对于许多印度司机来说，安全带就像红灯一样，是可以无视的。 他们拒绝安全带的原因五花八门： 32% 的受访者承认是由于执法不严而未系安全带； 27% 的印度 人认为这会影响他们的形象；另有 25% 的印度人担心安全带会弄脏他们的衣服。 这是来自玛鲁蒂铃木印度公司 2018 年的一项研究，其中，印度只有 25% 的乘客会定期系安全带。 更令人惊讶的是，高达 23% 的受访者根本不认为安全带是安全装置。还有 20% 的受访者认为没有 必要系安全带，因为他们的亲朋好友也不系。 到了 2025 年，情况在城市稍有改善，但在印度山区，驾驶者不系安全带仍是常态，那里常常能听 到司机说：" 安全带很危险。万一车子翻了，我们被勒住了怎么办？" 这种深深植根于司机和乘客心中的恐惧，使安全带的使用率低得惊人，尽管有无可辩驳的证据表 明，安全带是迄今为止最有效的安全防护措施之一，无论是防止碰撞时身体撞上方向盘，还是避免 从车窗被甩出，安全带都是预防事故最简单、可靠的方法之一。 撰 文 / 温 莎 编 辑 / 黄 大路 设 计 / 夏 萌 根据印度道路运输和公路部的数据， 2023 年因未系安全带产生的道路交通事故中， 16025 人 ...

北京时间10月3日，据彭博社报道，特斯拉公司因Cybertruck致命事故遭到起诉。原告称，Cybertruck的车门存在缺陷，导致汽车在发生车祸时成为"死亡陷 阱"，致使三名大学生未能及时逃离起火车辆，最终因吸入浓烟身亡。 "本案起因于特斯拉Cybertruck的灾难性设计缺陷，使得本可以生还的车祸变成致命火灾。"纳尔逊的家人在诉讼中称。 由于没有外部把手，Cybertruck车门唯一的开启方式是按车门旁柱上的电子按钮。如果车辆断电，按钮可能无法使用。特斯拉车辆配备了车内手动解锁装 置，但位置较难找到，尤其是后排乘客。 在皮埃蒙特的这起车祸中，载有塚原等四名大学生、返家过感恩节的Cybertruck在凌晨约3点以超过80英里(约合129公里)的时速行驶时，偏离道路，连续撞 击树木和挡土墙后卡在两障碍物之间并开始燃烧。毒理学检测报告，遇难驾驶员体内的酒精和毒品含量均较高。 截至发稿，特斯拉尚未就此置评。 特斯拉Cybertruck 这起诉讼源于2024年11月深夜，发生在旧金山皮埃蒙特郊区一条居民区街道上的车祸。事发时，车上乘客的一位朋友成功救出一人，但其余三人仍被困在车 内。 特斯拉的车门把手已引发关注。彭 ...

差评X.PIN . Debug The World，关注科技、数码、汽车、产经、游戏，传播能改变世界的科技互联网信息。 本文来自微信公众号： 差评X.PIN （ID：chaping321） ，作者：致命空枪，编辑：脖子右拧，题图 来自：AI生成 隐藏式门把手被全面禁用，新势力车企们几乎全军覆没？ 以下文章来源于差评X.PIN ，作者脖子哥 这波门把手新国标真的太狠了，但也真的是大快人心。 就在前几天，预热了很久的汽车门把手新国标终于公开征求意见了。里头最最重要的部分，就是隐藏 式门把手彻底凉凉了，如果有新车在2027年之后 （预计时间，非官宣） 还在用隐藏式门把手，那直 接就不让卖了。 关于新国标，脖子哥在闭门会阶段就写过 文章 ，结果发现大伙的问题其实还是挺多的。 比如新规的具体内容是啥，市面上的车子哪些合规哪些不合规，已经用了隐藏把手的车型要不要返厂 等等。 于是前一阵我们找到了几位行业内的大佬，有车企的总工程师，也有参与国标制定的企业代表，来帮 大伙一起看懂这回新规的内容和影响。 当然在开始讨论前，咱们还是先来看看这个新国标具体都要求了啥。 大伙做好笔记啊，后面有随堂检查的。 简单来说，这回新国标的重点 ...

