近日，四平市铁东区人民法院通过高效调解，成功化解了一起因洗浴中心地面湿滑导致的健康权纠纷， 在承办法官耐心细致的调解下，双方当事人达成和解并当场履行，实现了案结事了人和。 今年5月，李某在某洗浴中心消费时不慎摔倒，造成肋骨骨折，住院治疗近17天，医疗费支出1万余元。 事后，李某就赔偿问题与洗浴中心多次协商，但双方始终无法达成一致。李某遂诉至法院，要求赔偿各 项损失共计15万元。洗浴中心则辩称，李某作为成年人，自身未尽到安全注意义务，应分担部分责任， 并且洗浴中心在保险公司投保了公众责任险，应由保险公司在保险限额内赔偿。 最终，在法官主持下，双方达成调解协议：由保险公司理赔5万元；洗浴中心一次性赔偿李某医疗费、 护理费等各项费用共计1500元，并当场通过转账方式付清，李某与洗浴中心经营者均对调解结果表示满 意。 本案关系到群众切身利益与公共场所安全保障，铁东法院通过柔性调解，在依法维护消费者合法权益的 同时，强化了经营者的安全责任意识，实现了法律效果与社会效果的有机统一。 下一步，四平市铁东区人民法院将继续坚持和发展新时代"枫桥经验"，深入推进矛盾纠纷源头化解与多 元解纷机制建设，努力为人民群众提供更加便捷、高 ...

【基本案情】 被告陈某某辩称：认可自家水管爆裂导致漏水，愿意承担维修及赔偿责任，但认为原告主张的10000元 损失过高，部分家具损坏程度与漏水关联性不足，请求法院结合实际损失核定赔偿金额，同意配合完成 漏水部位修复工作，对租房费用不认可。 原告郭某某诉称：原告郭某某系富平县某小区1403室业主，被告陈某某系同小区1503室业主，双方为上 下楼邻居。2025年7月下旬，原告发现家中客厅、主卧、阳台、天花板出现渗水，墙面乳胶漆大面积剥 落，实木地板因长期泡水变形翘起，客厅灯、主卧灯灌水后导致短路。后经排查，确认漏水源头为被告 1503室水管老化爆裂导致。原告多次与被告协商修复及赔偿事宜，被告虽认可漏水事实，但对赔偿金额 存在异议，双方协商无果，原告诉至富平法院，请求判令被告因自家水管爆裂导致漏水给原告造成的财 产损失10000元及承担因房屋修缮无法居住给原告造成的租房费用3750元，并承担本案诉讼费用。 针对邻里漏水纠纷"标的小、影响久、情感牵连深"的特点，本案充分发挥司法调解"灵活高效、定分止 争、修复关系"的独特优势。法院工作人员通过多次耐心沟通，以法理为支撑释明双方权利义务，以情 理为纽带疏导对立情绪，在平 ...

杨某夫妇表示，起诉并非本意，只是希望能拿回辛苦积攒的养老钱，也盼着儿子和前儿媳能正视债务问 题；小杨与张某则坦言，离婚后经济压力较大，张某表示自己还要给付小杨孩子的抚养费，小杨则称自 己尚未给付张某财产折价款14万元，父母对自己的资助永不会忘。法官抓住双方仍有亲情基础的关键 点，引导双方换位思考，告知前儿媳债务清偿的法律责任，也劝说原告夫妇体谅对方的实际情况，兼顾 情理包容。经过法官数轮耐心细致的调解，双方最终达成和解协议：小杨向张某支付45000元，二人之 间的离婚债务纠纷，孩子的抚养费问题，还有二人和杨某夫妇的债务纠纷一并解决。协议签订后，双方 当即按照协议履行了义务，杨某夫妇也自愿撤回了起诉。 此次成功调解，不仅高效化解争议，更传递了司法温情，为化解家庭类纠纷提供了解决思路和实践样 本。 作者| 田雷 近日，一起由公婆起诉儿子与前儿媳的民间借贷纠纷案件，经大荔法院民三庭法官耐心调解，不但成功 化解此纠纷，还圆满处理了离婚债务、孩子抚养费的相关纠纷，实现"调解一案、化解一串"的良好效 果。 原告是杨某夫妇，被告一小杨系二人之子，被告二张某系小杨前妻。2016年期间，小杨与张某因家庭生 活及创业需要，先后向 ...

