美国常以"维护规则"为借口打压他国，实则却是当今全球最严重的规则破坏者与秩序破坏者。从撕毁伊 核协议、退出世贸组织上诉机构，到随意对中国、巴西、印度等发展中经济体施加301调查、技术限制 与关税壁垒，其行为与20世纪殖民帝国强行制定"外人不得居住条款"无异，只不过将军事力量换成了金 融、科技与贸易工具。而当中国主张在联合国、世贸组织等框架内推动真正平等、共赢的全球治理时， 却被一些西方国家用"修正主义""威胁规则"标签加以抹黑。这种选择性"拥抱规则"与"背弃规则"的双标 行为，是当今国际秩序混乱的一大根源。 在这种背景下，广大全球南方国家亟需携手坚定维护以联合国为核心的国际体系，以国际法为基础的国 际秩序，以联合国宪章宗旨和原则为基础的国际关系基本准则。这种秩序不是排他性的小圈子俱乐部， 不是以军事或技术主导的霸权结构，更不是通过关税威胁与地缘政治干预实现的利益分配工具。 面对美国对全球产供链的肢解与挟持，对WTO规则的公然藐视，对他国的结构性剥削，中国始终主张 开放包容、合作共赢，推动全球治理朝着更加公正合理的方向发展。国际社会也应放弃对中国的有色眼 镜，真正理解中国所倡导的多边主义与经济全球化，不是对旧秩 ...

7月22日，美国总统特朗普（左）在华盛顿白宫欢迎到访的菲律宾总统马科斯。新华社记者 胡友松 摄 近日，在菲律宾总统马科斯结束访美之际，美国总统特朗普高调宣扬又一项"伟大交易"：菲律宾将对美国开放市场并实施零关税，而美国将对菲 律宾进口商品征收19%的关税。这场单方面的"胜利宣言"，在菲律宾激起了一场舆论风暴。 消息一经公布，便在菲律宾政坛引发跨党派声讨。参议员潘菲洛·拉克松直斥其为"主人对客人最无礼的侮辱"，而总统的姐姐、资深参议员伊梅·马 科斯则点明这并非"胜利"，而是单方面的妥协。这些来自政坛核心人物的激烈言辞，将矛头直指协议的"不公平"本质，暴露出菲律宾政坛对这份 所谓"盟友馈赠"的强烈不满。参议员约瑟夫·维克托·埃赫西托质问："我们真的是被当作盟友看待的吗？" 民间舆论的反应同样激烈。"19%对0"迅速成为网络上的热梗，在菲律宾社交平台上，网友将这次关税协议斥为"披着全球化外衣的新殖民主 义""为美国奉上的保护费"，还有人讽刺，面对美国霸凌，"菲律宾成了自掏腰包买特权的乖学生"。面对如此单边让步，不少政界人士和学者也提 出了法律疑虑。公民行动党主席拉斐拉·戴维指出，此协议涉嫌违反世界贸易组织（WTO） ...

2024年3月，为了缓解财政压力，尼日尔军政府与中国石油天然气集团有限公司（简称中石油）签订了一项资源换贷款协议。然而，协议执行近一年后，尼 日尔政府突然变脸，先是向中石油索要巨额税款，随后又要求追加贷款，遭到拒绝后，便开始了一系列针对中国企业的报复性行动。 尼日尔的能源危机：一场由贪婪和误判引发的灾难 尼日尔首都尼亚美在经历了长达三天的全面停电后，其经济正经历着前所未有的困境。工厂停工，炼油厂损失百万美元，这一切的根源都可以追溯到几个月 前尼日尔政府的一系列令人匪夷所思的举动——驱逐中国石油技术人员，搬起石头砸了自己的脚。 在收回部分资源后，尼日尔政府似乎错误地认为可以轻易摆脱对中国技术的依赖。他们没有意识到，中石油在尼日尔二十多年的投资（累计46-60亿美元） 建设了油田、炼油厂以及尼日尔-贝宁输油管道，将尼日尔从石油进口国转变为出口国。尼日尔驱逐中国技术人员后，其自身的石油产业却无法支撑，导致 能源系统瘫痪。 面对经济困境，尼日尔外交部长桑加雷上个月访问中国，试图修复两国关系，但为时已晚。尼日尔的鲁莽行为，不仅导致经济崩溃，还激怒了中国，这个曾 经重要的经济合作伙伴。 这场危机深刻地揭示了尼日尔政府的短 ...

Group 1 - The global economy is undergoing profound structural changes, characterized by weak growth momentum, intensified geopolitical conflicts, and a dilemma of high inflation, high interest rates, high debt, and low growth [2] - Private entrepreneurs' ability to accurately assess the economic situation and grasp development trends will directly determine the scientific and feasible nature of corporate strategy formulation [3][4] - Many enterprises are still stuck in traditional development models, incurring high trial-and-error costs [3] Group 2 - The current global economic situation is viewed as the early stage of a Great Depression, which is a core manifestation of a century-long change [5] - The Great Depression is not a natural phenomenon but a forced correction due to long-term deviations from objective economic laws [5] - The evolution of this crisis is expected to present three stages: "value return period" (2023-2025), "structural adjustment period" (2026-2028), and "order reconstruction period" (2029-2031) [6] Group 3 - The current economic crisis is marked by a deep restructuring of the post-World War II international economic and political order [8] - The dollar is entering a historical "value return" process, with its share in international settlements dropping from 73% in 2001 to 47% today [9] - The new colonialism is in a "structural adjustment" decline cycle, with a significant shift towards decolonization movements led by countries like those in BRICS [10][11] Group 4 - The decoupling of the US and Chinese economies has initiated a new era of de-globalization, fundamentally altering the global economic landscape [12][13] - The current economic crisis is compounded by a technological revolution, with the fifth and sixth industrial revolutions reshaping industries and accelerating the pace of corporate evolution [14][15] Group 5 - The economic crisis is characterized by a "crisis transfer" mechanism, where developed countries are shifting internal crises externally through monetary, industrial, financial, and geopolitical dimensions [17][18] - The domestic economy is expected to face profound impacts, including a debt crisis for local governments and state-owned enterprises, leading to a series of chain reactions [19][20] Group 6 - A wave of bankruptcies and restructurings among private enterprises is anticipated, as the old growth model based on demographic, resource, reform, and industrial chain dividends is nearing exhaustion [21][22] - The A-share market is undergoing a significant valuation system reconstruction, with traditional fundraising models becoming increasingly unsustainable [22][23] Group 7 - The current economic downturn is expected to exacerbate social tensions, with rising litigation and social unrest due to economic pressures [24] - The crisis is likely to lead to a significant increase in the number of corporate bankruptcies, particularly among small and medium-sized enterprises [24] Group 8 - To effectively respond to the economic crisis, a systematic crisis response mechanism is needed, focusing on local government debt resolution, financial system restructuring, and enterprise transformation [28][29] - Enterprises should adopt a digital asset strategy, enhance governance, and prepare for mixed ownership reforms to ensure adaptability and resilience [32][34]