▲2026年1月6日，在圆满完成在北京的访问行程之后，韩国总统李在明和其妻子离开北京即将前往上海。图/IC photo 据新华社报道，1月4日至7日，韩国总统李在明对中国进行为期4天的国事访问。这是2026年伊始，中国迎来的第 一位外国国家元首，也是韩国总统时隔近9年再次对中国进行国事访问。 结束在北京三天的访问行程后，韩国总统李在明6日前往上海。7日下午，他在上海出席大韩民国临时政府旧址100 周年纪念活动。 李在明此次中国之行，如何让两国关系从尹锡悦时期挖的"坑"里走出来是重要命题。从由韩国四大集团掌门人领 衔、200多名韩国企业家随行的豪华商业阵容看，加强经贸合作是中韩关系回暖的一个支点。 而另一个重要的支点则藏在历史当中。今年恰逢大韩民国临时政府上海旧址设立100周年，也是韩国独立运动家金 九诞辰150周年。参访上海马当路306弄朝鲜半岛抗日先烈旧址，是李在明访华的重要一站。这当然不是一次简单 的文化行程，而是一次能否坚持正确历史认知的表态。 在这一点上，李在明与尹锡悦形成了鲜明对比。 到1919年9月，以大韩民国上海临时政府为主，三个组织完成了机构统一。之后，朝鲜独立人士在上海宣布临时政 府国体为共 ...

集会参加者：我认为这是没有正视历史事实的问题，尤其是拥有大规模杀伤性武器。一旦使用，其造成的伤害将极其巨大。特别是日本曾经给亚洲人民带来 了巨大的伤害，进行殖民统治、发动侵略，夺取领土并造成破坏。对于这些历史，日本是否进行了充分的反省，并将历史正确地传承下去？这方面日本做得 实在太不够了。 集会参加者：日本作为唯一遭核爆的国家，政府却在讨论拥有核武器，甚至动摇"无核三原则"，这是极其不负责任的行为。高市政权试图走向大规模军备扩 张，导致日本民生受到挤压。我对此也要强烈发声反对。 当地时间26日晚，日本多名国会议员与民众在东京举行集会，针对日本首相高市早苗的涉台错误言论、持续推进军备扩张等发出强烈反对声音。 日本众议院议员 田村智子：民众生活相关的预算并未得到应有的增加，唯独防卫费、防卫预算却在异常增长。这样真的可以吗？我想提出这个质问。 日本参议院议员 社会民主党党首 福岛瑞穗：在高市政权成立时，我就给它起了一个名字，叫"战争准备内阁"。事实正是如此，"战争准备"正以滚雪球般的 速度推进。高市说安全环境一天比一天严峻，但这难道不是她的责任吗？践踏宪法、践踏法律，连政府既有见解都不顾的首相我认为必须下台。各位觉 ...

（来源：千龙网） 据《中国文物报》报道，2025年冬季，阿房宫遗址考古取得突破性进展。最新考古进一步证实，这座被 传颂千年的秦代宫殿既未建成，也未遭焚毁，考古成果与杜牧《阿房宫赋》所述内容有别，《阿房宫 赋》所描述的阿房宫景象非写实之作。这一发现改写了人们对秦代建筑的认知，引发了对历史叙事本质 的深刻思考——在考古发现的事实与文学想象的炽热表达之间，历史究竟以何种形态存在？ 从对阿房宫遗址的发掘情况来看，最震撼人心的不是夯土台基的规模，而是被时光凝固的细节。0.5米 厚的黑色淤泥层，诉说着营建者面对沼泽的艰难；立柱留下的柱洞，凝固着未完成的建筑梦想；车辙印 痕里，仿佛还能听见两千年前夯土的号子。这些细节拼凑出的阿房宫与文学想象截然不同：没有金碧辉 煌的宫殿，没有绵延百里的宫墙，有的只是一片未完成的夯土台基和一段被历史突然中断的营建史。 杜牧的《阿房宫赋》无疑是文学史上的杰作，但当我们把文学想象与考古发现并置时，会发现一个有趣 的现象：唐代文人笔下的阿房宫，更像是他们心中对奢靡的想象投射。那些华丽辞藻与其说是对秦代建 筑的描写，不如说是对唐代社会现实的隐喻。杜牧用阿房宫的奢靡来讽刺唐敬宗的大兴土木。这种借古 讽 ...

日本前首相福田康夫曾在2018年参观侵华日军南京大屠杀遇难同胞纪念馆，他是第四位参观的日本前首相。接受总台《高端访谈》专访时，他说， 日本人也必须了解这段历史。 日本前首相 福田康夫：历史无法磨灭。今后的日本人，有必要了解这些过去的事，需要探访历史遗址、回望历史，我深切地感受到做这些事的必要 性。因为这些都是历史，历史无法磨灭。日本人同样需要去学习这些历史。而且，对于历史上发生过的事，需要自己去认真思考，需要有这样的时 间。我想，南京的那次参观经历给了我这样的机会。 ...

