湖北大学区域与国别研究院院长吴洪英6日在接受《环球时报》记者采访时表示，希尔德布兰德的最新 言论呼应现任美国政府的拉美政策。美国在去年12月发布的《国家安全战略报告》中明确将拉美列为优 先关注地区，并寻求巩固其在西半球的所谓绝对主导地位。 她认为，从美国近期对委内瑞拉动武一事，到其驻哥斯达黎加大使的表态，都显示出美国希望通过政 治、经济、军事、舆论等各类手段，压制拉美左翼政府，同时遏制其他大国在该地区的影响力，干扰地 区国家与中国等国的合作。 今年9月，中国驻哥斯达黎加大使馆批评希尔德布兰德的相关言论说，中国同哥斯达黎加合作，着眼于 共同发展和造福民众，从不针对任何第三方，同时也坚决反对第三方干涉中哥关系。（白云怡） 据《哥斯达黎加时报》5日报道，美国新任驻哥斯达黎加大使梅琳达·希尔德布兰德5日一抵达该国赴 任，就在当地大肆炒作所谓"中国威胁"。接受《环球时报》采访的专家表示，这一做派呼应美国政府的 拉美政策，旨在通过舆论手段干扰拉美国家和中国正常合作。 据哥斯达黎加媒体报道，美驻哥大使馆在一份新闻稿中引述了希尔德布兰德的话："哥斯达黎加是一个 可靠的民主伙伴，身处一个面临跨国有组织犯罪、打击毒品贩运、网络安 ...

【环球时报综合报道】据《哥斯达黎加时报》5日报道，美国新任驻哥斯达黎加大使梅琳达·希尔德布兰 德5日一抵达该国赴任，就在当地大肆炒作所谓"中国威胁"。接受《环球时报》采访的专家表示，这一 做派呼应美国政府的拉美政策，旨在通过舆论手段干扰拉美国家和中国正常合作。 据哥斯达黎加媒体报道，美驻哥大使馆在一份新闻稿中引述了希尔德布兰德的话："哥斯达黎加是一个 可靠的民主伙伴，身处一个面临跨国有组织犯罪、打击毒品贩运、网络安全威胁、非法移民以及中国经 济影响等挑战的地区。" 《哥斯达黎加时报》认为，希尔德布兰德关于中国的表态呼应了她今年9月在美国参议院听证会上的相 关承诺。她当时称，自己将与哥斯达黎加当地政府合作，应对北京不断扩大的影响力，尤其是在5G技 术等领域。 "长期以来，哥斯达黎加一直在华盛顿与北京之间保持平衡关系。"报道评论称，2007年，哥斯达黎加与 中国建交，随后与中国开展了一系列经济合作项目。然而，近几届美国政府一直敦促哥方对与中国的关 系保持谨慎。 湖北大学区域与国别研究院院长吴洪英6日在接受《环球时报》记者采访时表示，希尔德布兰德的最新 言论呼应现任美国政府的拉美政策。美国在去年12月发布的《国家安 ...

法新社记者提问，特朗普表示美国需要格陵兰岛，原因之一是格陵兰岛被中国船只"包围"。发言人对此 有何回应？ 转自：北京日报客户端 1月5日，外交部发言人林剑主持例行记者会。 林剑 资料图 对此，林剑回应："我们敦促美方停止把所谓'中国威胁'作为捞取自身私利的借口。" 来源：长安街知事微信公众号 ...

