27 January 2026 | 10:31PM SGT Commodities Research BASE METALS ANALYST Aluminium: Stress-Testing Our Bearish Aluminium Call Eoin Dinsmore +65-6889-2401 | eoin.dinsmore@gs.com Goldman Sachs (Singapore) Pte Aurelia Waltham +44(20)7051-2547 | aurelia.waltham@gs.com Goldman Sachs International Lavinia Forcellese +44(20)7774-9243 | lavinia.forcellese@gs.com Goldman Sachs International Daan Struyven +1(212)357-4172 | daan.struyven@gs.com Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC Samantha Dart +1(212)357-9428 | samantha.dart@gs.com ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the recent "China Shock 2.0" narrative propagated by Western think tanks and media, which distorts China's normal industrial competition and foreign cooperation as a systemic risk to other economies [1] - Xinhua News Agency released a creative response in the form of an AI-generated MV titled "Breaking News: Another Wave of 'China Shock' Arrives," which gained millions of views overseas and attracted significant attention from mainstream media and experts [1][4] - The MV employs AI technology and features a bald eagle rapping, criticizing the double standards of the U.S. government regarding China's trade and technological advancements [2][4] Group 2 - The MV's animation and humor replace serious diplomatic language, making it appealing to a broader audience, as noted by various international media outlets [7] - Prominent figures, including scholars and journalists, have commented on the MV, with some highlighting its effective summary of economic perspectives regarding China's rise and its impact on global markets [7][9] - The MV has become popular on domestic platforms like Weibo and Douyin, with view counts nearing ten million, and has received significant engagement from younger audiences [11]

Core Viewpoint - The narrative of "China Shock 2.0" is a politically constructed discourse that misrepresents China's rapid development as a threat, while ignoring the benefits and opportunities it brings to the global economy [1][5]. Group 1: Economic Performance and Innovation - China's high-tech manufacturing profits increased by 10% year-on-year from January to November 2025, outpacing the average growth of all industrial sectors by 9.9 percentage points [2]. - The growth in China's high-tech sector is attributed to a mature innovation ecosystem, a complete industrial chain, and a large pool of R&D personnel, rather than "unfair competition" [2]. Group 2: Contribution to Global Sustainability - China has become a core player in global clean energy deployment, with renewable energy capacity leading the world and contributing significantly to climate crisis mitigation [3]. - By providing affordable solar panels and batteries, China is helping developing countries reduce reliance on fossil fuels, establishing itself as a reliable source of clean technology products [3]. Group 3: Open Market and Foreign Investment - China is committed to high-level openness, expanding access in sectors like telecommunications and healthcare, and has seen significant foreign investment in high-tech industries, amounting to 221.26 billion RMB in the first 11 months of 2025 [4]. - The Belt and Road Initiative and international capacity cooperation are enhancing infrastructure in developing countries, reducing global logistics and transaction costs [4]. Group 4: Global Economic Relations - In response to the U.S. imposing tariffs on Chinese products, China has taken decisive countermeasures while also engaging in dialogue to maintain communication channels between the two largest economies [4]. - The narrative of "China Shock 2.0" reflects anxieties in some Western circles about their declining competitiveness, which leads to a misallocation of blame towards China instead of addressing internal economic issues [5].

Core Viewpoint - The narrative of "China Shock 2.0" is a politically constructed discourse that misrepresents China's rapid development as a threat, ignoring the significant benefits and opportunities it brings to the global economy [1][5]. Group 1: Economic Performance and Competitiveness - China's high-tech manufacturing profits increased by 10% year-on-year from January to November 2025, outpacing the average growth of all industrial sectors by 0.1 percentage points [2]. - The growth in China's high-tech sector is attributed to a mature innovation ecosystem, a complete industrial chain, and a large pool of R&D personnel, rather than "unfair competition" [2]. Group 2: Contribution to Global Sustainability - China has become a core player in global clean energy deployment, with renewable energy capacity leading the world and contributing significantly to climate crisis mitigation [3]. - By providing affordable solar panels and batteries, China is helping developing countries reduce reliance on fossil fuels, establishing itself as a reliable source of clean technology products [3]. Group 3: Open Market and International Cooperation - China is committed to high-level openness, expanding access in sectors like telecommunications and healthcare, and has attracted significant foreign investment in high-tech industries [4]. - The "Belt and Road" initiative and international capacity cooperation are enhancing infrastructure in developing countries, reducing global logistics and transaction costs [4]. Group 4: Global Economic Governance - China's five-year plans are seen as strategic and forward-looking, providing effective references for global economic governance and international cooperation [5]. - The narrative of "China Shock 2.0" reflects anxieties in some Western countries about their declining competitiveness, which leads to misplaced blame on China instead of addressing internal economic issues [5].

