失信被执行人
Search documents
职工工资存入天瑞集团旗下APP遇取现难?天瑞集团称账上没有钱
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-12-30 11:38
【#职工工资存入天瑞集团旗下APP遇取现难#?#天瑞集团称账上没有钱# 】 一家高新技术企业和软件企业何以会陷入理财纠纷?12月29日上午,第一财经记者多次拨打天瑞信科的 多个办公电话,却被提示为"空号"。 天瑞信科官网信息显示,该公司是由天瑞集团股份有限公司投资成立的一家专业从事信息技术服务、软 件开发销售、网络技术咨询服务、企业信息化、智能化解决方案服务及工业互联网平台研发运营有关的 高新技术企业和软件企业。企查查信息显示,天瑞集团股份有限公司持有天瑞信科90%股权。天瑞集团 的业务板块覆盖绿色建材、铸造(智能制造)、互联网科技、文化旅游等产业,曾一度名列中国企业 500强380位,中国制造业500强195位。 2025年底,天瑞信科(河南)数字科技有限公司(下称"天瑞信科")及其法定代表人王某,再次被法院 列入失信被执行人。而被列为失信被执行人的原因之一,则是由于民间委托合同理财纠纷。 ...
前国脚戴琳被曝欠款辱骂球迷,最低一笔还款仅7元,涉事球迷如今重病昏迷,进入ICU,每日治疗费3万元,正急售房和车
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-12-14 13:33
每经编辑|许绍航 据红星新闻,12月14日,被前国脚戴琳拖欠钱款的球迷正在ICU抢救,处于昏迷之中,暂时没有清醒过来。为了能够筹集医药费,家属已在水滴筹平台发 起募捐,希望能获得好心人帮助。 涉事球迷在医院接受治疗 图据水滴筹 此前,知名体育博主李平康发文曝光了前职业球员戴琳拖欠山东泰山球迷钱款,至今未能支付完毕,并在索要欠款期间该球迷还被戴琳多次言语辱骂一 事,引发广泛关注。 李平康说,这个球迷病情恶化,确实需要钱。在此情况下,李平康又第二次发布了微博。 随后戴琳再次找到该球迷,进行言语辱骂,并表示再继续发微博将一分钱也不还。随后戴琳又再次还款4000元,要求删除微博。"因为这钱够他做一个小 手术了,在戴琳的进一步恐吓下,球迷说想让我给删掉,我就隐藏了微博。"李平康表示。 根据球迷提供的还款记录,目前戴琳仅还款3.4万余元,还款金额最高的为1万元,最低的为7元。戴琳目前不接陌生电话,抖音也已变成私密账号。 | 23:05 | | .. II さ ● | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | × | 转账记录 | | 导出凭证 | | 09月23日 13:23 | | | | | 转账- ...
同德化工,沦为失信被执行人
Shen Zhen Shang Bao· 2025-12-01 02:08
此前11月1日,同德化工披露关于公司及全资子公司收到执行通知书的公告,案件处于执行阶段,上市公司及全资子公司所处的当事人地位为被执行人, 涉案金额为《执行通知书》中列明的执行标的11542889.2元,执行费用78942.88元。 案件详情显示,公司于2025年5月12日收到的《上海市浦东新区人民法院传票》等相关法律文书显示,上海市浦东新区人民法院受理的平安租赁诉讼公司 融资租赁合同纠纷一案将于2025年7月1日开庭审理。后经上海市浦东新区人民法院主持调解,公司与平安租赁自愿达成诉前调解。 值得注意的是,同德化工近日"状况不断"。据11月13日公告,公司全资子公司同德科创也被上海市浦东新区人民法院列入失信被执行人名单。 公开资料显示,山西同德化工股份有限公司是国家民爆行业的优势企业,公司于2006年改制为股份有限公司,2010年3月在深交所中小板上市。目前公司 从事的主要业务是民用炸药的研发、生产、销售(流通),以及为客户提供工程爆破的整体解决方案等相关服务。 业绩方面,同德化工在去年转亏0.72亿后,今年前三季度营收净利双降,公司实现营业收入3.31亿元,同比下降20.53%;归母净利润-993.7万元,同 ...
涉嫌串通投标罪,ST岭南遭起诉!
