Core Viewpoint - The Shenzhen People's Procuratorate has initiated legal proceedings against key members of Dingyifeng, including Sui Guangyi and Ma Xiaoqiu, for multiple charges related to illegal fundraising and fraud [1][2] Group 1: Legal Actions - A total of 30 individuals, including Sui Guangyi and Ma Xiaoqiu, have been prosecuted for crimes such as fundraising fraud, illegal public deposit acceptance, money laundering, and other related offenses [1] - Another 50 individuals, including Tang Jiqiang and Zhu Yunlei, have also been prosecuted for similar illegal fundraising activities and related crimes [1] Group 2: Background and Warnings - The Shenzhen illegal fundraising prevention office has issued four risk warnings regarding Dingyifeng's involvement in illegal fundraising and fraud, along with multiple warnings and discussions with relevant entities and individuals [2] - On November 5, 2024, law enforcement took criminal coercive measures against Sui Guangyi, Ma Xiaoqiu, and others for suspected fundraising fraud [2]

Group 1 - The Shenzhen People's Procuratorate has filed public prosecution against 30 individuals, including Sui Guangyi and Ma Xiaoqiu, for illegal fundraising activities involving Shenzhen Dingyifeng Asset Management Co., Ltd. and its affiliated companies [1] - The Futian District People's Procuratorate has also prosecuted 50 individuals, including Tang Jiqiang and Zhu Yunlei, for crimes related to illegal fundraising and information network crimes associated with the same companies [2] - The Shenzhen authorities have issued multiple risk warnings regarding Dingyifeng's involvement in illegal fundraising and fraud activities [2]

Group 1 - The core members of Dingyifeng, including Sui Guangyi and Ma Xiaoqiu, have been prosecuted for crimes such as fundraising fraud and illegal public deposit acceptance, involving a total of 30 individuals [2] - The Shenzhen Municipal People's Procuratorate has filed charges against 50 individuals, including Tang Jiqiang and Zhu Yunlei, for illegal fundraising activities related to Dingyifeng and its affiliated companies [2] - The Shenzhen Municipal Procuratorate's announcement indicates that the defendants are charged under various laws, including the Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China [2] Group 2 - The Shenzhen office for preventing and handling illegal fundraising has issued multiple risk warnings regarding Dingyifeng, highlighting its involvement in illegal fundraising and fraud [3] - Law enforcement took criminal coercive measures against Sui Guangyi, Ma Xiaoqiu, and others on November 5, 2024, for suspected fundraising fraud [3]

Group 1 - The Shenzhen People's Procuratorate has filed public prosecution against 30 individuals, including Sui Guangyi and Ma Xiaoqiu, for illegal fundraising activities involving Dingyifeng Asset Management Co., Ltd. and its affiliates [1] - The prosecution includes charges of fundraising fraud, illegal public deposit acceptance, money laundering, embezzlement, border crossing, and providing false documents [1] - The Futian District People's Procuratorate has also prosecuted 50 individuals, including Tang Jiqiang and Zhu Yunlei, for similar illegal fundraising activities [1] Group 2 - The Shenzhen office has issued multiple risk warnings regarding Dingyifeng's involvement in illegal fundraising and fraud, highlighting the company's ongoing issues [1] - Law enforcement has taken criminal coercive measures against Sui Guangyi and Ma Xiaoqiu for suspected fundraising fraud as of November 5, 2024 [1] - Recent reports indicate that Dingyifeng is facing a liquidity crisis, with ongoing investigations and legal actions against its affiliates [2]

（来源：沂蒙金融） 苏某明等人非法吸收公众存款案 ——私募基金管理人经登记、私募基金经备案或者部分备案的不影响对非法集资行为"非法性" 的认定 案情简介 被告人苏某明，系深圳弘某财富管理有限公司（以下简称"弘某财富公司"）、深圳弘某基金管理有限公 司（以下简称"弘某基金公司"）实际控制人，上述两家公司在中国证券投资基金业协会（以下简称"基 金业协会"）登记为私募股权、创业投资基金管理人。被告人高某，系弘某财富公司副总裁、销售部负 责人。被告人贺某，系弘某基金公司副总裁、业务部负责人。 2016年7月至2018年7月，苏某明以弘某财富公司、弘某基金公司作为私募基金管理人，先后成立深圳弘 某天成添富投资企业、深圳弘某汇富贰号投资企业等有限合伙企业，以多个房地产开发项目为投资标 的，隐瞒投资项目均为苏某明实际控制的公司开发或者与他人合作开发的实情，发行私募股权类基金产 品5只（其中4只在基金业协会备案）。苏某明指使高某、贺某组织销售团队以口口相传、产品推介会、 通过其他金融机构和私募基金公司、同行业从业人员帮助推销等多种方式向社会公开宣传私募基金产 品，允许不合格投资者通过"拼单""代持"等方式突破私募基金投资人数 ...

