Core Viewpoint - Lingnan Ecological Cultural Tourism Co., Ltd. has been convicted of bid-rigging, resulting in a fine of 600,000 RMB and prison sentences for two employees [1][10]. Group 1: Legal Issues - The company was found guilty of bid-rigging, with a fine of 600,000 RMB imposed by the Henan Province Tangyin County People's Court [4][5]. - Two employees from the company's subsidiary were sentenced to ten months in prison, with one receiving a fine of 30,000 RMB and the other 25,000 RMB [4][5]. - The case originated from a bidding process for a project worth 96.2265 million RMB, where the employees failed to comply with legal bidding procedures [4][16]. Group 2: Company Response and Compliance - The company believes that this legal issue does not trigger mandatory delisting under the Shenzhen Stock Exchange rules [2][11]. - Lingnan plans to enhance compliance training for its board members and management to prevent future legal issues [2][11]. Group 3: Financial Performance - For the first three quarters of the year, the company reported total revenue of 253 million RMB, a significant decrease of 68.75% year-on-year [9][22]. - The net profit attributable to shareholders was a loss of 206.23 million RMB, reflecting a 23.34% increase in losses compared to the previous year [9][22]. - The company's total assets decreased by 5.16% to approximately 13.62 billion RMB, while equity attributable to shareholders fell by 19.37% [22].

12月16日晚间，ST岭南（002717.SZ）公告称，公司近日收到河南省汤阴县人民法院出具的《刑事判决 书》，因涉嫌串通投标罪一审被判处罚金60万元，两名直接责任人员亦被判处有期徒刑并适用缓刑。 对此，《中国经营报》记者致电ST岭南方面，截至发稿未获回复。ST岭南在公告中表示，截至目前， 上述判决暂未生效，事件暂未对公司生产经营产生重大影响，且不触及重大违法强制退市情形。 涉嫌串标 据ST岭南公告披露，该案源于2021年6月ST岭南中标的"安阳曹操高陵保护展示工程I、II期绿化及管网 项目"。该项目合同金额9622.65万元，占公司最近一期经审计净资产的9.04%。 中经记者 陈家运 北京报道 陷多重困境 目前，ST岭南还面临债务逾期、诉讼纠纷与业绩亏损等多重挑战。 债务层面，据ST岭南11月15日公告披露，2025年4月26日至11月13日，ST岭南新增利息逾期债务1.39亿 元，占公司2024年经审计净资产的13.08%；此外，ST岭南为子公司提供担保的765万元银行贷款亦已逾 期，可能面临支付违约金、罚息及代偿责任。 另外，ST岭南于12月11日发布的公告显示，截至12月9日，ST岭南及控股子公司连续 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the article is that Lingnan Ecological Cultural Tourism Co., Ltd. (ST Lingnan) has been penalized for bid-rigging, resulting in a fine of RMB 600,000 and prison sentences for two responsible individuals [1][3] - The case originated from a project won by the company in June 2021, with a contract value of RMB 96.2265 million, which accounts for 9.04% of the company's latest audited net assets [3] - The court ruling indicates that the company was found guilty of bid-rigging, with the two individuals receiving ten-month prison sentences, suspended for one year, along with fines of RMB 30,000 and RMB 25,000 respectively [3] Group 2 - The company stated that the incident has not significantly impacted its production and operations to date [3] - In response to the ruling, the company plans to enhance compliance awareness and implement corrective measures by organizing training for all directors, executives, and business departments regarding securities and bidding regulations [3]

Core Points - ST Lingnan has been prosecuted for collusion in bidding, with a court date set for October 31, 2025 [3] - The company announced that shareholder Yin Hongwei's 20 million shares (1.10% of total shares) were sold at auction for 36.288 million yuan [5] - As of November 4, the company's stock price closed at 1.93 yuan per share, down 3.02%, with a total market capitalization of approximately 3.5 billion yuan [1][2] Legal Issues - The company is cooperating with law enforcement and the court regarding the collusion in bidding case [3] - The total amount involved in ongoing litigation and arbitration cases is approximately 131 million yuan, which represents 12.28% of the company's latest audited net assets [4] - No single litigation or arbitration case exceeds 10 million yuan or 10% of the company's net assets [4] Financial Performance - For the first three quarters of 2025, the company reported revenue of approximately 253 million yuan, a year-on-year decline of 68.75% [4] - The net profit attributable to shareholders was approximately -206 million yuan, indicating a reduction in losses compared to the previous year [4] Shareholder Actions - Yin Hongwei's shares have faced multiple judicial sales, with a total of approximately 208 million shares frozen and 1.294 billion shares under pending judicial actions [6] - The recent auction of shares indicates ongoing financial distress for the shareholder, which may lead to further judicial disposals [6]

