11月20日，市委常委会召开会议，学习贯彻习近平总书记对全面依法治国工作的重要指示和给青年 汉学家的复信精神，严格落实党政机关习惯过紧日子要求，部署开展特殊困难群体排查和社会救助工 作，听取劳动社保领域和重点区域信访案件办理情况，研究部署经济稳增长工作措施。 会议强调，要深入贯彻习近平文化思想，统筹发挥西安文化、文旅、文教、文物等资源优势，创新 文化交流和文明互鉴方式，着力打造对外交往中心、国际传播中心、科研文教中心，为弘扬中华文明贡 献西安力量。 会议强调，要坚持从政治品格、党性修养、纪律作风、传统美德等方面认识党政机关习惯过紧日子 要求，坚持以上率下，强化制度约束，严在日常、抓在经常，推动好作风好习惯内化于心、外化于行。 会议强调，要深入践行以人民为中心的发展思想，加快完善市域社会治理体系，扎实开展特殊困难 群体排查工作，建立问题发现、报告应答、联动扶助机制，不断提高社会救助水平，建设更有温度更加 幸福的人民城市。 会议强调，要务实高效做好信访工作，加强问题台账管理和归类协同办理，"关键少数"要发挥关键 作用，各级各部门要同向发力同题共答，综合施策、标本兼治，用心用情用力解决群众急难愁盼问题。 会议强调， ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the implementation of new regulations aimed at promoting frugality and reducing waste within government agencies, highlighting the positive changes observed in various regions [4]. Group 1: Public Asset Management - The "Public Goods Warehouse Online" system in Shapingba District, Chongqing, has facilitated the efficient allocation of idle assets, allowing for the transfer of 9,728 items across 91 units, resulting in a cost saving of 20.07 million yuan [7]. - A mechanism has been established to prioritize the use of existing assets before making new purchases, with strict controls on over-purchasing and redundant procurement [8]. - The system has improved transparency and accountability in asset management, helping to prevent misuse and loss of public property [7]. Group 2: Public Reception and Hospitality - The "Xiangban Tong" application in Hunan Province has streamlined the process of managing official receptions, leading to a 94.4% reduction in public reception expenditures [11]. - The system allows for real-time tracking of expenses and ensures that all costs are covered by the respective departments, eliminating the need for upfront payments by individuals [11]. Group 3: Vehicle Management - The Guangdong Province has implemented a centralized public vehicle management platform that tracks vehicle usage and maintenance, significantly reducing the risk of misuse [12]. - The province has adopted a "unified procurement and separate signing" model for purchasing new energy vehicles, resulting in a cost saving of approximately 38 million yuan across 1,336 vehicles [13]. Group 4: Space Utilization - In Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, the consolidation of archives into a centralized storage facility has freed up 2,400 square meters of office space, enhancing operational efficiency [14]. - The local government has actively sought to repurpose idle properties, transforming them into innovation hubs that generate rental income and support local startups [16].

社会上还有一种担心，党政机关过紧日子，办事会不会紧巴巴的，影响效率？ 《党政机关厉行节约反对浪费条例》说得很清楚，"科学统筹财政资源""保证正常公务活动"……反对浪 费，不是该花的钱不花，而是坚决砍掉不重实效的"花架子"，比如奢华接待、超标配置、形象工程，目 的是精打细算，把钱花在刀刃上。 事实最有说服力。2025年，中央本级"三公"经费预算压减5%。省下的钱去哪了？前不久，财政部国库 支付中心相关负责人在新闻发布会上介绍，今年前三季度，全国社会保障和就业支出、教育支出均超过 3万亿元，分别增长10%、5.4%，卫生健康支出也有显著增长。一降一增中，是资源配置的优化，是民 生的改善，体现了现代治理的大格局、高效能。 新修订的《党政机关厉行节约反对浪费条例》实施半年多了，变化有目共睹。前不久，记者到基层调 研，中午餐叙时，没有专门的桌餐，更没人提酒水的事。两三个人就在单位食堂窗口打几份菜，边吃边 聊。这既不耽误下午的工作，还把吃饭的时间变成采访的过程，大家都觉得挺好，简单、高效，心里也 踏实。 可能有人嘀咕，一顿饭而已，稍微讲究点也没啥？ 话听上去没错，可仔细想想，那些落马的官员，不少就是从一顿饭、一杯酒、一次 ...

