试想，一位学生向生成式人工智能提问选题，并根据AI提示和回答撰写了一篇论文，然而，他却没有发 现，已经有相关学者在若干年前就提出了完全相同的论点，而这篇论文恰好包含在这一生成式AI的训练数 据集中。其原作者完全有理由对这种未经授权的抄袭行为感到恼火，然而，他们是否应该采取法律行动？ 大量的司法诉讼和法律评论文章都在探讨生成式人工智能系统是否侵犯了作者在模型训练过程中大量吸收 的作品的版权。但在我们的假设案例中，版权问题的答案很明确：AI的使用者仅仅使用了其他人的"思 想"，而没有使用他们的"表达方式"。思想本身不受版权保护。 然而，人工智能输出的创意存在一个问题——抄袭。摘录一整章作品并注明出处，你侵犯了版权，但并不 构成抄袭；将他人的想法据为己有，你构成了抄袭，但并不构成侵权。这种区别至关重要。 许多机构都在努力规范基于人工智能的复制行为，因此思考人工智能辅助抄袭问题至关重要。本文旨在为 这些新的治理方案如何应对抄袭问题提供路线图，并厘清其中涉及的不同危害。 简单来说，抄袭固然是一个问题，但它并非——也不应该是——法律问题。 一、打破 "引用链"：依赖AI无意中成为抄袭者 ChatGPT和其他生成式人工智能 ...

Core Viewpoint - The collaboration between Cha Yan Yue Se and Shanghai Rainbow Chamber Choir has faced allegations of plagiarism regarding a notebook product, leading to public outcry and an official apology from the company [1][4]. Group 1: Allegations and Responses - Multiple bloggers have accused Cha Yan Yue Se of plagiarizing their works in the recently launched collaborative notebook [4]. - The company acknowledged the unauthorized use of certain designs and issued a formal apology, citing management oversight as the cause [4]. - Cha Yan Yue Se plans to establish a dedicated investigation team to conduct a thorough review of their design processes and improve management practices [4]. Group 2: Ongoing Negotiations - The affected bloggers are currently in negotiations with Cha Yan Yue Se regarding the situation [2][6]. - Bloggers have expressed gratitude for public support while continuing discussions on how to resolve the issue [6].

Core Viewpoint - The company "Cha Yan Yue Se" has faced allegations of design plagiarism regarding its newly launched collaborative product, a multifunctional notebook, leading to public apologies and commitments to rectify the situation [1][4]. Group 1: Apology and Acknowledgment - The company issued an apology on social media, acknowledging that some designs in the new product were similar to those of various original creators [4]. - The team recognized unauthorized use of certain designs and expressed regret, stating they have reached out to the original authors to apologize and seek resolution [4]. Group 2: Response and Actions Taken - The company has established a dedicated investigation team to conduct a thorough self-examination and ensure compliance in future designs [4]. - They plan to enhance management processes and training to improve the team's ability to discern and control content [4]. Group 3: Public Reaction and Impact - Following the allegations, the multifunctional notebook quickly sold out online, with some consumers turning to resale platforms at inflated prices [4]. - Multiple users on social media have reported similar instances of their designs appearing in the notebook, prompting calls for a clear investigation and resolution from the company [11].