三是将撕裂亚洲稳定的安全架构。高市的涉台言论向"台独"势力释放错误信号，台当局近期频繁与 日方勾连，这种纵容分裂、火中取栗的行为，极大地推高了台海爆发军事冲突的风险。这种以邻为壑的 做法，正将亚洲推向"越扩军越不安全"的恶性循环，不仅破坏中日关系，更可能让亚洲失去数十年积累 的和平发展红利。 中日关系在当前已然被推向高度紧张、战略互信极低的严峻时期。这种由日方少数极端势力制造的 摩擦和对抗，不符合中日两国人民的根本利益，更不符合亚洲和平发展的历史潮流。国际社会对日本的 危险动向保持高度关切，普遍呼吁日方恪守和平承诺。日本国内的理性力量和经济界也担忧国家被少数 政客的极端思想拖入战争边缘。这充分说明，这种逆时代潮流而动的错误立场是不得人心的。 历史的教训历历在目，战后国际秩序容不得肆意篡改。日方若继续执迷不悟，在军国主义的道路上 狂奔，终将重蹈历史覆辙。国际社会应认清这一危险动向，共同捍卫二战胜利成果。日本国内的理性力 量更需站出来，阻止右翼将国家拖入灾难。只有真正深刻反思侵略历史，以负责任的态度维护战后国际 秩序，珍惜中日之间来之不易的合作关系，聚焦于和平合作与共同发展，才是真正符合日本国家利益、 符合人类和 ...

Core Points - Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan suggest a potential military intervention, which has been met with stern objections from China [1][2] - The comments are seen as a serious challenge to China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, violating international principles and agreements [1][2] - The remarks have sparked widespread criticism within Japan, indicating a disconnect between the government and public sentiment [3][4] Group 1: Provocation and Sovereignty - Kishi Nobuo's statements represent the first time a Japanese leader has linked Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense, signaling a dangerous ambition for military involvement [1] - The remarks challenge China's sovereignty as established by historical documents and international resolutions, emphasizing that Taiwan is a core interest of China [1][2] Group 2: Historical Context and Public Reaction - The year marks the 80th anniversary of both the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and Taiwan's liberation, highlighting the historical grievances against Japan's past actions [2] - There is significant domestic backlash in Japan, with public protests against Kishi Nobuo's comments, reflecting a strong sentiment against militaristic rhetoric [3][4] Group 3: International Relations and Stability - Kishi Nobuo's comments threaten regional peace and stability, drawing condemnation from various international figures and organizations [4] - The remarks undermine Japan's post-war international standing and could lead to Japan's isolation on the global stage due to perceived unreliability in foreign policy [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The recent provocative remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have escalated tensions, suggesting potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, which has been met with strong opposition from China [1][2][3][4]. Group 1: Provocation and Sovereignty - Takaichi's statements are seen as a serious provocation against China's sovereignty and territorial integrity, marking the first time a Japanese leader has linked Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense [1]. - The remarks contradict established international agreements that affirm China's sovereignty over Taiwan, including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation [1]. Group 2: Historical Context and National Sentiment - This year marks the 80th anniversary of both the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the recovery of Taiwan, highlighting the historical grievances stemming from Japan's colonial rule over Taiwan [2]. - Takaichi's comments are viewed as an affront to the collective memory of the suffering caused by Japan's wartime actions, which included significant atrocities against Chinese and Asian peoples [2]. Group 3: Military Expansion and International Relations - Takaichi's linkage of Taiwan's situation to Japan's collective self-defense is perceived as a pretext for military expansion, raising concerns about a resurgence of militarism in Japan [2][3]. - The remarks have drawn widespread criticism within Japan, with public protests indicating a significant portion of the population opposes Takaichi's stance [3]. Group 4: International Order and Legal Principles - Takaichi's statements challenge the post-World War II international order and Japan's pacifist constitution, which restricts military actions [3][4]. - The inconsistency in Japan's foreign policy regarding Taiwan undermines its credibility on the international stage, potentially isolating Japan diplomatically [3][4]. Group 5: Regional Stability and Global Reactions - The assertion that "Taiwan's issues are Japan's issues" poses a threat to regional peace and stability, with international figures expressing concern over the implications of Takaichi's remarks [4]. - The potential for Japan to become a destabilizing factor in the region is highlighted by reactions from other countries, emphasizing the need for Japan to reflect on its historical actions [4].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Foreign Ministry criticizes Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida for emphasizing the "San Francisco Peace Treaty," which is deemed illegal and invalid, while neglecting the "Cairo Declaration" and "Potsdam Proclamation," which have established international legal standing and are highlighted in bilateral agreements [1] Group 1 - The Chinese government asserts that Kishida's remarks undermine the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations as established in four key political documents [1] - The statement indicates that Kishida's actions reflect a lack of remorse and a continued challenge to the post-war international order and basic principles of international law [1] - The Chinese side calls for the international community to remain vigilant against such provocations and urges Japan to reflect on its statements and fulfill its commitments to China [1]

