苏吉约诺当天在雅加达发表讲话时说，"当前，我们再次意识到当前世界秩序的脆弱性。"他表示， 当违反规则而不受惩罚时，崩溃的不仅仅是某一条规则，而是对规则以及秩序的信任。 他警告说，一些国家将狭隘的自身利益凌驾于集体安全之上。全球治理机制滞后于快速演变的地缘 政治现实，世界正滑向更激烈的竞争和更深层的分裂。 新华社雅加达1月14日电（记者 叶平凡）印度尼西亚外交部长苏吉约诺14日表示，强权国家公开奉 行双重标准正侵蚀国家间信任，当前世界秩序面临严峻挑战。 ...

Part.1 在掳走委内瑞拉总统马杜罗的行动中，美军的三角洲突击部队12分钟完成突袭。加拉加斯城易守难攻， 委内瑞拉军营重兵把守，而保总统安全的还有最后的防线——"铁盒子"，这些关卡是被如何快速突破 的？ 当《三角洲部队》游戏中的虚拟战场还在屏幕上演绎着特种作战的惊险时，2026年1月3日晚，一场代号 为"绝对决心"的军事行动在委内瑞拉首都加拉加斯上演，在世界政治版图上投下了一枚重磅炸弹。 美联社称，美国陆军三角洲特种部队完成了跨境行动，在不到两小时的时间内，抓走了熟睡中的委内瑞 拉总统尼古拉斯.马杜罗及其夫人。 此次行动的成功，在于此前长达数月的精密情报搜集与渗透。据报道，整个计划早在2025年8月已经开 始准备，美国中央情报局成功策反了马杜罗身边一名关键线人，数月内，这名线人不仅提供了马杜罗的 作息规律、饮食习惯，甚至精确到了他所饲养宠物的种类，以至于在行动前，特种部队对马杜罗的作息 规律做到了极为细致的掌控。 特朗普称，自己在海湖庄园与军方将领实时观看了马杜罗被抓的细节。他透露此次行动没有人员阵亡。 几小时后，特朗普将在海湖庄园发表电视讲话，"我们军队的所有人与执法部门通力合作，在夜深人静 时成功抓走了 ...

Group 1 - The article highlights the unilateralism of the United States regarding Venezuela, which poses a serious challenge to the current international order [1] - Any military intervention without UN Security Council authorization and not meeting self-defense criteria violates the fundamental principles established by the UN Charter [1] - The U.S. attempts to reconstruct the rules of interpretation in international affairs under the guise of prioritizing domestic law, which has profound implications for the existing international governance system [1] Group 2 - There is a noticeable disparity in the international community's response to different sovereignty issues, raising questions about the consistency of international law application [2] - International law has long been viewed by many third-world countries, including those in Africa, as a crucial safeguard for their sovereignty against external interference [2] - Selective application of international rules undermines the stability of the principle of sovereignty and decreases trust in the international order among affected countries [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the unilateralism of the United States regarding Venezuela poses a serious challenge to the current international order [1] Group 1: International Law and Sovereignty - Any military intervention without authorization from the United Nations Security Council and not meeting self-defense criteria violates the fundamental principles established by the UN Charter [1] - Allowing one country to impose coercive measures on another country's sitting head of state based on domestic law undermines the principle of sovereign immunity, increasing uncertainty in international relations [1] - The selective application of international rules can weaken the stability of the principle of sovereignty, leading to decreased trust in the international order among affected countries [2] Group 2: Global Reactions and Consistency - There is a notable disparity in the international community's responses to different sovereignty issues, as seen when European countries quickly reaffirmed the principle of inviolability of sovereignty regarding the U.S. proposal to "purchase" Greenland, while responses to Venezuela varied [1] - This inconsistency raises questions about the uniform application of international law [1][2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that the unilateralism of the United States regarding Venezuela poses a serious challenge to the current international order [1] Group 1: International Law and Sovereignty - Any military intervention without authorization from the United Nations Security Council and not meeting self-defense criteria violates the fundamental principles established by the UN Charter [1] - Allowing one country to impose coercive measures on another country's sitting head of state based on domestic law undermines the principle of sovereign immunity, increasing uncertainty in international relations [1] - The selective application of international rules can weaken the stability of the principle of sovereignty, leading to decreased trust in the international order among affected countries [2] Group 2: Global Reactions and Consistency - There is a notable disparity in the international community's responses to different sovereignty issues, as seen when European countries quickly reaffirmed the principle of inviolability of sovereignty regarding the U.S. proposal to "purchase" Greenland, while responses to Venezuela varied [1] - This inconsistency raises questions about the uniform application of international law [1][2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the United States' aggressive stance towards Greenland, highlighting the geopolitical motivations behind its actions, including resource acquisition and control over strategic maritime routes [3][6][10]. Geopolitical Motivations - The U.S. aims to acquire Greenland due to its rich resources such as rare earth elements and graphite, which are essential for modern energy transitions and chip manufacturing [6]. - Greenland's strategic location between North America and Europe enhances its commercial value, especially with the increasing importance of Arctic shipping routes due to climate change [6]. U.S. Actions and Reactions - The U.S. has issued threats not only towards Greenland but also towards other countries like Iran, Colombia, and Cuba, indicating a broader strategy to control strategic minerals and secure vital shipping lanes [8]. - European leaders, including those from France, Germany, and Italy, have issued a joint statement asserting that Greenland belongs to its people and that its affairs should be determined by Denmark and Greenland [10][12]. European Response - The European response, while appearing strong, reflects a sense of helplessness in the face of U.S. aggression, as they have historically relied on the U.S. for strategic security [10][15]. - The joint statement from European leaders emphasizes the need for NATO to maintain security in the Arctic region, indicating a collective concern over U.S. actions [12]. Implications of U.S. Strategy - The U.S. strategy mirrors its approach in trade negotiations, using pressure tactics to achieve its goals, which raises concerns about violations of international law and the sanctity of national sovereignty [14]. - The article suggests that the U.S. is shifting its security strategy from global resource allocation to focusing on key regions, indicating a potential decline in its geopolitical dominance [15]. Greenland's Position - Greenland's government has responded firmly, asserting that the issue of its sovereignty should be determined by its own people, highlighting a resistance to U.S. neo-colonial tactics [16]. - The situation surrounding Greenland is seen as a test of the resilience of the current international order, with implications for smaller nations facing similar threats [16].

