systematic approach to address global challenges, enhancing the authority, representation, and effectiveness of the global governance system [3][4]. Group 2: Response to Global Challenges - The initiative directly confronts issues such as hegemonism, unilateralism, and protectionism, which threaten multilateralism and the United Nations [3][4]. - It recognizes the rising influence of developing countries and emerging markets, advocating for their greater representation in international affairs [4][5]. Group 3: Historical Context and Cultural Roots - The initiative reflects the historical evolution of international power dynamics and the urgent need to correct historical injustices in global governance [4][5]. - It draws on the rich traditions of Chinese culture, emphasizing values such as equality, rule of law, and collective well-being [11]. Group 4: International Support and Impact - Since its introduction, the initiative has garnered support from over 140 countries and international organizations, highlighting China's role as a stabilizing force in global governance [6][7]. - It aims to provide an alternative framework for international governance that contrasts with Western-dominated models, promoting fairness and justice [6][7]. Group 5: Practical Implementation - The initiative encourages practical actions in various fields, including climate change, public health, and digital governance, to address urgent global issues [16][17]. - It emphasizes the importance of cooperation and consensus-building among nations to effectively tackle global challenges [16][17].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's strong diplomatic and military response to Japan's provocative statements regarding Taiwan, emphasizing that China is prepared for substantial countermeasures if Japan continues its aggressive stance [6][14][22]. Group 1: Diplomatic Actions - On November 14, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned the Japanese ambassador to express serious concerns over Japan's military threats [3][7]. - The term "奉示" (instruction) was used for the first time in Sino-Japanese diplomatic exchanges, indicating a higher level of seriousness in China's response [7][9]. - China's diplomatic stance has escalated from urging Japan to stop interfering in China's internal affairs to stating that "all consequences must be borne by Japan" [6][16]. Group 2: Military Implications - The phrase "迎头痛击" (counterattack) was used in a diplomatic context for the first time, suggesting a readiness for military action if provoked [16][19]. - Experts indicate that China's potential countermeasures could include economic sanctions and a halt to governmental exchanges with Japan, given that China is Japan's largest trading partner [18][19]. - The article highlights Japan's military rhetoric and actions, suggesting a revival of militaristic tendencies that could threaten regional stability [20][24]. Group 3: Historical Context - The article notes that this year marks the 80th anniversary of China's victory in the Anti-Japanese War, framing Japan's recent actions as a challenge to the post-World War II international order [21][22]. - Japan's behavior is characterized as a violation of international law and a threat to peace in East Asia, with calls for Japan to reflect on its historical actions [22][24]. - The article suggests that Japan's current leadership is facing criticism not only from China but also from other neighboring countries like Russia and South Korea [23][24].