齐鲁晚报.齐鲁壹点主余凤 "非法集资正以'线上伪装+线下变现'的新模式蔓延，隐蔽性更强、迷惑性更大，守护群众'钱袋子'必须构建全链条防控体系。"在今年临沂两会期间，临沂 市政协委员管政带着《警惕新型变种筑牢非法集资全民防火墙》提案履职建言，聚焦非法集资治理痛点，为完善防控机制、维护金融生态献策。 近年来，临沂市公安机关持续亮剑非法集资，2025年以来破获相关案件1200余起，为群众挽回经济损失2.4亿余元，成功侦办多起案件。但非法集资正加 速迭代变种，既打着"数字拍卖""影视众筹"旗号依托社交平台扩散，又以"藏品回购""养老公寓租赁返利"为包装渗透线下，通过实体讲座、宴请等活动制 造假象，给治理工作带来新挑战。 "传统'事后打击'已难应对新形势，必须向'事前预警、事中阻断、全程共治'转型。"管政表示，浙江"金融风险天眼"系统、上海"护老防非"专项行动的经验 值得借鉴，核心在于构建跨部门协同、技术与人力结合的治理体系。 管政认为，面对新变种，传统治理模式显得被动。必须运用新智慧，构建跨部门、科技与人力结合、线上线下（300959）全覆盖的防控体系。他特别强调 了数据融通与智能预警的迫切性。"建议由市地方金融监督 ...

Group 1 - The elderly couple invested a total of 1.2 million yuan in Henan Super Kang Technology Co., Ltd., expecting to receive cash rewards and other benefits [1][3] - The company promised various incentives, including cash rewards, food, clothing, travel opportunities, and future plans for a nursing home [3] - Since June of the previous year, the company has stopped providing any returns on the investments made by the elderly couple [3][9] Group 2 - The company staff described the investment as a form of consumption, claiming that profits would be gradually returned as rewards [3] - When questioned about the specific details of the couple's purchases, the staff refused to provide detailed information, indicating a lack of transparency [5][7] - Legal experts suggest that the company's practices may constitute illegal fundraising or a Ponzi scheme, especially if there is no reasonable profit support [9]

AI变声骗钱？奶奶差点上当！ （来源：南湖晚报） 转自：南湖晚报 N晚报记者 孔嘉敏 漫画 张利昌 岁末年初，电信网络诈骗活动也进入高发期，骗术不断翻新，让人防不胜防。 在嘉兴，金融机构正在构筑一张"精准拦截+主动宣传"的双层防护网，全方位守护市民的"钱袋子"。而 守护不止于网点之内，嘉兴金融机构更主动将防线前移，走进商圈、社区、企业，开展形式多样的反诈 宣传活动。通过剖析真实案例、讲解最新骗术、发放宣传资料，将专业的金融知识转化为通俗易懂的防 骗指南，切实帮助市民，尤其是易受骗的老年群体与经营者，从源头加固"钱袋子"的安全防线。 "我在学校呀！"听到孙子熟悉的声音后，老人终于长舒一口气，转头便对身边的民警以及银行工作人员 不住道谢。 时间倒回到一小时前，一位头发花白的老人推开工行嘉兴高新支行的大门，环顾四周，神情急切。工作 人员小陈急忙过去询问她要办理什么业务，老人表示要取5万元现金急用。"您先别急，一下子要取5万 元，是不是出什么事了？"小陈安抚道。 "没出事，我就想取钱，取自己的钱还不行吗？"看到老人情绪逐渐激动，小陈先搀扶老人至休息区，为 其递上温水，等她情绪稍微平复一点后，继续委婉地询问具体事宜，但 ...

（来源：南京晨报） 刘鹃以非法集资刑事案件的审理情况为引入，深入讲解了非法集资相关的法律规范、核心特征等内容， 并结合典型案例揭露非法集资常见的"幌子"。此外，还围绕《防范和处置非法集资条例》，重点讲解了 非法集资监测预警和处置的相关政策规定。 参会人员纷纷表示，将把此次所学法律知识运用到实际工作中，进一步加强风险排查和引导，从源头遏 制非法集资行为的发生。 高淳法院将持续延伸审判职能，进一步加强防范非法集资普法宣传力度，共同营造防范非法集资的良好 氛围，守住群众的"钱袋子"，护好群众的"幸福家"。 转自：南京晨报 晨报讯（通讯员 任璐 南京晨报/爱南京记者 刘通）近日，高淳法院刑庭庭长刘鹃受邀开展惩治与防范 非法集资专题法治讲座。区打非机制成员单位以及辖区所有银行、保险机构负责人、防范非法金融活动 网格员共90余人参加活动。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The rising gold prices have led to an increase in gold investment schemes, particularly targeting middle-aged and elderly consumers, but these schemes are often fraudulent and resemble Ponzi schemes [2][3][6] Group 1: Investment Schemes - Many gold stores are introducing services like "gold custody" and "value repurchase" to attract consumers looking for asset preservation and appreciation [2] - These schemes often involve selling gold at inflated prices, promising high returns and buyback guarantees, creating a false sense of security for investors [4][6] Group 2: Consumer Warnings - The provincial consumer association has issued warnings about these investment schemes, highlighting their potential to be illegal fundraising or Ponzi schemes [3][6] - Complaints have surged, with a 30% increase in inquiries and rising issues related to unfulfilled buyback promises and high fees that diminish returns [5] Group 3: Fraudulent Practices - The business model of these schemes is unsustainable, relying on new investors' funds to pay returns to earlier investors, which can lead to a collapse when new investments dry up [6] - Many businesses lack sufficient gold reserves, and claims of "professional storage" are often misleading, with some using substandard gold to fulfill obligations [6] Group 4: Consumer Protection Measures - The consumer association recommends verifying market prices, avoiding custody services, and ensuring transactions are conducted through reputable channels [7] - It emphasizes the importance of checking the legitimacy of businesses and being cautious of high-return promises that contradict market principles [7][8]