Core Points - The newly revised regulations emphasize the need for government agencies to cut unnecessary expenditures and focus on practical spending, particularly discouraging "face projects" that waste public funds [1][2] - Recent reports highlight various cases of wasteful spending, such as extravagant landscape projects and underutilized public facilities, which undermine government credibility and public trust [1] - The essence of "face projects" is linked to a distorted performance outlook and a lack of accountability among officials, leading to superficial spending without addressing actual needs [1] Summary by Sections - **Government Spending Regulations** - The revised regulations aim to tighten control over government spending, ensuring that every penny is spent wisely and transparently [1] - The focus is on eliminating unnecessary expenditures that serve only to enhance appearances rather than deliver real value [1] - **Examples of Wasteful Spending** - Numerous cases have been reported where funds were misallocated to projects that ultimately failed to deliver, such as abandoned scenic projects and underused public restrooms [1] - These projects often disguise themselves as innovative or beneficial but result in significant waste of financial resources [1] - **Accountability and Performance Evaluation** - There is a call for stricter supervision and accountability for those involved in "face projects," with a push for reforms in performance evaluation to prioritize tangible results [2] - The goal is to ensure that government officials focus on practical contributions to society rather than superficial displays of spending [2]

Core Viewpoint - The newly revised regulations emphasize the importance of frugality in government spending, particularly targeting unnecessary expenditures that serve only to enhance appearances rather than deliver real value to the public [1][2] Group 1: Government Spending and Regulations - The implementation of the revised regulations aims to tighten control over government spending, ensuring that every penny is spent wisely and transparently [1] - Recent reports highlight various cases of wasteful spending on "vanity projects," which often result in incomplete or ineffective outcomes, undermining public trust [1][2] Group 2: Accountability and Performance - The essence of "vanity projects" stems from a skewed performance outlook and a lack of responsibility among some officials, who prioritize flashy spending over actual needs [1] - To combat the impulse to spend for appearances, government agencies must adopt stricter oversight and accountability measures, penalizing those who engage in superficial projects [2] Group 3: Focus on Practical Outcomes - Genuine value comes from investing in practical initiatives that address public needs, such as employment support, education improvement, healthcare enhancement, and social welfare [2] - The goal is to redirect funds towards critical areas that promote technological innovation and industrial upgrades, ensuring that government spending translates into tangible benefits for the populace [2]

Core Viewpoint - The revised "Regulations on Strict Economy and Opposition to Waste in Party and Government Agencies" emphasizes the importance of frugality in government spending while clarifying that this does not contradict the need to stimulate consumption [2][5] Group 1: Reduction in Government Spending - Government agencies are encouraged to "live frugally," which means prohibiting extravagant spending on "image projects" and "performance projects" that waste public resources [3] - The regulations set higher standards for budget management, domestic travel, official receptions, and other expenditures, aiming to reduce non-essential spending and control "three public" expenses [3] - The focus on reducing waste is intended to enhance public confidence and market vitality, rather than constraining normal consumer spending [3] Group 2: Stimulating Consumption - The government plans to redirect saved funds into key areas that enhance consumer spending, such as social security, healthcare, and education, thereby alleviating burdens on citizens and encouraging consumption [4] - Specific measures include increasing support for trade-in programs, improving county-level commercial infrastructure, and providing assistance to consumers, which collectively aim to boost consumption demand [4] - The issuance of consumption vouchers has proven effective in stimulating consumer activity, demonstrating how government savings can lead to increased market activity and tax revenue [4] Group 3: Long-term Economic Impact - The frugality demonstrated by government agencies serves as a model for society, promoting a rational and healthy consumption mindset [5] - Savings from reduced government spending can be invested in critical long-term areas such as basic research, core technologies, and public health, laying a solid foundation for future consumption upgrades and industrial development [5] - The alignment of precise government spending with improved market conditions enhances the intrinsic motivation for consumer spending, leading to genuine consumption stimulation [5]

