登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：002789 证券简称：*ST建艺（维权） 公告编号：2025-160 深圳市建艺装饰集团股份有限公司 关于诉讼的进展公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗 漏。 "驳回原告胡忠库全部诉讼请求。 案件受理费140,729.61元（原告已预交），由原告胡忠库负担。 如不服本判决，可以在判决书送达之日起十五日内，向本院递交上诉状，并按对方当事人的人数提出副 本，上诉于新疆维吾尔自治区乌鲁木齐市中级人民法院。" 三、其他尚未披露的诉讼仲裁事项 截至本公告披露日，公司及控股子公司不存在其他应披露而未披露的诉讼、仲裁事项。 四、本次公告的诉讼对公司本期利润或期后利润的可能影响 本次诉讼判决为一审判决，涉案方是否申请上诉尚存在不确定性，对公司本期利润或期后利润的影响存 在不确定性。公司将依据有关会计准则的要求和实际情况进行相应的会计处理。公司将密切关注和高度 重视相关案件，积极采取各种措施，维护公司的合法权益并及时履行信息披露义务，敬请投资者注意投 资风险。 一、本次诉讼的基本情况 2025年，深圳市建艺 ...

Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court has released a draft interpretation regarding the application of laws in construction contract disputes, addressing issues such as the validity of contracts for non-bid projects, qualification borrowing, illegal subcontracting, and wage payment guarantees for migrant workers [1][2] - The draft clarifies that for construction contracts that should have undergone bidding, if the parties did not conduct a bidding process and the project is not deemed mandatory for bidding, courts should not declare the contract invalid solely due to the lack of bidding [1] - It states that contracts involving the transfer or borrowing of qualifications by construction enterprises will be deemed invalid by the courts, and any claims for fees related to such arrangements will not be supported [1] Group 2 - New regulations have been introduced to ensure the payment of wages to migrant workers, stating that if a construction project involves qualification borrowing, subcontracting, or illegal subcontracting, courts will support claims for unpaid wages from construction units and subcontractors [2] - The draft specifies that while contractors may not claim priority for compensation due to work stoppages caused by the client, the portion of losses related to migrant workers' wages will be an exception [2] - The deadline for public comments on this draft interpretation is set for November 29, 2025 [2]

Core Viewpoint - The company, Tsinghua Tongfang Co., Ltd., has received a civil judgment regarding a construction contract dispute, which may have significant financial implications for the company and its stakeholders [1][2][3]. Summary by Sections Civil Judgment Details - The civil judgment was issued by the Intermediate People's Court of Xianyang, Shaanxi Province, in a case involving a construction contract dispute between Hunan Jinsha Road and Bridge Construction Co., Ltd. and the company [1][2]. - The plaintiff, Hunan Jinsha, requested a total payment of approximately 659.46 million yuan, including principal and interest, from the defendants, which include the company [2]. - The court partially supported the plaintiff's claims, ordering the defendant, Xingping Hongyuan Development Construction Co., Ltd., to pay approximately 441.68 million yuan plus interest to Hunan Jinsha [3][4]. Company’s Liability - The company is held jointly liable for the debt owed by Xingping Hongyuan Development Construction Co., Ltd. to Hunan Jinsha, indicating potential financial exposure for the company [4][5]. - The judgment also includes provisions for the transfer of construction materials and documentation related to the project from Hunan Jinsha to Xingping Hongyuan [5]. Financial Implications - The judgment specifies that if the defendants fail to fulfill their monetary obligations within the stipulated time, they will incur additional interest penalties [5]. - The total litigation costs and fees have been allocated among the parties involved, with the company bearing a portion of these costs [5]. Company’s Response - The company is actively working to mitigate litigation and execution risks and aims to communicate with relevant parties to reach a resolution [5].

Group 1 - The lawsuit is currently in the acceptance stage by the court, with the company being a shareholder in the defendant company [2] - The amount involved in the case is approximately 194.13 million yuan as of September 10, 2025 [3] - The lawsuit is related to a construction contract dispute, with the plaintiff claiming significant unpaid amounts due to delays and other issues in the project [3][4] Group 2 - The plaintiff, Information Industry Electronics Eleventh Design Research Institute Technology Engineering Co., Ltd., is seeking a total of approximately 137.36 million yuan in unpaid project costs, along with additional claims for interest and legal fees [4] - The defendant, Jule Energy (Cangzhou) Co., Ltd., is preparing to respond to the lawsuit and will submit materials as required by the court [4] - The potential impact of this lawsuit on the company's current and future profits remains uncertain, and the company will monitor the situation closely [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The company is involved in a lawsuit regarding a construction contract dispute, which has not yet gone to trial, and the impact on the company's profits remains uncertain [1][10]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was initiated by China 22nd Metallurgical Group Co., Ltd. against the company's subsidiary, Xuyi Yurun Central Shopping Plaza Co., Ltd., over a construction contract dispute [2][3]. - The lawsuit was filed in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, with the claim amounting to 49.7572 million yuan [3]. - The original contract was signed on January 9, 2023, with a total contract price of 273.515 million yuan [2]. Group 2: Claims and Damages - The plaintiff claims that the defendant has only paid 5.2869 million yuan of the completed work valued at 33.5885 million yuan, leaving an outstanding payment of 28.3016 million yuan [4][9]. - The plaintiff also seeks compensation for various losses, including idle equipment costs of 296.43 million yuan, delay damages of 163.89 million yuan, and a total of 982.42 million yuan in penalties and losses due to contract termination [8][9]. - The expected profit loss is estimated at 479.85 million yuan based on average industry profit margins [8][9]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit has not yet been heard in court, and the plaintiff has requested property preservation measures, resulting in a court order to seize assets valued at 49.7572 million yuan belonging to the defendant [10]. - The company will continue to fulfill its disclosure obligations as required by law and will keep investors informed about the developments of the case [10].

Core Viewpoint - The company, Zhongtong Guomai Communication Co., Ltd., is currently involved in a significant lawsuit regarding a construction contract dispute, with the case now in the second instance of appeal [2][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Overview - The company received a summons from the Jilin Province Tongyu County People's Court regarding a construction contract dispute with Zhongsheng Hongcheng (Group) Co., Ltd. [3] - The company has appealed against the first-instance judgment made by the Tongyu County People's Court, which ruled against it in the amount of 27,348,024.83 yuan plus interest [2][4]. - The second-instance case has been accepted by the Baicheng Intermediate People's Court, with the first hearing scheduled for August 21, 2025 [4][11]. Group 2: Legal Parties Involved - The appellant (original defendant) is Zhongtong Guomai Communication Co., Ltd., represented by its legal representative, Li Xuegang [5]. - The appellee (original plaintiff) is Zhongsheng Hongcheng (Group) Co., Ltd., represented by its legal representative, Gong Shufeng [6]. - The original defendant also includes China United Network Communications Co., Ltd. Jilin Province Branch [7][8]. Group 3: Appeal Details - The company requests the annulment of the first-instance judgment and seeks a retrial of the case [9]. - The appeal is based on several grounds, including procedural violations and errors in the original court's factual determinations [10]. - The company emphasizes that the original judgment improperly assigned financial responsibilities and failed to consider certain agreements related to cost-sharing [10]. Group 4: Financial Impact - As of the date of the announcement, the lawsuit has not yet been heard, and the final outcome remains uncertain regarding its impact on the company's current and future profits [12].