"我家房檐凭啥他说切就切？"刘某堂报警后，兄弟俩当着民警争执不下。经界首市人民调解委员会 多轮调解，2024年9月双方签署《人民调解协议书》：刘某怀赔偿6万元，刘某堂自行修复房檐（宽不超 20公分），刘某怀若阻碍，再付5万元违约金。 付了赔偿款，刘某怀心结未解，耿耿于怀，调解时刘某堂口头承诺的"不滴水到邻家"未写入协议。 2024年11月，刘某怀担心再次滴水，直接砌砖墙堵死了两家之间的通道。修房檐的施工队进不了场，双 方协商无果，刘某堂诉至光武法庭，要求哥哥拆墙并赔违约金。 弟弟刘某堂家房檐常年滴水进哥哥刘某怀家小院，双方多次交涉无果，矛盾逐渐升级，诉至法院。 安徽省界首市人民法院光武人民法庭法官宋楠一次次上门勘查、促膝长谈，终让亲情重燃。 家住界首市光武镇某村的亲兄弟刘某怀与刘某堂宅基地前后相邻，因滴水问题产生矛盾。2024年4 月，没跟弟弟商量，哥哥直接带着切割机走进弟弟家，一口气将房檐切去20公分。 弟弟接口说："违约金我不要了，修复房檐时我多盯着，保证不再往哥家滴水，完工后有问题我再 改。" 次日，刘某怀就拆了砖墙，施工队顺利进场；修复房檐时，他还不时去搭把手查看排水槽。 随后，兄弟俩上法庭撤回了起诉 ...

"谢谢你啊法官，帮了我一个大忙。"心里的石头终于落地了，我由衷表示感谢。如果不是她及时安 排调解，事情恐怕没这么快解决。杜法官摆摆手让我不用谢。 人生中第一次走进法庭，竟在一天之内经历了两种不同的身份——上午我还是个为案子焦头烂额的 被告；中午却成了协助法官调解老乡纠纷的"调解员"。这一天，让我对人民法庭有了全新的认识。 那天早上，我正给孩子收拾行李，突然发现银行账户被冻结了。翻了翻手机，这才想起是老客户老 张起诉了我。他说我们公司最近交付的一批鞋子有质量问题，要求退货退款。 我心头一紧，赶紧拨通了浙江省慈溪市人民法院逍林人民法庭法官杜姝璇的电话。"法官，我的账 户被冻结了，这马上要送孩子去外地读书，能不能今天就调解？我愿意先付一部分钱……"我有些着 急，没想到杜法官非常体谅我的处境，当即表示会联系原告方征求意见。老张听说我愿意付款，也立刻 同意马上安排律师过来。 10时45分，我站在了逍林法庭的调解室里。在法官的主持下，我和老张的代理律师签署了分期付款 的调解协议，并当场支付了10万元货款，法庭工作人员也加急为我办理了解除账户冻结手续。 熟悉的乡音果然让现场的气氛缓和了不少。在接下来的调解中，我帮助杜法官准 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a civil lending dispute between Zhang and Xie, which escalated due to cultural misunderstandings regarding traditional festival dates for repayments, ultimately resolved through judicial intervention and cultural guidance [3][4][5]. Group 1: Dispute Background - The dispute began in early 2024 when Zhang and Xie entered the execution phase of their civil lending agreement, which stipulated monthly repayments of 2,500 yuan from March 2024 to July 2027 [3]. - The agreement aimed to alleviate Xie's immediate repayment pressure while ensuring Zhang's debt recovery, reflecting the traditional wisdom of "harmony is precious" [3]. Group 2: Escalation of Conflict - Tensions arose as Xie chose traditional festival dates, such as Qingming and Zhongyuan, for repayments, which Zhang found offensive, leading to further conflicts [4]. - The court intervened multiple times, urging both parties to respect the cultural significance of these festivals, but the situation worsened during the Zhongyuan Festival when Xie again made a payment, turning the festival into a tool for personal grievances [4]. Group 3: Resolution Process - The court issued a warning to Xie for his inappropriate behavior, leading him to recognize his mistake and submit a written apology, acknowledging that his actions violated public order and morals [5]. - The judge encouraged Zhang to let go of past grievances and emphasized the core values of traditional festivals, while motivating Xie to rectify his actions through prompt repayment [5]. Group 4: Final Outcome - By September 2025, Xie paid off the remaining 55,000 yuan in two installments, completing the repayment plan 22 months ahead of schedule, thus resolving the dispute influenced by cultural misunderstandings [5]. - The case highlights the importance of integrating legal authority with cultural understanding in dispute resolution, promoting respect for traditional values while ensuring legal compliance [6].

