Core Insights - Blockchain technology has transcended the financial sector, impacting areas such as law, management, supply chain, and public governance, promising a new paradigm of trust through decentralized consensus [1] - The proliferation of blockchain-related projects has led to a conceptual and value confusion, challenging scholars to discern genuine academic value amidst the noise [1] - A systematic understanding of the technology's essence is essential for identifying worthwhile academic directions in blockchain research [1] Group 1: Academic Resources - "Research on Chinese Strategies for Developing Blockchain Payment Systems" focuses on China's strategic development of blockchain payment systems, providing a theoretical framework based on three major economic theories: the "trilemma theory," "free currency theory," and "transaction cost theory" [2][5] - "International Handbook of Blockchain Law" offers an in-depth analysis of blockchain technology principles, regulatory policies, smart contracts, data privacy, capital markets, and crypto-assets, serving as a crucial reference for legal practitioners and scholars [2][7] - "Convergence of Blockchain, Internet of Everything, and Federated Learning for Security" explores the integration of blockchain with IoE and federated learning to enhance digital ecosystem security, emphasizing its importance in modern digital environments [2][10] Group 2: Practical Guides - "Blockchain Technology for the Engineering and Service Sectors" serves as a guide for leveraging blockchain technology to drive cross-industry innovation and efficiency, discussing current challenges and future prospects [2][12] - "Hands-On Blockchain for Python Developers" is a practical guide for Python developers, detailing how to build decentralized applications using Python and related frameworks, covering essential topics like smart contracts and secure content storage [2][15]

Core Viewpoint - The concept of an "open market of ideas" is crucial for economic development, as emphasized by economist Ronald Coase, who expressed concerns about the lack of such a market in China, linking it to various economic issues [2][16]. Group 1: Definition and Importance of the Idea Market - Coase defines the "market of ideas" as a broad concept that encompasses the expression and competition of academic, viewpoints, and beliefs, emphasizing the need for freedom in both the production and acceptance of ideas [4][5]. - An open idea market fosters innovation, as a lack of free exchange of thoughts can stifle creativity and lead to stagnation in innovation [6]. - The idea market serves as a correction mechanism, allowing erroneous beliefs to be challenged and eliminated through competition, thus forming a social consensus [7][8]. Group 2: Economic Implications of the Idea Market - The idea market is essential for institutional evolution, as it encourages the necessary institutional innovations for economic transformation [11]. - It plays a critical role in resource allocation, as restrictions on the freedom of thought can lead to talent misallocation and waste of resources [13][14]. - Coase's theories suggest that a clear "intellectual property" framework can enhance the effective allocation of knowledge resources [14]. Group 3: Historical Context and Future Outlook - Historical evidence indicates that countries that successfully transitioned economically often had open idea markets, highlighting their importance in economic success [16][18]. - Coase's insights into the idea market are rooted in the thoughts of historical figures like Milton, who advocated for the significance of free thought [20]. - The future of the idea market is seen as a necessary evolution, with expectations that it will significantly benefit macroeconomic conditions through enhanced discourse [18][20].

Group 1 - The market has entered a new phase of strategic equilibrium following the US-China negotiations, with a shift towards internal economic growth in China and a reduction in global risk aversion [1][2] - Gold prices have adjusted significantly, with COMEX gold down 4.1% as the need for safe-haven assets diminishes due to improved geopolitical stability [1][2] - The Nasdaq index saw a weekly increase of 7.2%, benefiting from the easing of trade tensions between the US and China, while the S&P 500 and Dow Jones also recorded gains [2][3] Group 2 - The recent financial data indicates a significant drop in new bank loans in China, with only 280 billion yuan in new loans in April 2025, the lowest since 2005 for the same period [3][4] - The US has faced a downgrade in its credit rating from Aaa to Aa1 by Moody's, primarily due to rising debt and interest payment concerns, which could lead to increased borrowing costs [4][5] - The loss of credibility in the US is attributed to both rising debt pressures and inconsistent political commitments, which may increase transaction costs in international dealings [6][7] Group 3 - The ongoing trade war has led to a deterioration in market trust, increasing transaction costs and complicating contractual agreements [5][6] - The financial strain on companies is linked to poor resource allocation and aggressive expansion strategies, which could lead to a rise in financial crises and loss of credibility [8][9] - Mergers and acquisitions are becoming a focal point for investors, with a need for careful analysis of post-merger competitiveness to achieve desired returns [10][11]