问：我们注意到交通运输部等发布公告，就美国对中国采取海事、物流和造船业301调查限制 措施采取反制措施，能否介绍相关情况？ 答： 美东时间4月17日，美国贸易代表办公室宣布对中国海事、物流和造船领域301调查的最 终措施。其中针对中国相关船舶征收港口费的措施将于10月14日正式实施。美方措施是典型 单边主义行为，具有明显歧视性色彩，严重损害中国企业利益。中方对此强烈不满，一再申明 坚决反对的立场。 为维护国内相关产业利益，中方有关部门根据《中华人民共和国国际海运条例》等有关规定， 对涉及美国旗、美国造、美国公司拥有、参股或经营等美国元素的船舶收取特别港务费。 上 述措施将于10月14日美方针对中国相关船舶征收港口费的措施实施同时正式实施。 中方强调，相关反制措施旨在维护国际航运和造船市场的公平竞争环境，是"正当防卫"行为。 希望美方慎重考虑，纠正错误做法，与中方相向而行，通过平等磋商与合作找到解决问题的办 法。 tes w now 点击下载中国基金报客户端 ■ 中国基金报内容矩阵 ■ 巅峰对话 投资热点说 IPO情报站 ETF风向标 f= o la l ® -444 4 4 4 4 4 a 4 4 4 CHI ...

近期，最高人民法院发布《关于贯彻落实〈中华人民共和国民营经济促进法〉的指导意见》，提出具体 举措，以法治之力破解民营经济发展中面临的难题。落实民营经济促进法的各项配套制度政策陆续出 台，举措更细更实。专家表示，这些举措将全方位、立体式促进民营经济发展壮大，释放更多可预期的 政策信号。 创造公平竞争环境 民营经济促进法于今年5月20日起正式施行，首次在国家层面系统确认了民营经济的法律地位、权利边 界与政府职责。在中国人民大学法学院院长杨东看来，"最高法出台的指导意见以25条举措把这种制度 确认转化为可感可用的司法供给"。 杨东分析，在竞争秩序维度，围绕反垄断与反不正当竞争、知识产权与商业秘密保护等重点领域，最高 法加密司法供给，推动各种所有制平等竞争的规则在审判实践中落地。 对于民营经济组织股东之间的争议，指导意见明确，通过依法行使释明权，积极引导通过股权转让、股 权回购等途径实质性化解经营僵局，防止内部治理失序阻滞企业生产经营。 "在经营中，股东之间难免会产生争议。如果争议不能得到有效解决，会对企业的发展造成重大损 失。"王楠认为，该规定对化解经营僵局提出了具体措施，更好维护股东与公司之间财产独立、责任分 离 ...

创造公平竞争环境 民营经济促进法于今年5月20日起正式施行，首次在国家层面系统确认了民营经济的法律地位、权利边 界与政府职责。在中国人民大学法学院院长杨东看来，"最高法出台的指导意见以25条举措把这种制度 确认转化为可感可用的司法供给"。 近期，最高人民法院发布《关于贯彻落实〈中华人民共和国民营经济促进法〉的指导意见》，提出具体 举措，以法治之力破解民营经济发展中面临的难题。落实民营经济促进法的各项配套制度政策陆续出 台，举措更细更实。专家表示，这些举措将全方位、立体式促进民营经济发展壮大，释放更多可预期的 政策信号。 "在经营中，股东之间难免会产生争议。如果争议不能得到有效解决，会对企业的发展造成重大损 失。"王楠认为，该规定对化解经营僵局提出了具体措施，更好维护股东与公司之间财产独立、责任分 离，切实维护中小股东权益。 提升司法可预期性 最高人民法院民二庭副庭长周伦军提出，此次指导意见坚持问题导向，目的就是要打通民营经济促进法 落地的"最后一公里"，针对"新官不理旧账"、涉企案件久拖不决、趋利性执法司法等企业反映强烈的问 题，予以明确回应。 指导意见将法律原则细化为可操作的司法规则，明确加强涉民营企业的征 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the recent policy measures aimed at boosting private investment in China, indicating a positive trend in private sector participation in fixed asset investment, particularly in infrastructure and emerging industries [1][2]. Group 1: Investment Growth - From January to August this year, national fixed asset investment (excluding rural households) grew by 0.5% year-on-year, while private project investment increased by 3%, outpacing overall investment growth [1]. - Private investment in infrastructure surged by 7.5%, exceeding the overall infrastructure investment growth by 5.5 percentage points [2]. Group 2: Policy Measures - The State Council's recent meeting outlined practical measures to stimulate private investment, focusing on addressing key concerns of enterprises, expanding market access, and enhancing support mechanisms [1][2]. - The government aims to create a fair competitive environment by removing hidden barriers to private investment and providing better financing support [2][3]. Group 3: Sector-Specific Opportunities - Private capital is encouraged to invest in new productive forces, emerging service industries, and new infrastructure, with significant growth observed in sectors like electricity, gas, and water supply, which saw a 23.5% increase in private investment [2]. - In the service sector, private investment in accommodation and catering, as well as cultural and sports industries, grew by 17% and 7% respectively during the same period [2]. Group 4: Long-term Mechanisms - The establishment of a long-term mechanism for private enterprises to participate in major national projects is progressing, particularly in sectors like railways, energy, and water conservancy [2][3]. - The National Development and Reform Commission is working on policies to enhance private investment in significant projects, including setting minimum participation ratios for private investments in major infrastructure projects [3].

