Core Viewpoint - The insurance asset management industry is entering a phase of "strict regulatory normalization," with increased transparency and regularity in enforcement actions [1][3]. Regulatory Actions - Recent penalties have been imposed on several insurance asset management companies, including China Merchants Insurance Asset Management Co. and Pacific Asset Management Co., totaling 1.259 million yuan in fines this year [2][3]. - Specific violations include non-compliance in investment operations related to trust plans and debt investment plans, with multiple responsible individuals also facing penalties [2][5]. Industry Trends - The insurance asset management sector has seen a significant increase in regulatory penalties, with 42 individuals penalized across four institutions this year alone [3]. - The shift from a "principle-oriented" to a "rule-oriented" regulatory approach indicates a tightening of oversight, reflecting a need for the industry to transition from rapid expansion to standardized development [3][6]. Areas of Concern - Violations are primarily concentrated in alternative investment areas such as debt investment plans and trust plans, which are characterized by their complexity and lack of transparency [5][6]. - The industry's pressure to deliver stable returns in a low-interest environment has led to a misalignment between risk appetite and compliance requirements [6]. Governance Issues - There is a notable correlation between the violations of insurance asset management companies and their parent insurance companies, often due to governance structure flaws and lack of independent decision-making [7][8]. - The dependence on parent companies for business and funding can lead to compromised compliance and risk management practices [8][9]. Recommendations for Future Regulation - Future regulatory focus should not only address operational violations but also strengthen governance structures to prevent parent company interference in asset management decisions [9].