Shen Zhen Shang Bao· 2025-11-05 09:11
Group 1 - The company, Lingnan Ecological Culture Tourism Co., Ltd. (ST Lingnan), has been indicted for collusion in bidding and is scheduled for a court hearing on October 31, 2025 [1][4] - As of now, the incident has not significantly impacted the company's operations, but the potential effects on its financial performance remain to be determined pending the court's judgment [4] - The company has faced financial difficulties, reporting net losses of 1.554 billion yuan in 2022, 1.092 billion yuan in 2023, and 984 million yuan in 2024 [4] Group 2 - In the first three quarters of 2025, the company achieved revenue of 253 million yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 68.75%, while the net profit attributable to shareholders was -206 million yuan, an increase of 23.34% year-on-year [4] - The company has been listed as a dishonest executor due to construction contract disputes, which has affected its ability to secure new orders and collect payments [4] - As of November 4, the company's stock price closed at 1.93 yuan per share, down 3.02%, with a total market capitalization of 3.513 billion yuan, reflecting a year-to-date decline of 40.25% [5]
除了不能坐高铁,王健林还有这些事情做不了——
Xin Jing Bao· 2025-09-28 10:19
Core Viewpoint - The news highlights the recent restriction on high consumption imposed on Wang Jianlin of Wanda Group, reigniting public discussion on the issue of creditworthiness and the consequences of being a "dishonest debtor" in China [1]. Group 1: Definition and Scope of Dishonesty - As of September 28, 2023, there are 8.449 million individuals classified as dishonest debtors in China [10]. - The concept of being a dishonest debtor arises when individuals fail to fulfill their obligations, leading to restrictions on their consumption [1][6]. - Individuals who have the ability to repay but refuse to comply with court orders are categorized as dishonest debtors, commonly referred to as "laolai" [7][8]. Group 2: Restrictions on High Consumption - The Supreme People's Court of China has outlined specific consumption behaviors that are prohibited for those under high consumption restrictions, including: - Traveling by airplane or soft sleeper train, and staying in star-rated hotels [11]. - Purchasing real estate or luxury vehicles [12]. - Enrolling children in high-fee private schools and engaging in leisure travel [12]. - Individuals under these restrictions must seek court approval for necessary high consumption related to work or life [22]. Group 3: Consequences and Enforcement - Violating the high consumption restriction can lead to penalties such as detention or fines, and in severe cases, criminal charges may apply [16]. - The public is encouraged to monitor the activities of those under consumption restrictions, with courts providing channels for reporting violations [21]. Group 4: Lifting Restrictions - To lift a high consumption restriction, individuals must either fulfill their legal obligations, provide valid guarantees, or negotiate with the creditor to alleviate concerns [23][24].
罗永浩实控的锤子科技回应被列为失信被执行人
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-09-18 10:38
Core Viewpoint - Smartisan Technology (Chengdu) Co., Ltd. has been listed as a dishonest executor due to a loan dispute with Suzhou Zihui Shengwang Venture Capital, amounting to a total of 21.42 million yuan that remains unpaid [1][2] Group 1: Company Response - Smartisan Technology clarified that the debt of 15 million yuan owed to Zihui Venture Capital is a company liability, not a personal debt of its founder, Luo Yonghao [1] - Luo Yonghao expressed willingness to repay the debt personally, but has delayed the matter due to ongoing defamation and attacks from Zihui Venture Capital's representative, Zheng Gang [1] Group 2: Legal and Financial Context - The company was officially listed as a dishonest executor on the China Execution Information Disclosure Network, indicating a complete failure to fulfill the court's ruling regarding the loan dispute [1] - In August, Smartisan Technology and its legal representative, Guan Zhiliang, were already executed for over 21.42 million yuan due to the same case and faced restrictions on high consumption [1]
罗永浩实控的锤子科技再成“老赖”?内部人士回应
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-09-18 08:11
Core Viewpoint - Recently, Smartisan Technology (Chengdu) Co., Ltd. has been listed as a "dishonest executor" due to unresolved loan disputes with Suzhou Zihui Shengwang Venture Capital Co., Ltd. [1] Group 1: Company Financial Issues - Smartisan Technology has reportedly borrowed a total of 15 million yuan from Zihui Venture Capital, which is classified as company debt rather than personal debt of its founder, Luo Yonghao [1] - An internal source from Smartisan stated that the information regarding the loan disputes is outdated [1] Group 2: Management and Control - Luo Yonghao remains the chairman and actual controller of Smartisan Technology, holding 22.6667% of the company's shares [1] - Luo has expressed willingness to repay the debt to Zihui Venture Capital personally, but has decided to delay addressing the debt due to past conflicts with Zihui's management [1]
蓝光发展、广汇汽车等被纳入失信被执行人
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-09-18 02:53