1月5日，外交部发言人林剑主持例行记者会。 法新社记者提问，美总统特朗普说"美国需要格陵兰岛"，他给出的理由之一是，格陵兰岛"到处都 是中国船只"。您对此有何回应？ 来源：澎湃新闻 对此，林剑回应："我们敦促美方停止把所谓'中国威胁'作为捞取自身私利的借口。" ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the backlash against Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Sanae due to her controversial remarks regarding Taiwan, which have led to public protests and criticism from various political figures, suggesting that her actions have plunged Japan into a national crisis [1][9]. Group 1: Political Reactions - Public protests occurred in front of the Prime Minister's residence, with demands for Kishi's resignation and apologies for her statements regarding Taiwan [1]. - Criticism from political figures, including former Prime Minister Noda Yoshihiko, who labeled Kishi's remarks as reckless and damaging to Japan-China relations [2][9]. - The opposition party, led by Okada Katsuya, questioned Kishi on the implications of her statements, indicating a serious political backlash [2]. Group 2: Historical Context and Ideological Background - Kishi's political rise is attributed to former Prime Minister Abe Shinzo, who is known for his right-wing views and military expansionist policies [3]. - Kishi's stance on historical issues and military policy aligns closely with Abe's, including calls for constitutional amendments and increased defense spending [3][5]. - The article highlights Kishi's past actions, such as visiting Taiwan and promoting Japan-Taiwan security cooperation, which reflect her aggressive stance on regional security [3][4]. Group 3: Legal and International Implications - Experts argue that Kishi's remarks lack legal grounding, as Japan's security laws do not support military intervention in Taiwan, which is not recognized as a sovereign state [6][7]. - The article emphasizes that Japan's post-war commitments and international law recognize Taiwan as part of China, warning that military involvement would be seen as aggression [7][8]. - Kishi's statements are viewed as a potential threat to Japan's peace constitution, raising concerns about the future of Japan's military policies [12]. Group 4: Economic Consequences - The article outlines potential negative impacts on Japan-China relations, which could harm trade and economic ties, as China is Japan's largest trading partner [11]. - Concerns are raised about the economic repercussions for Japan, including reduced trade and tourism from China, should relations deteriorate further due to Kishi's remarks [11][12]. - The article suggests that Kishi's aggressive rhetoric could lead to significant economic fallout for Japan, affecting its citizens directly [11].

Group 1 - The remarks by U.S. Ambassador Nicholas Burns emphasize that the U.S. must not fall behind China as the world's second superpower, indicating rising tensions in U.S.-China relations [1] - The discussions between the U.S. and China on October 25-26 covered various topics including tariff reductions and export controls, leading to some consensus, which Burns expressed dissatisfaction with [3] - Burns, representing the Democratic Party, aims to push for a more competitive stance against China, despite advocating against tariff wars [6] Group 2 - The competitive pressure on the U.S. from China has increased in various sectors, including rare earth supplies affecting U.S. manufacturing and agricultural exports facing challenges due to reduced orders from China [7] - During Trump's visit to Japan from October 27-29, agreements were made for Japan to import $8 billion worth of U.S. agricultural products, although actual compliance may be limited due to Japan's domestic political and economic constraints [9] - Japan's agricultural cooperative, which holds significant influence over agricultural policy, may resist large imports of U.S. products, potentially leading to domestic price surges and political backlash [10]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government firmly opposes the sensationalism surrounding alleged "Chinese espionage activities" and emphasizes the importance of mutual respect and cooperation in Sino-British relations [1] Summary by Relevant Categories Sino-British Relations - The Chinese stance on developing Sino-British relations is consistent, based on mutual respect and the essence of cooperation being mutually beneficial [1] - The Chinese government urges the UK to view the situation correctly and not to allow anti-China forces to provoke and create tensions [1] Response to Allegations - The Chinese Foreign Ministry has repeatedly clarified its serious position regarding the so-called "Chinese espionage case," rejecting any attempts to smear China [1] - The Chinese government warns that if the UK continues to entertain anti-China sentiments, it will ultimately lead to losses for the UK [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government dismisses claims that Chinese companies are establishing port networks globally for espionage and military purposes, labeling such statements as "anxiety selling" and urging the U.S. to stop exaggerating security concerns and undermining China's normal economic cooperation [1]. Group 1 - Chinese officials criticize U.S. narratives about Chinese companies controlling global trade through port networks [1] - The Chinese government calls for an end to the U.S. portrayal of a "China threat" [1] - The response emphasizes the importance of normal economic cooperation between China and other countries [1]

Group 1 - The NATO summit in The Hague resulted in a commitment to increase military spending to 5% of GDP, a significant rise from the previous 2% target, which could amount to trillions of dollars over the next decade [1][4] - NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg has been promoting the idea of a "China threat" to justify increased military spending, alongside the ongoing Ukraine crisis, which has led to heightened tensions in Europe [1][2] - The expansion of NATO's military budget is seen as a response to perceived threats, but it raises concerns about the effectiveness of such measures in ensuring security, as evidenced by the ongoing conflicts in Eastern Europe [1][3] Group 2 - The absence of leaders from three countries in the "Indo-Pacific partners" group at the summit highlights concerns about being drawn into conflicts and the unpopularity of military interventions [3] - European nations are increasingly recognizing the need to strengthen their own defense capabilities to reduce reliance on the U.S., yet the push for higher NATO spending contradicts this goal [3][4] - The perception that NATO has become a tool for U.S. geopolitical interests raises questions about its future relevance and the financial burden it places on European countries [4]