Group 1 - The evolution of automotive design has undergone numerous changes and innovations over the past century, with each transformation bringing new challenges and opportunities [1] - The introduction of mandatory national standards by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology aims to address gaps in safety regulations, such as those concerning hidden door handles [1] - There is a call for domestic automakers to prioritize safety alongside innovation, emphasizing that the ultimate competitiveness of the automotive industry lies in establishing robust safety systems rather than merely focusing on visual appeal [1] Group 2 - The future automotive market competition will center around safety standard systems, with a need to elevate safety concepts to a shared belief within the industry [2] - Establishing "Chinese safety" as a benchmark in the global value chain represents a significant shift from product advantages to standard output, marking a transition from a manufacturing power to an industrial powerhouse [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the safety concerns and usability issues associated with hidden door handles in electric vehicles, highlighting the need for regulatory intervention to prioritize safety over aesthetics in automotive design [7][8][27]. Group 1: Industry Trends - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) has initiated a public consultation on the safety technical requirements for automotive door handles, focusing on hidden designs that have been criticized as "technological burdens" [7][8]. - Hidden door handles have become a standard feature in many electric vehicles, with brands like Tesla, NIO, and Xpeng adopting this design to enhance the futuristic appeal of their cars [11][13][15]. Group 2: Safety Concerns - Data indicates that approximately 12% of annual rescue delays for new energy vehicles are related to door handle design flaws, a figure that has increased by 8% since 2020 [22]. - Hidden door handles can complicate emergency situations, as they may not open in case of power failure or accidents, leading to increased rescue times and reduced survival chances [20][24][27]. Group 3: Company Responses - Great Wall Motors' chairman has publicly criticized hidden door handles, stating that their drawbacks outweigh the benefits, particularly in terms of safety and reliability [27]. - Xpeng Motors is working on developing door handles that are more reliable in extreme conditions, acknowledging existing design issues [29]. - Some manufacturers, like Volvo and Aito, are adopting hybrid designs that combine electronic and mechanical functions to ensure safety while maintaining aesthetic appeal [29][31].

Core Viewpoint - The increasing frequency of "malfunctioning" car door handles has prompted regulatory intervention, leading to the development of mandatory safety standards for automotive door handles to address safety concerns and improve user experience [3][4]. Group 1: Industry Concerns - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology has initiated a public consultation for the revision of the "Safety Technical Requirements for Automotive Door Handles" due to safety issues arising from the rapid development of electric and intelligent vehicles [3]. - Hidden door handles, while aesthetically pleasing and designed to reduce wind resistance, have been criticized for their practical usability, especially in adverse weather conditions [3][4]. - The current market features various types of hidden door handles, each with different operational mechanisms, which can confuse users and lead to difficulties in emergency situations [3]. Group 2: Safety Risks - There are significant safety risks associated with hidden door handles, particularly in extreme conditions such as collisions or power failures, where mechanical unlocking may fail [3][4]. - Data from Automotive Home Research Institute indicates that the success rate for the deployment of hidden electric door handles in freezing conditions is only 23% for Chinese brands and 40% for overseas brands [3]. - The new standards aim to enhance safety by ensuring that door handles can function in emergencies, such as collisions or fires, and by mandating clear visibility of emergency door handle markings [4]. Group 3: Industry Response - Industry experts suggest that the new standards may compel manufacturers to rethink their design strategies and incorporate safety redundancies, although this may lead to increased costs and design challenges in the short term [5]. - Long-term implications of the new standards could lead to a shift in focus towards prioritizing safety over aesthetic innovations in automotive design [4][5].