Core Viewpoint - Recent narratives from overseas individuals and institutions have distorted China's normal industrial competitiveness and foreign cooperation into a so-called "China Shock 2.0," portraying it as a systemic risk to other economies. This rhetoric is primarily driven by a reluctance to accept the rise of others [2]. Group 1 - The term "China Shock" is being exaggerated to suggest that China's economic activities pose a threat to other countries [2]. - The narrative is seen as an attempt to undermine China's legitimate economic growth and international collaboration [2]. - The discourse reflects a broader trend of resistance against the rise of emerging economies, particularly China [2].

Group 1: Overview of "China Shock 2.0" - The concept of "China Shock 2.0" highlights China's advancements in high-tech sectors, posing unprecedented challenges to the U.S. [2][4] - The transition from "China Shock 1.0," which focused on low-end manufacturing, to "2.0," which targets high-tech industries, marks a significant shift in global economic dynamics [6][8] - Key high-tech areas affected include aerospace, artificial intelligence, telecommunications, semiconductors, robotics, nuclear energy, quantum computing, biomedicine, solar energy, and battery technology [6][8] Group 2: Economic and Technological Impact - China's rapid rise in the global value chain is attributed to its technological progress and industrial upgrades, leading to a reassessment of U.S. strategies [4][12] - The shift in focus from low-cost labor to technology-intensive industries requires long-term R&D investment and skilled talent [8][10] - China's electric vehicle industry has emerged as a global leader, with companies like BYD and CATL driving innovation and market share [8][10] Group 3: Policy and Strategic Shifts - The role of local governments and private enterprises has become central in driving China's industrial policy, moving from short-term growth to nurturing strategic emerging industries [10][12] - The competitive landscape has evolved, with Chinese firms like DJI and LONGi Green Energy demonstrating significant advancements in their respective fields [8][10] Group 4: Global Competition and Standards - China's dominance in 5G technology and its control over rare earth resources are critical components of "China Shock 2.0," enhancing its global influence [14][21] - The shift in technological leadership is evident, with China leading in 57 out of 64 frontier technologies by 2023, compared to only 7 for the U.S. [12][19] Group 5: U.S. Response and Strategic Recommendations - The U.S. response has primarily relied on tariffs, which have proven to be ineffective against China's high-tech advancements [17][22] - Recommendations for the U.S. include forming alliances, allowing Chinese firms in non-sensitive sectors, maintaining policy continuity, and improving reemployment systems for affected workers [17][22]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the transformative impact of China's economic rise on the U.S. economy, highlighting the first "China Shock" and warning of a potentially more severe "China Shock 2.0" that could affect various high-tech industries in the U.S. [1][2][3] Group 1: Historical Context - Between 1999 and 2007, the first "China Shock" led to the loss of nearly a quarter of manufacturing jobs in the U.S. due to the influx of cheap Chinese goods [1] - The initial shock was a result of China's transition from a planned economy to a market economy, which caused significant job losses in U.S. manufacturing towns [1] - Although some regions have seen growth since then, the new jobs created are primarily in low-wage sectors, with many labor-intensive industries still feeling the effects of the initial shock [1] Group 2: Emerging Challenges - The article emphasizes that the "China Shock 2.0" is emerging, with China now challenging the U.S. in high-tech sectors such as aerospace, artificial intelligence, telecommunications, and renewable energy [3][5] - China's rapid advancements in these industries could lead to high-profit companies and high-paying jobs, reshaping geopolitical dynamics and military capabilities [3][5] Group 3: Policy Recommendations - U.S. policymakers are urged to recognize that many issues with China are shared with allies and to collaborate with them rather than imposing high tariffs indiscriminately [10] - The article suggests that the U.S. should invite Chinese companies to invest in American manufacturing, particularly in electric vehicles and batteries, to stimulate competition and innovation [10][11] - It advocates for a proactive approach in selecting strategic industries for investment, similar to China's model, to foster innovation and competitiveness [12][13] Group 4: Economic and Workforce Implications - The article highlights the need for the U.S. to avoid devastating job losses from future economic shocks, whether from China or other sources, by enhancing support for displaced workers [16][17] - It stresses the importance of creating a robust ecosystem for emerging industries, including reliable energy supplies and modern infrastructure, to maintain competitiveness [12][13] - The need for a strategic investment department to manage research and innovation is also proposed, aiming to drive progress without political interference [12][13]