Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the evolving relationship between Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, and Elon Musk, highlighting their past collaboration, subsequent ideological conflicts, and ongoing rivalry in the tech industry [1][4][6]. Group 1: Historical Context - In 2015, Altman and Musk, along with other tech leaders, founded OpenAI with the vision of ensuring artificial intelligence benefits all humanity rather than a select few [3]. - Musk was initially a prominent figure in OpenAI, actively participating in the board and investing heavily [4]. - The initial collaboration was characterized by shared ideals, but it quickly deteriorated due to fundamental disagreements over the direction of OpenAI [4]. Group 2: Ideological Conflicts - The split began in 2018 when Musk left the OpenAI board, primarily due to differing views on whether to open-source AI technology [4]. - Musk advocated for open-source technology to benefit humanity, while Altman favored a more cautious approach to commercialization to mitigate risks [4]. - Following his departure, Musk publicly criticized OpenAI for straying from its non-profit mission and later took legal action against the company [4][5]. Group 3: Ongoing Rivalry - The rivalry intensified as both parties clashed over overlapping projects, such as Musk's Starlink and OpenAI's satellite AI monitoring initiatives [5]. - Musk accused OpenAI of stealing Tesla's autonomous driving data, while Altman defended OpenAI with evidence of patent ownership [5]. - The article likens their conflict to a "tech version of Romeo and Juliet," emphasizing the philosophical differences driving their rivalry [5]. Group 4: Current Developments - Musk's formation of the "American Party" is seen as another manifestation of his confrontational nature, which Altman critiques [6]. - Despite their ongoing disputes, both figures continue to intersect in the tech landscape, with significant developments occurring in their respective companies [6]. - The article concludes that their relationship reflects the broader dynamics of Silicon Valley, where former allies can become adversaries and vice versa, driven by innovation and disruption [6][7].

Core Points - The 24th International Conference on the Philosophy of Technology (SPT2025) was held in the Netherlands from June 25 to 28, where Professor Li Bocon from the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences received the Lifetime Achievement Award, marking the first time a Chinese scholar has won this award [1][4] Group 1 - Professor Li Bocon's research focuses on engineering practice and social reality, bridging Eastern and Western philosophical traditions, emphasizing interdisciplinary collaboration, and closely following contemporary academic developments [3] - In 2002, Professor Li published "Introduction to Engineering Philosophy," the first academic work titled "Engineering Philosophy" both domestically and internationally, which introduced the triadic theory of science, technology, and engineering [3] - The book argues that the core of scientific activity is "discovery," the core of technological activity is "invention," and the core of engineering activity is "construction," establishing a fundamental viewpoint of engineering philosophy [3] Group 2 - During the award ceremony, Professor Li expressed gratitude for the recognition, highlighting the deepening dialogue between Eastern and Western perspectives in the field of technology philosophy and its growing global influence [4] - He emphasized the importance of the SPT as a platform for international dialogue in technology philosophy and referenced the historical significance of adding a "fourth critique" to Kant's three critiques, which pertains to technology [4] - The SPT was established in 1976 to encourage meaningful philosophical reflection on technology and interdisciplinary discussions, holding biennial conferences, and since 2017, six philosophers have received the Lifetime Achievement Award [4]

Group 1 - The article emphasizes that individuals have the power to make choices regarding technology and investments, which reflect their values and beliefs about the future [2][3] - It discusses the significance of cryptocurrency investments, where holding Bitcoin represents support for decentralization and freedom, while holding fiat currency like the US dollar maintains the existing financial system [2][3] - The piece highlights the importance of actively engaging with new technologies, such as trying out decentralized applications and participating in communities, as a way to explore alternatives to traditional systems [3][4] Group 2 - The article critiques the tendency of individuals to follow orders without questioning, leading to a lack of awareness about how their actions may reinforce existing systems of control [3][4] - It posits that true freedom lies in the ability to reflect on one's actions and their implications, rather than merely following routines [3][4] - The conclusion suggests that individuals do not need to be world-changers but should strive to understand their actions and choices, thereby participating in shaping the future [4]

技术哲学学者王小伟：我的恐惧感加剧了，不是对具体技术，而是对人的生存意义。 文 丨 朱丽琨 编辑 丨 钱杨 技术哲学学者王小伟问 DeepSeek："如果所有科技都越来越发达，有什么不好吗？" 在多轮问答后，它几乎说出了海德格尔式的观点—— 如果总是强调技术，人们可能会忽视技术的"背 景"，技术镶嵌在非常宏大的人性的基础上。过于专注在技术作为一种控制能力、作为权力意志的彰 显，会遮蔽人的存在。 海德格尔在六七十年前就预见到未来是以 "计算、快速和巨量" 为突出特征的技术时代。他警示，技术 只不过是人类的一种存在方式，但却被当成了唯一的存在方式。他忧虑于，现代技术对 "存在" 造成 "遮蔽"。 技术哲学实则是批判技术的哲学。王小伟持续观察 AI、手机、通勤、外卖等深入日常生活的技术，在 著作《日常的深处》中他思考和呈现了当代生活是如何被技术逻辑主宰。 从技术哲学的角度，"肥胖可看作是一种技术现象"，可能是因为食品工业发展、食物能量密度过高； 通勤的产生是城市生活消费化、所有关系商品化的结果——消费场所占据城市核心地段，人被挤到城 市边缘；外卖象征着当代生活被简化为效率优先、无内在价值的机械过程。手机上瘾，则是因 ...