Core Points - Lei Jun emphasized the importance of aesthetics in the design of the Xiaomi SU7, stating that "looks are paramount" in the product definition [7][8] - The controversy arose from a previous interview where Lei Jun's comments were interpreted as prioritizing aesthetics over safety, leading to public debate [6][8] - Lei Jun clarified that Xiaomi's automotive design adheres to stringent safety standards, including the 2024 version of C-NCAP and the 2023 version of Euro NCAP, asserting that "safety is paramount" [16][11] Summary by Sections - **Product Design Philosophy** - Xiaomi's approach to the SU7 emphasizes visual appeal as the primary design criterion, differing from their previous mobile phone strategies [7] - The focus on aesthetics has been misinterpreted by some as neglecting safety considerations [8] - **Safety Standards** - Lei Jun reiterated that Xiaomi vehicles are designed with the highest safety standards in mind, aiming for top ratings in established safety tests [16] - The company aims to balance aesthetics and safety, arguing that both can coexist in automotive design [17]

今天（11月16日） 雷军连发多条微博 重申小米汽车安全设计理念 相关话题冲上了热搜 雷军表示 ⬇️ 在去年4月的一次采访中，我在谈产品定义时说，"一辆车，好看是第一位的"，这和"安全是基础、安全 是前提"矛盾吗？还是在这次采访，我谈设计时候说轮毂最难设计，这有啥问题？ 他在微博附上自己于2023年和2024年发布的四则微博截图，称"这是小米SU7发布之前我发的微博，我 谈对安全的理解和SU7的研发标准。" 雷军在这四则微博中 多次强调"安全高于一切" ⬇️ 小米SU7按最严苛的三大标准设计：以2024版C-NCAP五星、2023版Euro NCAP五星及C-IASI 3G+为设 计底线，覆盖被动安全、主动安全、电池安全与隐私安全四重保护。 在车身结构上，SU7采用MI铠甲笼式钢铝混合车身，高强度钢和铝合金占比达90.1%，最高强度达 2000MPa，整车扭转刚度达51,000N·m/deg。 电池安全方面，小米自研并自建电池包工厂，采用14层硬核物理防护、17层高压绝缘、双大面主动冷却 （7.8㎡水冷面积）及165片气凝胶隔热材料，行业首创电芯倒置技术，确保热失控时喷射方向远离乘员 舱，实现"无明火、无热蔓 ...

11月16日，雷军连发多条微博，重申小米汽车安全设计理念。 他表示，" 在去年4月的一次采访中， 我在谈产品定义时说，' 一辆车，好看是第一位的 '，这和' 安全是 基础、安全是前提 '矛盾吗？ 还是在这次采访， 我谈设计时候说轮毂最难设计，这有啥问题？" 在微博中，附上他于2023年和2024年发布的四则微博截图，称"这是小米SU7发布之前我发的微博，我谈对安 全的理解和SU7的研发标准。" 雷军 首页》 24-1-4 06:50 小米创办人, ... 已编辑 发布于 北京 早! ♥ #小米SU7# 安全无小事,安全高于一切。我们按最严 苛的三大标准来设计:C-NCAP 2024版,五星安全标 准:E-NCAP 2023版,五星安全标准;C-IASI 2023 版,3G+ 优秀安全标准。 在车身结构上，SU7采用MI铠甲笼式钢铝混合车身，高强度钢和铝合金占比达90.1%，最高强度达2000MPa， 整车扭转刚度达51,000N·m/deg。 电池安全方面，小米自研并自建电池包工厂，采用14层硬核物理防护、17层高压绝缘、双大面主动冷却（7.8 ㎡水冷面积）及165片气凝胶隔热材料，行业首创 电芯倒置技术 ， ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes Xiaomi's commitment to safety in its automotive design, highlighting that safety is the foundation and priority in their vehicle development strategy [1][4]. Group 1: Safety Standards - Xiaomi's vehicles are designed using the most stringent safety standards, with a steel-aluminum mixed body composition where high-strength steel and aluminum account for over 90% [4]. - The structural design of the vehicle achieves a torsional rigidity of 51,000 Nm/deg, indicating a robust construction [4]. - The highest strength of the high-strength steel used in the vehicle reaches 2000 MPa, showcasing the material's durability [4]. Group 2: Battery and Performance - The battery is identified as the most critical and expensive component of electric vehicles, and Xiaomi applies the strictest safety standards to its battery design [4]. - Xiaomi aims to be the leader in winter driving range, indicating ongoing innovations in thermal management for their electric vehicles [4]. Group 3: Comprehensive Safety Measures - Xiaomi's safety approach includes four layers of protection: passive safety, active safety, battery safety, and privacy safety, ensuring comprehensive safeguarding for users [4]. - The founder, Lei Jun, reiterated that "safety is the foundation, safety is the premise," responding to criticisms and affirming the company's dedication to safety [6].

