保险公司偿付能力
Search documents
联合资信-保险行业季度观察报(2025年第1期)-251013
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-10-13 10:44
3.2025年上半年,随着乘用车销量同比提升以及公众保险意识增强,财产险保费收入保持增长态势,但 宏观经济回复不及预期背景下,居民收入水平和消费预期或存在不确定性,需对业务持续性保持关注。 同时,极端天气频发,或对财产险公司赔付压力及全年盈利表现带来一定影响。 4.保险公司资金运用余额保持增长态势,但受债券利率下行及权益市场表现不及预期等因素影响,综合 (总)投资收益率水平较上年有不同程度下降,需关注资本市场波动及险企未来投资收益表现情况。 5.2025年6月末,保险公司整体偿付能力指标较上年末进一步提升,保险公司偿付能力数据不达标数量 较上年末有所下降,在保险公司业务经营持续发展的背景下,保险公司资本消耗持续增长,需关注偿付 能力指标变动及企业资本补充压力。 展望: (来源:研报虎) 2025年上半年,我国保险行业竞争格局基本保持稳定,险企头部效应仍较为明显;人身险公司保费收入 保持增长,寿险业务为其主要驱动力,车险业务收入占比回升,健康险增速较快,共同推动财产险公司 保费收入增长;险企资金运用规模持续提升,但债券利率波动以及权益市场表现不及预期,投资收益率 水平较上年有所降低;行业整体偿付能力进一步提升且 ...
拟募资3亿元,大股东或突破持股上限,中煤保险渴求增资
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-09-29 13:50
具有煤炭业股东背景的中煤财产保险股份有限公司(以下简称"中煤保险")官宣了一份增资方案。9月29日,北京商报记者了解到,中煤保险近日公告称, 该公司拟向原股东山西金融投资控股集团有限公司(以下简称"山西金控")增发股份3亿股,共募集资金3.006亿元。若此次增资获批,中煤保险大股东山西 金控持股比例将达到46.05%,超过监管划定的上限。 向股东募集资金的背后,中煤保险对注册资本金的增加有着怎样的渴望?该公司第三大股东中国中煤能源集团有限公司(以下简称"中煤集团")频频萌生退 意,又将如何影响中煤保险? 3亿元增资方案出炉 9月28日,中煤保险公告称,2025年第一次临时股东会于9月25日召开,会议审议并通过了《关于山西金融投资控股集团有限公司为公司增资扩股的议案》。 具体而言,中煤保险本次增资扩股按1.002元/股向原股东山西金控增发股份3亿股,共募集资金3.006亿元。上述增资事项需监管批准后生效。 据了解,山西金控是集银行、证券、保险、信托、担保、金融租赁、资产管理、小贷、要素交易、互联网金融、产业基金等金融业态于一体的全牌照金融控 股集团。如果增资获批,在上海对外经贸大学保险系专家朱少杰看来,两者可以 ...
二季度偿付能力“体检”:5家不达标,提升偿付能力有何妙招
Bei Jing Shang Bao· 2025-08-04 13:30
保险公司二季度偿付能力报告密集披露。截至8月4日,已有143家保险机构发布相关信息,其中包括60家人身险公司和83家财产险公司与再保险公 司。数据显示,截至今年上半年,仍有5家保险公司偿付能力未能达标,具体为4家财产险公司和1家人身险公司,分别是安华农险、华安保险、亚 太财险、前海财险和华汇人寿。 在业内专家看来,偿付能力不达标或对险企正常业务开展产生限制,为缓解偿付能力压力,险企除了加快增资"补血"步伐,还应通过加强风险管 理、完善管理层、优化业务结构等方式,不断提高公司治理水平。 "这会直接影响保险公司的业务拓展和保费收入,进一步阻碍其正常经营发展。"付建分析。 5家险企不达标 偿付能力是保险公司对保单持有人履行赔付义务的能力。按照《保险公司偿付能力管理规定》,保险公司须同时满足核心偿付能力充足率不低于 50%、综合偿付能力充足率不低于100%、风险综合评级在B类及以上三项指标,才能被认定为偿付能力达标。换言之,核心偿付能力充足率、综 合偿付能力充足率、风险综合评级作为三项关键指标,其中一项不符合即视为偿付能力不达标。 北京商报记者梳理发现,在已披露二季度偿付能力报告的保险公司中,5家保险公司偿付能力未能 ...
五家险企偿付能力不达标
news flash· 2025-05-26 22:35
Core Insights - The insurance companies' solvency remains sufficient, with a comprehensive solvency adequacy ratio of 204.5% and a core solvency adequacy ratio of 146.5% as of the end of Q1 2025 [1] Group 1: Solvency Status - The overall solvency of insurance companies shows a positive trend, with three companies exiting the non-compliance category [1] - However, five companies still do not meet solvency standards, including one life insurance company and four property insurance companies [1] Group 2: Industry Implications - Industry experts indicate that non-compliance with solvency standards may restrict the business operations of affected companies, necessitating timely measures to improve solvency [1]
风险综合评级拖累偿付能力 五家险企“亮红灯”
Zhong Guo Zheng Quan Bao· 2025-05-26 21:45
Core Viewpoint - The solvency of insurance companies remains adequate, with an overall positive trend in solvency ratios, although some companies still do not meet the required standards [1][2]. Solvency Ratios - As of the end of Q1 2025, the comprehensive solvency adequacy ratio for insurance companies is 204.5%, and the core solvency adequacy ratio is 146.5% [1]. - The solvency ratios for property insurance companies, life insurance companies, and reinsurance companies are 239.3%, 196.6%, and 255% respectively, with core solvency ratios at 209.5%, 132.8%, and 221.6% [2]. Companies Not Meeting Solvency Standards - Five companies, including one life insurance company and four property insurance companies, do not meet solvency standards, with specific companies like Huahui Life and Anhua Agricultural Insurance rated as C class [2][3]. - The main reason for the failure to meet solvency standards is the inadequate risk comprehensive rating, which reflects issues in corporate governance, operational risk, and compliance [2][3]. Improvement Measures - Companies are advised to adjust their business structures, enhance risk management capabilities, and improve corporate governance to address solvency issues [4]. - Specific companies, such as Anhua Agricultural Insurance and Qianhai Property Insurance, have reported progress in their rectification efforts to improve solvency [4][5].