Core Viewpoint - The report indicates that the "Chuangjin Hexin Stable Pension Target One-Year Holding Period Mixed Fund of Funds (FOF)" will enter liquidation due to its net asset value falling below 200 million yuan by July 21, 2025, as stipulated in the fund contract [1][2]. Fund Overview - The fund was officially established on July 21, 2022, with a total share amount of 10,001,822.90 shares, and it had no accrued interest at the time of inception [1]. - The fund's A/Y share classes reported cumulative net values of 1.0563 yuan and 1.0630 yuan, with cumulative returns of 5.63% and 7.40% respectively [2]. Management Background - The fund was previously managed by Yan Biao, who has extensive experience in the investment sector, having held various positions in different financial institutions since 2008 [3]. - Currently, Yan Biao manages seven other FOF funds, most of which have positive returns but underperform compared to their peers [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance issues of the Shenwan Hongyuan's fund, particularly the Shenwan Lingshin Industry Select Fund, which has experienced significant losses shortly after its establishment, raising concerns among investors about the management and investment strategies of the newly appointed vice president, Jia Chengdong [3][5][10]. Group 1: Fund Performance - The Shenwan Lingshin Industry Select Fund, managed by Jia Chengdong, has seen a cumulative decline of over 8% since its inception on June 3, 2025, while the Shanghai Composite Index rose by 8.96% during the same period, indicating a significant underperformance [6][7]. - The fund's initial net asset value was 0.98 yuan, which dropped to 0.92 yuan by August 11, 2025, reflecting volatility and a rapid decline in value shortly after launch [7]. - Investors have expressed dissatisfaction with the fund's performance, with comments highlighting disappointment in its ability to generate returns during a bullish market [5][10]. Group 2: Management Background - Jia Chengdong joined Shenwan Lingshin in December 2024 and became vice president in March 2025, shortly before launching the Shenwan Lingshin Industry Select Fund [6][9]. - Prior to joining Shenwan Lingshin, Jia managed multiple funds at Guotai Fund and招商基金, with mixed performance results, including both significant gains and losses in various funds [9][10]. - His previous experience included managing funds that performed well over several years, but he also oversaw funds that recorded losses during market downturns [9]. Group 3: Industry Context - Shenwan Lingshin has faced challenges in its equity products, with multiple funds facing liquidation due to asset values falling below the required thresholds [10]. - As of August 12, 2025, Shenwan Lingshin's total asset management scale was 825.57 billion yuan, ranking 66th in the industry, down from 846.40 billion yuan at the end of 2024 [10].

Core Viewpoint - The performance of the Shenwan Hongyuan Fund's Shenwan Lingshin Industry Select Mixed Fund has declined over 8% since its establishment, raising concerns about the fund manager's investment strategy and prompting a response from the company [1][4]. Fund Performance - The Shenwan Lingshin Industry Select Fund, established on June 3, has a unit net value of 0.9177 yuan as of August 8, reflecting a decline of over 8% since inception [4]. - The fund raised 1.219 billion yuan, making it one of the larger mixed equity funds launched in recent months [4]. - The fund's performance is benchmarked against a composite index consisting of 65% CSI 300, 10% Hang Seng Index, and 25% China Bond Index [4]. Fund Manager Background - The fund manager, Jia Chengdong, has 17 years of experience in the securities industry and has previously managed funds with significant performance records [5]. - Jia Chengdong joined Shenwan Lingshin in December 2024 after leaving China Merchants Fund, where he managed several successful funds [5]. Company Challenges - Shenwan Lingshin has faced multiple fund liquidations this year, including the Shenwan Lingshin Carbon Neutrality Mixed Fund and others, indicating potential issues within the company's product offerings [8]. - The company has struggled to maintain competitive performance and scale compared to peers like Tianhong Fund, with a current non-monetary scale of 70.324 billion yuan, ranking 59th in the public fund industry [9]. - Despite attempts to improve performance by hiring well-known fund managers, the results have not yet met expectations [9].

