Core Viewpoint - The recent actions of the United States regarding Greenland and military operations in Venezuela have sparked ongoing criticism within Europe, highlighting a call for greater autonomy from the EU [1][3]. Group 1: U.S. Actions and International Law - The U.S. is perceived as acting like an imperial power, seeking to seize resources such as oil from Venezuela and territory like Greenland, undermining international law [3]. - The effectiveness of international law is questioned, with the U.S. seen as violating it at will due to its superpower status [3]. Group 2: EU's Response and Autonomy - The EU must strive for more autonomy and sovereignty in light of U.S. actions, as it can no longer afford to be passive or act as a puppet to U.S. interests [4][6]. - There is a call for the EU to adopt a tougher stance in trade and tariff negotiations with the U.S., moving away from being manipulated by American demands [4][6]. Group 3: NATO and Trust Issues - NATO is described as a "dead" institution, with diminishing trust in the U.S. among European allies, emphasizing the need for the EU to become more self-reliant [3].

据法新社1月13日报道，唐纳德·特朗普接下来的一周（1月19日至23日）在达沃斯论坛上将成为焦点人 物。这是一个多边主义和自由贸易的盛会，而特朗普重返白宫以来却在实施破坏，也让贸易和地缘政治 局势变得紧张。 在美国总统第二任期开始一年之后，特朗普将于6年后再次赶往达沃斯。达沃斯论坛组织者13日宣布， 他会发表备受关注的讲话。不过当着全球经济和政治精英们的面，他可能会更在意那些不满其削弱购买 力政策的美国选民，此时距离关键的美国中期选举只有不到一年的时间了。 达沃斯论坛总裁博尔格·布伦德在线上新闻发布会上称，他（特朗普）将会率领达沃斯论坛史上"最大的 美国代表团"，成员将包括国务卿马尔科·鲁比奥、财政部长斯科特·贝森特、商务部长霍华德·卢特尼 克，以及包括英伟达和微软在内的高科技巨头高管。 审核 | 卢长银 编辑 | 徐璐明 校对 | 郭炜桐 在2025年春季发动关税战之后，特朗普的参会正值美国外交甚至军事局势升级之际。在军事干预委内瑞 拉之后，他最近还不顾欧洲盟友的反对要拿下格陵兰岛。 美国咨询机构贝恩公司的经济学家卡伦·哈里斯表示："2025年无疑是历史上新自由主义全球化结束的一 年……让人们进入了后全球化 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant expansion of executive power under Trump's second term, highlighting the challenges to the traditional checks and balances of the U.S. government and the implications for American governance and global order [4][10][25]. Group 1: Executive Power Expansion - Trump's administration has increasingly utilized executive orders to bypass legislative processes, exemplified by the renaming of the Department of Defense to the "Department of War" without Senate approval [4][8]. - The use of administrative appointments, such as the controversial appointment of Alina Habba as acting U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, illustrates the strategic maneuvering within the bureaucratic system to consolidate power [6][7][9]. - The Trump administration's approach to budget cuts, including the use of "pocket vetoes" to eliminate previously approved foreign aid, demonstrates a bold strategy to assert executive authority over congressional appropriations [9][10]. Group 2: Historical Context of Executive Power - The article traces the roots of executive power expansion back to the New Deal era under Franklin D. Roosevelt, where significant regulatory authority was shifted to the executive branch in response to the Great Depression [10][11]. - Historical precedents of executive overreach are cited, including actions taken by past presidents during wartime and crises, suggesting that Trump's actions are part of a broader historical trend rather than an isolated phenomenon [10][11][14]. Group 3: Political Implications - The article posits that Trump's challenge to the "deep state" reflects a broader ideological struggle within American politics, questioning the neutrality of government institutions and their alignment with specific political ideologies [14][15]. - The implications of Trump's policies, such as the introduction of the "Trump Golden Card" for wealthy immigrants, indicate a shift towards using state power as a tool for economic gain, diverging from traditional neoliberal principles [18][19]. - The potential for increased political polarization and the erosion of democratic norms is highlighted as a consequence of Trump's aggressive expansion of executive power [25][26].