Core Viewpoint - Lei Jun, the founder of Xiaomi, emphasizes the importance of safety in the design of Xiaomi's automotive products, particularly the SU7 model, countering claims that aesthetics are prioritized over safety [1][4][5]. Group 1: Safety Standards - The Xiaomi SU7 is designed according to the strictest safety standards, including the 2024 version of C-NCAP five-star rating, the 2023 version of Euro NCAP five-star rating, and C-IASI 3G+ as the design baseline [5]. - The vehicle incorporates four layers of protection: passive safety, active safety, battery safety, and privacy safety [5]. Group 2: Structural Integrity - The SU7 features a MI armor cage structure made of a steel-aluminum hybrid body, with high-strength steel and aluminum alloy making up 90.1% of the vehicle, achieving a maximum strength of 2000 MPa [5]. - The torsional rigidity of the entire vehicle reaches 51,000 N·m/deg, indicating a robust structural design [5]. Group 3: Battery Safety Innovations - Xiaomi has developed its own battery pack factory, implementing 14 layers of physical protection, 17 layers of high-voltage insulation, and dual large-area active cooling with a water cooling area of 7.8 square meters [7]. - The battery pack features an industry-first cell inversion technology to ensure that during thermal runaway, the spray direction is away from the passenger compartment, achieving no open flames and no thermal propagation [7]. - The battery pack has passed IP6K9K sealing tests and has undergone over 1,000 safety tests, with the number of projects being 20 times that of national standards [7].

当地时间11月4日美股收盘，特斯拉报444.26美元，跌5.15%，最新市值1.48万亿美元，其市值一夜蒸发 802亿美元（约合人民币5718亿元）。 挪威主权财富基金目前持有特斯拉1.12%的股份，市值约170亿美元，为特斯拉第七大股东。 图片来源：视觉中国-VCG111556675842 此外，值得注意的是，因为隐藏式门把手可能带来的安全隐患，特斯拉在美面临诉讼和相关机构调查。 10月31日，鲍尔夫妇的4个孩子向威斯康星州戴恩县的州法院提起了这起诉讼。诉讼文件指出，鲍尔夫 妇等人的命运在碰撞时就被"锁死"了，因为Model S在碰撞后发生故障，导致车辆的电子门系统失灵。 原告的法律团队写道："特斯拉的设计选择造成了一个高度可预见的风险：即在事故中幸存的乘客将被 困在燃烧的车辆中。" | 04:59 444.170 2.82万 | | | --- | --- | | 05:00 444.210 7099 | | | L | | | more of a realing and development to many of the state of the states of the same would | ...

Core Viewpoint - Tesla is facing lawsuits and investigations in the U.S. due to safety concerns related to its hidden door handle design, which may have contributed to a fatal accident where passengers were trapped in a burning vehicle [1][5]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - A lawsuit was filed on October 31 in Wisconsin regarding a fatal accident involving a Tesla Model S, where five passengers died after being trapped in the vehicle during a fire [2][3]. - The lawsuit claims that the electronic door locking system failed after the collision, preventing the passengers from escaping [3]. - The plaintiffs argue that Tesla was aware of the potential risks associated with its design choices but failed to implement known safety practices [3][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Investigations - The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has initiated an investigation into Tesla's hidden door handle design following multiple complaints from owners about the door handles failing due to low-voltage battery issues [6][7]. - NHTSA has received 16 complaints regarding the 2021 Tesla Model Y, indicating that the door handles can become inoperative after a collision [6]. - Tesla is required to submit records related to the door system design and customer complaints by December 10, with potential fines for non-compliance [7]. Group 3: Industry Response - Tesla's design chief has indicated that the company plans to change the door handle design in response to the safety concerns raised [8]. - Competitors, including Rivian, are also reconsidering their hidden door handle designs, emphasizing that functionality should take precedence over aesthetics based on customer feedback [10].