Group 1: Blue Light Development - Blue Light Development has been added to the list of dishonest executors, with 25 new entries from June 17, 2025, to September 16, 2025 [1] - The company reported a net loss of 2.552 billion yuan for the first half of 2025, primarily due to an operating loss of approximately 1.88 billion yuan, impairment provisions of 194 million yuan, and non-operating losses of 480 million yuan [2] - As of the latest update, Blue Light Development has 15 defaulted bonds totaling 12.067 billion yuan, with 3 offshore bonds remaining in circulation, totaling 1.05 billion USD, all of which are also in default [2] Group 2: Guanghui Automobile Service - Guanghui Automobile Service has been added to the list of dishonest executors, along with its subsidiaries, due to failure to pay rent and penalties as per court judgment [2] - The company’s chairman and controlling shareholder have also been restricted from high consumption activities [2] - Guanghui Automobile Service has 3 defaulted bonds amounting to 2.117 billion yuan [3] Group 3: ST Dongshi - ST Dongshi has had its bank accounts frozen for an amount of 265.2 million yuan due to a court ruling related to a liability dispute [3] - The company expects a net profit loss of between 126 million yuan and 105 million yuan for the first half of 2025, primarily due to declining revenue and high fixed costs [4] - ST Dongshi reported a continuous net loss of 903 million yuan in 2024 and 362 million yuan in 2023 [4] Group 4: Shandong Shengtong Group - Shandong Shengtong Group has defaulted on 9 bonds, with a total default amount of 5.756 billion yuan [4] - Ordinary creditors received a distribution of 0.2% of their unpaid claims as part of the bond default process [4] Group 5: Hongyang Real Estate - Hongyang Real Estate's liquidation hearing has been postponed to March 23, 2026, with support from several priority noteholders [5] - The company reported a revenue of approximately 2.712 billion yuan for the first half of 2025, a decrease of 54.8% compared to the same period in 2024 [5] - The net loss attributable to the parent company was approximately 1.884 billion yuan, an increase of 5.59% year-on-year [5] - Hongyang Real Estate has 6 offshore bonds in circulation, with a total outstanding balance of 1.5134 billion USD, all of which are in default [6]
男子借12万不还成失信被执行人,以患癌需治疗为由申请解除惩戒,实际赴港澳消费赌博,其包裹中搜到大量现金,微信收支金额超300万
新浪财经· 2025-07-25 08:37
Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a case involving the enforcement of a civil loan dispute, emphasizing the consequences of evading execution and the legal measures taken against the debtor, who misused the temporary lifting of restrictions to engage in gambling activities abroad [1][2]. Group 1 - The case involves a loan of 125,000 yuan that the debtor, Di, failed to repay, leading to his inclusion in the list of dishonest debtors after failing to report any assets [1]. - Di claimed health issues as a reason for his inability to repay and had his restrictions temporarily lifted, but he subsequently engaged in gambling in Hong Kong and Macau [1]. - Upon being apprehended, authorities found significant cash and evidence of Di's gambling activities, leading to his acknowledgment of evading execution and a settlement with the creditor [2]. Group 2 - The court's actions included a thorough investigation and collaboration with law enforcement to apprehend the debtor, demonstrating the judicial system's commitment to enforcing financial obligations [2]. - The case illustrates the legal repercussions for individuals who attempt to evade financial responsibilities, including potential criminal charges for refusal to comply with court orders [2].
昔日大牛股东方材料实控人或生变 接盘方法定代表人竟身背“限消令”
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-07-02 11:30
Core Viewpoint - The actual controller of Dongfang Materials may change due to the judicial auction of shares held by its controlling shareholder Xu Guangbin, which has significantly reduced his stake from 5.43% to 1.93% [1] Group 1: Company Ownership Changes - Xu Guangbin's 702.41 million shares were auctioned, leading to a potential change in the company's controlling shareholder [1] - Jiangsu Teliang New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. and its concerted party, Wuxi Hongsheng Dingrong Investment Management Partnership, have become the largest shareholders of Dongfang Materials [1] - Teliang is a subsidiary of Kosen Technology, and its actual controller Xu Zhengliang has been listed as a restricted consumer due to legal issues [1][2] Group 2: Financial Performance of Teliang - Teliang's revenue fluctuated from 367 million yuan in 2022 to 264 million yuan in 2023, and then increased to 385 million yuan in 2024; net profit also saw a similar trend [4] - Teliang's products have been certified and applied by well-known companies in the electronics and semiconductor sectors [2] Group 3: Xu Guangbin's Financial Issues - Xu Guangbin's debt problems have led to a significant reduction in his control over Dongfang Materials, with his debts amounting to approximately 45 million yuan in overdue payments [5] - He is involved in multiple legal disputes, with a total amount of approximately 1.279 billion yuan related to ongoing litigation or arbitration [5] Group 4: Future Governance and Investor Concerns - Despite Xu Guangbin's reduced shareholding, he still controls the board with five out of nine seats [5] - Investors have raised questions regarding the timing of the new major shareholder's exit and potential adjustments in the board of directors, but the company has not provided responses [5][7]