Group 1 - The market sentiment score has increased, indicating a further recovery in market sentiment, with the score rising from -0.9 to -0.25 as of July 11 [1][3] - The industry trading volatility has risen, reflecting a recovery in fund activity and a decrease in short-term sentiment uncertainty [3][5] - The overall trading volume in the A-share market has increased, with the highest daily trading volume reaching 17,366.10 billion RMB on Friday [8][11] Group 2 - The short-term trend scores for industries such as construction materials, construction decoration, and basic chemicals have significantly increased, with construction materials showing a rise of 21.05% [17] - The relative strength index (RSI) indicates that small-cap stocks are currently favored, with a strong signal for growth style, although there are multiple signal switches that require further observation [19][17]

证券研究报告·行业跟踪周报·金融产品 金融产品跟踪周报 权益 ETF 系列：关注结构变化，行情可能临 近变盘点 增持（维持） [Table_Tag] [Table_Summary] 投资要点 ◼ 基金配置建议： 风险提示：1）模型基于历史数据测算，未来存在失效风险；2）宏观经济 不及预期；3）发生重大预期外的宏观事件。 2025 年 07 月 12 日 证券分析师 孙婷 执业证书：S0600524120001 sunt@dwzq.com.cn 证券分析师 唐遥衎 执业证书：S0600524120016 tangyk@dwzq.com.cn 行业走势 -9% -2% 5% 12% 19% 26% 33% 40% 47% 54% 61% 非银金融 沪深300 2025-07-12 《国有险企长周期考核细则落地，充 分发挥险资长期资本优势》 2025-07-12 东吴证券研究所 1 / 22 请务必阅读正文之后的免责声明部分 2024/7/12 2024/11/10 2025/3/11 2025/7/10 ◼ A 股市场行情概述：（2025.7.7-2025.7.11） ◼ 主要宽基指数涨跌幅：排名前三名的宽基指数 ...

Core Insights - As of July 4, 2025, the interest rate timing model has maintained a bullish signal since June, indicating a stable upward trend in the bond market [1][10] - The model's predictions align with the actual performance of the TL bond, which rose by 1.01 yuan, a 0.85% increase in June [1][10] Model Performance Review - The timing model effectively identified multiple buying windows in 2024, with a high correlation between predicted results and periods of declining interest rates [2][11] - Since May 14, 2024, the strategy's net value reached 1.179, outperforming the benchmark net value (TL) by a cumulative excess of 4.22% [2][17] - The model demonstrated strong excess return capabilities during bullish cycles but showed significant drawdowns during bearish periods, indicating a need for improvement in recognizing short-selling scenarios [2][14][17] Subsequent Optimization - The model's performance in bearish market conditions is limited due to insufficient training data from the newly listed 30-year Treasury futures (TL) [2][18] - To enhance the model's ability to identify bearish trends, historical data from the 10-year Treasury futures (T), which has a high price correlation with TL, will be utilized for training [2][19]

Group 1 - The market sentiment score has further declined, with the current score at -0.9 as of July 4, down from -0.65 the previous week, indicating a bearish outlook [1][3] - The trading volatility between industries has decreased, suggesting a lack of active capital and increased uncertainty in short-term sentiment [3][11] - The overall trading volume in the A-share market has shown a slight increase compared to the previous week, but the daily trading volume has been on a downward trend, with the lowest daily trading volume recorded at 1.33 trillion RMB on Thursday [5][8] Group 2 - The short-term trend scores for industries such as steel, construction materials, and basic chemicals have significantly increased, with construction materials showing a rise of 90.91% [23][24] - The banking, communication, media, and comprehensive sectors are identified as the top five industries with the strongest short-term trends [23] - The value style is currently dominant, with the model indicating a preference for large-cap stocks over growth stocks [23][24]