Core Viewpoint - The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Guo Jia Kun, emphasized that Taiwan's return to China is a significant outcome of World War II and an essential part of the post-war international order, supported by various international legal documents [1][2]. Group 1 - The status of Taiwan was resolved in 1945 with the victory of the Chinese people in the Anti-Japanese War, and the establishment of the People's Republic of China (PRC) on October 1, 1949, reaffirmed China's sovereignty over Taiwan [1]. - The PRC is recognized as the sole legitimate government of China, as stated in the 1972 Sino-Japanese Joint Statement, which Japan acknowledges and respects [1]. - Guo criticized the San Francisco Peace Treaty for being illegal and ineffective regarding Taiwan's sovereignty, as it was made without the participation of key WWII parties and violated international agreements [2]. Group 2 - Guo highlighted that the current Japanese Prime Minister's focus on the San Francisco Peace Treaty, while ignoring the Cairo Declaration and Potsdam Proclamation, undermines the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations and challenges the post-war international order [2]. - The Chinese government urges Japan to reflect on its statements and take corrective actions to fulfill its obligations as a UN member state [2].

11月24日晚，中国国家主席习近平同美国总统特朗普通电话。随后，在特朗普要求下，美日两国领导人进行了通话。 耐人寻味的是，美日双方均未透露这次通话的具体内容。在被问到是否谈及台湾问题时，高市早苗更以"细节不便透露"为由搪塞过去。 第二层，我们知道高市早苗这一轮挑衅不仅是试探中国，其实也在试探美国，甚至是企图改变战后国际秩序。众所周知，特朗普第二次上台以来外交战略回 归杰克逊主义，抛弃了以建立联盟为核心的威尔逊主义；他认为联盟没有太大用处，反而拖累了美国。这在欧美关系中体现得非常明显。所以要回归大国博 弈，把所有的战略外交资源放到中国、俄罗斯这些大国上。 中美两国元首自釜山会晤后不到一个月内再次通话，传递了怎样的信号？特朗普为何在此时主动给日本打电话？这会在多大程度上影响日本的盘算？中国如 何进一步反制日方的挑衅？观察者网对话上海外国语大学杰出教授黄靖，分享他的观察。 ·高市言论不仅挑衅中国，也在试探美国 观察者网：这两天，国内外媒体的关注焦点被两通电话所吸引。11月24日，习近平主席同特朗普总统通话；紧随其后的是，特朗普要求与日本首相高市早苗 通话。尽管美日领导人通话并未透露具体内容，但外界对于两次通话背后所 ...

Group 1 - The core message emphasizes the importance of maintaining the post-war international order and global peace, highlighting the shared responsibility of China and the U.S. to counter any resurgence of militarism and threats to stability [1][3] - The recent phone call between President Xi Jinping and President Trump is seen as a strategic move to further implement the consensus reached during their meeting in Busan, contributing to the overall stability and positive momentum in China-U.S. relations [1][2] - The cancellation of tariffs and export controls by the U.S. on Chinese goods, along with China's corresponding suspension of countermeasures, illustrates the principle that cooperation benefits both parties while conflict leads to mutual harm [1][2] Group 2 - The current positive trend in China-U.S. relations is attributed to the leadership of both heads of state, emphasizing the need for mutual efforts to maintain this partnership [2] - Taiwan is identified as a core interest for China, with President Xi reiterating that Taiwan's return to China is a crucial part of the post-war international order, which the U.S. acknowledges [2][3] - The communication between the two leaders is deemed significant in light of recent provocations from Japan regarding Taiwan, which raises concerns about Japan's strategic intentions and its implications for regional stability [3]

