三是财务管理情况。重点检查膳食经费财务管理相关情况，包括财务制度建设、会计核算、财会监督等 情况。 四是膳食经费补助资金管理情况。重点检查农村义务教育学生营养膳食补助资金收支相关情况，包括补 助资金安排、使用、监管等情况。 记者从教育部获悉：教育部组织开展校园食品安全和农村义务教育学生营养改善计划专项资金检查，全 面加强校园食品安全管理、规范农村义务教育学生营养改善计划专项资金使用，巩固深化"校园餐"专项 整治成果。 检查组分赴有关省份，通过座谈访谈、查阅资料、实地检查及入校陪餐等方式开展严格检查。 一是责任落实情况。重点检查教育行政部门食品安全监管责任和学校主体责任的落实情况，包括学校食 堂内部控制、食品安全管理等制度建设与执行情况，学校负责人陪餐制度落实情况，教育行政部门开展 监督检查、业务培训等情况。 二是食堂管理情况。重点检查食材制作全流程管理情况，包括食材采购、配送、验收、贮存、加工、留 样等食品制作关键环节控制情况。 对于检查中发现的问题，检查组将第一时间向相关省份主管部门反馈，提出整改要求，督促落实闭环整 改，确保问题整改到位。 （文章来源：人民日报） ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the efforts of the Huixian City Discipline Inspection Commission in ensuring food safety in schools through a digital platform called "Internet + Campus Sunshine Canteen," which enhances the supervision of food procurement, quality testing, and delivery processes [1][2][3] Group 1: Food Safety Supervision - The Huixian City Discipline Inspection Commission has established a supervision team to monitor food safety in schools, focusing on the freshness, compliance, and safety of food ingredients [1] - The supervision team conducts thorough checks on food items, including testing for pesticide residues and other harmful substances, ensuring that data is uploaded in real-time [1][2] - A digital platform allows parents to track food sources and safety reports, enhancing transparency and trust in school meals [2] Group 2: Delivery and Operational Standards - Customized delivery plans are implemented based on school sizes, with larger schools receiving food deliveries twice a day to maintain freshness [2] - The supervision team monitors cold chain logistics to ensure temperature control during transportation, triggering alerts for any anomalies within 10 minutes [2] - Regular inspections of kitchen operations are conducted to ensure compliance with food safety management protocols [2] Group 3: Long-term Safety and Quality Improvement - The city aims to shift from merely ensuring food safety to enhancing the quality of school meals through effective supervision [3] - The initiative involves collaboration among government, educational authorities, schools, parents, and social oversight to create a comprehensive supervision network [2][3] - Continuous monitoring of data authenticity and effective implementation of safety protocols is emphasized to maintain high standards in school dining [3]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court has released eight typical cases related to campus food safety, highlighting issues from suppliers to regulatory bodies, and various types of food safety violations [1] - Recent judicial interpretations have been established to enhance the legal framework for punishing food safety crimes, particularly focusing on the sale of unsafe food to minors in and around schools [1] - In a case involving a supplier selling fake products, the supplier was sentenced to seven months in prison and fined for selling duck meat disguised as beef, amounting to over 120,000 yuan [1] Group 2 - A case involving a supermarket selling expired snacks to a parent resulted in a court ruling that imposed punitive damages, thereby increasing the cost of violations and deterring illegal sales near schools [2] - The court has actively extended its judicial functions to address regulatory gaps, issuing recommendations to relevant departments to enhance oversight and accountability in campus food safety [2] - The People's Court aims to integrate criminal, civil, and administrative judicial functions to strengthen legal protections for campus food safety and promote a collaborative governance model [3]