Core Points - The article discusses the significant changes in the U.S. government structure under Trump's administration, particularly the renaming of the Department of Defense to the Department of War, reflecting a broader ideological shift [1] - It highlights the ongoing political battles between the Democratic and Republican parties, emphasizing the constitutional challenges posed by Trump's executive orders [2] - The article also examines Trump's strategic use of executive power to bypass traditional legislative processes, showcasing a trend of expanding executive authority [8][23] Group 1: Executive Power Expansion - Trump's administration has increasingly utilized executive orders to assert control, often bypassing legislative approval, as seen in the renaming of the Department of Defense [1][6] - The article notes that Trump's approach to executive orders has become more sophisticated, exploiting legal loopholes to challenge the traditional bureaucratic structure [3][6] - The use of "parallel nomenclature" to rename government departments illustrates a tactical maneuver to consolidate power without formal legislative changes [6] Group 2: Political and Legal Challenges - Trump's opponents have reacted strongly against his executive actions, with plans to challenge them in court, indicating a deepening partisan divide [2][4] - The article describes the legal battles surrounding the appointment of federal officials, highlighting the complexities and conflicts arising from Trump's appointments [4][5] - The ongoing struggle between the executive branch and the judiciary reflects broader concerns about the erosion of checks and balances in the U.S. political system [2][8] Group 3: Ideological Implications - The article argues that Trump's actions represent a challenge to the post-World War II ideological framework of the U.S. government, aiming to reshape its foundational principles [1][23] - It suggests that Trump's expansion of executive power is not unique but part of a historical trend among U.S. presidents, raising questions about the nature of governance and authority [8][15] - The concept of a "deep state" is explored, indicating a belief that entrenched bureaucratic interests oppose Trump's agenda, complicating his efforts to implement change [16][23] Group 4: Economic Policies and Globalization - Trump's recent policies, such as imposing high fees on H1B visa applications and introducing a "Trump Golden Card" for wealthy immigrants, reflect a shift in economic strategy towards leveraging foreign capital [17][18] - The article discusses how these policies aim to attract investment while simultaneously asserting national control over economic resources [17][19] - It highlights the tension between traditional neoliberal globalization and Trump's more nationalist economic approach, suggesting a potential reconfiguration of U.S. economic policy [17][19]

以下文章来源于新潮沉思录 ，作者潮思 新潮沉思录 . 新潮沉思录 来源 | 新潮沉思录 2025年4月2日，特朗普的关税大棒终于落下。由于征税的力度和范围远超资本的预期，美股应声下跌。随之而来的是特朗普的第二任期的支持率达到了新 低。根据路透社的最新民调显示，特朗普的支持率为43%，低于上任时的47%。 特朗普的关税战争也激起了全世界的惊涛骇浪。欧盟可能是除了中国以外最主要的战场，除了狡猾的英国人通过有效公关只被加收10%关税外，欧盟整体 被加收20%关税。在马克龙多次暗示敌在太平洋的情况下，特朗普的冷面无情与打脸无异。 社交媒体对特朗普关税战争的解构更为热闹。从"对万国宣战诏书"到"特朗普赢学"再到"草台班子论"，特朗普的关税战争普遍被解释为反智主义或者单纯 的情绪价值，这在经济学相关人士和美股爱好者中特别明显。对前者而言，这是捍卫经济学作为科学的必要反应；对后者而言，真金白银的损失足以让他 们宣泄对罪魁祸首的愤怒。特朗普必须变为一个"异质性的疯子"。 通过"非人化"或者"非理性化"满足两边日益极化的政治情绪是一个有趣的问题，这不是本文的重点。笔者试图指出，还是存在着某种概率，特朗普的关税 战争有可能并非纯 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of Trump's tariff policies, suggesting they may not be purely irrational but part of a broader anti-neoliberal globalization agenda that Trump has contemplated for decades [2][14]. Group 1: Tariff Policies and Economic Impact - On April 2, 2025, Trump signed an executive order declaring a state of emergency in the U.S. economy, citing significant trade deficits as a threat to domestic manufacturing and national security [4]. - Trump's tariffs are seen as a response to perceived unfair trade practices by other nations, which he argues have led to the hollowing out of American manufacturing [5]. - The tariffs imposed on the EU and other trading partners are significantly higher than those faced by the U.S., with the EU facing a 20% tariff [1]. Group 2: Political and Ideological Context - The article posits that Trump's tariff war is a declaration of war against the neoliberal globalization system, which he believes undermines American community consensus [14][15]. - Trump's approach reflects a rejection of expert opinion and bureaucratic norms, leading to a perception of his administration as lacking sophistication in economic policy [10][11]. - The article highlights a fundamental ideological divide between traditional conservatism and neoliberalism, with Trump advocating for a trade system that prioritizes community ethics over pure economic efficiency [6][15]. Group 3: Future Implications - The article suggests that Trump's tariffs are just the beginning of a larger strategy to dismantle the neoliberal global order, which could have profound implications for global supply chains and international relations [17][18]. - The potential for increased economic isolationism and the decoupling of global supply chains is emphasized, particularly in relation to the EU's vulnerability in geopolitical conflicts without U.S. support [17]. - The long-term consequences of Trump's policies could lead to a significant transformation in how countries engage in trade and economic cooperation, marking the end of the neoliberal era [18].