近日，网购平台出现一个有意思的现象--车用破窗锤开始热销。 有媒体报道，本周网购平台的车用安全锤呈现热销的势头。其中，热销榜前9的车用破窗锤产品均在24小时销量超过100件。排名第一的安全锤在24小时 内的销量甚至已经超过500件。此外，20多款车用破窗锤产品在本周的销量均突破600件，周销量上涨约3倍。 这个曾经被遗忘在手套箱角落多年的小工具，竟成为了有车一族争相抢购的"硬通货"。 以下文章来源于汽车公社 ，作者李尘埃 汽车公社 . 速度 深度 态度 频发的事故，让冷门工具成为硬通货。 文 ｜ 李尘埃 编辑 ｜ 何增荣 来源｜ 汽车公社（ID：iAUTO2010） 封面来源 ｜ Unsplash 消费现象的转变，绝非空穴来风。它就像一面镜子一样，映照出近年来频发的、触目惊心的车祸后因车门无法打开而酿成的悲剧。 众所周知，近年来因车祸打不开车门而酿成的悲剧频发，让汽车安全问题再次被置于放大镜下。车用破窗锤的热销，无疑是消费者开始用手中的"购买 权"投票，进行自我保护。而这背后，与其说是公众安全意识的突然觉醒，不如说是对当前汽车安全性的一次集体追问。 破窗锤销量狂飙的背后 此次车用破窗锤的热销，呈现出几个鲜明的 ...

本周，天猫平台出现一个有意思的现象--车用破窗锤开始热销。 有媒体报道，本周天猫平台的车用安全锤呈现热销的势头。其中，热销榜前9的车用破窗锤产品均在24小时销量超过100件。排名第一的安全锤在24小时内 的销量甚至已经超过500件。此外，20多款车用破窗锤产品在本周的销量均突破600件，周销量上涨约3倍。 这个曾经被遗忘在手套箱角落多年的小工具，竟成为了有车一族争相抢购的"硬通货"。 消费现象的转变，绝非空穴来风。它就像一面镜子一样，映照出近年来频发的、触目惊心的车祸后因车门无法打开而酿成的悲剧。 众所周知，近年来因车祸打不开车门而酿成的悲剧频发，让汽车安全问题再次被置于放大镜下。车用破窗锤的热销，无疑是消费者开始用手中的"购买 权"投票，进行自我保护。而这背后，与其说是公众安全意识的突然觉醒，不如说是对当前汽车安全性的一次集体追问。 破窗锤销量狂飙的背后 此次车用破窗锤的热销，呈现出几个鲜明的特点。 首先是数据上的爆发性增长。有销售表示"本周以来（10月13日开始），汽车破窗锤的销量比上周增长了5倍。"这种高于同时数倍的井喷式增长，表明这 一现象驱动的因素是强烈的外部刺激，而不是常规的市场渗透。 同时，报道 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the safety risks associated with the electronic door handles of new energy vehicles, emphasizing the need for mechanical redundancy to ensure that doors can be opened in emergencies, particularly after accidents [5][19]. Group 1: Safety Risks of Electronic Door Handles - New energy vehicles are prone to battery fires after high-speed collisions due to the physical and chemical properties of lithium batteries [5]. - The reliance on electronic systems for opening doors in new energy vehicles poses risks, as failures can prevent doors from opening even if they are not physically deformed [7][11]. - The design of hidden and semi-hidden door handles, while aesthetically pleasing, complicates the emergency opening process [7][12]. Group 2: Cost Implications of Safety Features - Adding mechanical redundancy to door handles can increase the cost of each vehicle by approximately 100 yuan, which can accumulate to tens of millions or even billions when multiplied by production volumes [6][9]. - The most expensive fully hidden door handles can cost around 1,000 yuan per vehicle due to the additional electronic systems involved [8][12]. Group 3: Regulatory Changes and Industry Standards - New regulations require that every car door must have a mechanical release function, ensuring that doors can be opened without tools in emergencies [15][16]. - The automotive industry is being pushed to adopt standardized emergency opening methods for hidden door handles, which will reduce user learning costs and enhance safety [16]. Group 4: Testing and Validation Challenges - Traditional automotive companies have rigorous quality management systems that include failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) to anticipate potential failures and design redundancies [17][18]. - The testing standards for electronic door handles are as stringent as those for traditional mechanical handles, requiring extensive validation to ensure reliability [18]. Group 5: Industry Evolution and Consumer Expectations - The trend towards electronic door handles in vehicles is influenced by consumer preferences for cleaner and simpler designs, mirroring the evolution seen in consumer electronics [17]. - The automotive industry faces challenges in balancing rapid design iterations with the need for thorough testing and validation, as mistakes can have severe consequences [19].