Group 1 - The article discusses the ongoing protests in Los Angeles, highlighting the chaotic environment under "Trump 2.0" and the sense of disorder that has emerged [3][4]. - It contrasts the previous era of uncertainty with the current state of disorder, indicating that the new developments are disconnected from past rules and expectations [4]. - The article mentions various conflicts involving Trump, including his interactions with Zelensky, international trade, China, Harvard, and California, illustrating the breadth of issues under his administration [4]. Group 2 - The piece emphasizes that the term "disorder" encapsulates the current political climate, suggesting a lack of a coherent path forward compared to the previous uncertainty [4]. - It notes that the rapid succession of events and conflicts reflects a significant shift in the political landscape, with unpredictable outcomes becoming the norm [4].

Group 1 - The article discusses the ongoing protests in Los Angeles, highlighting the chaos and disorder under "Trump 2.0," contrasting it with the previous era of uncertainty [3][4]. - It notes that within just six months of "Trump 2.0," various conflicts have emerged, including tensions with Ukraine, international trade, China, Harvard, and California, indicating a significant shift in the political landscape [4]. - The term "disorder" is emphasized as a defining characteristic of the current political climate, suggesting that events are increasingly unpredictable and detached from established norms [4].