Group 1 - The overall A-share market is experiencing a fluctuating upward trend, yet some public equity funds are facing continuous shrinkage in scale, triggering liquidation conditions [1] - As of July 16, 50 active equity funds have entered liquidation procedures this year, with initiated funds being particularly affected [1][3] - The case of Zhongyin Securities Huize Jinqi 3-Month Holding Fund highlights the challenges faced by small and medium-sized fund companies in the FOF product layout, as its net asset value was only 0.28 billion yuan, significantly below the 2 billion yuan safety line [3][4] Group 2 - The "three-year test" for initiated funds has become a primary reason for liquidation, as funds must maintain a net asset value of at least 2 billion yuan after three years to avoid termination [4] - The increase in the number of liquidated equity funds is attributed to structural market conditions, where capital is concentrated in top funds and track-type products, diminishing the appeal of smaller funds [4] - Analysts suggest that the liquidation of initiated funds should not be viewed merely as failure but as a reflection of market competition, urging fund companies to carefully assess product strategies and resource alignment [4]

Group 1 - The core issue in the industry is the ongoing rumors of mergers, particularly involving Hai Futong and Hua An Fund, which are facing significant challenges such as frequent fund liquidations and poor performance [2][15] - Hai Futong has seen a wave of fund liquidations, with seven funds being liquidated in 2025 alone, and 19 funds currently below the 50 million threshold for liquidation [5][9] - The product structure of Hai Futong is heavily skewed towards bond and money market funds, which account for 84% of its total fund size, while equity funds only total 7.891 billion [11][12] Group 2 - Hua An Fund is also struggling, with 5 funds liquidated this year and 17% of its funds below the 50 million threshold, indicating a similar trend to Hai Futong [19][16] - The performance of equity products at Hua An Fund is weak, with many fund managers reporting negative returns, raising concerns about the overall management and strategy [20][22] - The management turmoil at Hai Futong, including the recent appointment of a new chairman without prior fund industry experience, complicates the resolution of its performance issues [14][30] Group 3 - The merger rumors between Hai Futong and Hua An Fund are driven by regulatory compliance issues following the merger of their parent companies, which necessitates the integration of their fund management operations [15][19] - Both companies have similar product structures, with a significant portion of their assets in bond and money market funds, limiting their growth potential in equity markets [16][18] - The historical performance of both funds has been marred by scandals, including a recent case of insider trading involving a former Hua An Fund manager, which has further damaged investor trust [24][34]

Core Viewpoint - The report from Furong Fund indicates that the Furong Medical Health Mixed Fund will enter liquidation due to its total fund size falling below 200 million RMB by June 28, 2025, which triggers the termination clause in the fund contract [1] Fund Performance Summary - The fund was established on June 28, 2022, and will cease operations on June 28, 2025, with a total fund size of 12,369,681.57 shares at the end of its operation [1] - The net asset value for Class A shares is 0.7920 RMB, with a total of 11,555,608.85 shares, while Class C shares have a net asset value of 0.7825 RMB and a total of 814,072.72 shares [1] - The fund has experienced cumulative losses of 20.8% for Class A and 21.75% for Class C over its three-year lifespan [1] Management Background - The fund has been managed by Li Huanghai since its inception, who has extensive experience in various investment roles across multiple firms [2] - Currently, Li Huanghai also manages three other funds, with only one, Furong Fuyue Mixed Fund, slightly outperforming its peers, while the other two, including Furong Value Selection Mixed Fund, have seen significant declines, with the latter down over 38% in nearly two years [2]

Group 1 - The number of fund liquidations in the year has reached 136, indicating a normalization of fund closures due to scale pressure or a decrease in the number of holders [1] - The number of liquidated funds has decreased by 50% year-on-year, despite a recovery in A-shares and Hong Kong stocks [1] - Equity funds remain the dominant type of liquidated funds, with a total of 88 funds, accounting for 65% of the closures [1] Group 2 - 33 bond funds have been liquidated, along with 14 FOF funds and 1 QDII fund [1] - Not all liquidated funds are from unpopular sectors; several popular themes such as dividends, pharmaceuticals, and Hong Kong-related funds have also been closed [1]