对于案件审理过程中反映出的监管漏洞，人民法院积极延伸审判职能，及时向有关部门发出司法建议， 督促相关职能部门对校园食品安全违法问题共防共治。在一起典型案例中，法院办案时发现，校园餐中 标企业与其他未中标企业共同经营校园配餐项目，但监管部门只对部分主体进行处罚。法院在作出判决 的同时向市场监管部门、教育部门发出司法建议，推动全面履行监管责任，有力打击食品生产经营者逃 避食品安全责任的"金蝉脱壳"行为。 人民法院将充分发挥审判职能作用，进一步融合贯通刑事、民事、行政审判职能，全方位加强对校园食 品安全的司法保护，积极参与校园食品安全综合治理，充分运用法治力量，推动形成共建共治共享的校 园食品安全治理格局。 《 人民日报 》（ 2025年09月15日 11 版） 校园食品安全关乎广大学生健康成长，是重要的民生工程。最高人民法院11日发布8个涉校园食品安全 典型案例，涵盖了从食材供应商、供餐饭店、食堂经营者到监管主体，从食品标签、保质期到伪劣食 材、滥用食品添加剂等不同主体、不同领域、不同类型的涉校园食品安全案件。 近年来，最高人民法院单独或者会同有关部门制定发布一系列食品安全领域司法解释，不断完善惩治食 品安全违法 ...

多名家长质疑校外供餐存在安全隐患、校方未第一时间告知。 针对山东济宁昨日通报的"一民办学校师生逾百人因腹痛呕吐住院留观"事件，第一财经最新了解到，目前有关部门调查人员已经介入，到医院对相关住院师 生开展原因调查。 该起事件究竟是食物中毒还是病毒感染所致，仍待官方公布调查结果。第一财经致电山东济宁兖州疾病预防控制中心，电话未接通。不过，多名接受第一财 经采访的兖州区朝阳学校家长质疑，"校外供餐存在安全隐患"，以及"校方在事发后未第一时间告诉家长"。 家长质疑校食安全 "我们今天接到有市民反映称，朝阳小学的学生因食用汉堡而出现腹痛、呕吐等不适症状。"13日晚7时许，山东济宁政务服务热线相关工作人员回复第一财 经。 朝阳学校为山东济宁兖州区的一所九年一贯制民办学校，亦是兖州区委区政府2018年招商引资的重大民生工程。根据2024年的统计数据，兖州区朝阳学校有 63个教学班，在校学生2679人，教职工180人。 | 兖州区朝阳学校2024年度统计数据 | | | | --- | --- | --- | | 在校生数据 | 学生数据 | 2679人 | | | 班额班数情况 | 63个 | | 教师数据 | 教职工数据 ...

校园食品安全关乎广大学生健康成长、万千家庭幸福和社会发展未来，是一项重要的民生工程。 9月11日，2025年全国食品安全宣传周活动正式启动。当日，最高人民法院发布一系列涉校园食品 安全典型案例，涵盖了不同领域、不同主体、不同类型的涉校园食品安全案件，展现了人民法院切实维 护校园食品安全的坚定决心。 校外供餐饭店滥用亚硝酸盐引发学生集体严重食物中毒、食材供应商用鸭肉卷冒充牛肉卷向学校食 堂供货、管理者贪污农村义务教育学生营养改善计划财政补助专项资金……在这些触目惊心的案例中， 人民法院均依法作出严厉判决，亮明了司法保护校园食品安全的鲜明态度，为守护学生"舌尖上的安 全"提供了强有力的司法保障。 密织法网，捍卫"舌尖"安全 在校门口超市花4元买到一包过期零食，商家该赔多少？根据食品安全法惩罚性赔偿的相关规定， 答案是1000元。 2025年4月，学生家长颜某在接孩子放学时，于学校附近某超市花费4元购买了一袋零食。回家后对 照生产日期发现，此零食已过期，遂起诉请求某超市返还货款4元，支付惩罚性赔偿金1000元。 农村学生营养餐中的鸡腿为何"缩水"成了鸡翅根？看似简单的食材调换背后，隐藏着令人震惊的贪 腐行为。 法院 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has released eight typical cases related to campus food safety to strengthen judicial efforts in this area and deter violations, ensuring the health and safety of students [3][5]. Group 1: Judicial Actions and Regulations - The "Four Stricts" principle includes the strictest standards, strictest supervision, strictest penalties, and strictest accountability, which are being implemented in handling food safety violations [4][6]. - Recent cases highlight severe penalties for food safety violations, such as a supermarket selling expired food worth 4 yuan being fined 1,000 yuan, and a producer sentenced to seven years for causing food poisoning among students [4][5]. - The Supreme Court emphasizes the need for continuous enhancement of the "Four Stricts" to achieve more effective deterrence and accountability in food safety violations [5][7]. Group 2: Legislative Developments - A draft amendment to the Food Safety Law is under review, with suggestions for comprehensive revisions to address new challenges and improve the legal framework [6]. - There is a call for harsher penalties for serious violations, including personal fines for company executives involved in severe food safety breaches [6][7]. - The judicial system aims to integrate criminal, civil, and administrative functions to strengthen the legal protection of campus food safety [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of food safety in schools and highlights typical cases of violations to deter illegal activities related to food safety in educational institutions [2]. Group 1: Case Summaries - Case 1: A defendant was sentenced to 7 years in prison for adding sodium nitrite to school lunches, resulting in food poisoning for 56 students [3][4][6]. - Case 2: A defendant was sentenced to 7 months in prison for selling duck meat disguised as beef to a university cafeteria, with sales amounting to over 120,000 yuan [7][8]. - Case 3: A defendant was sentenced to 3 years in prison for embezzling 547,000 yuan from a student nutrition program by substituting chicken legs with wings and falsely reporting expenses [10][12]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The court's decisions reflect a strict stance against food safety violations in schools, aiming to protect students' health and deter similar crimes [6][12]. - The use of sodium nitrite, while permitted in certain meat products, is heavily regulated, and violations can lead to severe legal consequences [5][6]. - The cases illustrate the legal repercussions for fraudulent practices in food supply chains, emphasizing the need for compliance with food safety standards [8][12].

