后端提成模式
Search documents
服务好投资者是基金立命之本
Di Yi Cai Jing Zi Xun· 2025-09-08 00:47
Core Viewpoint - The recent fee reform in China's public fund industry marks a significant step towards reducing investor costs and shifting the focus from scale-driven growth to professional competence and effective returns [2][3][4]. Group 1: Fee Reform Details - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has revised the sales fee management regulations for publicly offered securities investment funds, indicating the final phase of fee reform [2]. - The maximum subscription and purchase fees for stock funds have been reduced from 1.2% and 1.5% to 0.8%, while mixed funds have seen a reduction from 1.2% and 1.5% to 0.5% [2]. - Bond funds' maximum subscription and purchase fees have decreased from 0.6% and 0.8% to 0.3%, and the sales service fee for stock and mixed funds has been lowered from 0.6% per year to 0.4% per year [2]. - Index and bond funds' sales service fees have been cut from 0.4% per year to 0.2% per year, and money market funds' sales service fees have decreased from 0.25% per year to 0.15% per year [2]. Group 2: Implications for the Industry - The fee reform is expected to enhance the competitiveness of public funds by encouraging a shift from a focus on scale to a focus on professional investment capabilities and long-term performance [3][4]. - The existing front-end fee model has limited the competitive spirit and professional development of public funds, making them less responsive to market changes compared to private funds [3]. - A new institutional framework is needed to align the interests of fund managers, custodians, and investors, promoting a shared incentive model that fosters trust and competition within the public fund market [4][5]. Group 3: Future Directions - The fee reform is seen as a new starting point for the public fund industry, emphasizing the importance of professional capabilities and trust-based relationships in the capital market [5]. - The industry is encouraged to explore back-end profit-sharing models to better serve investors and enhance market competitiveness [4][5].
服务好投资者是基金立命之本
第一财经· 2025-09-08 00:37
Core Viewpoint - The recent fee reform in China's public fund industry marks a significant step towards reducing investor costs and shifting the focus from scale-driven growth to professional competence and effective returns [2][3]. Summary by Sections Fee Reform Details - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has revised the sales fee management regulations for publicly offered securities investment funds, indicating the final phase of fee reform [2]. - The maximum subscription and purchase fees for stock funds have been reduced from 1.2% and 1.5% to 0.8%, while for mixed funds, they have been lowered to 0.5%. Bond funds' fees have decreased from 0.6% and 0.8% to 0.3% [2]. Impact on the Public Fund Industry - The fee reform aims to lower investment costs for investors and encourages a shift away from a scale-oriented approach towards a focus on professional investment capabilities and returns [3]. - The existing front-end fee model has limited the competitive spirit and professional development of public funds compared to private funds, leading to a lack of market sensitivity [3][4]. Future Directions - To foster healthy development in the capital market, a new institutional framework is needed that aligns the interests of fund managers, custodians, and investors [4]. - The introduction of a back-end performance-based fee model could create a community of interests among investors, fund managers, and custodians, enhancing market competition and trust [6]. Conclusion - The fee reform is not an endpoint but a new starting point for the public fund industry, emphasizing the importance of professional capability and trust in the market [6].