Core Viewpoint - The rise of stablecoins has led to an increase in illegal fundraising activities, with fraudulent entities exploiting public ignorance about stablecoins to attract investments through misleading claims and scams [1][2]. Group 1: Characteristics of Illegal Fundraising - Lack of qualifications: Entities involved in illegal fundraising do not have the necessary approvals or registrations from the State Council's financial management departments [2]. - Conceptual packaging: Fraudsters use terms like "stablecoin," "decentralized finance," and "Web 3.0" to create confusion and mislead investors [2]. - False promises: These entities often make exaggerated claims of guaranteed returns, high fixed income, and capital protection to lure investors [2]. - Fund pool operation: The operational model relies on attracting new investors to pay returns to earlier investors, creating a risk of significant losses if the funding chain breaks [2]. Group 2: Regulatory and Preventive Measures - Continuous monitoring: Authorities need to strengthen dynamic supervision of illegal fundraising and fraud activities, providing early warnings [2]. - Administrative enforcement: There is a need to explore administrative enforcement models to eliminate illegal fundraising at an early stage [2]. - Criminal prosecution: Regulatory bodies should enhance the connection between financial regulation and criminal prosecution, ensuring timely legal action against suspected criminal activities [2]. Group 3: Investor Awareness - Caution against false advertising: Investors should be wary of high-return promises and remember that high returns are often associated with high risks [3]. - Verification of legitimacy: It is crucial for investors to verify the legal qualifications of institutions and products through official channels before investing [3]. - Reporting illegal activities: Investors are encouraged to report any illegal fundraising activities related to stablecoins to law enforcement to protect their assets [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the risks associated with stablecoins, emphasizing the need for public awareness and caution against illegal financial activities disguised as stablecoin investments [3][4][6]. Group 1: Risks of Stablecoins - The Shenzhen Special Task Force warns that illegal organizations are exploiting the public's lack of understanding of stablecoins to engage in fraudulent activities, including illegal fundraising, gambling, and money laundering [3][4]. - The Task Force emphasizes that these organizations lack the necessary licenses from national financial authorities and are not authorized to publicly solicit deposits [3][4]. - The article stresses the importance of rational investment awareness among the public to avoid falling victim to deceptive promises related to stablecoin investments [3][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Responses - Multiple regulatory bodies and international financial organizations have issued risk warnings regarding the recent surge in interest in stablecoins [6]. - The Hong Kong Monetary Authority's CEO, Yu Weiwen, indicates that while public interest in stablecoins is welcomed, it is essential to maintain a balanced perspective and mitigate potential risks [6][7]. - The article notes that stablecoins are not intended for investment or speculation but serve as payment tools utilizing blockchain technology, with their future development largely dependent on market forces [7]. Group 3: International Concerns - The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) expresses skepticism about stablecoins, stating they do not meet the requirements to be a pillar of the monetary system and raise concerns about their potential use in money laundering and terrorism financing [8]. - The BIS report highlights that stablecoins have become a preferred method for illegal activities due to their anonymity and lack of traditional financial safeguards like Know Your Customer (KYC) standards [8]. - The report concludes that while demand for stablecoins may persist, they perform poorly in system-level integrity tests, raising significant regulatory challenges [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the risks associated with illegal fundraising activities disguised as stablecoin or digital asset investments, emphasizing the need for public awareness and caution in financial dealings [1] Group 1: Risks of Illegal Fundraising - Recent monitoring indicates that some illegal entities are using terms like "financial innovation" and "digital assets" to attract investments from the public, exploiting their lack of understanding of stablecoins [1] - These entities are engaging in activities such as illegal fundraising, gambling, fraud, pyramid schemes, and money laundering, which pose significant threats to public financial security [1] - The article stresses that these organizations lack the necessary licenses from national financial regulatory bodies to publicly solicit deposits, making their operations illegal [1] Group 2: Regulatory Framework - The "Regulations on the Prevention and Handling of Illegal Fundraising" explicitly prohibit any form of illegal fundraising, and participants in such schemes bear the risk of losses incurred [1] - The article calls for the public to enhance their rational investment awareness and to avoid blindly trusting extravagant promises made by these illegal entities [1] - It encourages the establishment of correct monetary concepts and investment philosophies to improve risk awareness and prevent falling victim to scams [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the ongoing challenges and complexities in combating illegal fundraising activities in China, highlighting the need for enhanced legal measures and collaborative efforts among regulatory bodies to protect investors and maintain financial stability [1][2][3]. Group 1: Current Situation of Illegal Fundraising - The illegal fundraising crime situation remains severe and complex, with both online and offline methods being utilized, and traditional and new techniques intermingling [1]. - Major illegal fundraising models include private investment, pension schemes, and emerging sectors like blockchain and virtual currencies [1][2]. - The Supreme People's Procuratorate is actively pursuing significant illegal fundraising cases and enhancing the prosecution and asset recovery processes [2]. Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Measures - The article discusses the establishment of a working mechanism between the Supreme People's Procuratorate and the National Financial Regulatory Administration to strengthen information sharing and collaborative efforts [3]. - There is a focus on enhancing legal frameworks and mechanisms for asset recovery, including the use of civil and criminal methods to maximize restitution for victims [2][4]. - The article highlights the importance of legal education and public awareness campaigns to improve risk prevention capabilities among the general public [3]. Group 3: Technological Integration in Legal Processes - The article mentions the integration of technology in legal processes, such as the use of big data and artificial intelligence to enhance the efficiency of handling illegal fundraising cases [6][7]. - Various local procuratorates are developing data analysis tools to identify high-risk entities involved in illegal fundraising activities [7]. - The emphasis is placed on the need for continuous adaptation to new financial technologies and methods to effectively combat evolving illegal fundraising tactics [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Procuratorate has released typical cases of illegal fundraising crimes, highlighting the deceptive methods used and the associated risks, particularly in the context of the growing elderly care economy and travel-based retirement services [1][2]. Group 1: Illegal Fundraising Cases - A case revealed that criminals used the guise of "elderly finance" to illegally raise over 5 billion yuan by promoting retirement apartments and travel bases, which should alert consumers [1][2]. - Companies involved in elderly care and travel have faced funding issues and investigations for illegal fundraising, with operations in various provinces including Shanghai, Jiangsu, Anhui, and Yunnan [2]. Group 2: Consumer Awareness and Caution - Consumers are advised to be cautious when selecting travel-based retirement products, as many offerings may be misleading and merely marketing tactics [2]. - The concept of "travel prepayment cards" was identified as a significant risk, as these cards were found to have characteristics of deposit-like financial products, leading to illegal fundraising [2]. Group 3: Regulatory and Enforcement Actions - There is a call for enhanced market regulation and qualification reviews by relevant authorities to maintain market order and protect consumer rights [3]. - Law enforcement and judicial bodies are urged to collaborate closely to combat related criminal activities and foster a trustworthy market environment for travel-based elderly care services [3].

