记者11月25日从最高人民法院获悉，《最高人民法院关于审理建设工程施工合同纠纷案件适用法律问题 的解释（二）（征求意见稿）》日前公布。这份司法解释征求意见稿，对未招标项目合同效力、资质借 用、违法转包以及农民工工资支付保障等问题作出回应。 关于建筑领域资质借用、违法转包等问题，征求意见稿提出，建筑施工企业转让、出借资质或者以其他 方式允许他人以本企业名义承揽工程，人民法院应当认定涉及转让、出借资质等关系的合同无效。建筑 施工企业主张约定的转让、出借资质等费用的，人民法院不予支持。 征求意见稿对农民工工资支付保障作出新规。其中明确，工程建设项目涉及借用资质、转包或者违法分 包，参与工程建设的农民工依照《保障农民工工资支付条例》规定请求建设单位、施工总承包单位、分 包单位等支付拖欠工资的，人民法院依法予以支持。承包人就发包人原因造成的停工、窝工等损失主张 享有建设工程价款优先受偿权的，人民法院不予支持，但停工、窝工损失中的农民工工资部分除外。 本次征求意见截止日期为2025年11月29日。（经济日报记者 李万祥） 征求意见稿明确未招标项目合同效力，提出建设工程施工合同订立时属于必须招标的工程项目，当事人 未进行招 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company, Tsinghua Tongfang Co., Ltd., has received a civil judgment regarding a construction contract dispute, which may have significant financial implications for the company and its stakeholders [1][2][3]. Summary by Sections Civil Judgment Details - The civil judgment was issued by the Intermediate People's Court of Xianyang, Shaanxi Province, in a case involving a construction contract dispute between Hunan Jinsha Road and Bridge Construction Co., Ltd. and the company [1][2]. - The plaintiff, Hunan Jinsha, requested a total payment of approximately 659.46 million yuan, including principal and interest, from the defendants, which include the company [2]. - The court partially supported the plaintiff's claims, ordering the defendant, Xingping Hongyuan Development Construction Co., Ltd., to pay approximately 441.68 million yuan plus interest to Hunan Jinsha [3][4]. Company’s Liability - The company is held jointly liable for the debt owed by Xingping Hongyuan Development Construction Co., Ltd. to Hunan Jinsha, indicating potential financial exposure for the company [4][5]. - The judgment also includes provisions for the transfer of construction materials and documentation related to the project from Hunan Jinsha to Xingping Hongyuan [5]. Financial Implications - The judgment specifies that if the defendants fail to fulfill their monetary obligations within the stipulated time, they will incur additional interest penalties [5]. - The total litigation costs and fees have been allocated among the parties involved, with the company bearing a portion of these costs [5]. Company’s Response - The company is actively working to mitigate litigation and execution risks and aims to communicate with relevant parties to reach a resolution [5].

Group 1 - The lawsuit is currently in the acceptance stage by the court, with the company being a shareholder in the defendant company [2] - The amount involved in the case is approximately 194.13 million yuan as of September 10, 2025 [3] - The lawsuit is related to a construction contract dispute, with the plaintiff claiming significant unpaid amounts due to delays and other issues in the project [3][4] Group 2 - The plaintiff, Information Industry Electronics Eleventh Design Research Institute Technology Engineering Co., Ltd., is seeking a total of approximately 137.36 million yuan in unpaid project costs, along with additional claims for interest and legal fees [4] - The defendant, Jule Energy (Cangzhou) Co., Ltd., is preparing to respond to the lawsuit and will submit materials as required by the court [4] - The potential impact of this lawsuit on the company's current and future profits remains uncertain, and the company will monitor the situation closely [3][4]

Core Viewpoint - The company is involved in a lawsuit regarding a construction contract dispute, which has not yet gone to trial, and the impact on the company's profits remains uncertain [1][10]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit was initiated by China 22nd Metallurgical Group Co., Ltd. against the company's subsidiary, Xuyi Yurun Central Shopping Plaza Co., Ltd., over a construction contract dispute [2][3]. - The lawsuit was filed in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, with the claim amounting to 49.7572 million yuan [3]. - The original contract was signed on January 9, 2023, with a total contract price of 273.515 million yuan [2]. Group 2: Claims and Damages - The plaintiff claims that the defendant has only paid 5.2869 million yuan of the completed work valued at 33.5885 million yuan, leaving an outstanding payment of 28.3016 million yuan [4][9]. - The plaintiff also seeks compensation for various losses, including idle equipment costs of 296.43 million yuan, delay damages of 163.89 million yuan, and a total of 982.42 million yuan in penalties and losses due to contract termination [8][9]. - The expected profit loss is estimated at 479.85 million yuan based on average industry profit margins [8][9]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit has not yet been heard in court, and the plaintiff has requested property preservation measures, resulting in a court order to seize assets valued at 49.7572 million yuan belonging to the defendant [10]. - The company will continue to fulfill its disclosure obligations as required by law and will keep investors informed about the developments of the case [10].

Core Viewpoint - The company, Zhongtong Guomai Communication Co., Ltd., is currently involved in a significant lawsuit regarding a construction contract dispute, with the case now in the second instance of appeal [2][4]. Group 1: Lawsuit Overview - The company received a summons from the Jilin Province Tongyu County People's Court regarding a construction contract dispute with Zhongsheng Hongcheng (Group) Co., Ltd. [3] - The company has appealed against the first-instance judgment made by the Tongyu County People's Court, which ruled against it in the amount of 27,348,024.83 yuan plus interest [2][4]. - The second-instance case has been accepted by the Baicheng Intermediate People's Court, with the first hearing scheduled for August 21, 2025 [4][11]. Group 2: Legal Parties Involved - The appellant (original defendant) is Zhongtong Guomai Communication Co., Ltd., represented by its legal representative, Li Xuegang [5]. - The appellee (original plaintiff) is Zhongsheng Hongcheng (Group) Co., Ltd., represented by its legal representative, Gong Shufeng [6]. - The original defendant also includes China United Network Communications Co., Ltd. Jilin Province Branch [7][8]. Group 3: Appeal Details - The company requests the annulment of the first-instance judgment and seeks a retrial of the case [9]. - The appeal is based on several grounds, including procedural violations and errors in the original court's factual determinations [10]. - The company emphasizes that the original judgment improperly assigned financial responsibilities and failed to consider certain agreements related to cost-sharing [10]. Group 4: Financial Impact - As of the date of the announcement, the lawsuit has not yet been heard, and the final outcome remains uncertain regarding its impact on the company's current and future profits [12].