Core Viewpoint - ST Lingnan has been accused of collusion in bidding and is facing legal proceedings, which may impact its operations and financial status in the future [1][3][4]. Group 1: Legal Issues - The company has been formally charged with collusion in bidding, with a court date set for October 31, 2025 [3]. - As of October 28, 2025, the company and its subsidiaries have faced litigation and arbitration totaling approximately 131 million yuan, which represents 12.28% of the company's latest audited net assets [4]. Group 2: Shareholder Actions - Shareholder Yin Hongwei's 20 million shares (1.10% of total shares) were sold at auction for 36.288 million yuan on November 2, 2025 [5]. - Yin Hongwei has faced multiple judicial sales of his shares, with a total of approximately 208 million shares frozen and 1.294 billion shares under pending judicial actions [6]. Group 3: Financial Performance - For the first three quarters of 2025, the company reported revenues of approximately 253 million yuan, a year-on-year decline of 68.75%, and a net loss attributable to shareholders of approximately 206 million yuan [4].

Core Viewpoint - The company ST Lingnan (002717.SZ) has been indicted for collusion in bidding, with a court date set for October 31, 2025. Currently, this legal issue has not significantly impacted the company's operations [1]. Group 1 - The company has received a summons from the People's Court of Tangyin County, Henan Province [1]. - The court hearing is scheduled for the morning of October 31, 2025, at 8:30 AM [1]. - The company is accused of collusion in bidding, which is a serious legal charge [1]. Group 2 - As of now, the ongoing legal proceedings have not had a major effect on the company's production and operations [1].

Core Viewpoint - ST Lingnan (002717.SZ) has been indicted for collusion in bidding, with a court date set for October 31, 2025. The company states that this incident has not yet significantly impacted its operations, and the potential effects on its business and financials will depend on the court's ruling [1] Summary by Category - **Legal Issues** - The company has received a summons from the People's Court of Tangyin County, Henan Province, regarding allegations of collusion in bidding [1] - The court hearing is scheduled for October 31, 2025, at 8:30 AM [1] - **Operational Impact** - Currently, the incident has not had a major impact on the company's production and operations [1] - The future implications for the company's business and financial status remain uncertain pending the court's decision [1]

Group 1: Criminal Cases - The number of first-instance cases accepted for crimes disrupting the socialist market economy reached 35,000, a year-on-year increase of 2.65% [1] - The number of first-instance cases for bid-rigging crimes surged to 707, marking a significant year-on-year increase of 30.44% [2] - The total number of criminal cases accepted in the first half of the year was 529,000, reflecting a year-on-year decrease of 10.4% [1] Group 2: Civil and Commercial Cases - The total number of civil and commercial first-instance cases accepted was 12.37 million, showing a year-on-year increase of 38.87% [3] - Labor dispute cases reached 436,000, with a year-on-year increase of 40.17% [3] - Cases related to companies saw a dramatic rise to 97,000, a year-on-year increase of 78.42% [3] Group 3: Execution Cases - The number of first-time execution cases accepted was 5.31 million, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 13.62% [4] - The execution completion rate and execution effectiveness rate were 41.96% and 54.38%, respectively, maintaining high levels [4] - The number of individuals added to the dishonesty list was 1.033 million, a year-on-year decrease of 2.46% [4]

Group 1 - The case involves two defendants, Zhang and Fang, who were found guilty of colluding in a bidding process, resulting in illegal gains through bribery and manipulation of tender information [1][2] - The total amount involved in the three projects was approximately 1.54 million yuan, with Fang profiting over 187,000 yuan from the collusion [1][2] - The court ruled that the 150,000 yuan exchanged between the defendants was disguised as a loan but was actually a bribe, leading to their conviction for collusion in bidding [2][3] Group 2 - The court emphasized the importance of regulating bidding activities to protect public interests and maintain market order [3] - The legal framework surrounding bidding is designed to ensure fair competition and optimal resource allocation, which was undermined by the defendants' actions [3] - The ruling serves as a deterrent against corrupt practices in the bidding process, reinforcing the integrity of the tendering system [3]