Group 1 - The article emphasizes the importance of protecting minors' rights and preventing juvenile crime, highlighting that it is a societal responsibility that requires collective effort [1] - The establishment of the juvenile trial work studio in Longyou County aims to enhance judicial functions and collaborate with educational institutions to provide psychological guidance and legal education for minors [1][2] Group 2 - A case involving a student named Xiaoxue reveals the psychological impact of parental conflicts on minors, leading to a decline in academic performance [2][3] - The court's intervention in Xiaoxue's family dispute resulted in a successful mediation, where the father promised to change his behavior and the mother withdrew the divorce petition [4][5] Group 3 - The Longyou Court has implemented various educational initiatives, such as the "Dragon Law Good Parents" class, to improve family dynamics and prevent negative impacts on children during critical academic periods [6][7] - The court has issued over 120 family education guidance orders and organized multiple public classes to enhance parental skills in managing family conflicts [6] Group 4 - The article discusses the need for specialized handling of juvenile cases, with judges forming teams to address new challenges and develop solutions for protecting minors' rights [7][8] - A specific case illustrates how the court facilitated an agreement between parents regarding child custody, emphasizing the importance of respecting children's opinions in such matters [8] Group 5 - The article highlights the rise in cases involving minors engaged in illegal activities, prompting the court to collaborate with law enforcement to address the root causes and prevent future occurrences [9][10] - The Longyou Court has successfully implemented preventive measures, resulting in a significant decrease in such cases over the past year [10] Group 6 - The article describes initiatives aimed at educating left-behind children in rural areas, including legal knowledge sessions during summer camps [10][11] - The court's outreach efforts include home visits and support for families in need, demonstrating a commitment to the welfare of minors [11][12] Group 7 - The collaboration between the judiciary and educational authorities is emphasized as a means to enhance the protection of minors, with joint efforts to address safety concerns in schools [14][15] - The article concludes with a call for continued cooperation among various stakeholders to ensure comprehensive protection for minors [14][17]

Group 1 - The case involves a traffic accident where the driver, Wu, was found fully responsible for the collision that injured the plaintiff [1] - The plaintiff suffered a level ten disability due to the accident, but there were complications regarding the causality of the injuries due to pre-existing health conditions [1] - The court facilitated a mediation process that ultimately led to a resolution, protecting the plaintiff's legal rights and providing a sense of judicial warmth [1] Group 2 - The plaintiff was in the early stages of pregnancy at the time of the accident, which complicated the medical treatment due to potential risks to the unborn child [2] - The family is in a difficult financial situation and urgently needs the compensation to alleviate their struggles [2] - The judge actively worked to mediate between the plaintiff and the insurance company, leading to an increase in the compensation amount and a resolution of the dispute [2]