11月24日晚，国家主席习近平同美国总统特朗普通电话。双方在重申釜山会晤共识、肯定中美关系稳定 向好的基础上，就台湾问题交换了意见。习近平主席强调，台湾回归中国是战后国际秩序重要组成部 分。特朗普总统表示，中国当年为二战胜利发挥了重要作用，美方理解台湾问题对于中国的重要性。两 国元首的这一表述尤其受到国际舆论关注。在战后秩序受到个别国家挑战、地区和平出现新的不稳定因 素之际，这次通话表明，在两国元首战略引领下，中美在关键原则问题上的沟通与共识具有重要意义。 近期，日本高市早苗政府有意在台湾问题上挑衅，已成为地区和平的显著风险点。东京方面试图通 过"借台制华"，推动国际舆论将台湾问题从战后秩序中抽离，包装为所谓"地区安全议题"。其深层目 的，是借台湾议题突破日本作为"战败国"在军事与安全政策上的结构性约束，为日本突破和平宪法铺平 道路。高市的言论之所以危险，不仅因其直接冲击中国核心利益，也在于其动摇了二战后形成的国际秩 序根基，向区域稳定投下巨大的不确定性。 在这样的背景下，中美元首通话的稳定意义愈发凸显。当今世界格局正经历深刻演变，守护与巩固二战 胜利成果和以联合国为核心的国际秩序，比以往任何时候都更具现实意 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses Japan's disappointment regarding the recent diplomatic interactions between the U.S. and China, particularly focusing on President Trump's calls to both countries, which have left Japan feeling sidelined and frustrated [2][3][4]. Group 1: Japan's Disappointment - Japan feels frustrated as Trump prioritized a call to China before reaching out to Japan, which is perceived as "top-down diplomacy" [3][4]. - The Japanese public's perception of their close alliance with the U.S. is challenged by Trump's actions, leading to a sense of disillusionment [4][12]. - Trump's unusual silence following his call with Japan, especially after being vocal about U.S.-China relations, has further disappointed Japanese officials [8][9]. Group 2: Historical Context - The article draws parallels to historical events where Japan's close alignment with the U.S. did not guarantee its interests, referencing past diplomatic shifts [5][6]. - The current situation is likened to past instances where Japan's government faced consequences for its stance against China, suggesting a potential repeat of history [6]. Group 3: U.S.-China Relations - Trump's focus on U.S.-China relations, particularly regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict and economic ties, indicates a strategic priority that may overshadow Japan's concerns [18][20][24]. - The article highlights that Trump is keen on ensuring China purchases more U.S. agricultural products, which reflects a broader economic strategy [24]. Group 4: China's Position - China is portrayed as standing on moral high ground regarding historical agreements and international order, particularly concerning Taiwan [28][29][32]. - The article emphasizes that Japan's recent actions regarding Taiwan are seen as a violation of established international agreements, which could have long-term diplomatic repercussions [28][30].

Core Viewpoint - Japan is attempting to break free from the constraints of international law as a defeated nation in World War II, leading to a potential resurgence of militarism, which poses a serious threat to peace and stability in Asia and the world [1][3][4] Summary by Sections Japan's Recent Actions - Japan has made several provocative moves, including the first export of lethal weapons since easing restrictions in 2023, discussions within the ruling party to revise security documents, and plans to deploy offensive weapons on islands near Taiwan [1][3] International Legal Obligations - International documents such as the UN Charter, the Potsdam Declaration, and Japan's surrender documents clearly outline Japan's obligations as a defeated nation, including disarmament and restrictions on military capabilities [2][3] Domestic and International Reactions - There is growing concern from both domestic and international communities regarding Japan's shift away from its post-war pacifism, with criticism from scholars, media, and public protests against the government's militaristic rhetoric [3][4] Historical Context and Responsibilities - The historical context emphasizes the importance of acknowledging past mistakes to prevent future conflicts, urging Japan to adhere to international law and its own pacifist constitution to build trust with neighboring countries and the international community [4]