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has released eight typical cases related to campus food safety to strengthen judicial efforts in this area and deter violations, ensuring the health and safety of students [1][2]. Group 1: Judicial Actions and Regulations - The "Four Stricts" principle includes the strictest standards, strictest supervision, strictest penalties, and strictest accountability, which are being implemented in handling food safety violations in schools [2][3]. - Recent cases highlight severe penalties for food safety violations, such as a supermarket selling expired food worth 4 yuan being fined 1,000 yuan, and a producer sentenced to seven years for causing food poisoning among students [2][4]. Group 2: Legislative Developments - The Supreme Court has issued various judicial interpretations to enhance the legal framework for combating food safety crimes, particularly focusing on the protection of minors [3][4]. - Ongoing discussions in the National People's Congress regarding the Food Safety Law aim to address new challenges and improve the legal system, with suggestions for comprehensive amendments to ensure stricter regulations [3][4]. Group 3: Future Directions - There is a call for increased penalties for serious violations, including personal fines for company executives involved in food safety crimes, to ensure accountability [4][5]. - The judicial system aims to integrate criminal, civil, and administrative functions to enhance protection for campus food safety and promote a collaborative governance model [5].

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court has released eight typical cases related to campus food safety to deter illegal activities and ensure the health and safety of students [1][2] - The cases involve various stakeholders including food suppliers, catering restaurants, and regulatory bodies, highlighting issues such as food labeling, shelf life, and the use of inferior ingredients [1] - Courts are enforcing strict penalties for violations such as selling expired food and misusing food additives, reflecting a commitment to maintaining food safety standards in schools [1][2] Group 2 - A recent case involved a parent suing a supermarket for selling expired snacks to their child, resulting in a court ruling that emphasized the vulnerability of minors in food safety matters [2] - The court's decision aims to increase the cost of illegal activities and create a safer consumption environment for students and parents [2] - The Supreme Court has been actively developing judicial interpretations to enhance the legal framework against food safety violations, particularly in and around schools [2][3] Group 3 - A case of embezzlement was reported where a nutrition program manager replaced chicken legs with cheaper chicken wings, illegally pocketing funds meant for student meals [3] - The court not only penalized the offender but also issued judicial recommendations to address regulatory gaps identified during the trial [3][4] - The Supreme Court aims to integrate criminal, civil, and administrative judicial functions to strengthen legal protections for campus food safety [4]