Core Viewpoint - The use of "外挂" (external tools) by delivery riders to gain an unfair advantage in order grabbing is disrupting the operational order of food delivery platforms, prompting legal action against the technology company producing these tools [1][2]. Group 1: Impact on the Industry - The external tool, named "点滑器," allows riders to simulate manual operations, enabling them to grab orders at an unusually fast pace, which undermines the normal order dispatch mechanism of the platform [1]. - The sales of the external tool have reached several million yuan, leading to numerous complaints from riders and significantly affecting the platform's reputation and operational order [1]. - The court's injunction against the technology company aims to halt the production, sale, and promotion of the infringing product to protect the integrity of the delivery platform [1]. Group 2: Legal and Competitive Implications - The court emphasized that a healthy development of the food delivery industry relies on a fair competitive environment, where riders earn different rewards based on their route familiarity, time management, and effort [2]. - The use of order-grabbing tools not only deprives rule-abiding riders of their opportunities but also diminishes the overall motivation of the majority of riders, thereby harming the competitive ecosystem [2]. - The prevalence of these tools disrupts the platform's algorithms, leading to an increase in abnormal order data, which complicates the platform's ability to match orders accurately and assess market trends [2].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the trade agreement paves the way for establishing a fair competitive environment among South Korea, Japan, and the European Union [1] Group 2 - The trade agreement is expected to enhance cooperation and reduce trade barriers among the three regions [1] - It aims to create a more balanced market for automotive industries in South Korea, Japan, and the EU [1] - The agreement is seen as a significant step towards fostering economic growth and stability in the automotive sector [1]

Group 1 - The article discusses the challenges faced by European Union (EU) companies in acquiring rare earth resources from China, highlighting the EU's dissatisfaction with China's export restrictions on these materials [1][4] - During the 13th round of strategic dialogue held in Brussels, EU Foreign Minister Karas and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi addressed various geopolitical issues, reaffirming the EU's commitment to constructive engagement with China [1][4] - The EU's concerns primarily revolve around trade and the geopolitical implications of the Russia-Ukraine war, with rare earth materials being a significant point of contention [4][7] Group 2 - The EU has called for China to lift its restrictions on rare earth exports, arguing that such policies distort market rules and pose significant risks to European companies, thereby affecting global supply chain reliability [4] - The CEO of the EU's first lithium hydroxide battery factory expressed frustration over the difficulty in securing critical raw materials, suggesting that the situation is so dire that it feels like applying to become a province of China [4] - The EU is urging China to reconsider its economic relationship with Europe to create a fair competitive environment and improve market access conditions [4]

Group 1 - The G7 finance ministers and central bank governors concluded a three-day meeting in Canada, committing to address "excessive imbalances" in the global economy, which is perceived as a veiled criticism of China [1] - The joint statement emphasized the importance of a "fair competitive environment" and the need for coordinated action against countries that do not adhere to the same rules and lack transparency [1] - The statement also highlighted the increase in "low-value goods," suggesting potential strain on customs and tax systems [1] Group 2 - Experts noted that the G7's statement serves as a justification for the U.S. government's trade pressure on China, although there is uncertainty about whether this will lead to collective action [2] - The joint statement did not address U.S. tariffs, which have been a source of significant contention among G7 members, indicating deep divisions within the group [2] - The meeting is seen as a precursor to the upcoming G7 summit scheduled for June 15-17 in Alberta, Canada, where further discussions on these issues are expected [2]

Group 1 - The G7 finance ministers and central bank governors are committed to addressing the issue of "excessive imbalances" in the global economy [1] - There is a need for a unified understanding of how "non-market policies and practices" undermine international economic security [1] - The draft communiqué calls for an analysis of "market concentration and the resilience of international supply chains" [1] Group 2 - The G7 leaders emphasize the importance of a "fair competitive environment" and the need for a coordinated approach to address harm caused by countries that do not adhere to the same rules and lack transparency [1] - The G7 is considering increasing sanctions against Russia if a ceasefire agreement cannot be reached with Ukraine [1]

Group 1 - The forum held in Beijing on May 14 commemorated the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between China and the EU, focusing on themes of balance, commitment, and responsibility [3][6] - Former French Prime Minister Michel Barnier emphasized the importance of Europe maintaining independent foreign policies and highlighted that 85% of global trade occurs outside the US, with China being a key trading partner for the EU [3][4] - The bilateral trade volume has significantly increased from €2 billion annually to approximately €2 billion daily, showcasing the depth and breadth of China-EU relations [6] Group 2 - There are concerns regarding trade imbalances, with China's trade surplus with the EU increasing by 39% year-on-year as of April, leading to competitive pressures on some European companies [6][7] - The ongoing negotiations regarding Chinese electric vehicle imports illustrate the complexities of trade relations, with both sides recognizing the need for continued dialogue and cooperation [7] - Despite external uncertainties, foreign investment in China remains strong, indicating that the Chinese market continues to attract European companies [7]