证 券 研 究 报 告 月度择时模型：7月10年国债利率中枢或下行 证券分析师：黄伟平 A0230524110002 栾强 A0230524110003 2025.07.02 10年国债利率月度择时模型预测更新： www.swsresearch.com 证券研究报告 2 风险提示：模型计算可能存在误差，指标选取可能不够全面 信息披露 证券分析师承诺 本报告署名分析师具有中国证券业协会授予的证券投资咨询执业资格并注册为证券分析师，以勤勉的职业态度、专业审慎的研究方法，使用合法合规的信息，独立、客观地出具本报告,并对本报告的内容和观点负责。本人不曾因，不因，也将不会因本报 告中的具体推荐意见或观点而直接或间接收到任何形式的补偿。 与公司有关的信息披露 ◼ 模型预测2025年7月10年国债YTM中枢下行，低于6月1.65%的中枢水平。 经济特征 市场环境 其他要素 因子选取： ➢ 经济增长 ➢ 物价变化 ➢ 资金面 ➢ 市场现状 ➢ 季节性 历史对比： T 期 特 征 因 子 与历史比较， 选 择 与 T 期 相 似度高的若干 期历史阶段。 市场预测： 使用与当前阶 段相似度高的 历史阶段的下 一 期 ， 作 为 ...

《短期上涨动能枯竭，控制仓位做好 防御——微盘股指数周报 20250615》 - 2025.06.16 《为何微盘股基金仓位下降指数却不 断新高？——微盘股指数周报 证券研究报告：金融工程报告 20250608》 - 2025.06.09 研究所 分析师:肖承志 SAC 登记编号:S1340524090001 Email:xiaochengzhi@cnpsec.com 近期研究报告 《调整仍不充分——微盘股指数周报 20250622》 - 2025.06.23 《小盘股成交占比高意味着拥挤度高 吗？——微盘股指数周报 20250601》 - 2025.06.02 《微盘股容易被忽略的"看空成本" ——微盘股指数周报 20250525》 - 2025.05.26 《证监会修改《重组办法》，深化并购 重组改革——微盘股指数周报 20250518》 - 2025.05.19 《微盘股会涨到什么时候——微盘股 指数周报 20250511》 - 2025.05.12 《4 月完美收官，5 月看好高波成长— —微盘股指数周报 20250504》 - 2025.05.06 《年报效应边际递减，右侧买入信号 触发——微盘股指 ...

Group 1 - The market sentiment score has further declined, indicating a bearish outlook as of June 20, with a score of 0.05, down from 0.8 the previous week [1][4][6] - The price-volume consistency has decreased, reflecting a lack of capital activity and increased divergence in market sentiment [4][6] - The overall trading volume in the A-share market has significantly decreased, with a daily trading volume of 1.09 trillion RMB, marking the lowest for the month [9] Group 2 - The electronic industry shows a significant upward trend, with a short-term trend score increase of 25.00%, indicating strong performance [18][19] - The banking, oil and petrochemical, communication, comprehensive, and national defense industries are identified as the top five sectors with the strongest short-term trends [18] - The small-cap value style is currently favored, while there are signs of a potential strengthening of the large-cap style [20]

