新能源车安全设计
Search documents
新能源车门把手,加100多元可以更安全一点
首席商业评论· 2025-10-18 03:50
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the safety risks associated with the electronic door handles of new energy vehicles, emphasizing the importance of maintaining mechanical redundancy to ensure doors can be opened in emergencies [5][7][12]. Group 1: Safety Risks of Electronic Door Handles - New energy vehicles are prone to battery explosions during high-speed collisions, which can hinder rescue efforts if doors cannot be opened [5]. - The reliance on electronic systems for opening doors in new energy vehicles poses risks, especially if the electronic system fails after a collision [9][11]. - The article highlights that while some models can sense a collision and unlock doors, they still require manual operation to open, which can be problematic if the electronic handle fails [7][9]. Group 2: Solutions and Costs - Solutions to enhance safety include adding mechanical backup systems and redundant power sources, which typically increase the cost of each vehicle by around 100 yuan [5][9][12]. - Some manufacturers, like Audi, are integrating features such as a plastic pull cord that can be activated in emergencies, which also adds to the vehicle's cost [14]. - The article notes that the cost of advanced electronic door handles can be significantly higher, with full hidden handles costing up to three times more than semi-hidden ones, potentially reaching around 1,000 yuan per vehicle [7][12]. Group 3: Industry Standards and Testing - New regulations require that all vehicle door handles must have a mechanical release function, ensuring that doors can be opened without tools in emergencies [12]. - The article emphasizes the importance of rigorous testing and validation for electronic components in vehicles, with companies like Volkswagen adhering to strict standards that increase their BOM costs by approximately 20% [15][18]. - The automotive industry is urged to adopt more robust safety measures and testing protocols to prevent design failures that could lead to severe consequences [19].
阿维塔06起火致多车烧毁!官方称原因待查,专业人士这样说
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-10-10 05:39
Core Viewpoint - A fire incident involving an Avita 06 vehicle during the National Day holiday has raised significant concerns, with the fire originating from the front passenger seat area, and the specific cause is still under investigation by relevant authorities [1][4]. Summary by Sections Incident Details - On October 5, at approximately 13:54, an Avita 06 parked in a parking lot in Ningde City, Fujian Province, suddenly caught fire, leading to the destruction of several surrounding vehicles [2]. - The vehicle had been purchased on August 28 and had been driven for only 1,066 kilometers before the incident [2]. Official Response - Avita's official statement confirmed that the fire started in the front passenger seat area, and initial checks indicated that the battery pack's voltage, temperature, and pressure were all within normal ranges at the time of the fire, ruling out battery-related issues as the cause [4]. - The company is currently investigating other potential causes of the fire [4]. Technical Analysis and Concerns - Multiple unanswered questions remain regarding the fire, such as the exact location of the ignition within the passenger seat and whether flammable items contributed to the fire [5]. - There are concerns about the vehicle's monitoring system, which reportedly failed to alert the owner about the abnormal temperature of 76.4°C recorded shortly before the fire [5][6]. - Experts have pointed out that while battery issues are often the first assumption in such incidents, other factors, including the presence of flammable materials inside the vehicle, could also be responsible for the fire [7][8]. Industry Implications - The incident has sparked discussions about the adequacy of fire safety measures in electric vehicles, particularly regarding the fire resistance of non-battery components and the overall safety design of vehicles [6][7]. - The failure of the vehicle's monitoring system to notify the owner raises questions about the effectiveness of current safety technologies in preventing such incidents [6][7].