日本资深媒体人乘松聪子表示，高市拒绝更正错误，损害中日互信。历史问题是中日关系的基础，日本教育体系长期弱化对日本二战 期间侵略事实的教育，年轻一代缺乏了解历史全貌的机会。 日 本 资 深 媒 体 人 乘 松 聪 子 ： 学 校 不 教 这 些 内 容 ， 这 是 一 个 非 常 严 重 的 问 题 。 教 科 书 中 的 相 关 记 述 也 在 不 断 减 少 ， 比 如 日 军 " 慰 安 妇"的内容，已经削减到几乎没有，至于南京大屠杀，还标注称，"关于被杀人数有诸多说法" "详细历史不明"。这样一来，年轻人根本 没有机会，去学习日本的侵略史。在这个意义上，我感到非常担忧。 世界范围内否认历史的国家只有日本，我因为住在加拿大，所以很清楚，日本是唯一被信息隔绝的国家，比如《南京照相馆》等电 影，海外都能看到，只有日本人看不到。日本各地还有许多与和平相关的民间博物馆，我认为应进一步扩大这些民间势力影响，让它 们国际化，利用这些微小的力量，通过国际性的合作，推动哪怕一点点的改善。 日本资深媒体人 乘松聪子： 中国人民之所以愤怒，是因为他们保存着对日本侵略战争的记忆，像南京大屠杀那样，日本犯下的是无论 如何都不能被 ...

Core Viewpoint - Recent provocative remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have sparked strong criticism domestically and raised concerns about Japan's historical awareness and potential shift towards militarism [1][5][7]. Group 1: Political Context - Takaichi's statements are seen as a blatant interference in China's internal affairs, reflecting a lack of historical understanding and potentially leading Japan down a dangerous path [1][5]. - The Japanese constitution, particularly Article 9, emphasizes Japan as a "non-war state" and prohibits the maintenance of military forces, which has historically allowed Japan to be viewed as a trustworthy nation by China [3][7]. Group 2: Economic Implications - Scholars warn that antagonism towards China could directly push Japan's economy into a crisis, emphasizing the need for the government to prioritize economic stability and the well-being of its citizens over military concerns [7][8]. - The potential loss of economic ties with China is highlighted as a critical risk, with warnings that Japan's economy could collapse without these relations, leading to severe consequences for the nation [8].

Core Viewpoint - Recent provocative remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have sparked strong criticism domestically and raised concerns about Japan's historical awareness and potential shift towards militarism [1][3]. Group 1: Historical Awareness and Political Implications - Takaichi's comments reflect a significant lack of historical understanding, which could lead Japan down a dangerous path [1][3]. - The Japanese constitution, particularly Article 9, emphasizes Japan as a "non-war state," prohibiting military forces and the use of force in international disputes, which has historically fostered trust with China [1]. - There is a growing concern that the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) aims to amend the constitution to allow Japan to become a nation capable of waging war, reminiscent of its militaristic past [3]. Group 2: Economic Consequences - Scholars warn that antagonism towards China could directly push Japan's economy into a crisis, emphasizing the need for the Prime Minister to prioritize economic welfare over military concerns [3][4]. - The potential loss of economic ties with China could lead to a complete economic collapse for Japan, highlighting the importance of placing economic stability and the well-being of citizens at the forefront of political decisions [4].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around the recent controversial statements and actions of Takashima Sanae regarding Taiwan issues and historical recognition, highlighting the legal invalidity of her remarks on Taiwan [1] - Takashima's attempts to modify the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" are seen as potentially harmful, raising concerns within Japan about the implications for national security and regional stability [1] - Various sectors within Japan have criticized her statements, indicating a significant backlash against her views on Taiwan and nuclear policy, reflecting broader societal and political tensions [1]

Group 1 - The core event is the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, with significant international participation [1][2] - 26 foreign heads of state and government leaders, including notable figures like Putin and Kim Jong-un, will attend, highlighting the event's global significance [1][2] - The event reflects China's rising influence and changing relationships with the world, as indicated by the high-level attendance from various countries [5][6] Group 2 - The attendance list includes leaders from Southeast Asian countries, indicating a desire to strengthen ties with China [5] - The event is seen as a diplomatic platform, showcasing China's military advancements and its role in promoting a multipolar international order [5][6] - The participation of international friends and their descendants who contributed to China's anti-Japanese efforts underscores the historical recognition and friendship [2][3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the World Anti-Fascist War, highlighting the international commemorative activities and Japan's attempts to downplay its historical aggression [1][3][4]. Group 1: Japan's Diplomatic Actions - Japan's government is reportedly urging European and Asian countries to refrain from participating in China's commemorative activities, claiming they overly focus on history and have a strong anti-Japanese sentiment [1][3]. - Japanese media has been closely monitoring China's commemorative events, labeling them as a "historical war" that Japan must confront [3][4]. - The Japanese embassy in China has warned its citizens about rising anti-Japanese sentiment in light of China's commemorative activities [3]. Group 2: International Participation - A significant number of international diplomats, including representatives from 112 embassies and 10 international organizations, have actively participated in China's commemorative events [4]. - Diplomats from various countries expressed the importance of learning from history to prevent repeating past mistakes, emphasizing the significance of China's role in the anti-fascist struggle [4][6]. Group 3: Historical Recognition and Criticism - Experts highlight that Japan's attempts to obstruct participation in China's commemorative activities reflect a failure to confront its historical aggression and a continuation of right-wing revisionism [4][9]. - Criticism from within Japan points to a lack of comprehensive reflection on its wartime actions, with some Japanese intellectuals acknowledging the dangers of distorting historical narratives [7][9]. - The article notes that Japan's actions could undermine the post-war international order, which is based on historical agreements like the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation [9].