巩固停火局面是各方的当务之急。公报首先强调，要确保27日柬泰停火联合声明"全面有效落实"，并提 出了支持柬泰联合边界委员会工作、为推进"人道主义扫雷"提供必要支持等极具操作性的方案。这超越 了口头呼吁，进入了具体的实施与保障层面。 随后的重点工作，是推动恢复正常交往和各领域多层级沟通交流。公报明确将恢复边境地区交往合作和 流离失所民众的日常生计作为重点，中方愿立即为两国提供人道主义援助。向柬方提供的包括帐篷、毛 毯、食品在内的首批紧急人道主义援助物资，已于28日中午运抵金边。这些举措聚焦冲突直接造成的诸 多民生痛点，旨在让和平迅速显现出实实在在的福祉。 宋清润 中国云南抚仙湖的粼粼波光，映照出地区和平的新希望。12月28日至29日，中国、柬埔寨、泰国三国外 长及军队部门负责人在这里举行重要会晤，会晤后发表了《中柬泰三方抚仙会晤新闻公报》。这不仅是 对柬泰两国27日达成停火协议的及时确认与强力"加持"，更是三方共同落实全球安全倡议、践行亚洲安 全观、擘画和平路线的关键行动。此次会晤的成功，生动诠释了对话协商这一"亚洲方式"在解决复杂争 端中的现实有效性，也是中国与东盟携手共建和平、安宁、繁荣、美丽、友好"五大家 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent military conflict at the Cambodia-Thailand border poses a significant threat to regional security and stability, prompting China to engage in diplomatic mediation as a responsible major power, enriching the Asian security concept and providing insights for regional cooperation and security order reconstruction [1][5]. Group 1: Conflict Background and Implications - The Cambodia-Thailand border conflict stems from historical territorial disputes and highlights the deep vulnerabilities in Southeast Asia's security architecture, exacerbated by increasing global geopolitical tensions [1]. - The prolonged conflict has resulted in severe casualties and a localized humanitarian crisis, undermining ASEAN's principles of consensus and peaceful dispute resolution, potentially fragmenting political trust among member states [1][2]. - Continued conflict risks creating a geopolitical vacuum that could invite external powers' intervention, hindering regional cooperation and stability, which is crucial for Southeast Asia's role as a global growth engine [1]. Group 2: Mediation Efforts and Framework - Achieving lasting peace requires moving beyond traditional mediation methods, as previous ceasefire agreements have been repeatedly violated, indicating the need for a framework supported by political trust and institutional guarantees [2]. - China's mediation in the Cambodia-Thailand conflict exemplifies a constructive approach, focusing on conflict de-escalation and advocating for resolution within the ASEAN framework, thereby supporting ASEAN's central role in regional security [2][3]. Group 3: China's Strategic Role and Initiatives - China's mediation aims to complement existing ASEAN mechanisms rather than replace them, seeking sustainable solutions through dialogue and cooperation, which aligns with China's proposed Asian security concept emphasizing common, comprehensive, cooperative, and sustainable security [3]. - The unique advantage of China's mediation stems from its deep economic ties and political trust with both Cambodia and Thailand, leveraging its development-oriented influence to guide both parties towards rational consensus amidst complex situations [3][4]. - The mediation reflects China's strategic wisdom of "building security through development," emphasizing the importance of peace and stability in the region for major cooperation projects like the Belt and Road Initiative [4]. Group 4: Broader Implications for Regional Security - China's approach to the Cambodia-Thailand conflict illustrates a systematic interpretation and practice of the Asian security concept, advocating for security rooted in cooperative frameworks rather than confrontation [5]. - In the face of rising global uncertainties, China's pragmatic actions position it as an indispensable stabilizing force for regional and global peace and development, fostering a future built on dialogue, mutual trust, and cooperation [5].

Core Viewpoint - The Asia Confidence and Trust Measures Conference (ACCM) plays an indispensable role in the global multilateral mechanism network, promoting the reconstruction of international order and global governance reform [2][4]. Group 1: Current Challenges and Unique Value of ACCM - The current global security situation is tense, with geopolitical conflicts and internal turmoil, highlighting the unique value of ACCM in providing security dialogue in Asia [3][4]. - ACCM faces significant challenges, including skepticism towards multilateralism, a noticeable global governance deficit, and the acceleration of a multipolar international landscape [4][5]. - The desire of "Global South" countries, including ACCM members, to maintain a multilateralism-centered global governance system is strong, emphasizing the need to avoid a return to "might makes right" principles [4][5]. Group 2: ACCM's Role in Conflict Resolution - ACCM is currently transitioning to a formal international organization, which limits its ability to provide effective security public goods, such as conflict resolution or direct intervention [6][8]. - The complexity of ACCM's membership, which includes 28 countries with diverse cultures and development stages, complicates cooperation and dialogue [5][6]. - Historical issues and external interventions contribute to conflicts in the region, necessitating a nuanced approach to conflict resolution [6][7]. Group 3: Transition to a Formal Organization - The transition of ACCM to a formal international organization is crucial for enhancing its capabilities and effectiveness in addressing security threats and promoting development cooperation [8][9]. - A formal organization would allow ACCM to establish a more robust institutional framework, improve coordination, and enhance its ability to provide effective public goods [9][10]. - Emphasizing development as a primary goal among member countries can foster cooperation and mitigate conflicts, aligning with the notion that development and security are interconnected [10][11]. Group 4: Chinese Contributions and Perspectives - Chinese initiatives, such as the Asian Security Concept and global governance proposals, aim to integrate traditional Asian political and security cultures into regional cooperation frameworks [12][13]. - The emphasis on sustainable security and the interconnection between development and security reflects a significant contribution from China to the discourse on regional stability [13][14]. - Think tanks and research institutions play a vital role in supporting ACCM's transition by providing policy recommendations and facilitating knowledge exchange among member countries [14][15].

