Workflow
建设工程施工合同纠纷
icon
Search documents
乐山电力股份有限公司 关于参股公司涉及诉讼的公告
Zheng Quan Shi Bao· 2025-09-22 18:20
Group 1 - The lawsuit is currently in the acceptance stage by the court, with the company being a shareholder in the defendant company [2] - The amount involved in the case is approximately 194.13 million yuan as of September 10, 2025 [3] - The lawsuit is related to a construction contract dispute, with the plaintiff claiming significant unpaid amounts due to delays and other issues in the project [3][4] Group 2 - The plaintiff, Information Industry Electronics Eleventh Design Research Institute Technology Engineering Co., Ltd., is seeking a total of approximately 137.36 million yuan in unpaid project costs, along with additional claims for interest and legal fees [4] - The defendant, Jule Energy (Cangzhou) Co., Ltd., is preparing to respond to the lawsuit and will submit materials as required by the court [4] - The potential impact of this lawsuit on the company's current and future profits remains uncertain, and the company will monitor the situation closely [3][4]
南京中央商场(集团)股份有限公司关于控股子公司涉及诉讼及被申请财产保全事项的公告
Core Viewpoint - The company is involved in a lawsuit regarding a construction contract dispute, which has not yet gone to trial, and the impact on the company's profits remains uncertain [1][10]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was initiated by China 22nd Metallurgical Group Co., Ltd. against the company's subsidiary, Xuyi Yurun Central Shopping Plaza Co., Ltd., over a construction contract dispute [2][3]. - The lawsuit was filed in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, with the claim amounting to 49.7572 million yuan [3]. - The original contract was signed on January 9, 2023, with a total contract price of 273.515 million yuan [2]. Group 2: Claims and Damages - The plaintiff claims that the defendant has only paid 5.2869 million yuan of the completed work valued at 33.5885 million yuan, leaving an outstanding payment of 28.3016 million yuan [4][9]. - The plaintiff also seeks compensation for various losses, including idle equipment costs of 296.43 million yuan, delay damages of 163.89 million yuan, and a total of 982.42 million yuan in penalties and losses due to contract termination [8][9]. - The expected profit loss is estimated at 479.85 million yuan based on average industry profit margins [8][9]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit has not yet been heard in court, and the plaintiff has requested property preservation measures, resulting in a court order to seize assets valued at 49.7572 million yuan belonging to the defendant [10]. - The company will continue to fulfill its disclosure obligations as required by law and will keep investors informed about the developments of the case [10].
中通国脉通信股份有限公司关于重大诉讼进展的公告
Core Viewpoint - The company, Zhongtong Guomai Communication Co., Ltd., is currently involved in a significant lawsuit regarding a construction contract dispute, with the case now in the second instance of appeal [2][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Overview - The company received a summons from the Jilin Province Tongyu County People's Court regarding a construction contract dispute with Zhongsheng Hongcheng (Group) Co., Ltd. [3] - The company has appealed against the first-instance judgment made by the Tongyu County People's Court, which ruled against it in the amount of 27,348,024.83 yuan plus interest [2][4]. - The second-instance case has been accepted by the Baicheng Intermediate People's Court, with the first hearing scheduled for August 21, 2025 [4][11]. Group 2: Legal Parties Involved - The appellant (original defendant) is Zhongtong Guomai Communication Co., Ltd., represented by its legal representative, Li Xuegang [5]. - The appellee (original plaintiff) is Zhongsheng Hongcheng (Group) Co., Ltd., represented by its legal representative, Gong Shufeng [6]. - The original defendant also includes China United Network Communications Co., Ltd. Jilin Province Branch [7][8]. Group 3: Appeal Details - The company requests the annulment of the first-instance judgment and seeks a retrial of the case [9]. - The appeal is based on several grounds, including procedural violations and errors in the original court's factual determinations [10]. - The company emphasizes that the original judgment improperly assigned financial responsibilities and failed to consider certain agreements related to cost-sharing [10]. Group 4: Financial Impact - As of the date of the announcement, the lawsuit has not yet been heard, and the final outcome remains uncertain regarding its impact on the company's current and future profits [12].