Business Model & Investment - Nucor, a steel giant, invested $51 million in Tesla's Megapack to avoid demand charges [1] - The investment allows Nucor to essentially "buy out" high demand charges for decades to come [1] - Tesla Energy's business model involves using Megapack as a "power reservoir" to reduce electricity costs [1] Operational Efficiency - Modern steelmaking uses "electric arc furnaces" which consume large amounts of electricity intermittently [1] - This intermittent high electricity demand leads to "demand charges" from the power grid [1] - Megapack stores electricity when it's cheap and releases it when the electric arc furnace needs it, reducing demand charges [1]

如果馬斯克 跟你說 要免費送你一套 特斯拉太陽能 還每個月 倒貼錢給你 你敢信嗎？ 這聽起來 簡直是 天方夜譚！ 但特斯拉 最新的太陽能 租賃方案 就是這麼宣傳的！ 你家屋頂 等於直接 變成了印鈔機！ 但也先別 高興得太早 你以為 你賺到了？ 其實 馬斯克 賺得更多！ 這背後 藏著一個 教科書級別的 商業算計 第一你以為 你省了月租？ 其實美國政府 給的太陽能補貼 直接進了 特斯拉的口袋！ 等於是政府幫他 在你家屋頂上 裝了一套 他的設備！ 第二 也是最絕的 五年之後 你已經離不開 這套系統了 到時候 面對買斷 續租或者拆掉 你很大可能性 是在前兩個 選項徘徊？ 所以馬斯克下的 是一盤長達 25年的大棋！ 他根本不是 在做慈善 他是在悄悄地 把你變成他 能源帝國 最忠實的用戶！. ...

Business Model Analysis - Chinese Robotaxi companies adopt a "central kitchen" model, providing autonomous driving technology as a "pre-made meal" to global ride-hailing platforms [1] - This model prioritizes rapid expansion by leveraging existing user bases like Uber's millions of users [1] - The trade-off involves relinquishing brand control, customer ownership, and pricing power [1] - The industry views this approach as limiting their potential, capping them as suppliers rather than ecosystem definers [1] Competitive Positioning - The report suggests Chinese Robotaxi companies are positioning themselves as the "Intel" of the Robotaxi world, not the "Apple" [1] - The industry believes this model prevents them from achieving disruptive innovation, instead becoming advanced laborers [1] Risk Assessment - The industry highlights the risk of reliance on other platforms, where ride-hailing services can easily switch to competitors like Waymo [1]