Group 1 - The Trump administration's global trade strategy exhibits a dual approach, imposing high tariffs on numerous countries while softening its stance towards China, indicating a complex strategy based on the resilience of opponents [1][3][5] - The U.S. recognizes the importance of stable economic relations with China, particularly regarding critical materials like rare earths, leading to a more pragmatic approach of seeking dialogue rather than extreme pressure [3][5] - Trump's strategy involves a selective application of pressure, with high tariffs (up to 50%) on countries perceived as weaker, while seeking cooperation with stronger opponents like China, reflecting a principle where strength dictates the rules of engagement [5][6] Group 2 - Countries that choose to compromise often find themselves in a worse position, while those that adopt a more confrontational approach can gain leverage in negotiations [6][10] - The upcoming EU-China summit is a critical moment for the EU to decide whether to continue compromising or to assert its strength, which will influence its future role in global trade dynamics [6][9] - Recent trade agreements between the U.S. and countries like Japan demonstrate the benefits of compromise, as Japan agreed to significant investments and market openings in exchange for lower tariffs [7][9] Group 3 - Trump's approach has fundamentally altered the global trade landscape, shifting from multilateral negotiations to a more confrontational and power-based framework [9][10] - The ongoing trade tensions require all participants to reassess their positions and strategies in light of the new rules established by the Trump administration [9][10]