Core Insights - The rise of "initiated funds" has led to a significant number of funds facing liquidation due to not meeting the 200 million yuan threshold after three years [1][2] - Despite the high rate of liquidation, initiated funds remain a key strategy for fund companies, raising questions about their sustainability and operational costs [4][5] Group 1: Fund Liquidation Trends - As of July 15, 2023, 43 initiated funds have been liquidated this year due to failing to reach the required 200 million yuan, marking a historical high [1][2] - The average decline in value for these funds over three years is 18.65%, with nearly half experiencing a drop of over 20% [3][4] - Specific sectors like renewable energy and healthcare have seen significant performance issues, with some funds reporting cumulative returns as low as -53.43% [2][3] Group 2: Fund Company Strategies - Fund companies continue to launch initiated funds despite the risks, with over 404 such funds issued in 2023 alone [4][5] - The relatively relaxed establishment conditions for initiated funds allow companies to quickly enter niche markets and develop new fund managers [6][7] - Initiated funds serve as a "incubation" platform for new strategies and managers, providing opportunities in less recognized sectors [6][7] Group 3: Future Outlook - As of mid-July 2023, 183 initiated funds are approaching their three-year mark, with 98 of them still below the 200 million yuan threshold, indicating potential future liquidations [7] - Some initiated funds have successfully surpassed the threshold, such as the Yongying Advanced Manufacturing Fund, which has achieved a cumulative return of 82.35% [7]

Core Viewpoint - The recent wave of fund liquidations is seen as a necessary process of market self-purification, reflecting a survival of the fittest mechanism in the investment landscape [1][2]. Group 1: Fund Liquidation Trends - In 2024, over 300 funds have been liquidated, marking a record high, with 129 funds announcing liquidation in the first half of the year, an increase compared to the same period last year [1]. - Many of the liquidated funds failed to meet the minimum scale requirement, indicating rational choices made by investors as they shift funds towards products that can generate long-term returns [1]. - The average scale of the bottom 20% of actively managed equity funds has significantly shrunk, while the top 20% of products have seen substantial growth in their share [1]. Group 2: Market Mechanism and Fund Structure - The liquidation process serves as a necessary pain for market self-correction, with the total number of public funds nearing 13,000, including over 1,600 "mini funds" with scales below 50 million [1]. - The excess of products has led to resource allocation imbalances, and liquidation is a form of automatic correction for ineffective supply [1]. - Regulatory bodies have been optimizing the fund exit mechanism, encouraging the liquidation of "zombie products," which has prompted fund companies to abandon the "shell protection" strategy [1]. Group 3: Implications for Investors - Investors are encouraged to focus on the underlying logic of products, such as the stability of fund managers, the adaptability of strategies, and the company's resource investment, to avoid "high-risk liquidation" products [2]. - When encountering liquidated funds, investors should seize the opportunity to adjust their portfolios and utilize conversion functions to seamlessly transition to quality funds, preventing cash from being idle [2]. - The process of fund liquidation is compared to the elimination of outdated capacities in the solar industry, suggesting that it is a transformative change that expands effective supply and is a necessary step towards market maturity [2].

Core Viewpoint - The recent wave of fund liquidations is a natural outcome of market mechanisms, reflecting a process of self-purification and the survival of the fittest in the investment landscape [1][2] Group 1: Fund Liquidation Trends - In 2024, over 300 funds have been liquidated, marking a record high, with 129 funds announcing liquidation in the first half of the year, an increase compared to the same period last year [1] - Many of the liquidated funds failed to meet the minimum scale threshold, indicating rational choices by investors as they shift funds towards products that can generate long-term returns [1] Group 2: Market Mechanism and Fund Structure - The liquidation process serves as a necessary pain for market self-correction, with the total number of public funds nearing 13,000, yet over 1,600 funds classified as "mini funds" with assets below 50 million yuan [1] - The regulatory body has been optimizing the fund exit mechanism, encouraging the liquidation of "zombie products," which has led fund companies to abandon the "shell protection" strategy and focus on competitive products [1][2] Group 3: Impact on Investment Strategies - The reduction of low-efficiency supply through liquidation promotes the optimization of fund structures and directs capital towards new productive themes [2] - Investors are advised to focus on core indicators such as the stability of fund managers, the adaptability of strategies, and resource allocation to avoid "high-risk liquidation" products [2]