【 导读 】 中证协研究复盘近四年证券业人员变动情况 中国基金报记者 孙越 近日， 记者获悉， 中证协向券商发文， 系统 梳理了2021 — 2024年证券公司从业人员队伍的整体演变、结构调整、效能变化等，评估 了人员结构与业务发展的适配性。 从近四年的数据来看，证券公司从业人员队伍进入存量盘整阶段，行业正从"人海战术"向"高质高效"人才战略转型，一流金融人才队伍建 设取得新的积极进展。 人均营业收入降幅达54.74% 2021-2024年，投行业务人员规模从2.73万人 增长 10.6%至3.02万人，但人均营业收入却从258.06万元降至116.79万元，降幅达 54.74%。虽然2024年投行业务人员较2023年有所减少，但人均营业收入依然大幅下 滑 。 从业人员增速放缓 经纪人降幅近五成 从近二十年来的行业发展看，证券从业人员队伍经历了由快速增长到存量盘整的过程。2005年到2017年，人员数量每年递增，由6.51万 人扩充到34.39万人，随后进入盘整阶段，在32万人至36万人间小幅波动。 中证协发布的文件显示， 截至2024年末，证券公司从业人员 为 33.57万人，较2021年减少7003人，降 ...

Core Viewpoint - Dachen Fund Management Co., Ltd. announced a self-purchase of 20 million yuan in its newly launched floating-rate fund, Dachen Zhi Zhen Return Mixed Securities Investment Fund, reflecting a growing trend of self-purchases in the public fund industry as firms respond to regulatory fee reforms and strengthen ties with investors [1][2]. Group 1: Company Actions - Dachen Fund's self-purchase of 20 million yuan demonstrates confidence in the long-term stability and healthy development of China's capital market and the company's proactive investment capabilities [2]. - The Dachen Zhi Zhen Return Mixed Fund is one of the first floating-rate management fee products, managed by experienced fund manager Du Cong, who has 11 years of industry experience and a strong track record [2][3]. - Other institutions, including Jiao Yin Shi Luo De Fund and Zhong Ou Fund, have also announced similar self-purchase actions, indicating a collective movement within the industry [4][5]. Group 2: Fund Structure and Fee Mechanism - The Dachen Zhi Zhen Return Mixed Fund has a wide investment scope, including domestic stocks, bonds, and asset-backed securities, and employs a floating fee structure linked to fund performance [3]. - The management fee varies based on the holding period and performance, with rates ranging from 0.60% to 1.50%, depending on the fund's excess return relative to benchmarks [3]. - The floating fee mechanism aims to align the interests of fund companies with those of investors, promoting long-term investment and enhancing active management capabilities [3][5]. Group 3: Industry Trends - The self-purchase actions by Dachen Fund and other institutions signify a shift in the public fund industry towards a focus on returns and long-term performance [5]. - The implementation of floating fee mechanisms represents an innovation in fee structures and a reconfiguration of investment philosophies and assessment systems within the industry [5]. - As the regulatory framework evolves, fund companies' revenues will increasingly be tied to investor returns, influencing fund managers' compensation based on long-term performance [5].

Core Viewpoint - The recent approval of floating management fee fund products marks a significant step in the fee reform of public funds, providing new options for investors while posing challenges to the fund industry’s operational models and investment strategies [2][10]. Product Submission - The recent submission of floating management fee products includes 26 leading fund management institutions such as E Fund, Huaxia Fund, and GF Fund, indicating strong participation from both large and small fund companies [3][4]. Fee Structure Innovation - The new floating management fee products innovate the fee structure by linking management fees to both the holding period and the performance during that period, contrasting with previous models that primarily linked fees to fund size or investor holding time [5][10]. Challenges Faced - Fund managers face new challenges in managing floating fee funds, as their fees are closely tied to performance, necessitating precise market assessments and optimized investment portfolios to exceed performance benchmarks [6][7]. Operational Changes - The introduction of floating management fee products necessitates significant changes in fund operations, requiring advanced systems to handle complex fee calculations based on individual investor performance and holding periods [8][10]. Investor Implications - The design of floating management fee products encourages long-term investment by linking fees to holding periods and performance, potentially reducing short-term trading and promoting a focus on long-term returns [9][10]. Future Outlook - The floating management fee product is seen as a potential mainstream model for future fund issuance, with expectations for more refined designs and diverse investment strategies as regulatory frameworks evolve [10][11].

Core Viewpoint - The report from招商策略 indicates that after the short-term profit-taking pressure is released, the A-share market is expected to return to a trend of oscillating upward [1] Group 1: Market Conditions - The first batch of floating rate funds has officially been submitted for approval, marking the practical implementation of fee reform [1] - In April, the growth rate of social financing accelerated to a high level, supported by a series of counter-cyclical financial adjustment policies, which is expected to restore real financing demand [1] - The issuance of ultra-long special government bonds and special government bonds for central financial institutions has commenced, providing continued support for the total amount of social financing [1] Group 2: Central Bank Actions - In April, the central bank's "claims on other financial companies" increased significantly, likely related to providing liquidity support to the Central Huijin Investment [1] - The Central Huijin is expected to continue playing a stabilizing role, making market downside risks manageable [1] Group 3: Market Sentiment - The joint statement from the China-US Geneva economic and trade talks is expected to positively influence short-term market risk appetite [1] - Concerns over fluctuating tariffs and subsequent profit-taking may be the main reasons for the market's weakness in the latter half of the week [1]

Core Insights - The overall net profit of 65 fund companies reached 34.115 billion yuan in 2024, an increase of 1.323 billion yuan compared to 2023 [1] - Only 39 out of the 65 fund companies reported a year-on-year increase in net profit, indicating that the majority of companies faced challenges [1] - Less than half of the companies reported a year-on-year increase in revenue, highlighting the impact of fee rate adjustments on the industry [1] Financial Performance Overview - The top 11 fund companies with net profits exceeding 1 billion yuan saw changes in their rankings, with more than half experiencing shifts [5][6] - Two companies, namely Invesco Great Wall Fund and Jiao Yin Schroder Fund, dropped out of the 1 billion yuan net profit tier compared to 2023 [13] - The net profit of Tianhong Fund increased by 19.29% to 1.679 billion yuan, marking the most significant rise among the top companies [8][11] Revenue and Profit Changes - The total management fee income for over half of the fund managers declined, with a total drop exceeding 10 billion yuan [5][14] - The fee rate reform has led to significant revenue impacts, with many companies seeking to enhance their competitive edge [5][19] - Companies like Dongwu Fund reported a remarkable net profit increase of 274.84%, while others like Nanhua Fund faced a staggering loss of 978.08% [15][18] Strategic Responses - Fund companies are focusing on refining their core competencies to adapt to the ongoing fee rate reforms and market changes [19][20] - Companies such as Huaxia Fund and Guotou Ruijin Fund are enhancing their product offerings and digital integration to maintain competitiveness [20][21] - The industry is witnessing a trend where smaller firms are showing significant profit growth, while larger firms are experiencing more pronounced absolute profit changes [18]