Core Viewpoint - The emphasis is on the necessity for government agencies to adopt a frugal approach to spending, reallocating funds from inefficient expenditures to areas such as rural revitalization, ecological protection, and essential public services like education, healthcare, and elderly care, ultimately enhancing the well-being of the populace [1][3]. Group 1: Reasons for Frugality - The concept of "tightening" is not about restricting spending entirely but rather about optimizing expenditures to benefit the public and improve living standards [2][3]. - The goal is to enhance the governance system and efficiency by reducing unnecessary operational costs and reallocating saved resources to development and public welfare [2][3]. Group 2: Implementation of Frugality - Government agencies must clearly define what expenditures should be tightened, ensuring that necessary spending for operations and public services is not compromised [4][7]. - The implementation of the revised regulations on frugality requires strict adherence to avoid wasteful spending and ensure that funds are used effectively [4][7]. Group 3: Mechanisms for Sustaining Frugality - Establishing a long-term institutional framework is essential for maintaining frugality, including a comprehensive budget performance management system and enhanced auditing and supervision [7][8]. - Innovative management practices and the use of digital tools are encouraged to streamline processes and reduce costs, such as new regulations for public dining and vehicle management [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that government austerity measures are intended to stimulate consumption by reallocating resources to essential services and avoiding wasteful spending [2][3][4] Group 1: Government Spending and Consumption - The implementation of strict regulations against wasteful spending by government agencies has led to concerns that reduced government expenditure may negatively impact consumer spending [2] - However, the article argues that curbing unnecessary government spending is essential for creating a healthier market environment and enhancing consumer confidence [3][4] - By redirecting surplus funds to critical areas such as healthcare and education, the government can empower citizens to spend more freely, leading to sustainable consumption growth [3] Group 2: Role of Government in the Economy - The article asserts that the government's role should be to guide and supervise the market rather than directly intervene through excessive spending [3][4] - It highlights the importance of investing in high-tech industries and sectors that meet market needs, which can yield long-term benefits and avoid market saturation [3] - The article also points out that effective governance requires higher competency from officials, as they must balance administrative efficiency with the judicious use of limited financial resources [4]

Core Points - Multiple regions in China are implementing reforms in "official dining" to reduce public spending and improve efficiency in government operations [1][3][5] - The new regulations require public officials to self-manage their meals during official activities, with a focus on cost control and transparency [4][6] Group 1: Official Dining Reforms - Hunan Province has introduced a new regulation for official dining that mandates online applications, QR code payments, and uniform pricing for meals [1][3] - The "zero reception" policy is being adopted in various regions, where officials are required to pay for their meals out of pocket and are not accompanied by others during official dining [4][6] - Statistical data from Zhangjiajie City shows a dramatic decrease in reception expenses, with a 99.95% reduction in town reception costs and a 93.71% drop in expenses for district-level units from January to July 2025 [4][6] Group 2: Broader Cost Control Measures - The Central Government has emphasized the need for party and government agencies to practice frugality and reduce costs associated with official activities [5] - New management systems for official vehicles and travel are being explored, including a vehicle supervision system in Harbin that collects and analyzes data on vehicle usage [6] - The introduction of an "electronic public letter" system in Yichun City has led to a significant reduction in general official reception expenses, with a year-on-year decrease of 12.02% and 29.77% over two consecutive years [7]

Core Viewpoint - The revised regulations emphasize the importance of frugality and efficiency in government spending, aiming to balance economic development and improving people's livelihoods through a "reduction and addition" approach [1][2][3] Group 1: Implementation of Regulations - The regulations mandate government agencies to lead by example in frugality, establishing clear guidelines for budget management, travel, public receptions, and resource conservation [1] - The focus is on strict budget adherence, prohibiting overspending or unbudgeted expenditures to ensure responsible financial management [1] Group 2: Balancing Reduction and Addition - The approach to frugality is not about cutting all expenditures but rather about optimizing spending to enhance administrative efficiency and public service quality [2] - Government agencies are encouraged to innovate in asset management to unlock value from underutilized resources, thereby saving public funds [2] Group 3: Recent Social Welfare Initiatives - Recent policies, such as waiving education fees for kindergarten children and providing direct cash subsidies for child-rearing, are expected to benefit approximately 12 million families, with an increase in national fiscal spending of around 20 billion [3] - These initiatives aim to alleviate financial burdens on families, boost consumer confidence, and stimulate economic growth, reflecting a commitment to investing in people's welfare [3]