Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant expansion of executive power under Trump's second term, highlighting the challenges to the traditional checks and balances of the U.S. government and the implications for American governance and global order [4][10][25]. Group 1: Executive Power Expansion - Trump's administration has increasingly utilized executive orders to bypass legislative processes, exemplified by the renaming of the Department of Defense to the "Department of War" without Senate approval [4][8]. - The use of administrative appointments, such as the controversial appointment of Alina Habba as acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, illustrates the strategic maneuvering within the bureaucratic system to consolidate power [6][7][9]. - The Trump administration's approach to budget cuts, including the use of "pocket vetoes" to eliminate previously approved foreign aid, demonstrates a bold strategy to assert executive authority over congressional appropriations [9][10]. Group 2: Historical Context of Executive Power - The article traces the roots of executive power expansion back to the New Deal era under Franklin D. Roosevelt, where significant regulatory authority was shifted to the executive branch in response to the Great Depression [10][11]. - Historical precedents of executive overreach are cited, including actions taken by past presidents during wartime and crises, suggesting that Trump's actions are part of a broader historical trend rather than an isolated phenomenon [10][11][14]. Group 3: Political Implications - The article posits that Trump's challenge to the "deep state" reflects a broader ideological struggle within American politics, questioning the neutrality of government institutions and their alignment with specific political ideologies [14][15]. - The implications of Trump's policies, such as the introduction of the "Trump Golden Card" for wealthy immigrants, indicate a shift towards using state power as a tool for economic gain, diverging from traditional neoliberal principles [18][19]. - The potential for increased political polarization and the erosion of democratic norms is highlighted as a consequence of Trump's aggressive expansion of executive power [25][26].

Core Points - The article discusses the significant changes in the U.S. government structure under Trump's administration, particularly the renaming of the Department of Defense to the Department of War, reflecting a broader ideological shift [1] - It highlights the ongoing political battles between the Democratic and Republican parties, emphasizing the constitutional challenges posed by Trump's executive orders [2] - The article also examines Trump's strategic use of executive power to bypass traditional legislative processes, showcasing a trend of expanding executive authority [8][23] Group 1: Executive Power Expansion - Trump's administration has increasingly utilized executive orders to assert control, often bypassing legislative approval, as seen in the renaming of the Department of Defense [1][6] - The article notes that Trump's approach to executive orders has become more sophisticated, exploiting legal loopholes to challenge the traditional bureaucratic structure [3][6] - The use of "parallel nomenclature" to rename government departments illustrates a tactical maneuver to consolidate power without formal legislative changes [6] Group 2: Political and Legal Challenges - Trump's opponents have reacted strongly against his executive actions, with plans to challenge them in court, indicating a deepening partisan divide [2][4] - The article describes the legal battles surrounding the appointment of federal officials, highlighting the complexities and conflicts arising from Trump's appointments [4][5] - The ongoing struggle between the executive branch and the judiciary reflects broader concerns about the erosion of checks and balances in the U.S. political system [2][8] Group 3: Ideological Implications - The article argues that Trump's actions represent a challenge to the post-World War II ideological framework of the U.S. government, aiming to reshape its foundational principles [1][23] - It suggests that Trump's expansion of executive power is not unique but part of a historical trend among U.S. presidents, raising questions about the nature of governance and authority [8][15] - The concept of a "deep state" is explored, indicating a belief that entrenched bureaucratic interests oppose Trump's agenda, complicating his efforts to implement change [16][23] Group 4: Economic Policies and Globalization - Trump's recent policies, such as imposing high fees on H1B visa applications and introducing a "Trump Golden Card" for wealthy immigrants, reflect a shift in economic strategy towards leveraging foreign capital [17][18] - The article discusses how these policies aim to attract investment while simultaneously asserting national control over economic resources [17][19] - It highlights the tension between traditional neoliberal globalization and Trump's more nationalist economic approach, suggesting a potential reconfiguration of U.S. economic policy [17][19]

以下文章来源于新潮沉思录 ，作者潮思 新潮沉思录 . 新潮沉思录 来源 | 新潮沉思录 2025年4月2日，特朗普的关税大棒终于落下。由于征税的力度和范围远超资本的预期，美股应声下跌。随之而来的是特朗普的第二任期的支持率达到了新 低。根据路透社的最新民调显示，特朗普的支持率为43%，低于上任时的47%。 特朗普的关税战争也激起了全世界的惊涛骇浪。欧盟可能是除了中国以外最主要的战场，除了狡猾的英国人通过有效公关只被加收10%关税外，欧盟整体 被加收20%关税。在马克龙多次暗示敌在太平洋的情况下，特朗普的冷面无情与打脸无异。 社交媒体对特朗普关税战争的解构更为热闹。从"对万国宣战诏书"到"特朗普赢学"再到"草台班子论"，特朗普的关税战争普遍被解释为反智主义或者单纯 的情绪价值，这在经济学相关人士和美股爱好者中特别明显。对前者而言，这是捍卫经济学作为科学的必要反应；对后者而言，真金白银的损失足以让他 们宣泄对罪魁祸首的愤怒。特朗普必须变为一个"异质性的疯子"。 通过"非人化"或者"非理性化"满足两边日益极化的政治情绪是一个有趣的问题，这不是本文的重点。笔者试图指出，还是存在着某种概率，特朗普的关税 战争有可能并非纯 ...

以下文章来源于新潮沉思录 ，作者潮思 新潮沉思录 . 新潮沉思录 本文来自微信公众号： 新潮沉思录 ，作者：丁毅超，题图来自：视觉中国 2025年4月2日，特朗普的关税大棒终于落下。由于征税的力度和范围远超资本的预期，美股应声下跌。随 之而来的是特朗普的第二任期的支持率达到了新低。根据路透社的最新民调显示，特朗普的支持率为43%， 低于上任时的47%。 特朗普的关税战争也激起了全世界的惊涛骇浪。欧盟可能是除了中国以外最主要的战场，除了狡猾的英国 人通过有效公关只被加收10%关税外，欧盟整体被加收20%关税。在马克龙多次暗示敌在太平洋的情况下， 特朗普的冷面无情与打脸无异。 社交媒体上对特朗普关税战争的解构更为热闹。从"对万国宣战诏书"到"特朗普赢学"再到"草台班子论"，特 朗普的关税战争普遍被解释为反智主义或者单纯的情绪价值，这在经济学相关人士和美股爱好者中特别明 显。对前者而言，这是捍卫经济学作为科学的必要反应；对后者而言，真金白银的损失足以让他们宣泄对 罪魁祸首的愤怒。特朗普必须变为一个"异质性的疯子"。 通过"非人化"或者"非理性化"满足两边日益极化的政治情绪是一个有趣的问题，这不是本文的重点。笔者试 ...