Core Viewpoint - The increasing role of Asia in global development and policy-making is highlighted, emphasizing the need for better cooperation in the context of global security architecture [1][3]. Group 1: CICA's Role and Challenges - The CICA (Conference on Interaction and Confidence-Building Measures in Asia) serves as the most extensive multilateral security forum in Asia, covering 90% of the continent and over half of the global population, which reflects its core value of inclusivity and consensus among its 28 member states [3][4]. - The main challenge facing CICA is the rising trend of unilateralism globally, which hinders the realization of a multipolar world despite the ongoing evolution of international dynamics [4]. Group 2: Trust-Building Measures - CICA provides a platform for dialogue and trust-building among member states, even those without diplomatic relations or in conflict, through gradual Confidence Building Measures (CBMs) [6][8]. - The organization emphasizes that security is indivisible and should not come at the expense of other nations' safety, promoting a comprehensive approach to security issues [7][8]. Group 3: Transformation into an International Organization - CICA is in the process of transforming into a formal international organization, with significant progress made since 2022, including the establishment of a draft charter and the formation of management and advisory bodies [9][10]. - The upcoming leaders' summit in Baku is expected to formalize CICA's status as an international organization, further solidifying its role in global governance [10]. Group 4: Cooperation with Other Organizations - CICA maintains partnerships with various international organizations, including the UN and regional entities like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and the Arab League, reflecting its commitment to multilateralism [10].

Group 1: Shangri-La Dialogue Overview - The 22nd Shangri-La Dialogue is held from May 30 to June 1 in Singapore, with over 550 representatives from more than 40 countries and regions attending [1] - Key topics of interest include the U.S. response to regional countries' concerns about its policies, ASEAN's stance on regional security issues, and China's security concepts and proposals [1] Group 2: U.S. Indo-Pacific Policy - U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin is scheduled to deliver a speech on May 31 regarding the U.S. diplomatic and security policy in the Indo-Pacific region, marking the first public articulation of the policy since Trump's return to the White House [2] - Experts suggest that the Trump administration's focus is primarily on addressing trade deficits, and any security discussions may appear hollow and ineffective [2] Group 3: ASEAN's Role - ASEAN's response to the complex changes in international and regional situations is crucial for regional security and development [3] - The 46th ASEAN Summit resulted in the "Kuala Lumpur Declaration," reaffirming commitments to building a political-security community and enhancing ASEAN's influence in global affairs [3] - Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar's special speech at the dialogue will focus on regional integration and stability amid geopolitical uncertainties [3] Group 4: China's Security Concepts - China's role in maintaining regional peace and stability and promoting economic development is increasingly significant, with its security concepts gaining attention [4] - The Chinese delegation will engage in constructive dialogue to enhance cooperation and build consensus during the dialogue [4] - China has proposed several important security concepts, including a new security outlook and a global security initiative, which have received widespread recognition from regional countries [5]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of a new security model in Asia, which is based on the principles of mutual security, seeking common ground while reserving differences, and dialogue and consultation, integrating traditional Chinese wisdom with contemporary international relations practices [1][2][3]. Group 1: New Security Model - The Asian security model promotes a shared, comprehensive, cooperative, and sustainable approach to security, reflecting the common interests of Asian countries [2][5]. - This model incorporates the concept of "harmony and coexistence" from Chinese traditional culture, aiming to address global security challenges and maintain stability in Asia [1][2]. Group 2: Mutual Security - Mutual security is identified as the fundamental consensus for maintaining collective safety in Asia, recognizing the interconnectedness of countries in terms of geography, culture, and interests [3]. - China emphasizes the importance of friendly cooperation with neighboring countries, advocating for a new security path that avoids confrontation and promotes win-win outcomes [3]. Group 3: Seeking Common Ground - Seeking common ground while reserving differences is crucial for Asian countries to progress together, acknowledging the diversity in size, wealth, and cultural backgrounds [4]. - The article highlights the historical success of Asian nations in resolving disputes through equal consultation and mutual understanding, encouraging broader security cooperation [4]. Group 4: Dialogue and Consultation - Dialogue and consultation are presented as the correct approach to resolving regional differences, rejecting unilateralism and power politics [4]. - China calls for enhanced strategic communication among nations to build mutual trust, resolve conflicts, and manage differences, contributing to regional stability [4].