波兰总理图斯克9日说，他担忧美国扬言夺取格陵兰岛可能会给北约压力。同一天，美国总统特朗 普表示将不惜以"艰难"方式得到格陵兰岛。在此言论发表后，北约秘书长吕特与美国国务卿鲁比 奥讨论了加强北极地区安全事宜。法国媒体9日报道，鲁比奥定于14日与丹麦外交大臣会谈。 图斯克9日在新闻发布会上说："我非常关注格陵兰岛议题，同时也密切关注美国国内局势，以及 在北约内部和美国本土制造这种意识形态对立与政治紧张的一切事态。" 他说："正因为我们是盟友……当处于这样的情况，你不应卑躬屈膝，而应直言不讳……诚实地指 出对错。" 同在9日，北约一名发言人在社交媒体X平台上说，吕特与鲁比奥讨论了"北极地区对我们共同安 全的重要性以及北约如何努力增强在北极地区的能力"。 按法新社和路透社说法，美国意图从长期盟友丹麦手中夺取格陵兰岛，将在北约内部引发冲击 波，并加深特朗普与欧洲领导人之间的分歧。北约一直强调正采取措施加强北极地区安全，以转 移特朗普对格陵兰岛的觊觎。特朗普9日声称，美国需要得到格陵兰岛，如果无法"以简单方式"就 格陵兰岛达成协议，他将不得不采取"艰难"方式。对此，北约欧洲盟军最高司令亚力克苏斯·格林 克维奇当天回应说， ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the distinction between the situations in Venezuela and Taiwan, arguing that comparing them is misleading due to their differing international legal statuses and the nature of the issues involved [2][3] - The article asserts that China's decision-making regarding Taiwan is based on its comprehensive strength, strategic goals, and risk assessment, rather than being driven by external pressures or emotional responses [2][3] - It highlights that the pursuit of a decisive approach is aimed at preventing the Taiwan Strait from descending into chaos and war, embodying the logic of "using war to stop war" [4] Group 2 - Trump's recent comments suggest a transactional approach to international relations, indicating that the U.S. may not be willing to bear additional strategic costs or risks regarding Taiwan, reflecting a shift away from maintaining an abstract international order [6][7] - The article notes that Trump's stance does not equate to support for either side but rather redefines the U.S. position in the Taiwan issue as one of non-intervention, which could help reduce miscalculations by pro-independence forces [7] - It emphasizes that while China welcomes a reduction in U.S. intervention in Taiwan, it does not accept a new order that disregards international law and norms, advocating for a world with established boundaries and basic regulations [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that President Trump's actions are leading NATO into an "unknown territory" characterized by internal coercion and bizarre scenarios, undermining the international order and the alliance system [1][3]. Group 1: Impact on NATO - Trump's claim over Greenland, which is an autonomous territory of Denmark, has shocked allies and raised concerns about the stability of NATO [1][3]. - Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen expressed her frustration, stating that if the U.S. attempts to seize Greenland, it could lead to the end of NATO [3]. - The article highlights that NATO members are committed to defending certain values and resisting external aggression, but internal territorial grabs are unacceptable [3]. Group 2: Erosion of Alliances - Trump's actions, including the "kidnapping" of the Venezuelan president, illustrate a pattern that further destabilizes the U.S. alliance system [1]. - The unpredictability of Trump's presidency has led to discussions in serious media about the potential consequences for NATO, indicating a significant erosion of trust among allies [3]. - The article emphasizes that every statement and decision made by Trump could have profound implications for Europe's future [1].

新华社海牙1月10日电（记者邵海军）荷兰主流媒体《人民报》近日在其网站刊登分析文章认为，美国 总统特朗普正把北约带到"以内部胁迫外交和怪诞场景为标志的未知之域"。文章摘编如下： 特朗普声称要得到格陵兰岛，而这是美国坚定盟友之一丹麦的自治领土。他的所作所为已不仅仅是瓦解 国际秩序，此前"绑架"委内瑞拉总统的行动更加印证了这一点。特朗普的一系列行为使美国的联盟体系 进一步走向崩塌，其逻辑令盟友们震惊，也让他们进退两难。毕竟，他的每一句话、每一个反应、每一 个决定都可能对欧洲的未来产生影响。 特朗普持续不断的威胁让丹麦首相梅特·弗雷泽里克森忍无可忍。她愤怒地抨击美国政府，并预测如果 要强夺格陵兰岛，北约将走向终结。这番话不无道理：北约成员国宣称愿意捍卫某些价值观，抵御外部 侵略，但绝不允许联盟内部出现攫取盟国领土的行为。如今，一些严肃媒体也开始讨论上述情况可能如 何发生，这恰恰表明特朗普正以何种程度和速度侵蚀着北约。 特朗普上台后，一切都无法预料，北约正在走向"未知之域"。 ...