Core Viewpoint - The case of illegal fundraising led by Zhou Zhifeng and others highlights significant issues in financial regulation and the severe consequences of fraudulent activities in the financial sector, resulting in substantial losses for investors [1][3]. Group 1: Case Details - Zhou Zhifeng was sentenced to life imprisonment for fundraising fraud and money laundering, while co-defendants Wang Changdong and Lu Hong received 16 and 14 years respectively, along with fines [1]. - The defendants operated under the name "Shanhai Group," falsely claiming substantial assets and annual revenues of several hundred million yuan to attract investments [1]. - From September 1, 2015, to August 11, 2023, the group illegally raised over 24.419 billion yuan from participants [1]. Group 2: Legal and Financial Implications - The court emphasized that the illegal fundraising activities severely disrupted the national financial management order and caused significant financial losses to participants across the country [1]. - Following the verdict, law enforcement initiated asset recovery efforts targeting funds, stocks, real estate, and vehicles linked to the defendants, with plans to return recovered assets to the victims after the judgment becomes effective [3].

Core Viewpoint - The court has sentenced Zhou Zhifeng and others for illegal fundraising and money laundering, highlighting the severe disruption to the financial management order in the country and the significant financial losses incurred by participants [1][2]. Group 1: Case Details - Zhou Zhifeng was sentenced to life imprisonment for fundraising fraud and money laundering, while Wang Changdong and Lu Hong received 16 and 14 years of imprisonment respectively, along with fines [1]. - The defendants operated under the name "Shanhai Group," falsely claiming substantial assets and annual production value of several hundred million yuan to attract investments [1]. - From September 1, 2015, to August 11, 2023, the group illegally raised over 24.419 billion yuan from participants [1]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings and Asset Recovery - Following the arrest of the defendants, law enforcement initiated asset recovery efforts targeting funds, stocks, equity, real estate, and vehicles related to the case [2]. - The recovered assets will be returned to the participants after the judgment becomes effective [2].

