自7月10日二次被捕以来，尹锡悦一直以健康原因拒绝接受特检组讯问，并连续10次缺席涉及内乱 罪指控的庭审。 新华社北京9月24日电 韩国前总统尹锡悦的律师团队23日说，尹锡悦将出席26日首尔中央地方法院 关于去年12月紧急戒严事件的庭审。此前，尹锡悦以健康状况不佳为由已连续10次缺席戒严事件相关庭 审。 调查尹锡悦在戒严事件中应负刑责的特别检察组已对他提出内乱罪指控，目前该案正在审理中。26 日的庭审则是针对其滥用职权、妨碍权利行使等指控的首次庭审。尹锡悦的律师团队说，根据司法程 序，刑事案件首次庭审需被告人出庭。 7月9日晚，韩国前总统尹锡悦接受讯问后走出首尔中央地方法院。新华社/纽西斯通讯社 上周，尹锡悦以自我辩护权及健康问题为由提出保释申请。首尔中央地方法院26日将举行另一场听 证会，以决定是否批准其保释申请。 去年12月3日，时任韩国总统尹锡悦发布紧急戒严令。同月14日，韩国国会通过对尹锡悦的弹劾动 议案，尹锡悦总统职权随即停止。今年1月15日，尹锡悦首次被捕，成为韩国 宪政 史上第一个被逮捕的 现职总统。3月8日，尹锡悦从首尔拘留所获释。4月4日，韩国宪法法院宣布通过对尹锡悦的弹劾，尹锡 悦被罢免总 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses recent legal setbacks faced by former President Trump, highlighting the implications of his business-like approach to governance and the resulting conflicts with established legal frameworks [1][3][20]. Group 1: Legal Setbacks - A federal judge in California ruled that Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles in June violated the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, which restricts the use of military forces for domestic law enforcement without congressional approval [9][13][22]. - In a separate ruling, a federal appeals court determined that Trump's broad tariffs were illegal, emphasizing that the power to levy taxes is constitutionally reserved for Congress, not the President [7][20]. Group 2: Business Approach to Governance - Trump's background as a businessman influences his decision-making, particularly his use of tariffs as negotiation tools, akin to tactics used in business negotiations [5][7]. - The article notes that Trump's attempts to manage state affairs as if they were business operations have led to significant legal challenges, as governance requires adherence to constitutional limits on presidential power [18][20]. Group 3: Political and Legal Implications - The rulings against Trump may lead to substantial financial implications for the U.S. Treasury, as the government might have to refund previously collected tariffs, creating uncertainty for businesses regarding future import costs [20][22]. - The ongoing legal battles could escalate to the Supreme Court, where recent trends indicate a focus on limiting executive power and reinforcing the necessity for congressional authorization in significant decisions [22].

央视网消息：据"最高人民检察院"微信公众号消息，检察机关依法分别对陈少荣、彭红圃、王川、陈 波、蔡光辉决定逮捕。 贵州检察机关依法对陈少荣决定逮捕 贵州省人大常委会法制工作委员会原副主任陈少荣（正厅级）涉嫌受贿一案，由贵州省监察委员会调查 终结，移送检察机关审查起诉。经贵州省人民检察院指定管辖，由黔南州人民检察院审查起诉。日前， 黔南州人民检察院依法以涉嫌受贿罪对陈少荣作出逮捕决定。该案正在进一步办理中。 广西检察机关依法对彭红圃决定逮捕 广西建设职业技术学院原党委副书记、院长彭红圃（副厅级）涉嫌受贿一案，由广西壮族自治区监察委 员会调查终结，移送检察机关审查起诉。经广西壮族自治区人民检察院指定管辖，由来宾市人民检察院 审查起诉。日前，来宾市人民检察院依法以涉嫌受贿罪对彭红圃作出逮捕决定。该案正在进一步办理 中。 广西检察机关依法对王川决定逮捕 广西壮族自治区合浦县委原书记、二级巡视员王川涉嫌受贿一案，由广西壮族自治区监察委员会调查终 结，移送检察机关审查起诉。经广西壮族自治区人民检察院指定管辖，由广西壮族自治区人民检察院南 宁铁路运输分院审查起诉。日前，广西壮族自治区人民检察院南宁铁路运输分院依法以涉嫌受贿 ...

Core Viewpoint - The incident involving a "Mercedes driver" in Guangxi has sparked significant public interest and controversy, particularly regarding the misuse of authority and personal privacy concerns [1][2][9]. Group 1: Incident Overview - On July 22, a confrontation occurred between a local resident and a Mercedes driver who displayed an "administrative law enforcement" certificate to demand the resident yield the road [9]. - The resident, referred to as "平头哥," reported feeling threatened as the driver and a male companion revealed personal information about him during the encounter [9][10]. - Following the incident, "平头哥" shared a video online, which garnered over 10 million views, leading to further scrutiny and public discourse [11][13]. Group 2: Official Response - The Guangxi Public Security Bureau established a working group to investigate the incident after it gained media attention [2][3]. - Officials expressed gratitude for public oversight of law enforcement activities, indicating a recognition of the need for accountability [2][3]. Group 3: Privacy and Legal Implications - Legal experts highlighted that personal information, such as identity and address, is protected by law, and unauthorized collection or disclosure could lead to criminal liability [14]. - If the Mercedes driver is a public official, her actions may constitute an abuse of power by unlawfully accessing personal information [14]. - The police's demand for the video to be deleted raises concerns about potential overreach and misuse of authority in handling the situation [14].