李先生是怎么从一张色情小广告遭遇到电信网络诈骗的呢？这还要从一天清晨说起。刚准备上班的李先生发现，自己车辆的反光镜上，贴着一张宣传色情服 务的小广告，出于好奇，李先生对小广告上的网址进行了搜索，随后便跳转出了一个App的下载页面。 车辆反光镜上被贴上小广告，上面的网址你会尝试搜索吗？家住四川攀枝花市的李先生就发现，自己车上被贴上了涉黄小广告。也正是因为这张小广告，李 先生被一步步引入了电诈陷阱之中。 攀枝花市公安局东区分局网安大队大队长 钱靖：一个自称是交友客服的人主动联系上了被害人，对方先是给他发送了一些衣着比较暴露的女性图片，然后 告诉他如果线下交友约会需要通过支付宝充值完成一系列的充值任务。 客服告诉李先生，需要先支付29元成为平台会员，随后便可以解锁更多福利。李先生充值后，对方发来了一张VIP卡的图片，同时发给李先生的，还有一些 美女的照片。 攀枝花市公安局东区分局网安大队大队长 钱靖：对方会表现得很热情，比如问你在哪个城市，你喜欢什么类型的女性，并且偶尔会发一些诱惑性的视频， 还有发一些女性照片让他挑选，通过这些方法逐步让他放松警惕。 在聊天的过程中，对方还不断强调，收取会员费只是为了给所有单身的会 ...

Core Insights - The Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate have released typical cases to clarify the legal issues surrounding the concealment and disguise of criminal proceeds, particularly in the context of virtual currencies and large gold transactions [1][2] Group 1: Criminal Methods - Criminals are increasingly using blockchain technology and virtual currencies to obscure the origins and nature of illicit funds, facilitating rapid fund transfers and evasion of law enforcement [1] - The use of large gold transactions for concealing criminal proceeds has become a common method across various regions, as evidenced by cases where individuals knowingly participated in such transactions [1] Group 2: Legal Cases and Judgments - In the case of "An Certain et al.," defendants used a network trading platform to convert criminal proceeds into virtual currency, leading to convictions for the crime of concealing criminal proceeds, with severe penalties imposed [1] - In the case of "Chen Certain," the defendant knowingly purchased stolen steel plates at significantly undervalued prices, resulting in illegal profits exceeding 6 million yuan, and was sentenced to six years in prison [2] Group 3: Judicial Clarifications - The distinction between aiding information network criminal activities and concealing criminal proceeds has been a significant challenge in judicial proceedings, prompting the need for clear legal definitions and applications [2] - The release of these typical cases aims to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of handling criminal cases related to the concealment of criminal proceeds, thereby reinforcing the role of criminal justice in punishing crime and protecting the public [2]

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security issued opinions on handling criminal cases related to aiding information network crimes, providing clearer standards for conviction and sentencing [1][2] - The opinions consist of five parts and sixteen articles, addressing the overall requirements for handling aiding crimes, accurately identifying aiding crimes, and maintaining comprehensive governance [1][3] - The opinions clarify the subjective knowledge standards for aiding crimes, the criteria for serious circumstances related to "two-card" crimes, and the differentiation between aiding crimes and related offenses such as concealment and fraud [1][2] Group 2 - The opinions adjust the standards for recognizing serious circumstances in "two-card" crimes, specifying that selling or renting three bank accounts or payment accounts meets the serious criteria, and any sale or rental of over 20 phone cards is also considered serious [2] - The opinions emphasize a balanced approach to criminal policy, advocating for strict penalties for organized and professional aiding crimes while allowing leniency for minors and those at the end of the criminal chain [2][3] - Specific rules and measures for implementing judicial recommendations, enforcing occupational bans, and conducting legal education are detailed in the opinions [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing prevalence of telecommunications fraud and the legal measures being implemented to combat it, including a recent case involving a telecommunications operator who facilitated fraud by issuing multiple phone cards [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Cases - A telecommunications operator was sentenced to 8 months in prison and banned from related work for 5 years after issuing 24 phone cards used in fraud, resulting in over 94,000 yuan in losses to victims [1]. - The Supreme People's Court, Supreme People's Procuratorate, and Ministry of Public Security jointly released guidelines to clarify the legal standards for prosecuting those who assist in information network crimes [2][3]. Group 2: Crime Trends and Challenges - The rise of telecommunications fraud has led to the emergence of a black and gray industry, with associated crimes posing significant threats to network security and social stability [2]. - The characteristics of those involved in assisting such crimes have shifted, with a notable increase in younger, less educated individuals, including minors and students, becoming involved [2][3]. Group 3: New Guidelines and Policies - The newly issued guidelines consist of 5 parts and 16 articles, addressing the overall requirements for handling crimes related to assistance in information network crimes and clarifying the standards for recognizing such crimes [3][4]. - The guidelines establish clear criteria for determining the severity of crimes involving phone and bank cards, with specific thresholds for actions such as selling or renting multiple accounts [4][5]. Group 4: Collaborative Efforts - The guidelines emphasize the need for collaboration among various sectors, including finance, telecommunications, and education, to effectively combat information network crimes [5].

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security have issued opinions on the judicial application of crimes related to assisting information network criminal activities, providing clearer standards for conviction and sentencing [1] - The crime of assisting information network criminal activities was established in November 2015, and despite efforts to combat it, the number of cases involving "two cards" (phone cards and bank cards) remains high, with notable characteristics of professionalization and cross-border nature [1] - The opinions consist of five parts and sixteen articles, addressing overall requirements for case handling, legal recognition of assisting crimes, accurate understanding of criminal policies, and comprehensive governance [1] Group 2 - The opinions emphasize a balanced criminal policy, specifying circumstances for strict and lenient enforcement, particularly targeting organized, professional, and cross-border criminal activities [2] - There are provisions for leniency towards minors, students, and individuals at the end of the criminal chain with lighter circumstances [2] - The opinions also address the need for effective coordination between law enforcement and judicial recommendations, particularly concerning "insiders" who exploit their professional roles to commit crimes [2]