Core Viewpoint - The court has sentenced individuals involved in a large-scale illegal fundraising scheme, highlighting the severe consequences of financial fraud and the importance of regulatory oversight in the financial sector [1][2]. Group 1: Case Details - The Dalian Intermediate People's Court sentenced Zhou Zhifeng to life imprisonment for fraud and money laundering, while Wang Changdong and Lu Hong received 16 and 14 years respectively, along with fines [1]. - The defendants operated under the name "Shanhai Group," falsely claiming substantial assets and annual revenues of several hundred million yuan to attract investments [1]. - From September 1, 2015, to August 11, 2023, the scheme defrauded participants of over 24.419 billion yuan [1]. Group 2: Impact and Consequences - The illegal fundraising activities severely disrupted the national financial management order, resulting in significant financial losses for participants across multiple regions [1]. - Following the verdict, law enforcement agencies initiated asset recovery efforts, targeting funds, stocks, properties, and vehicles linked to the case [2]. - The recovered assets will be returned to the defrauded participants after the judgment becomes effective [2].

法院认为，周志峰等人实施的非法集资行为，严重扰乱了国家的金融管理秩序，造成全国多地集资参与 人巨额财产损失，依法应予以严惩。法院根据各被告人的犯罪事实、性质、情节和对社会的危害程度， 依法作出上述判决。 部分人大代表、政协委员、被告人家属、集资参与人等旁听了宣判。 非法集资244.19亿余元！周志峰一审被判无期徒刑 智通财经6月27日电，辽宁省大连市中级人民法院对周志峰等三人非法集资一案公开宣判。被告人周志 峰因犯集资诈骗罪、洗钱罪，被判处无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并处没收个人全部财产。被告人王 长东、鲁红分别被判处有期徒刑十六年、十四年，并处罚金。 法院审理查明：被告人周志峰、王长东、鲁红在未经国家金融监管部门许可的情况下，以"山海集团"的 名义，通过散发传单、组织旅游等途径，编造"山海集团"具有雄厚实力、拥有大量资产、年产值数亿元 等虚假事实，隐瞒无正常经营和盈利能力的真相，以高额利息为诱饵，公开进行虚假宣传，骗取集资参 与人信任，向社会公众非法集资。自2015年9月1日至2023年8月11日，累计骗取集资参与人资金人民币 244.19亿余元。同时，为掩饰、隐瞒集资诈骗所得的来源和性质，被告人周志峰、王 ...

（原标题：非法集资911亿！一审被判无期！） 【导读】盘继彪等十九人非法集资案一审宣判，盘继彪被判处无期徒刑 中国基金报记者 晨曦 盛大金禧实控人盘继彪，一审判决落地！ 长沙中院官微显示，6月25日，长沙市中级人民法院依法公开宣判被告人盘继彪等十九人集资诈骗、非 法吸收公众存款等罪一案。 长沙中院对被告人盘继彪以集资诈骗罪、诈骗罪、洗钱罪、偷越国（边）境罪并罚判处无期徒刑，剥夺 政治权利终身，并处没收个人全部财产；对其余十八名被告人分别以集资诈骗罪、非法吸收公众存款 罪、洗钱罪、伪造身份证件罪等不同罪名判处五年至二十年不等有期徒刑，并处罚金。 经审理查明，2011年11月起，被告人盘继彪等人在不具备吸收公众存款资格的情况下，以湖南盛大金禧 金融服务有限公司及多家关联公司名义，通过虚构投资项目、公开虚假宣传等方式，以还本付息、许诺 高额回报为诱饵，向社会公众募集资金911亿余元。大部分集资款用于兑付到期本息、经营成本开支、 盘继彪个人使用和挥霍，造成集资参与人经济损失129亿余元。 此外，法院还查明被告人盘继彪等人诈骗、洗钱、偷越国（边）境、伪造身份证件的犯罪事实。 案发后，办案机关全力开展涉案资产追缴工作，已 ...