Workflow
代位追偿
icon
Search documents
阿维塔 一把火烧出百万账单 谁来买单?
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-10-09 16:19
10月5日以来,关于一辆阿维塔06突然起火引起周围7辆车着火爆炸的事故在网络上热度高居不下。 此前,疑似涉事事件车主称,该车购于2025年8月28日,行驶仅1066公里,起火前车内温度达76.4且未 触发报警。 第一财经记者从律师方面获悉,根据目前的公开信息情况来看,双方的责任归属目前仍然难以认定。如 果该事件不能认定为产品责任,则需要由实际过错方来承担赔付责任。 第一起火点成为区分责任关键 10月9日,微博账号@阿维塔发布情况说明称,"根据当地相关部门的最新反馈:起火发生在副驾驶座椅 位置,火灾发生时,电池包的电压、温度、气压均正常,排除动力电池、驱动电机、高压电控故障等导 致起火。可能导致起火的其他原因,相关部门正在进一步查验中。" 此前,据中国证券报报道,相关部门将此次事故定义为"外源性失火"。 "阿维塔起火致8车烧毁"事件中,涉及的品牌有奥迪、宝马、马自达、埃安等,保守估计损失至少在百 万以上。那么,这笔赔偿由"谁来承担,怎么赔付"也成为公众关注的话题。 某车企技术负责人陈树(化名)向第一财经表示,这种情况下,首先要找到第一起火点,看是在车内, 还是在发动机舱或者后备箱等。找到起火点后再进一步分析起火 ...
网店卖假货怠于赔偿,合作推广方“假一赔三”后能追偿吗?
Ren Min Wang· 2025-09-03 00:30
Core Viewpoint - A well-known live streamer was found to be selling counterfeit goods, leading to a legal dispute between the talent agency and the partnered online store regarding compensation for consumers [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Shanghai Huangpu District People's Court ruled that the online store must pay the talent agency over 720,000 yuan in compensation, along with other fees and penalties [1][3]. - The talent agency had compensated consumers based on a "triple compensation" standard after determining the goods were counterfeit through a third-party inspection [1][2]. - The court found that the evidence provided by the talent agency, including inspection reports and consumer feedback, was sufficient to establish that the goods sold were not genuine [2]. Group 2: Financial Implications - The total compensation awarded to the talent agency includes a basic service fee of 21,000 yuan, over 10,000 yuan in inspection fees, and a penalty of 100,000 yuan for breach of contract [3]. - The talent agency's decision to compensate consumers was deemed legally justified, as they had a legitimate interest in protecting their reputation and avoiding further legal repercussions [4]. Group 3: Regulatory Context - The case highlights the responsibilities of online retailers in ensuring the authenticity of products sold and the legal ramifications of selling counterfeit goods [4]. - The ruling reinforces the rights of third parties to seek compensation when they have a legitimate interest in the fulfillment of a debt, as outlined in the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China [4].