食品安全关乎国计民生，监管不容松懈。作为食品销售的一环，平台理应落实监管责任。但现实中，在 电商平台竞争加剧的背景下，不少平台为吸引更多商家入驻，降低入驻条件及资质审查标准，这种宽松 也导致一些不法商家在这个平台被关了店马上可以轻松换驻其他平台，甚至换个"马甲"卷土重来。 回到假奶粉案件本身，究竟哪些品牌被假冒，哪些平台、店铺在售卖假奶粉，售出的假奶粉有无召回， 售假的商家有无赔偿……当下公众关心的问题很多，有关部门与涉事平台必须尽快给出交代。 现行食品安全国家标准规定，乳粉应当由单一品种的生乳为原料，调制乳粉的乳固体含量当不低于 70%。而此次河南警方破获的假奶粉丝毫不见"奶"，实则就是奶精掺淀粉，蛋白质、脂肪、钙等营养成 分含量几乎为零。令人揪心的是，婴幼儿是奶粉的主要使用群体，若孩子食用此类产品导致营养不良、 发育迟缓甚至是器官损伤，责任该由谁承担？ 目前，该案3名主犯因生产、销售伪劣产品罪，已被判处有期徒刑十五年，并处罚金。制假者得到了法 律制裁，但追责不应止步于此。 消费者追求价廉物美的产品无可厚非，部分商家和营销主播却利用这种心理，大搞水军刷单、虚假宣 传，坑骗辨别能力有限的消费者。食品安全法第6 ...

Core Points - A parent attempted to return over 500 yuan worth of cards purchased by their 11-year-old child on the QianDao app, but was met with an unreasonable request to upload a 5-minute video of "slapping the child" as a condition for the refund [1] - The QianDao app stated that the dispute arose from personal transactions and that the refund policy was set by the merchant, not the platform, effectively shifting responsibility [1] - The incident highlights a broader issue of minors facing obstacles in obtaining refunds, indicating a need for platforms to better protect consumer rights while managing merchant interests [1] Group 1 - The merchant's bizarre refund condition of requiring a video of "slapping the child" raises ethical concerns and challenges societal norms [1] - The platform's response to the parent's complaint was inadequate, suggesting a lack of responsibility in managing merchant behavior [1] - There is a call for platforms to implement stricter regulations and clearer refund policies to prevent unreasonable demands from merchants [1] Group 2 - The incident reflects a growing trend of difficulties faced by minors in refund situations, emphasizing the need for platforms to balance merchant protection with consumer rights [1] - Recommendations include enhancing merchant audits, refining refund rules, and implementing features like facial recognition for transactions involving minors [1] - The platform's failure to intervene in this case raises questions about its commitment to consumer protection and ethical standards [2]

Group 1 - The incident involves a seller on a trendy toy e-commerce platform demanding a mother to submit a video of her physically punishing her child as a condition for a refund, which raises serious ethical and legal concerns [1][2] - The platform's response indicates that the seller's demands were not part of official policies but rather personal communications, acknowledging the inappropriate nature of the seller's request [1][2] - The seller's actions may constitute "incitement to infringement," as they compel parents to harm their children to prove their innocence, which could violate laws against domestic violence and infringe on minors' rights [2][3] Group 2 - The platform has a responsibility to implement proper oversight and management of sellers to prevent such incidents, and merely suggesting "negotiation" is seen as neglecting regulatory duties [2][3] - There is a need for clearer rules and standards regarding refunds and disputes involving minors to enhance operational efficiency and protect both buyers and sellers [3] - Parents are encouraged to take responsibility for monitoring their children's online activities and instilling proper financial values to prevent such situations from arising [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights ongoing issues with Ctrip's car rental service, including frequent instances of "goods not matching" and allegations of false advertising, which have raised concerns about the company's service quality and regulatory compliance [1][7][9]. Summary by Sections Company Performance and Management Actions - Ctrip's total revenue for the first half of the year reached 28.7 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 21%, with operating profit at 7.665 billion yuan, up 27%, and net profit at 9.194 billion yuan, a 17% increase, indicating an average daily income of 159 million yuan [13][14]. - Ctrip's executives, including Liang Jianzhang and Fan Min, have collectively planned to cash out approximately 760 million yuan, raising market speculation about the company's future prospects as they sold shares when the company's performance was strong and stock prices were near historical highs [1][12][17]. Customer Complaints and Service Issues - Numerous customers have reported issues with Ctrip's car rental service, including receiving vehicles that do not match the descriptions provided at the time of booking, such as receiving older models instead of newer ones [7][9][10]. - Users have expressed concerns about the superficial nature of the vehicle inspection process, which often leads to customers unknowingly signing off on vehicles that do not meet the agreed-upon conditions, thus undermining consumer rights [10][11]. Regulatory Scrutiny - Ctrip has faced regulatory scrutiny, with market regulators conducting administrative talks with the company in August and September, indicating potential violations of the Electronic Commerce Law and the newly effective regulations against unfair competition [13][18]. - The article notes that Ctrip's platform has received over 140,000 complaints, with thousands related to its car rental service, highlighting a significant gap between the company's rapid business growth and its service quality [14][18]. Market Position and Competition - The online car rental market in China is growing rapidly, with Ctrip holding a 13% market share, ranking third behind Shenzhou Car Rental and Yihai Car Rental, which hold 24% and 18% respectively [17][18]. - The competitive landscape is intensifying with emerging platforms like Feizhu, Hello, and Didi, which are rapidly gaining market share, posing challenges for Ctrip to maintain its position [17].