在2025年12月的华盛顿，政治与金融的交汇点再次成为焦点。美国总统特朗普对现任美联储主席鲍威尔 的不满由来已久，双方多次公开对抗。 11月30日，特朗普在接受媒体采访时直言，他已敲定下一任美联储主席人选，但神秘地未透露姓名。次 日，具有"美联储通讯社"之称的《华尔街日报》记者尼克·蒂米拉奥斯（Nick Timiraos）爆料：尽管候选 人面试仍在进行，特朗普已"内定"其长期顾问、国家经济委员会主任凯文·哈西特（Kevin Hassett）。这 一消息如一石激起千层浪，不仅震动了华尔街，也让全球投资者重新审视美联储未来的独立性与货币政 策走向。 哈西特，这位62岁的保守派经济学家，以其坚定的特朗普忠诚度和务实的政策主张，一跃成为华盛顿权 力游戏中的关键人物。他并非华尔街的"金童"，而是一位从马萨诸塞州小镇走出的学者型官僚。他的崛 起，不仅源于学术背景和丰富履历，更得益于与特朗普的深厚默契，以及他对经济政策的独特解读。 从小镇少年到经济学精英：哈西特的成长之路 哈西特于1963年3月20日出生在马萨诸塞州格林菲尔德（Greenfield），一个典型的美国东北部小镇。这 里远离曼哈顿的喧嚣，居民多为中产阶级，经济 ...

Core Viewpoint - The discussion highlights the increasing wealth inequality in the U.S., the inefficiency of government, and the stagnation of technological progress, suggesting that these issues are interconnected and may lead to significant societal consequences [2][3][6]. Summary by Sections Wealth Inequality - The disparity between the wealth of the top 1% and the bottom 99% has been growing at an unprecedented rate, potentially surpassing levels seen in the early 20th century [2][3]. - The right-wing has largely ignored this issue, either denying its existence or deeming it unimportant, which is seen as a significant blind spot [2][3]. Government Inefficiency - Government efficiency has deteriorated, with rising expenditures failing to yield proportional improvements in governance [3][4]. - Examples include the prolonged construction times for infrastructure projects compared to historical benchmarks, indicating a decline in operational effectiveness [3][4]. Technological Stagnation - There is a concern that technological progress has slowed since the late 1960s, with significant innovations becoming rare outside of specific sectors like computing and finance [6][7]. - The stagnation in technological advancement is linked to broader economic growth issues, leading to political cynicism and a zero-sum perception of economic competition [7][10]. Globalization's Impact - Globalization has created a "winner-takes-all" environment, adversely affecting the middle class and white-collar workers, particularly through labor arbitrage with countries like China [12][20]. - The benefits of globalization have not been evenly distributed, leading to increased inequality and social unrest [12][20]. Education and Innovation - The education system is criticized for perpetuating a bubble, with many students accumulating debt without securing corresponding employment opportunities [27][29]. - There is a call for a reevaluation of educational investments and a shift towards recognizing non-college career paths as viable options [27][29]. Future Considerations - The discussion raises philosophical questions about the role of government in planning for the future, particularly in the context of technological innovation and economic policy [15][17]. - The potential for long-term societal issues stemming from demographic changes and technological stagnation is emphasized, suggesting a need for proactive policy adjustments [23][24].