Report Industry Investment Rating - The report gives a one-star rating (★☆☆) for the CITIC Five-Style - Financial, indicating a bullish bias but with limited operability in the market [3]. Core Viewpoints - In the public fund market, the returns of equity and bond strategies showed slight differentiation in the past week. The energy and chemical ETF had a significant net value increase, while the non-ferrous metal ETF had a slight decline. The financial and cyclical styles of the CITIC Five-Style recorded positive returns, and the style timing model signals a preference for the financial style this week [3]. - Among the Barra factors, the residual volatility factor performed well in the past week, and the factor cross-sectional rotation speed increased slightly this week. The style timing strategy had a return of 0.44% last week, with an excess return of 0.66% compared to the benchmark balanced allocation [3]. Summary by Relevant Catalogs Recent Market Returns - As of the week ending June 13, 2025, the weekly returns of the Tonglian All-A (Shanghai, Shenzhen, Beijing), ChinaBond Composite Bond, and Nanhua Commodity Index were -0.41%, 0.17%, and 2.14% respectively [3]. - In the public fund market, equity strategies showed mixed performance, with index enhancement strategies slightly回调 and market neutral strategies under slight pressure. Bond strategies saw better performance in medium - and long - term pure bonds, and the convertible bond index weakened slightly. Commodity strategies had significant increases in the energy and chemical ETF and the soybean meal ETF [3]. CITIC Style Index - Last Friday, the returns of the CITIC Five-Style index were differentiated, with the financial and cyclical styles recording positive returns. The style rotation chart showed a slight decline in the consumer and stable styles in terms of relative strength, and the cyclical style strengthened marginally in terms of indicator momentum [3]. - Only growth-style funds outperformed the index in the public fund pool in the past week, with an excess return of 0.15%. Some financial-style funds shifted towards consumer and cyclical styles [3]. Barra Factors - In the past week, the residual volatility factor had a weekly excess return of 0.82%. The scale factor's excess return continued to compress, and the leverage and growth factors' returns strengthened slightly. The medium - and long - term momentum and growth factors had better performance in terms of win - rate [3]. - The factor cross - sectional rotation speed increased slightly this week and is currently in the medium - to low - percentile range of history [3]. Style Timing Model - According to the latest score of the style timing model, the financial style rebounded this week, while the consumer and cyclical styles declined, and the current signal favors the financial style. The style timing strategy's return last week was 0.44%, with an excess return of 0.66% compared to the benchmark balanced allocation [3].

1．情绪模型观点：市场情绪得分有所下降 根据《从结构化视角全新打造市场情绪择时模型》文中提到的构建思路，目前我们用于构建市场情绪结构指标所用到 的细分指标如下表。 在指标合成方法上，模型采用打分的方式，根据每个分项指标所提示的情绪方向和所处布林轨道位置计算各指标分 数，指标分数可分为（-1，0，1）三种情况，最终对各个指标分数等权求和。最终的情绪结构指标为求和后分数的20 日均线，如图1所示，指标整体围绕0轴在[-6,6]的范围内上下波动，近5年A股市场情绪波动较大，其中2023年大部分 时间指标都处于较低位置，直至2024年10月市场情绪得分突破2。 截至5月30日，市场情绪指标数值为2.5，较上周五的2.65有所下降，代表市场情绪已经结束了进一步向上修复的趋 势，观点偏空。从所有分项指标分数之和的变化来看，本周分数之和有所下降。 1.1 从分项指标出发：本周行业交易活跃度下降，市场情绪向上修复态势结 本周各项情绪指标分数较上周有一定边际下行，行业间交易波动率、PCR结合VIX指标分数下降，从行业交易活跃度 和期权波动率两方面佐证资金情绪的不确定性增加。此外市场风险偏好进一步下降且行业涨跌趋势得分继续为负。 ...

1. 情绪模型观点：市场情绪得分较稳定 根据《从结构化视角全新打造市场情绪择时模型》文中提到的构建思路，目前我们用于构建市场情绪结构指标所用到 的细分指标如下表。 在指标合成方法上，模型采用打分的方式，根据每个分项指标所提示的情绪方向和所处布林轨道位置计算各指标分 数，指标分数可分为（-1，0，1）三种情况，最终对各个指标分数等权求和。最终的情绪结构指标为求和后分数的20 日均线，如图1所示，指标整体围绕0轴在[-6,6]的范围内上下波动，近5年A股市场情绪波动较大，其中2023年大部分 时间指标都处于较低位置，直至2024年10月市场情绪得分突破2。 截至5月23日，市场情绪指标数值进一步上行，代表当前市场情绪是近20日的较高位置，观点偏多。从所有分项指标 分数之和的变化来看，近两周分数之和没有明显变化。 1.1 从分项指标出发：市场情绪较上周没有显著变化，成交量和投资主线仍是未来情绪进一步上行的重要因素 本周各项情绪指标分数较上周没有变化，价量匹配度没有显著变化，沪深300RSI指标分数上升，市场资金情绪尚可， 但市场风险偏好进一步下降且行业涨跌趋势得分继续为负。我们维持未来市场情绪进一步上行需要来自成交 ...