2018年首次提出购买方案的被认为是美国化妆品巨头雅诗兰黛的创始人家族的罗纳德·兰黛。他是特朗 普学生时代的朋友，也是强有力的资金支援者。该公司成立于纽约，这也是特朗普出生和成长的地方。 河浪武史：获得格陵兰岛最初本不是特朗普的"最优先事项"，但随着对华强硬派强化这一构想，成 为"绝对必要"的重要战略。特朗普第二届政府充满了助长总统功名心的煽动者。缺乏制动者的大国将变 得更加危险…… 河浪武史： 美国总统特朗普取得格陵兰岛（丹麦自治领土）的构想并不是最近才出现的。起源于第一 次执政时期的2018年。最初本应"不是最优先事项"(特朗普)，但随着对华强硬派强化这一构想，成为"绝 对必要"的重要战略。 "与路易斯安那与阿拉斯加并列的伟大事业" 位于北冰洋和北大西洋之间的格陵兰岛是中国和俄罗斯的地缘政治要冲。往来于北冰洋周边的船舶数量 10年间增加了4成。格陵兰拥有世界第8位的稀土储量，有能力打破中国的市场垄断。 科顿表示"如果获得格陵兰岛，将同时获得地理利益和经济利益"。产生兴趣的特朗普在2019年8月表明 了购买计划。 首先为稀土矿提供资金 科顿亲自向丹麦政府询问土地买卖事宜。特朗普也在社交网络（SNS）上发布了 ...

Core Viewpoint - The extension of the tariff ceasefire between the US and China for 90 days until November 10 is a strategic move to allow for potential high-level discussions during the APEC summit, reflecting the delicate balance of negotiations and economic pressures [1][4]. Group 1: Tariff Ceasefire and Economic Context - The US Treasury Secretary had previously communicated the intention to extend the tariff pause, but the signing by Trump was delayed, indicating political sensitivities around appearing to compromise with China [4]. - Recent employment data shows a significant drop in non-farm jobs, with only 73,000 added last month, far below expectations, and a revised total loss of 258,000 jobs over previous months, highlighting economic strain [4][6]. - The unemployment rate has risen to 4.3%, the highest in three years, with job losses in manufacturing and retail sectors, suggesting a deteriorating economic environment that pressures the administration to avoid further tariff escalations [4][6]. Group 2: Political Dynamics and Future Negotiations - Trump's reluctance to take responsibility for economic issues is evident as he shifts blame for poor employment statistics, indicating a desire to maintain political capital while managing economic fallout [6]. - The potential for a framework agreement during the APEC summit could lead to an extension or partial cancellation of tariffs, but failure to reach an agreement may result in increased geopolitical tensions and pressure on China [10]. - Analysts suggest that Trump may be inclined to make concessions during negotiations to maintain a favorable public image, despite the underlying reality of the US conceding to China [10].