减负赋能夯实基层 干部下沉服务基层 "从群众中来，到群众中去，这个工作法宝果然有效。"敖超说。 以"村晚"带动招聘会，以招聘会助力"村晚"。望着熙熙攘攘的人群，东湖社区党总支书记敖超干劲十 足。 "不能有假，社区和市人社局都管着呢！"公司负责人保证没问题。鼓声渐息，舞龙歇步，李青英扭过 身，接过报名表，填写信息。 "持续整治形式主义为基层减负赋能，让我们有更多精力服务群众，破解难题。"敖超做过统计，为基层 减负赋能以来，各种会议缩减一半，材料报表减少四成，有更多时间走出办公室，"同步举办这两场活 动，就是在走访中得到的点子。" "在外打工，顾不上家里，要是在家门口上班，该多好。"李青英认为，要是参加技能培训，拿到技能证 书，选择面会更宽。 兴仁把招聘会开到群众家门口(新春走基层·开局之年新气象) 《人民日报》(2026年02月22日 第 01 版) 正月初五，阳光正好，暖意融融。下午3点，贵州省黔西南布依族苗族自治州兴仁市东湖社区广场上， 一场招聘会和一台"村晚"同步进行。 "一天工作几小时，工资多少？"踩着密集的鼓点，外出务工返乡的李青英，在本地一家物业公司展台前 停下脚步。 "每天8小时，到手3500元。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for grassroots officials to shift focus from paperwork to practical implementation, enhancing policy effectiveness and public satisfaction [1] Group 1: Reducing Bureaucracy - Grassroots officials are currently overwhelmed with paperwork, especially at year-end, which detracts from their ability to implement policies effectively [1] - The approach taken by Nanhua County involves reducing unnecessary documentation and focusing on substantive indicators like policy implementation and public satisfaction [1] - The shift in evaluation standards from documentation to practical results fosters a work environment that values frontline efforts and real outcomes [1] Group 2: Empowering Grassroots Officials - To alleviate burdens on grassroots officials, it is essential to empower them to focus on their core responsibilities and improve service quality [1] - Reducing unnecessary meetings and streamlining communication channels are critical steps to enhance efficiency [1] - By minimizing bureaucratic tasks, grassroots officials can dedicate more time and energy to meaningful work that directly benefits the community [1]

Core Points - The article discusses the efforts made by community leaders in Gansu Province to reduce bureaucratic inefficiencies and improve communication within community work groups [4][5] - It highlights the challenges faced by community workers due to excessive task assignments and the implementation of measures to streamline operations [3][6] Group 1: Communication and Task Management - The establishment of work groups has facilitated communication among community leaders, allowing for timely task assignments and updates [2] - However, there has been an issue with the random assignment of tasks that are not directly related to community work, leading to increased burdens on a small team of less than 20 staff members [2][3] - Recent reforms have aimed to limit the number of tasks assigned through work groups, resulting in a more efficient communication process [5] Group 2: Implementation of Reforms - Gansu Province has issued several plans to combat "formalism" in administrative tasks, including the prohibition of arbitrary task assignments in work groups [4] - The city of Dingxi has successfully reduced the number of government applications and work groups, streamlining operations to just one work group for community tasks [5] - The reduction in the number of tasks and the simplification of data reporting have led to improved efficiency and reduced workload for community workers [6] Group 3: Community Engagement and Outcomes - Community leaders have successfully mobilized residents for projects, such as the renovation of drainage systems, by utilizing streamlined communication methods [5] - The implementation of a "four comparisons and one report" mechanism has allowed for better data sharing among various departments, reducing redundancy in reporting [6] - The proactive approach taken by community leaders has resulted in successful project completions, such as the timely renovation of drainage systems before the rainy season [5]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of a stable and effective institutional system for the construction of the Party's good conduct, which has been continuously improved since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China [1] - The implementation of the Central Eight Regulations and the focus on combating the "Four Winds" (formalism, bureaucratism, hedonism, and extravagance) are key components of the Party's internal regulations [1][2] - The Party has established a series of regulations and documents to address the new manifestations of formalism and bureaucratism, which are characterized by concealment and technicality [2][3] Group 2 - The evaluation of leadership effectiveness includes loyalty to responsibilities, courage to take action, and the ability to maintain the interests of the masses [3][4] - The Party emphasizes the need to reduce burdens on grassroots levels, which is crucial for enhancing governance efficiency [4][5] - The Party's commitment to frugality and opposition to extravagance is reinforced through strict adherence to regulations regarding gifts and hospitality [5][6] Group 3 - The Party has implemented strict regulations to combat corruption related to improper dining and entertainment practices, which are seen as breeding grounds for corruption [6][7] - The focus on controlling the construction of government buildings reflects a commitment to using limited resources effectively for public welfare rather than ostentation [7][8] - The Party aims to transform institutional constraints into internal recognition and behavioral consciousness among all members [7]